-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> The package sys-apps/paludis is in the wrong category. It is a package
> manager on par with rpm, dpkg, etc. Those live in app-arch.
>
> Therefore I propose to move the paludis package to app-arch.
>
> It is not a system pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> To continue my development in an efficient way, I need a larger screen,
> particularly one with a resolution of 1024x3972. However, I can not
> afford the costs for such an investment, so I thought maybe the
> comm
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:30:27 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Peter wrote:
>> I did. Sources don't affect anything. The ck-sources are in the tree,
> and
>> there is dire warning associated with them. Only the -mm sources have
>
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 19:41 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
> I don't know all the details, but assuming no app supports qt3 and qt4 at the
> same time (i.e. you have two interfaces, one against each, which is pretty
> senseless), wouldn't something like
>
> qt? ( || (=x11-libs/qt-3* =x11-libs/qt-4*)
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 11:39 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2008, at 04:16, Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > Why the exherbo/paludis/PMS folk decided to go this route to report,
> > I'm not quite sure aside from assuming they're just griefers.
>
> s-exherbo/paludis/PMS-pkgcore-g and:
>
>
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 23:04 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Just for completenessess sake, i was nominated and declined. No one
> likes my idea of teaming up with McDonalds to create the McGentoo meal
> (each includes a free collectible developer bobblehead and
> maintainer-needed bug).
>
Depends on th
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 15:33 +, Duncan wrote:
> Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400:
>
> > Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though:
> > Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In
Not wanting to start a huge war about what arches are slacking and
which aren't - I asked in -dev on IRC and was told to check out
profiles.desc - based on this information, I closed Bug 208917 which
was about stablizing dbus-glib-0.74. The bug was opened on 04 Feb
2008, and as of today 05 Oct 200
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:44:51 -0500
> Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would suggest moving all the "slacking" arches to "experimental"
>> until there is desire from the dev community (read: manpower) to
>> support
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On E, 2008-11-10 at 13:13 -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
>> Removing Stable Ebuilds
>>
>> If an ebuild meets the time criteria above, and there are no technical issues
>> preventing stabilization, then the maintainer MAY choose
memoserv
Just picking a random response to reply to. I'm not speaking
officially, however, I'm pretty sure we at Genesi aren't going to pay
Microsoft in order to boot our own boards.
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 09:50 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
> > team has important bugs assigned to them for a long time, some of them
> > with patches (and
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Silva
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] patch linux-mod.eclass to add support for
module signing
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:25:38 -0100
@@ -663,7 +696,7 @@
# This looks messy, but it is needed to handle multiple variables
# bei
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 16:52 +, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> Kent Fredric gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Useflags have their perks for giving variations on behaviour, but having 3
> > effective packages in one, governed by useflags, means you'll have 3 much
> > more tightly coupled packages, and
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 09:01 +0100, Martin Gysel wrote:
> if you're on x86/amd64 and want to prepare a sdcard for e.g. arm. you
> extract the stage3 to the card but then you can't just chroot and emerge
> netifrc...
> on the other hand, as long as busybox' default config includes a dhcp
> client on
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 10:28 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Ok, now the concern is becoming more clear. You're intending to boot
> directly to the stage3 and not chroot into it, and so you want the
> stage3 to be a fully-functional userspace, though you don't actually
> need it to contain a kernel/bo
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 20:33 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> wrote:
> > I really don't like the idea of having no networking in the stage3 by
> > default, however, I'm becoming more open minded on what qualifies as
> > networking. What I'm wr
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 06:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 20:33 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > You're thinking with your x86/amd64 hat on here.
>
> Actually, I probably just underquo
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 13:07 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> When you say "drop keywords" do you mean:
>
> 1) revert the old version back to ~arch or
> 2) remove the old version.
>
> As a maintainer, I would rather do 2, because I do not want to backport
> fixes to the old version.
>
> William
>
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 02:32 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > In my testing, one known issue was that git on uclibc did (and still
> > doesn't) work properly starting with git 1.8 - so I noted in the bug
> > that this was the case, and to NOT stable it for arm. Unfortunately,
> > someone else on
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 10:46 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Now what problem are we trying to solve? As I see it, it is mainly
> one of manpower, namely that some arch teams cannot keep up with
> stable requests, and I doubt that any technical solution will help
> to solve this. Introducing a "noarc
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:13 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > I don't think that's what was being proposed, though. The question was
> > really the old complaint about slow architectures; the "-* arch"
> > solution sounds like the most reasonable definition of "dropping"
> > keywords, in the absence of
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 00:50 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:42:28 +0100
> Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> > Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > > you shoot down solutions
> >
> > Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
>
> Maybe it was; what is needed here, is the feedb
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 04:04 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:04:19 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > Your "suggestion" was expanding the "arm" keyword to "armv4-linux",
> > "armv5-linux", "armv6-linux&quo
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 18:26 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:52:47 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > The idea moves the work around, it doesn't lessen the workload at all.
