Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012, 11:23:00 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: On 17/12/2012 11:19, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never bothered enough how to make world and config files to be put

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012, 15:56:11 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: On 17/12/2012 15:49, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: What about setups where portage tree is mounted via NFS to reduce traffic and disk space? Since nothing in Gentoo and/or other distributions _enforces_ FHS, you're allowed to do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2012, 22:33:06 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: No /var/gentoo. No /var/repositories. /var/db/gentoo, /var/db/repositories, /var/cache/portage ... as long as Zac is fine with one whatever, but let's not invent any new top-level. Why not? From a FHS pov it seems ok... I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012, 14:43:56 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 19/12/2012 13:44, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: I would suggest /var/portage ... Seriously, mine is going to be a huge veto here with as much power I can put. Why? The portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

Am 19.12.2012 17:25, schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: On 19/12/2012 17:19, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: FHS 2.3: Applications must generally not add directories to the top level of /var. Such directories should only be added __if they have some system-wide implication__, and in consultation

Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet

Am Dienstag, 6. August 2013, 11:26:16 schrieb William Hubbs: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single person to respond to. I DO want more brainstorming on ideas for the naming of the package, and I

Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet

Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013, 12:00:57 schrieb William Hubbs: On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm replying the start of this thread, rather than picking a single person to respond to. I DO want

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

* Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:32 Uhr: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 18:12 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote: What mistakes? The mistake of introducing a pointless separation based on a rule of thumb which becomes more and more blurry over

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

* Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: /bin/systemctl libdbus-1.so.3 = /usr/lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 Here is a prime example of why vertical

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

* Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 19:53 Uhr: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 19:30 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: * Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

* Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 22:55 Uhr: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 21:45 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: That said, in the new systemd world, bash is.. Since it's only a UI tools (just like gnome-shell for example). Since you don't need it to boot. Yeah right. Having dbus

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

* Michał Górny schrieb am 05.01.12 um 09:26 Uhr: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:30:07 +0100 Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote: * Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr: On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100 Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 08.03.12 um 08:27 Uhr: On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Alec Warner wrote: *** Proposal 1: Parse the EAPI assignment statement *** [...] I don't like this idea because the sane way should be easy and straightforward. Mixing a constant declaration with bash assignment

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

* Zac Medico schrieb am 08.03.12 um 17:30 Uhr: On 03/08/2012 01:42 AM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: * Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 08.03.12 um 08:27 Uhr: Such constructs also cannot be used with any of the other proposed solutions. And in fact, nobody is using such things in practice. _All_

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

On Sunday 11 March 2012 21:08:47 Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:49:11AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:27:06 -0600 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: An initramfs which does this is created by =sys-kernel/genkernel-3.4.25 or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Let's redesign the entire filesystem! [was newsitem: unmasking udev-181]

Am Montag, 12. März 2012, 21:22:26 schrieb Joshua Kinard: [...] After all, /usr was originally for user data, not system data, until someone cooked up /home (I don't know the full exact history here, so feel free to correct me). IIRC usr = unified system resources (not an abbrev. for user)

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

* Justin schrieb am 21.03.12 um 16:14 Uhr: On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in other contexts without permission of the author.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree

* Aaron W. Swenson schrieb am 27.03.12 um 21:59 Uhr: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/27/2012 03:47 PM, Alec Warner wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: On

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2012, 18:33:41 schrieb Michał Górny: On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:42:37 +0200 Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: *if you still read this* *wow* Please discuss my arguments and come to the conclusions to RESO/WONT-FIX testing git-cvsserver, make a clean cut and remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/udev: udev-187-r1.ebuild udev-9999.ebuild ChangeLog

Am Samstag, 4. August 2012, 10:31:05 schrieb Samuli Suominen: + if [ -d ${ROOT}/lib/udev ] If you don't use double [[ then ${ROOT} will need quoting This was only true if ${ROOT} stood there on its own. IMO if you have ${ROOT}/foo you do not need quoting because even if $ROOT is empty you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/udev: udev-187-r1.ebuild udev-9999.ebuild ChangeLog

Am Montag, 6. August 2012, 01:25:44 schrieb Peter Stuge: Marc Schiffbauer wrote: + if [ -d ${ROOT}/lib/udev ] If you don't use double [[ then ${ROOT} will need quoting This was only true if ${ROOT} stood there on its own. IMO if you have ${ROOT}/foo you do not need

