El 26/12/20 a las 10:20, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
This would apply retroactively since 2018-10-21 (when GLEP 76 was marked
as Active). I am going to file a bug for authors to acknowledge that
their news items can be distributed under CC-BY-SA-4.0.
For all matters the news item I wrote in 2017
El 13/7/20 a las 22:07, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
> El 13/7/20 a las 21:27, Michał Górny escribió:
>> On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 19:33 +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
>> (klondike) wrote:
>>> El 13/7/20 a las 19:23, Michał Górny escribió:
>>
El 13/7/20 a las 21:27, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 19:33 +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> (klondike) wrote:
>> El 13/7/20 a las 19:23, Michał Górny escribió:
>>> On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 19:07 +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
>>> (klondike
El 13/7/20 a las 19:23, Michał Górny escribió:
> On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 19:07 +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> (klondike) wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We have currently two packages that have USE cpu-flags-x86-rdrand as there
>> is no USE_EXPAND version available. Thi
Please ignore patches 2 and 3, I missed some USE flag replacements. I'll
resubmit in a second.
El 13/7/20 a las 19:07, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
> Hi!
>
> We have currently two packages that have USE cpu-flags-x86-rdrand as there is
> no USE_EXPAND versi
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.23
Signed-off-by: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
---
dev-libs/json-c/json-c-0.14-r3.ebuild | 4 ++--
dev-libs/json-c/json-c-.ebuild | 4 ++--
dev-libs/json-c/metadata.xml | 3 ---
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.23
Signed-off-by: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
---
dev-haskell/cryptonite/cryptonite-0.21.ebuild | 8
dev-haskell/cryptonite/cryptonite-0.26-r1.ebuild | 6 +++---
dev-haskell/cryptonite/metadata.xml | 1 -
3
Notice that this is for cpuflags2cpuid
Signed-off-by: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
---
src/x86.c | 1 +
tests/x86/amd-colfax.txt | 2 +-
tests/x86/xeon-e-2176g.txt | 2 +-
tests/x86/xeon-silver-4410.txt | 2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.23
Signed-off-by: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
---
dev-libs/json-c/json-c-0.14-r3.ebuild | 2 +-
dev-libs/json-c/json-c-.ebuild | 2 +-
dev-libs/json-c/metadata.xml | 3 ---
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.23
Signed-off-by: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
---
dev-haskell/cryptonite/cryptonite-0.21.ebuild | 4 ++--
dev-haskell/cryptonite/cryptonite-0.26-r1.ebuild | 2 +-
dev-haskell/cryptonite/metadata.xml | 1 -
3 files changed
Introduce 'rdrand' flag that corresponds to RDRAND instruction.
This currently has two users.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
---
profiles/desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc b/profiles/desc
Hi!
We have currently two packages that have USE cpu-flags-x86-rdrand as there is
no USE_EXPAND version available. This pattern is likely to confuse users as
they may not be aware of the difference between dashes and underscores.
Affected packages:
dev-haskell/cryptonite
dev-libs/json-c
The
El 31/5/19 a las 11:47, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> Would it be reasonable to use the same schedule as for profiles/updates
> in future, namely to remove everything older than 5 years? Of course,
> that shouldn't stop anyone from removing a news item earlier if it has
> become irrelevant.
Hi
El 26/3/19 a las 22:15, Ralph Seichter escribió:
> * Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera:
>
> All of my systems, and a big part of my business, depend on Postfix. I
> don't want to start a tug-of-war, but I have been building and using
> Postfix for roughly ten years now. I'm *certain* I'll do a good
El 26/3/19 a las 21:02, Michał Górny escribió:
> mail-filter/opendkim
I'm unsure if anybody feels responsible for this one. Upstream is pretty
silent and made no releases since 2015.