>
> It is an idea to solve your actual problem, which isn't work
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 20:29 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:10:30 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > The problem isn't finding someone that has everything - we have people
> > that test on ARMv5, some that test on ARMv6, we have some that test o
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 21:00 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> If someone is interested in the results of my tests and benchmarks,
> I've uploaded the initial version of my article on the topic in our
> dev-space.
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/squashfs-deltas.pdf
>
> I am terribl
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 16:35 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that's "completely optional" though, it sounds like a
> > one-way function. If have ever stabilized a package once then must
> > ensure a stable package forever.
> >
>
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 09:52 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> > It's not necessarily the STABLEREQs stopping, some of the issues are (at
> > least on some arches!) that some of the unstable software doesn't quite
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 03:15 +, Duncan wrote:
> Tom Wijsman posted on Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:11:48 +0100 as excerpted:
>
> [Seven J. Long wrote...]
>
> >> There's plenty of ways to stay on the bleeding-edge; throwing out the
> >> baby with the bathwater will only tip you over it, and bork the dis
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 01:08 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> "The -* keyword is special. It is used to indicate package versions
> which are not worth trying to test on unlisted archs." [1]
>
> You can keep rehashing about "winning", but all it does is break policy.
>
> [1]: http://devmanual.gentoo.
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:07 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:23:28 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 01:08 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> >
> > > "The -* keyword is special. It is used to indicate package versions
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:48 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > Alright, well, I've tried my best, I give up. Instead of having
> > something working we should just remove ebuilds of working packages.
>
Against my better judgment...
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 05:55 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:15:47 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 02:48 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > > On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:35:22 -0600
> &g
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 05:52 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> >
> > You know what - this is pure and utter bullshit. Keeping it around for
> > "slower" arches does NOT block progress. I have intimate k
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 13:58 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> Can we do something about our growing queue when fixing is insufficient?
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/chart.cgi?category=-All-&datefrom=&dateto=&label0=All%20Open&line0=320&name=320&subcategory=-All-&action=wrap
>
> PS: As a bonus, here's a n
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 09:03 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Also, keeping the bugs assigned to package maintainers will still allow
> > them to try to get that pending bugs fixed (or resolved in some way) as
> > they will take care more about th
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 07:55 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 20/02/14 00:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > Following up to today's QA meeting: The gtk3 USE flag is used by
> > 27 packages, so I suggest making it a global flag:
> >
> > gtk3 - Add support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit) version 3
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 20/02/14 09:44, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 07:55 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 20/02/14 00:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>> Following up to today's QA meeting: Th
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 09:11 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-02-20, o godz. 01:44:17
> Steev Klimaszewski napisał(a):
>
> > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 07:55 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > > On 20/02/14 00:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > Following up to t
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 03:59 -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> And this is an example of why everyone on the gnome team doesn't like
> the "gtk3" flag. Because well-meaning developers will be looking at
> their one corner of the portage tree, deciding that they are going to
> handle the choice of
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 07:32 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> If it's okay, I'd want to post this fast, before adding KEYWORDS to
> sys-fs/udev-209's ebuild
>
>
SHOULD or NEEDS TO BE ? Honestly, this didn't read like much of a news
announcement at all, and reads more like something I'd write when
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've
> taken into account any concerns, but please check
> the grammar part. Thanks!
>
> - Samuli
CONFIG_DMIID isn't available for ARM. Can we make that warning go away
if on
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 10:31 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> I think using INSTALL_MASK to kill a few inodes that probably don't
> even have extents using a sledgehammer to kill a fly, and if you put
> some holes in your walls in the process I_TOLD_YOU_SO. However, I
> won't tell people they can't
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 19:32 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 07:09:08PM -0600, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> > I'm not exactly a fan of systemd, though I know it has some uses, and
> > I'm still curious as to why it installs/stores *configuration* data
&
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 19:18 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 28/02/14 19:01, Lars Wendler wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:41:23 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >
> >> On 28/02/14 16:41, Lars Wendler wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >>>
> It would be v
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 10:09 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> I don't know how much chromium is built and tested on lesser-used
> arches (ie: arm, hppa, ia64, etc), but if there are dev's that try and
> maintain these keywords that aren't in the team, it might be a good
> idea to leave src_test in p
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 18:43 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I find this useless at this time because the work is in-progress, but in
> order to silence the loud minority,
> please review the news item.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Samuli
>
>
I appreciate your work on this - and you may call them the loud
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 13:37 +, hasufell wrote:
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn:
> > hasufell schrieb:
> >> No improvements so far. I am going to hardmask sys-devel/crossdev,
> >> unless someone can explain why we are still in broken stage.