Re: [gentoo-dev] git-2.eclass final review

* Mike Frysinger schrieb am 23.03.11 um 00:08 Uhr: 2011/3/22 Tomáš Chvátal: Dne 22.3.2011 22:26, Mike Frysinger napsal(a): # @BLURB: This eclass provides functions for fetch and unpack git repositories fetching/unpacking Yarp fixed. well, the fix broke the blurb. it has to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE4 eclasses review

* Tomáš Chvátal schrieb am 04.04.11 um 19:00 Uhr: Hi guys, since we didn't do this for quite long time I would like kde4 eclasses reviewed as whole rather than on patch basis (altho i attach the patches for convenience too). It is 2 years since we reviewed them last time fully on -dev so

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory

* Drake Wyrm schrieb am 18.05.11 um 00:26 Uhr: Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote: 2011/5/18 Olivier Cr??te tes...@gentoo.org: The main reason is that you want /run to be writable super early in the boot process, before even / has been fscked and re-mounted. That means you can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

* Jonathan Callen schrieb am 19.05.11 um 11:49 Uhr: Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific features) are allowed here. The GLEP does not

Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key

* Dane Smith schrieb am 25.03.11 um 12:35 Uhr: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/25/2011 05:47 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote: Hi, it says here http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml#doc_chap2 that the validity should be 6 month. What is the protocol when the expiry

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov: Hi devs, I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32 packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to commit it to the tree. Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: leechcraft.eclass

* Alex Alexander schrieb am 22.07.11 um 13:30 Uhr: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov: Hi devs, I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32 packages and uses it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?

* Samuli Suominen schrieb am 01.08.11 um 09:23 Uhr: On 07/31/2011 05:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:55:23 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: I dislike the IUSE=+static some packages are currently doing to workaround this, instead of moving the needed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?

* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto schrieb am 01.08.11 um 11:19 Uhr: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01-08-2011 08:31, Eray Aslan wrote: On 2011-08-01 10:23 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: that's my impression now too since nobody has managed to provide useful case for separate

Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?

* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 01.08.11 um 13:19 Uhr: El lun, 01-08-2011 a las 13:12 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer escribió: [...] * /usr/portage can get very huge and is often written to. With / and /usr being on the same FS you really want to have /usr/portage on a seperate FS then I am

Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?

* Kacper Kowalik schrieb am 01.08.11 um 13:32 Uhr: I'm responding to this particular mail cause it's last in queue and because it replicates things already mentioned before. I am a zeleous follower of having seperate /usr partition, thus seeing moot arguments that goes in favour of my case

Re: [gentoo-dev] portage locations

* William Hubbs schrieb am 01.08.11 um 19:49 Uhr: On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:22:15PM +0200, Francesco Riosa wrote: everything about portage is very specific and should be separated, I would like to see an addition of one root directory gentoo where ${PKGMANAGER} keep all it's stuff. Some

Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux

* Robin H. Johnson schrieb am 05.08.11 um 02:46 Uhr: [...] That leaves the only reasonable solution as #2. In terms of minimal impact, I propose that we offer users with a static system an absolutely minimal initramfs, that _just_ mounts the required directories. No modules, no LVM, no MD, no

Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux

* Rich Freeman schrieb am 05.08.11 um 14:42 Uhr: On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote: * Robin H. Johnson schrieb am 05.08.11 um 02:46 Uhr: [...] That leaves the only reasonable solution as #2. In terms of minimal impact, I propose that we offer users

Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux

* Samuli Suominen schrieb am 05.08.11 um 15:43 Uhr: On 08/05/2011 04:12 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: OTOH the initrd that Robin described would be a very static solution with almost no dependencies, so if genkernel had a USE flag like dracut it would be possible to build it without dracut

Re: [gentoo-dev] Autodep project

* Александр Берсенев schrieb am 04.09.11 um 09:13 Uhr: Hi! Hi Александр, seems to be a nice tool. I am not a native english speaker, but I found at least some words that need to be fixed: * There is no readed its always read * And: writed - written -Marc I am Alexander Bersenev, I was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due cbrannon retirement

* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 13.09.11 um 21:24 Uhr: Due cbrannon retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: net-misc/telnet-bsd I will take that one. -Marc -- 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 pgpYVzqWJeeUl.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