In a modern mail system it is important to be able to sign outgoing
e-mail with DKIM as things like mailing lists
gt;
> 16 Mar 2019 Cts 10:10 PM tarihinde Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> (klondike) mailto:klond...@gentoo.org>> şunu yazdı:
>
> Hi Michał
>
> El 16/3/19 a las 20:06, Michał Górny escribió:
> > # The current Gentoo version of Nessus is from 2006 (!). It
Hi Michał
El 16/3/19 a las 20:06, Michał Górny escribió:
> # The current Gentoo version of Nessus is from 2006 (!). It does
> # not build for quite some time (#590226), also -client fails with new
> # openssl (#674424). Upstream has stopped releasing non-proprietary
> # versions. While at it,
El 28/06/18 a las 23:15, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
> Hi!
>
> I just want to notify that an attacker has taken control of the Gentoo
> organization in Github and has among other things replaced the portage
> and musl-dev trees with malicious versions
as is and GitHub has now
removed the organization, please don't use any ebuild from the GitHub
mirror ontained before 28/06/2018, 18:00 GMT until new warning.
Sincerely,
Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
Gentoo developer.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Michał,
El 15/05/18 a las 08:20, Michał Górny escribió:
> If you are still using Python 3.4, please consider switching to a newer
> version as it is reaching its end-of-life. The end-of-life dates
> for the currently used versions are:
>
> Python 3.42019-03-16
> Python 2.7
Dear Gentoo Council,
During the meeting you held on December (see the logs here:
https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20171210.txt ), you
voted for restricting the gentoo-dev mailing list. Although in said
meeting somebody raised that such a change affected the Gentoo Social
Contract
El 24/03/18 a las 04:34, Aaron Bauman escribió:
>
> On March 23, 2018 11:11:16 PM EDT, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> (klondike)" <klond...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> El 20/03/18 a las 09:52, Kristian Fiskerstrand escribió:
>>> This was not put in effec
El 20/03/18 a las 09:52, Kristian Fiskerstrand escribió:
> This was not put in effect on 23 January 2018, however I have now
> requested infra to put it in place in [bug 650964]. Users wishing
> posting permissions are encouraged to find a mentor and register in [bug
> 644070]
>
> References:
>
El 20/08/17 a las 00:44, Michał Górny escribió:
> W dniu sob, 19.08.2017 o godzinie 22∶15 +, użytkownik Duncan
> napisał:
>> Aaron W. Swenson posted on Sat, 19 Aug 2017 07:18:20 -0400 as excerpted:
>>
>> [Proposed news item excerpt]
>>
>>> We'd like to note that all the userspace hardening and
El 19/08/17 a las 13:18, Aaron W. Swenson escribió:
> On 2017-08-19 13:01, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
>> El 19/08/17 a las 12:37, Aaron W. Swenson escribió:
>>> On 2017-08-15 17:01, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>
El 19/08/17 a las 12:37, Aaron W. Swenson escribió:
> On 2017-08-15 17:01, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'd like to get this one up by Saturday so that we can proceed with
>> masking and removing of the hardened-sources after upstre
to gentoo-hardened which is the porject's
mailing list.
El 18/08/17 a las 02:59, R0b0t1 escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> (klondike) <klond...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> El 15/08/17 a las 17:50, R0b0t1 escribió:
>>> Where was this d
El 16/08/17 a las 18:01, Duncan escribió:
> Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) posted on Wed, 16 Aug 2017
> 12:09:57 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> s you may know the core of sys-kernel/hardened-sources have been the
>> grsecuirty patches.
> New typo: s/grsecuirty/grsec
El 16/08/17 a las 09:40, Marek Szuba escribió:
> Two tiny bits of formal nitpicking from my side:
> - it's "grsecurity" (not a typo, they do use a lowercase g except when
> the name appears at the beginning of a sentence), not "grsec";
> - the patches were not *distributed by* grsecurity, they
El 15/08/17 a las 18:08, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
>> Updated the news item following comments from dilfridge, mrueg and
>> floppym. Also made it display to users of hardened profil
El 15/08/17 a las 17:50, R0b0t1 escribió:
> Where was this decision discussed?