> >>
> >> More packages are popping up that randomly bre
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:42 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> alexxy added it more than a year ago to the tree as part of the x11
> herd, of which he isn't a maintainer. It hasn't been really seen any
> attention and is broken with current versions of Mesa. I've pinged him
> multiple times to see if he's
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:54 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is "Tom". He
> arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
> mentoring him to full developership ;-).
>
> In the meantime, he's got his own alb
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 01:02 +0100, Ser Gio wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ser Gio wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild
> > > doesn't look like it's using it.
> > >
> > > thanks,
>
Roy Marples wrote:
On Saturday 15 July 2006 19:25, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
As some of you already know, I will be taking a hiatus from Gentoo
starting this weekend. While I am gone, the mobile herd is pretty much
left without active developers. Uberlord and phreak have already
adopted some o
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Not actually an eye-catching.
Ummm, D, as opposed to U... Yeah, that catches my eye. I am weird like
that though.
>
> To be fair, do *you* actually look through *all* the emerge
> output if there's any "D" flag, without the risk of overlooking
> it someday ?
Yes, hone
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'm interested in arguments whether patches should sit directly
> within the portage tree or downloaded when needed.
>
> My feeling: downloading on demand is better.
>
> + makes the tree smaller, saves space, saves network traffic
> - downloading lots of
Noack, Sebastian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Palm Zire 71 device, with Palm OS on it and a 400 MHz
> ARM-Processor in it. Actually I don't use this device anymore, so if
> somebody wants try to get Gentoo Linux run on it, I would give it to him.
>
> There is an SD/MMC-Slot which could become used t
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ?
>
> Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be
> able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a while than add a new
> option to install stuff nobody will e
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ?
>>> Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rathe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
I think it is over engineering of a non-issue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Simon Stelling wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>>
>
Chris White wrote:
> On Monday 02 October 2006 13:30, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> We'll keep status in the topic at #gentoo-dev while we're working on it.
>
> Alright, I'm starting a pool on how many people will still ask why cvs and
> svn are down. Starts at $5, who'se in?
>
What about how soo
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>>> The missing Stage3 is the real problem.
>> Apparently...
>>
>> http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/x86/2006.1/stages/stage3-i686-2006.1.tar.bz2
>> http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/amd64/2006.1/stages/stage3-amd64-2006.1.tar.bz2
>> http://gentoo.osuosl.org
Petteri Räty wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Timothy "drizzt" Redaelli, the
> latest addition joining to help out with the Gentoo/FreeBSD effort.
>
> He hails from Milan, Italy. He currently works as an embedded programmer
> using ASM/C. It probably doesn't come as a surprise to anyo
Dominique Michel wrote:
> It seam at it is a big problem with the livecd.
>
>>From the forum:
> QUOTE: The problem is you can't use the GTK installer due to this problem. It
> crashes out and leaves you with no option but to wash, rinse, repeat,
> re-crash.
>
> By saying they won't fix the bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a heads up...
This is part of the reason that dbus > .9x is still p.masked.
We are moving from dbus-core back to dbus - dbus will NOT be a meta
package for dbus > .9x. It will be the core daemon. You should be
depending on either just the bin
Steve Long wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/bashrc
At the bottom of solar's bashrc you will find some lines dealing with
AUTOPATCH, I don't see the bashrc.autopatch in his dev space, but you
can probably request it from him.
Would it be possible to post that to this list
Luca Barbato wrote:
Tóth Csaba wrote:
hal cannot install when one dependencie built with zlib USE flag..
Hal should be fixed then...
lu
We've already been arguing about this on the bug, can we please not
bring it here...
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:46:40AM -0600, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
T?th Csaba wrote:
hal cannot install when one dependencie built with zlib USE flag..
Hal should be fixed then...
lu
We've already been arguing about this on the bug, c
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else
could he say he'd gone thru the appropriate channels? Devrel (a
group, not an individual) weren't set up to respond quickly as others
have informed us all.
Case in point: you need to distinguish betwee
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 11:50 +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:23:49PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
If you read what you are quoting:
Mozilla will drop support for that series from 24 April 2007 onwards.
That's still almost a month + the time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*daemons/applications that crashed:
dbus
powersaved -> KPowersave
Networkmanager -> KNetworkmanager
Also, the new hald didn't want to start, because dbus had crashed because of
the auto-hald-reload.
