On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 00:21 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
* Aron Griffis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Agenda:
* GLEP 44 - Manifest2 format
Outcome:
* Council members were generally in agreement that GLEP 44 is a good
idea, but without genone present to answer questions, the council
was
certainly be interested to hear
any comments on the above and similar suggestions that others may have.
Daniel
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
. http://tinyurl.com/pmrmx
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
/thoughts/sporadic opinions?
I object to the addition of new categories for pretty much any reason
but especially for moving existing packages around.
I think Kevin Quinn best described the problem recently on
Mon, 20 Feb 2006
Putting all log related packages into it's own category
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL
)
-gentoo-qa
- gentoo-(hardened|server)
- gentoo-(desktop|misc|maintainers|etc..)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
was elected. The council decided
that QA trumps devs. If anybody has a problem with that they are free to
object at the next council meeting.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
right ? any last questions ? /me looks at solar
Far as I'm concerned at this point we are just formalizing it.
I have no remaining questions or recommendations.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
/doc installed.
One might argue that INSTALL_MASK should apply for
binary-package-building also, but so is not the case at the moment.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81025
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
be reworded or dropped?
I dropped it.
It was unofficially decided last week that having to have
proxy commits monitored for a suspended dev pretty much
would be a moot point.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 02:11 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
It's infras job to enforce the permissions as given by devrel. If devrel
says,
somebody is allowed to commit in the main tree, nobody but devrel should be
allowed to revoke this. The only exceptions are those case
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 03:14 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:40:54 -0400
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm ok. I've decided that root is root no matter how you look at it
and it's not worth getting into a vertical pissing contest over.
So this is effectively
).
If no one objects to this, I'll add it to the text-markup herd?
(and look at/fix the bug).
No objection. Please take it ASAP.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to the portage tree and keep your fingers off of my bugs.
Understood?
you really need to get out of this mind frame of the website being yours
it isnt yours, nor is it mine
it belongs to Gentoo
-mike
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
set on modular X I'd stick with the 6.8.x series.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master. Richard Stallman
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
Matthias
--
Matthias Schwarzott
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 13:40 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~blubb/funding.png
What a great way to start off my day..
Thanks hopefully I'll continue to laugh for the rest of the day.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
profiles or any other packages. This will reduce
headaches for all of us, and hopefully cut down on needless arguments
that get us no where.
Thanks,
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
Outstanding points:
---
- Discussion of how the keymaster(s) should operate to maintain the
keyring.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
others please provide input on this question.
Regardless on the decision on this item there is no restriction of
non-gentoo developers participating in the developement of the package
manager.
Paul
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133908
is resolved.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
And now per arch breakdowns.
http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 23:02 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
ferringb took the time to write a parser and setup a cronjob
(every 4 hours at the half hour) to parse over our GLSA's and see what
pkgs
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:51 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:22 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
And now per arch breakdowns.
http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
No offense, but that isn't exactly useful in its current form.
heh
trapni
usata
vapier
video
voip
vserver
vserver-devs
web-apps
wine
wschlich
www-servers
x86-kernel
xemacs
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 16:22 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
And now per arch breakdowns.
http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
[snip]
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 13:18 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
Package: net-nds/openldap Herd: ldap Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will be keeping the most recent version of each of the major
releases, as there are still people using
and/or get it into portage.
busybox absolutely seems the ideal place for cut out utils.
mii-tool is a handy one also.
--
Natanael Copa
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-*
packages, then it needs to be masked.
Over and out.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
it should never be marked stable. *VCS*
ebuilds simply can't be checksumed and there are far to many ways
to abuse such things. Think MiM
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
that
is on your system now.
Thanks,
Jeremy
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
to commit it. So that's a yes right? :)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 07:49 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
-for conf in ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do
+for conf in default ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do
Call it 'default' ?
Switch the order around so it's 'default PN PN-PV PN-PV-PR' -- that way
you
are the alternatives? If a project's activities are not
automatically official, then who gets to decide, and how is that
decision made? How can that decision be made fairly, without
contradicting the metastructure, and without giving rise to any
accusations of 'cabals'?
Best regards,
Stu
--
Ned Ludd
USE of minimal at
all for this. I'd rather see that flag reserved for mostly
embedded alike use.
-peace
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
assuming that
uclibc itself was built with +nls when it's really (-nls) use.masked
etc..
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 13:38 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On related note, why virtual/portage ? Why not virtual/packagemanager, or
something like that?
Because it already exists and is the least intrusive change. bug #69208
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
not
want it you shall not shit in their home (it's rude).