* Tomáš Chvátal schrieb am 11.11.11 um 12:38 Uhr: Hello guys, As my only Gentoo installation is libreoffice test virtual I am not able to really care about these. So these packages are up for grabs if anyone finds them interesting: I will take this one: net-dns/opendnssec -Marc --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

* Tomáš Chvátal schrieb am 11.11.11 um 12:38 Uhr: Hello guys, As my only Gentoo installation is libreoffice test virtual I am not able to really care about these. So these packages are up for grabs if anyone finds them interesting: and those two as well as opendnssec depends on them

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-geosciences/googleearth is orphan and needs a dedicated maintainer

* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr: Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494624 But due its bumps and current bugs, this needs a maintainer... otherwise, I would treeclean it (the problem is that looks like some

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-geosciences/googleearth is orphan and needs a dedicated maintainer

* Mike Gilbert schrieb am 30.01.14 um 23:02 Uhr: On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El jue, 30-01-2014 a las 13:47 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer escribió: * Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr: Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-geosciences/googleearth is orphan and needs a dedicated maintainer

* Tom Wijsman schrieb am 31.01.14 um 00:52 Uhr: On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:47:27 +0100 Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote: * Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr: Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494624 But due

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab

* Christian Ruppert schrieb am 22.02.14 um 14:57 Uhr: Hi, I don't use the listed packages anymore so feel free to take those: net-analyzer/mk-livestatus net-misc/igmpproxy x11-misc/tint2 x11-misc/tintwizard net-misc/cfengine - I'll just keep maintaining Cfengine 2.x for now since we/Infra

Re: [gentoo-dev] [news item review] bash-completion-2.1-r90, version 2

* Michał Górny schrieb am 10.11.14 um 22:18 Uhr: Hello, developers. I'm planning to commit this news item before =2.1-r90 goes stable. I have rewritten the message to be more user-oriented like Rich suggested (big thanks to you!) and added a paragraph about loading bashcomp in bashrc. Please

Re: [gentoo-dev] [news item review] bash-completion-2.1-r90, version 2

* Michał Górny schrieb am 11.11.14 um 12:06 Uhr: Dnia 2014-11-11, o godz. 09:53:58 Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org napisał(a): * Michał Górny schrieb am 10.11.14 um 22:18 Uhr: Hello, developers. I'm planning to commit this news item before =2.1-r90 goes stable. I have rewritten

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

* Andreas K. Huettel schrieb am 14.03.15 um 23:34 Uhr: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 imho, Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository. gentoo (it's also the repo_name) +1 My furst idea, too. -- 0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should Gentoo do https by default?

TL;DR: Yes! * Hanno Böck schrieb am 27.03.15 um 15:33 Uhr: Hi, Right now a number of Gentoo webpages are by default served over http. There is a growing trend to push more webpages to default to https, mostly pushed by google. I think this is a good thing and I think Gentoo should follow.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: Apache AddHandler news item

* Sebastian Pipping schrieb am 26.03.15 um 19:15 Uhr: As of the momment, affected packages include: ^ Typo -- 0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev.gentoo.org outage resolved and postmortem report up

* Robin H. Johnson schrieb am 07.05.15 um 09:47 Uhr: Details on the wiki: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Incident_Reports/2015-05-07_woodpecker First rough draft, I'm going to bed now. Thanks for you work and the great report. I think the PAX error is a known issue. At

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: SquashDelta syncing support

* Michał Górny schrieb am 17.05.15 um 05:47 Uhr: Dnia 2015-05-16, o godz. 20:38:36 Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 05/16/2015 06:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: We have gentoo-announce@g.o and gentoo-user@g.o too! That's gentoo-dev-announce. 'dev' is the key part. And

Re: [gentoo-dev] more packages up for grabs

* Tim Harder schrieb am 18.05.15 um 23:13 Uhr: Here are some packages that I've dropped (or will drop) myself as primary maintainer from. Many of them (e.g. protobuf*) could really use some more collaborative non-maintainer update method but no one has gotten around to finalizing, documenting,

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge --binpkg-changed-deps

* Zac Medico schrieb am 05.08.15 um 00:04 Uhr: On 08/04/2015 01:16 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: hi all, i find it a bit hard to understand how --binpkg-changed-deps is supposed to work and what implications it has. Moreover I think the man page is not very clear about what it does: --binpkg