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/62ebc2e26d91e8f079197c2c83788cff
And many other threads in that list for example, those are just blueness
(the package maintainer) conclussions.
> The last available
El 15/08/17 a las 17:01, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to get this one up by Saturday so that we can proceed with
> masking and removing of the hardened-sources after upstream stopped
> releasing new patches.
>
> This is my first time
inform users as to
the options available for hardening their system kernels after the
removal of the hardened-sources.
Sincerely,
Klondike
Title: sys-kernel/hardened-sources removal
Author: Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) <klond...@gentoo.org>
Posted: 2017-08-19
Revision: 1
New
El 09/08/15 a las 12:02, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On 09 Aug 2015 11:31, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
* Michael Weber schrieb am 09.08.15 um 11:00 Uhr:
On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the
entire day on it, and there's
Hi!
El 29/03/14 05:13, Samuli Suominen escribió:
I took the liberty to unbreak the tree for you. Don't ever touch my
packages again unless
they are broken.
Udev is broken:
* They have known off by one string handling errors on their libraries,
the developers were warned of that but have chosen
El 24/06/13 19:10, Sven Vermeulen escribió:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
I like the idea. It might help bring developers and users closer.
Me too, if I can ever contribute to it, or help users with their Gentoo
(Hardened/SELinux/IMA/EVM/...) through it, I'll
El 18/11/12 04:39, Greg KH escribió:
Anyway, I now see a _very_ dangerous commit in the Copyright branch
that better not get merged into the tree, as it's wrong, and illegal
under all countries that follow the normal body of Copyright Law. It
should be removed right now before someone gets
El 03/11/12 14:35, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to announce a new subproject of Hardened Gentoo: Hardened
uClibc. It is an effort to port both tool chain and kernel hardening
to uClibc based systems for a variety of architectures, treating
uClibc more as a drop in
So I have been doing some bash scripting out of some comment in a
conversation to count (and rank) the packages by the number of ebuilds
they have (and thus of versions of said package). The results can be
seen at http://dev.gentoo.org/~klondike/ebuildrank.txt and if there is
interest I can try to
El 12/03/12 17:29, Samuli Suominen escribió:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (12 Mar 2012)
# media-sound/lilypond required for this is masked in ../package.mask
# for removal
app-text/asciidoc test
asciidoc only depends with the test use flag set so why don't just
remove the test USE
El 21/01/12 19:01, . escribió:
Hello there!
Is there a chance that Gentoo may become a free distro?
I'm so unhappy with the fact that there are some non-free packages in
the main tree.
The main goal of the GNU project was to replace the proprietary Unix system.
You are actually ruining
El 18/11/11 17:11, Christian Ruppert escribió:
What is left is:
Kernel
Any problem regarding hardened? Need a hand from somebody in the team?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
El 31/10/11 17:43, Alec Warner escribió:
We can't force people who write Gentoo specific software to host w/us
(that would be silly.) If upstream is dead then take a tarball and
clone it into a git repo; nothing is stopping you.
We can, all you need is enough field agents to convince people to
El 23/10/11 05:56, Steven J Long escribió:
Will we be able to switch off SSP via config, or will we have to setup our
own profile?
This should do the trick:
CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -fno-stack-protector
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Today I have found that build dependencies are left in the system but
won't be upgraded when running emerge -vauD1 world.
This can be inconvenient since security issues fixed in those left over
packages won't be applied properly.
So, is there any reason for this behaviour? Shouldn't build
El 11/10/11 20:55, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 10/11/11 19:50, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
Hi,
Today I have found that build dependencies are left in the system
but won't be upgraded when running emerge -vauD1 world. This can be
inconvenient since security issues
El 11/10/11 21:36, Alec Warner escribió:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
(klondike) klond...@gentoo.org wrote:
El 11/10/11 20:55, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 10/11/11 19:50, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
Hi,
Today I have found that build
El 25/08/11 23:25, Matt Turner escribió:
2011/8/25 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org:
Hello,
Please see the attached news item for review. The news item should be
published before mesa-7.11 goes stable.