When a package lists a herd then the responsibility is shared
among the maintainer and the herd.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 17:25 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 14:47 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 09:13 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Just because the maintaining *project* doesn't
want it doesn't mean it doesn't belong to that herd
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 18:04 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
solar has requested an account on overlays.gentoo.org for the embedded
overlay for you.
Your password: DX7wnSe40Y
think you can change my pw and lets do this offlist?
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev
have to be raised with them.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
because the goal will be to get a real decision to send to
gentoo-dev-announce.
I would be in favor of a gentoo-dev-announce list if it allowed me
to unsubscribe from this list.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:33 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
[snip]
P.S
I will not leave you all the users with noone to maintain the packages
that 98% of you all depend on when it comes to a browser.
Thanks..
/me guesses you had a few brews when you wrote said mail.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 09:54 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 07:49 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
-for conf in ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do
+for conf in default ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do
Call it 'default
;-).
In the meantime, he's got his own album on
http://www.cs.ru.nl/~pauldv/tom/
Paul
ps. If I'm a bit away these days, it is due to me being preoccupied with my
mentoring task.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
on others.. We have ~arch and blockers for stuff like this...
Please don't take this as a personal attack... I'm just calling shit as
I see it.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 22:30 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
will be p.masking them tonight along
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cellphone: +49 174 7066481
-
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo
the same as the x86 flags.
There's probably some USE_EXPAND trickery that can be used here...
CPU_FEATURE_X86=mmx sse - cpu_feature_x86_mmx etc might be cleaner?
I tend to agree this might be a cleaner approach vs having to edit
redit CFLAGS all over the place.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED
PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT= and the
attachment as an example which solves this exact problem.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
export PORTDIR=$(portageq envvar PORTDIR)
export ROOT=/dev/shm/blah
export PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT=${ROOT}
PROFILES=$(grep ^[a-z,0-9] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/profiles.desc | awk
uses the GNU Toolchain.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 18:44 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 17:33, Ned Ludd wrote:
I tend to agree this might be a cleaner approach vs having to edit
redit CFLAGS all over the place.
Really if one has to disable mmx support in one package, it should
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 19:09 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 18:58, Ned Ludd wrote:
All together as in across the board? Or simply for the 1 pkg
in question?
For the package in question of course. Do you think I'm an idiot? Seriously?
Well. Sorry
most.
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
..
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:40 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
Keep pushing this and the only thing you will end up with is the
vanilla flag being removed all together..
Is that a threat? If not, is there a reason behind this?
Yes
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 15:18 -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 7/7/06, Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You want a pure 100%
vanilla(POS) non working toolchain then go download it and
compile it yourself. You will soon see why things exist the way
they do..
LFS http
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 23:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:57:51PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:40 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
Keep pushing this and the only thing you will end up
pkg cflags are here already it would fall under the per
pkg env variables.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 13:41 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 17:45 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
The local root exploit-of-the-week would have been unable to run if our
users systems had /proc mounted with nosuid and/or noexec
It would be worthwhile considering making
category for *new*
packages.
[1] http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/dev/genstef/net-im
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:34:37 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad.
| See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg
| moves are bad.
Uh, as far as I recall
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad.
See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg
moves are bad.
yeah new packages is my primary concern.
Any objections, problems with the plan
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:51 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Every single year quarter after quarter the more updates
| that happen the slower portage is becoming.
| Care to solve that?
This is a minute amount of time
/amd64)
lu_zero (senior dev/ppc)
jaervosz (sec dev)
ramereth (infra)
robbat2 (gpg signing/CGL)
-- No --
nattfodd (nfc)
patrick (nope)
pauldv (probably not/new dad)
spb (really bad idea)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
are
thinking about.
Thanks for clarifying. I wish you the best of luck then.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 23:30 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
* Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/07/31 16:48 -0400]:
Pylon (maybe.. not around enough however)
I don't know the basis for your statement, but I'm quite
good around.
Is it that you don't see that many emails from me here at
this list
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 21:39 +, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
kloeri (nice guy but dunno if the council is a proper match)
Guess I could do a lot worse than nice guy :) I haven't been part of
the council before so it's a bit difficult
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 00:29 +0200, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 23:14:56 +0200, Ned Ludd wrote:
-- No --
nattfodd (nfc)
...
clue? I might agree to both :)
Meaning only that we have not really worked together.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev
of Gentoo Bugzilla
[1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss
ongoing active bugs that are in progress.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla
[1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss
ongoing
be setting
this feature for the most part before stable markings.
It's a noble idea. I just don't think we are ready for
FEATURES=test USE=test either.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
*isn't* there a portage team member
who works on sandbox?
cuz portage is a python beast and azarah wrote sandbox in c as a
preload module.