[gentoo-dev] emerge --binpkg-changed-deps

hi all, i find it a bit hard to understand how --binpkg-changed-deps is supposed to work and what implications it has. Moreover I think the man page is not very clear about what it does: --binpkg-changed-deps [ y | n ] Tells emerge to ignore binary packages for which the corresponding

Re: [gentoo-core] [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

* Michael Weber schrieb am 09.08.15 um 11:00 Uhr: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the entire day on it, and there's more to go tomorrow. Thanks a lot! use

Re: [gentoo-dev] <>-DEPENDS

* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 07.09.15 um 15:07 Uhr: > >>>>> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <> > > > This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] <>-DEPENDS

* Kent Fredric schrieb am 07.09.15 um 15:18 Uhr: > On 8 September 2015 at 00:35, Marc Schiffbauer <msch...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > What do you think and would is the proper way to suggest this for a new > > EAPI? A new bug? On what > > > My opposition would be I f

Re: [gentoo-dev] <>-DEPENDS

* Ian Stakenvicius schrieb am 07.09.15 um 16:41 Uhr: > Why not just: > > DEPEND=" > dev-python/paramiko > !~dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 > " > > Depend on the package but block the individual atom(s) that don't work? I like it. At least with the current possibilities. I was not aware that "!~"

Re: [gentoo-dev] <>-DEPENDS

* Michał Górny schrieb am 07.09.15 um 17:16 Uhr: > Dnia 2015-09-07, o godz. 14:35:07 > Marc Schiffbauer <msch...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > > > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <> > > > > This would mean "Any version but the one

[gentoo-dev] <>-DEPENDS

Hi, I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is not compatible for example. I currently have this case in app-backup/obnam which is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Determenistic system group and user id

* Alec Warner schrieb am 13.12.15 um 23:23 Uhr: [...] > I never understood why people would think the distro should handle unique > gid / uids. Plus you usually end up running: > > 1) More than one distro. not in most places > 2) More than one 'flavor' of a single distro where for whatever

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

* Michael Orlitzky schrieb am 06.01.16 um 20:53 Uhr: > On 01/06/2016 02:36 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > On 05.01.2016 20:35, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> I just pushed a new revision with this fix. In eselect-php-0.8.2-r1, > >> we ship both the new 70_mod_php.conf and the old 70_mod_php5.conf.

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4

* Dirkjan Ochtman schrieb am 14.01.16 um 22:41 Uhr: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Display-If-Installed: www-servers/apache > > > > Can't that be made > 2.4 need a news item about something they've already taken care of? > > This makes sense to me,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW

* Kent Fredric schrieb am 16.06.16 um 16:05 Uhr: > On 17 June 2016 at 01:52, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > because > > sometimes, issues can get reported that are really obscure and, for example, > > tied to a particular hardware configuration, thus cannot be easily and > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

* Rafael Goncalves Martins schrieb am 18.07.16 um 03:12 Uhr: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Set it for a minute or two. This will protect from commits from > > really out-of-sync systems (like 14 days mentioned above) and will > > keep usablity

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need design help/input for eclean-kernel

* Michał Górny schrieb am 30.06.16 um 15:19 Uhr: > > My /boot/: > > > > grub > > lost+found > > backup -> linux-4.4.1-gentoo-2 > > boot > > What's 'boot' here? Is that relevant? This might be a symlink to '.' which I too have on many systems. You need it, so grub can find files that start with

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

* Rich Freeman schrieb am 22.08.16 um 20:29 Uhr: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > > > Yes, wouldn't the Docker project be happy to take on a patch that uses > > gethostname() or so? > > > > This might be another option: symlink to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 29.12.16 um 13:08 Uhr: > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > >> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be > >> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both > >> components. > > > ago suggested "Packages list" or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 29.12.16 um 16:52 Uhr: > >>>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > > I'd prefer "package versions" but the people will come up with > > "sys-apps/eix-1.2.3" or just "1.2.3", not the desi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

* Ciaran McCreesh schrieb am 29.12.16 um 18:23 Uhr: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:28:12 +0100 > Marc Schiffbauer <msch...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > "atom" is a well defined term in the gentoo world, so why not use it? > > Because it isn't... Are set names atoms? Are pac

Re: [gentoo-dev] New package neomutt

* Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr: > It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we > think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt installed > at the same time. If we don't allow this use case, we don't have > to worry about eselect and the neomutt

Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds

* Matt Turner schrieb am 04.02.18 um 19:04 Uhr: > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > > registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds.org > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 09/11] glep-0063: Make recommended expiration terms mandatory

* Matthias Maier schrieb am 05.07.18 um 15:51 Uhr: > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, at 08:36 CDT, Michał Górny wrote: > > > That said, I'm open to using a different recommendation, e.g. 2 years > > as in riseup [1]. I suppose having the same time for both primary key > > and subkeys would make the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 09/11] glep-0063: Make recommended expiration terms mandatory

* Michał Górny schrieb am 06.07.18 um 11:33 Uhr: > W dniu pią, 06.07.2018 o godzinie 11∶08 +0200, użytkownik Marc > Schiffbauer napisał: > > * Michał Górny schrieb am 05.07.18 um 20:25 Uhr: > > > W dniu czw, 05.07.2018 o godzinie 17∶37 +0200, użytkownik Marc > > > S

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 09/11] glep-0063: Make recommended expiration terms mandatory

* Michał Górny schrieb am 05.07.18 um 20:25 Uhr: > W dniu czw, 05.07.2018 o godzinie 17∶37 +0200, użytkownik Marc > Schiffbauer napisał: > > +1 for 5 years or at least 3. > > > > Having to renew/edit the key each year seems crazy to me. > > > > I have my p

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 09/11] glep-0063: Make recommended expiration terms mandatory

* Kristian Fiskerstrand schrieb am 06.07.18 um 13:00 Uhr: > On 07/05/2018 05:37 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > I have my primary key offline only, so renewing/editing it is a much > > more time consuming matter than if I had my primary key always with me > > which I consid

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the State of PaX in the tree

* Anthony G. Basile schrieb am 16.04.18 um 02:04 Uhr: > Hi everyone, Hi Anthony, I vote for keeping PaX Support as I am still using it and might be doing so in the future. Thanks ;) -Marc -- 0xCA3E7BF67F979BE5 - F7FB 78F7 7CC3 79F6 DF07 6E9E CA3E 7BF6 7F97 9BE5

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the State of PaX in the tree

* Anthony G. Basile schrieb am 16.04.18 um 14:12 Uhr: > On 4/16/18 4:05 AM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > * Anthony G. Basile schrieb am 16.04.18 um 02:04 Uhr: > >> Hi everyone, > > > > Hi Anthony, > > > > I vote for keeping PaX Support as I am

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774

On October 11, 2018 19:05:43 Thomas Deutschmann wrote: On 2018-10-11 17:45, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: What's a "blind stable"? I'm guessing stabilizing without testing? If yes, why? Yes, stabilized without testing. Reason: No ARM arch team member with access to an ARM box was

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Replacing binary-only SLOTs with separate packages

* Michał Górny schrieb am 19.01.19 um 17:25 Uhr: > On Sat, 2019-01-19 at 17:37 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > I do not like the idea. Slots are very elegant and effective > > mechanism and is one of the points where Gentoo outruns other > > distributions. Proposed approach with compat packages

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-python/{cliapp,CoverageTestRunner,larch,tracing,ttystatus} dev-util/cmdtest

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs. Since obnam has gone I have no use for them anymore: Package # open bugs needs bump? dev-python/CoverageTestRunner 1* yes dev-python/cliapp

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/automx

# Marc Schiffbauer (2020-03-17) # No py3 support, replaced by its successor automx2 # Removal in 30 days. Bug #708410 net-mail/automx signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/automx

* Rolf Eike Beer schrieb am 17.03.20 um 14:10 Uhr: > Am Dienstag, 17. März 2020, 18:50:33 CET schrieb Marc Schiffbauer: > > # Marc Schiffbauer (2020-03-17) > > # No py3 support, replaced by its successor automx2 > > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #708410 > > net-mail/aut

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: kubernetes packaging

* William Hubbs schrieb am 14.09.20 um 00:39 Uhr: > All, > > I would like to get some thoughts on kubernetes packaging. > > When I started maintaining it in Gentoo, it was packaged as 7 ebuilds > (one per executable), and only one of them was marked stable. > > Since we normally do not split up

Re: [gentoo-dev] [virtualization project] Help needed with libvirt virtualization stack