So we need to prevent this before it goes stable:
a) print out a big
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 11:03 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested users
filing bugs, so
genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release based
on what was open in bugs.gento
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
On the contrary we warn people about not behaving badly and if that
doesn't help despite many warnings and complaints being filed we finally
take to firmer action which is exactly what have happened in this case.
Regards,
Bryan Østergaard
Sorry, I am going to have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wernfried Haas wrote:
> Just a general note to everyone in this thread:
> I haven't had the time to read the posts in this thread, but proctors
> have received complaints about behaviour within. For the time being, i
> would ask all people participatin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Færøy wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought news were
>> supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also "You should update your
>> configuratio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 of June 2007 23:13:48 Wernfried Haas wrote:
>> So far we have temporarily suspended both ciaran's and geoman's account
>> from posting and encourage everyone to do as Roy initially suggested.
>
> Haven't roy ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500
> Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to
>> be a proctor directive.)
>
> He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:44:49 -0500
> Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Or... perhaps when asked not to respond to a thread for 24 hours, you
>> could keep your fucking trap shut?
>
> If I'm asked by someone with a g
Mike Doty wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500
>> Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to
>>> be a proctor directive.)
>> He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of gentoo-proctors".
>>
>>> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Sled wrote:
> Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> got out of hand. Perhaps the goal was laudable, but the methods were
>> not? (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to
>> be a proctor directive.) Or are peop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> The Code of Conduct was written with the hopes that its existence would
> help to curb the flamewars and other general nastiness between people
> within the community. The proctors were created to enforce the Code of
> Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> app-accessibility/festival has not done a release upstream in some time.
> We currently have several bugs against this package, including one
> security bug.
>
> Since a lot of blind people are now using espeak as t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an honest
>> question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have serious doubts
>> about it. It's of no use if people have t
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:50:02 -0500
> Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
>> can't have that, no sir.
>
> It's censorship when it's being do
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
>>> Marius Mauch wrote:
>>>> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an
>> honest question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:10:32 +0200
>> Benjamin Judas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> ...which means that he has a documented history of trolling not only
>>> on mailinglists but also
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
>> Any alternatives?
>
> Drop it from stable completely, possibly package.mask or move to
> overlay. Why should this closed-source rootkit be in stable?
>
Said the java dev
Personally, I'd say if upstream doesn't provide downloads, nothing
Jayson Vaughn wrote:
> Ok,
> Gentoo is over. As an outsider who has been following gentoo-dev and
> other gentoo lists for a while, this is just completely nuts.
> Is there any order or clear idea anymore for this distro? No other
> distro seems to be as lost or confused as Gentoo is. And WTF i
Steve Long wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
piece of software. We're not debian.
Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to
the
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
piece of software. We're not debian.
Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
licensing issue? If the latter case,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
not technical, take it to -project.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGn9rz1c+EtXTHkJcRAqEiAJ91+dcEu2/q6F1K/QTkqaHgWJUl0QCeMh6u
3PfRN7OZ8rNFwiXEr//dg7
Dale wrote:
> George Prowse wrote:
>> Ned Ludd wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>>>
Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be
heard from developers...
>>> Please stop flooding my inbox.
>>>
>> It is an honest devel
Hey all,
Donnie wants to remove virtual/x11 (can ya blame him?) and since Josh_B
has retired (for now! ;) ) I wanted to help Donnie out a bit, since he
is busy and X is a massive undertaking... a "quick" grep of the tree
excluding ChangeLog files shows 3319 occurrences of virtual/x11 still in
Sven Köhler wrote:
Why did you provocate this breakage?
Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here.
That is with USE=hal. Crap...
Oh! So USE="hal" forces pciutils not to use zlib?
And so the check, which the hal ebuild performs, should be modified to
check for USE="hal" rather
Martin Schwier wrote:
The gnome meta ebuild pulls in way too much stuff. I always have to copy
it in my local overlay and have to remove epiphany, evolution, vino,
ekiga and more. There are no use flags to control this and I expect many
gnome users to use Firefox and Thunderbird instead of epip
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
dodoc calls should have || die and USE=doc should be tested before
commiting a bump, IMHO
Sorry, I didn't realize my 3 hour compile of $APPLICATION should die
because TODO wasn't around. Vote against || die - it doesn't affect
anything aside from misc docs not being
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 11:37 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> ebuild when it is being merged. If this really is so objectionable, I'd
> just assume WONTFIX the request and move on with it.
>
+1
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:23:48 -0400
> James Cloos wrote:
>> OK. Let me rephrase. Portage does not need to validate local
>> changes.
>
> Sure it does. If it doesn't, and your local changes affect metadata,
> horrible things happen.
Why n
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alistair Bush wrote:
Use common sense here.
^^ Seems pretty clear to me.
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