And really as Mike already pointed out the problem lies within the mips
dynamic linker/loader..
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo
.)
/me lands in the profiles dir when he really wants the *-* dir all the
time.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
Why would you vote for somebody who did not even publish a manifesto?
I don't know but I love you for it. My only intention was to help offset
dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us.
Well that has been
. More abstract ideas
at this point.
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org:
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win.
Nor did I, especially because you were quite low on my ballot.
Congratulations.
The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to
vote
the stuff.
Happy xcompiling,
Assuming you have the G2 you could skip all that and simply merge from
these .tbz2 into a $ROOT
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/embedded/armv6j-softfloat-linux-gnueabi
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:37 +, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Some packages are not automake driven. We have to detect those.
make DESTDIR=${D} PREFIX=/usr \
STRIP=true ENABLE_NLS=${USE_NLS} \
, xargs, yes, zcat
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Then simply do something like this.
cvs diff
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/local/patches/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-1.2.1-sfperms.patch
emerge sandbox
# where /var/cvs/gentoo-x86/local/patches is equiv to your desired auto
PATCH_OVERLAY
have fun.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
-1.2/4 era. The smooth migration path away from 1.4 profiles
correlates to having a proper default-linux/$ARCH/gcc2 profile.
So far it looks as if only x86 has made this move while every other arch
appears to be letting the =1.4 profiles rot.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev
ignore me.. do not respond.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 23:20 +0200, Francesco Riosa wrote:
[stuff..]
case $(getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION | tr abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ) in
tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]'
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 17:55 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Please backup all data you might still have on nemo.amd64.dev.gentoo.org
as plasmaroo and I are going to kill it in approx. 72 hours. We will
set up a fresh system and restricted
reasons. I see
far to many threads about changing stuff. No real valuable work ever
gets done. Stuff simply just gets shifted around somebody can think of a
new way to categorize existing data.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 19:34 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 17:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
I think they are fine where they are. Moving stuff around is a waste of
time. Makes things more complex. Makes more work on everybody.
Sorry but I don't agree with that, at least
will
go full circle before long if we consistently keep shuffling packages
around.
All in all this is seriously the reason why ebuilds have a DESCRIPTION=
and one of the reasons we have metadata.xml files.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 21:21 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 21:03, Ned Ludd wrote:
14 files matching the pam prefix and 18 thing matching description.
You missed pam_ssh. And that's just an example.
By the way... mind telling everyone here how did you do
. Or selinux profiles, to force the selinux flag to be turned
on.
Comments?
Cheers,
Sven
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Anybody know what might loads the gnu iconv libs
(EUC-JP UHC EUC-KR JOHAB EUC-CN EUC-TW ISO-2022-KR ISO-2022-JP
ISO-2022-CN ISO-2022-CN-EXT EUC-JISX0213 EUC-JP-MS SHIFT_JISX0213
ISO-2022-JP-3) from the /usr/lib/gconv directory?
Perhaps some LC_foo=bar setting?
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED
thank you Harald
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 01:04 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Anybody know what might loads the gnu iconv libs
(EUC-JP UHC EUC-KR JOHAB EUC-CN EUC-TW ISO-2022-KR ISO-2022-JP
ISO-2022-CN ISO-2022-CN-EXT EUC-JISX0213 EUC-JP-MS SHIFT_JISX0213
ISO-2022-JP-3
of the category media-vdr for vdr,
its plugins and other related packages.
Please use the existing media-video for this.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
might think is that not
what fixpackages is supposed to fix. But sadly the existing fixpackages
is flawed in design which renders it pretty much usable to most.
I love these ebuilds but I hope you do not add net-telephony to the
tree.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
.
That new command would be called between src_unpack and src_compile and
only if FEATURES contain preconfig.
What you want already exists. Enable USE=savedconfig
Then add an /etc/busybox/busybox.config
Then merge busybox.
Have fun.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:13 -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 20:02 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:44 -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
I'm trying to add a new command to ebuild (preconfig) for packages like
But anyway, the question is not whether the idea
E.
Coyote-kernel herd; http://bugs.gentoo.org/123456
This is a good idea kumba.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99394
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 00:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 17 July 2005 12:03 pm, Ned Ludd wrote:
INSTALL_MASK is non cumulative.
Please use INSTALL_MASK=${INSTALL_MASK} /usr/lib/charset.alias as to not
override the user in anyway.
any harm with making it cumulative ?
iirc
,
patch is small), that would be much appreciated, the bug number is
100245. Otherwise, it's our intent to security mask the package in the
next 24 hours.
fixed
Thanks in advance,
Stefan
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