Corresponding bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377349
El 07/08/11 02:48, Dmitry Goncharov escribió:
Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc?
Yes the shell-tools herd. You can email them at shell-tools (at) g.o
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
El 03/08/11 03:31, c1p...@gentoo.org escribió:
wi¹~BBº“‚ã°êØvܬ»\‡Š
ôß(ÇW¨Ý‚é{Ò…Ä�
ô2‡°¼ÛûÜîÙ‹–õ–~HwX~/؉ý†íE[¬£ÜœŸdd‰¶§ã±8ÒŠ6gîvs
ã�X„òYFý5ù1çFØŸô
L`Ce¤ÎA‘]²´e¼s§eµ©ùÍáÍmÉãZÄþ²cxZ:Õ•ƒÙFyÚ‘wû–a—š|×:¤b~ØüœÔ§X‰AQ¬bR\ž‡|ĉ3u±«Ÿ4æØ7‡˜øU\ö/°tÛnæKß¡^¸Åڌ٤ÚbT;3ºI7%$œÎÆc™Öšoåi
El 03/08/11 06:57, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
(klondike) wrote:
Come on they can't be serious... this won't work against Gentoo devs,
will it?
It is concerning that the spammer used a valid list subscriber.
Crunching
El 17/06/11 16:25, Rich Freeman escribió:
If we
think that tweaking the changelog policy causes pain, just wait to see
how the git migration goes.
Just a few words regarding this, in my company we moved to git (from
darcs) recently. I have ended up taking some non working days because
the
El 17/06/11 18:46, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Friday, June 17, 2011 12:08:43 Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera wrote:
El 17/06/11 16:25, Rich Freeman escribió:
If we
think that tweaking the changelog policy causes pain, just wait to see
how the git migration goes.
Just a few words regarding
El 03/06/11 23:48, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (3 Jun 2011)
# Requires KDE 4.4, which is not in the portage tree anymore.
# Please unmerge before upgrading KDE, and emerge afterwards
# net-wireless/bluedevil for bluetooth support in KDE 4.6.
# Masked
I was thinking of writting this in private, but I bet it will do more
good if I do it public.
I'm 22 (most of you could call me a kid) and a reasonably recent new
developer and I'm sad having to ask you, am I the only one seeing
childishness on your actions, and this yours implies at least
El 10/06/11 17:33, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
* Diego, Berlusconi a way better reason to be outraged I think.
Small clarification here: I'm not comparing Diego with Berlusconi AFAIK
he isn't a corrupt underage fucking politician, I'm pointing him
Berlusconi ruling Italy
El 08/06/11 20:07, Vikraman escribió:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:35:26PM +0400, Николай Антонов wrote:
On 08.06.2011 18:36, Vikraman wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on the `Package statistics` project this year. Till now, I
have managed to write a client and server[0] to collect the
El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribió:
Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which tend
to quickly convert into the witch hunt and seldom lead to anything
conclusive.
To some of us (i.e. me as a staffer and probably any wanna be developer
following the list) it is a
El 13/05/11 01:57, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto escribió:
Hi Markos.
On 12-05-2011 20:19, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hi,
Quite a lot of users tend to change bugzilla fields without even
understand why they are doing it. Would it be possible to restrict users
from touching the following
El 11/05/11 17:43, Duncan escribió:
Markos Chandras posted on Wed, 11 May 2011 15:27:48 +0100 as excerpted:
To my perspective, split ebuilds ease the integration of patches. You
can patch a single ebuild and not have to rebuild everything else. But,
when it comes to version bumps, I think it
60 matches
Mail list logo