I would like to help out with lxc * Matthias Maier schrieb am 21.09.20 um 22:25 Uhr: > Dear all, > app-emulation/lxc > app-emulation/lxc-templates > > If you use these packages and are interested in helping out with version > bumps and maintenance, please contact me over e-mail / IRC and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [virtualization project] Help needed with libvirt virtualization stack

* Joonas Niilola schrieb am 22.09.20 um 14:06 Uhr: > > On 9/22/20 3:02 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > I would like to help out with lxc > > > > * Matthias Maier schrieb am 21.09.20 um 22:25 Uhr: > >> Dear all, > >> app-emulation/lxc > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [News review] LibreSSL support discontinued

Just a typo... * Michał Górny schrieb am 03.01.21 um 21:47 Uhr: > All these issued considered, we came to the conclusion that OpenSSL s/issued/issues/ right? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: binhost

* Andreas K. Hüttel schrieb am 10.02.21 um 12:57 Uhr: > Hi all, > > I'm announcing a new project here - "binhost" > > "The Gentoo Binhost project aims to provide readily installable, precompiled > packages for a subset of configurations, via central binary package hosting. > Currently we are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Experimental binary package hosting

* Matt Turner schrieb am 23.09.21 um 09:28 Uhr: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 7:12 AM Andreas K. Huettel > wrote: > > > > Hi Vadim, > > > > > Finally it happened! > > > I already planned to try to ask infra/council about sponsoring few > > > servers for build farm for "official gentoo binhosts" when

Re: [gentoo-dev] Common options missed in OpenRC declarative scripts and how to improve them

* Michael Orlitzky schrieb am 02.12.21 um 08:05 Uhr: > On 2021-12-02 08:12:55, Alec Warner wrote: > > > > Can we automate any of it? Emit QA warnings? etc. > > > > I would love to be proven wrong, but I don't think so. We have two > main problems. First, The service scripts are POSIX sh, which

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/bareos-fastlzlib

# Marc Schiffbauer (2022-03-22) # Unmaintained upstream. No reverse dependencies. # Removal on 2022-04-23. dev-libs/bareos-fastlzlib signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: app-misc/zygrib

# Marc Schiffbauer (2022-07-30) # No update since 2016, compilation and build system # errors # Bugs #637150, #686078, #733066, #733068, #828986, #854744 # removal in 30 days (2022-08-29) app-misc/zygrib signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add systemd/merged-usr profiles

* Mike Gilbert schrieb am 01.09.22 um 03:38 Uhr: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:29 PM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > That really depends. > > > > If the expectation is that everything in /usr/{bin,sbin,lib*} needs to now > > fit on / rather than /usr we're queued to re-install a very, very

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-filter/sigh

# Marc Schiffbauer (2022-09-02) # Dead upstream, open bugs, removal in 30 days # bugs #829447, #836227, #862504 mail-filter/sigh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add systemd/merged-usr profiles

* Mike Gilbert schrieb am 03.09.22 um 01:11 Uhr: > To more directly answer your question: yes, having /usr on a separate > filesystem is still "supported" with an appropriate initramfs. Thanks, makes me sleep better ;) Maybe this can be pointed out a bit more in the docs, to make this more

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] A new GLSA schema

* John Helmert III schrieb am 10.11.22 um 14:19 Uhr: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 02:10:09PM +1000, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > * Sam James schrieb am 10.11.22 um 13:58 Uhr: > > > > > > I think we'd rename impact -> description but description would now > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] A new GLSA schema

* Sam James schrieb am 10.11.22 um 13:58 Uhr: > > I think we'd rename impact -> description but description would now > be "description of the problem" and not "description of the package". +1, but additionally having the short description of the package sounds still useful to me, as not

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] More packages up for grabs due to developer inactivity

* Michał Górny schrieb am 14.02.24 um 11:38 Uhr: > Hello, > > The following packages are also left with no maintainer: I will take care of this: > sys-fs/zfs-auto-snapshot -- 0x8201F9436611ABF9 - 41C5 71F2 0535 7D66 2E71 6DAA 8201 F943 6611 ABF9 signature.asc

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-dns/opendnssec

Hi, net-dns/opendnssec needs a new maintainer as I am not using it anymore. Current version is in tree now and works fine. Three open bugs exist: One for failing tests and two for future compiler compatibilty. -Marc