On 10.6.2014 5.31, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:16:02 -0600
Ryan Hill rh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Beginning with GCC 4.8.3, Stack Smashing Protection (SSP) will be
enabled by default.[..]
.. on supported architectures.
Right?
I would rather make news items architecture
Hi everyone,
when doing a fresh installation I noticed that during I get to see many
old news items. There used to be a problem with Portage so no news items
could be removed. I think that has now been fixed for years so we
should be able to do this without problems. How about we start by
On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
graduates from kindergarten :-)
And perhaps introduce a culture-fit score in the recruiting,
mentoring process.
As an employee that
On 20.6.2013 16.07, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
graduates from kindergarten :-)
And perhaps
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
keep the stable
On 24.11.2012 23.12, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (24 Nov 2012)
# Doesn't build against recent kernels (#247898), all its supported
# devices are not supported by latest kernels. Removal in a month.
net-wireless/linux-wlan-ng-modules
net-wireless/linux-wlan-ng-utils
On 19.11.2012 18.33, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
The answer appears to be that a file is the unit
I personally consider it to be smaller; a number of lines within
a file, or even a single line, all depending
On 18.11.2012 6.28, Greg KH wrote:
Also, you can not assign copyright to a third party, unless you have a
copyright assignment form. Do the developers doing this work have such
a form assigned? And in what country and state is that form valid for?
Different countries, and states, have
On 19.11.2012 19.02, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Thank you for these responses because they did help me understand
copyright/left better. I appreciate your expertise in the matter
and would hope I can draw on it again in the future,
On 31.10.2012 14.39, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Hi all,
In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2]
into the devmanual[3].
As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of
development information. I believe consolidation of this information
into a
On 29.10.2012 18:15, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Good idea to inform users.
Is there a way to have this news item go away, say after a year or so?
Every time I do a fresh install, I get hit with a couple of
perpetual news items, and it is a little annoying.
News items were designed to be
On 22.5.2012 8.53, Michał Górny wrote:
Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out
of nowhere. I don't believe this issue was that
On 15.04.2012 17:12, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 16:02 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:59:50 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am unsure about validate_desktop_entries() utility. It's currently
provided by eutils.eclass and only called by
On 12.3.2012 1.15, William Hubbs wrote:
How do you plan to handle notifying stable users if you go with ?
I was thinking of another news item once we are ready to go stable.
What do you think?
William
We could reuse the same news item if we now release it as = and then
release a new
On 11.03.2012 04:53, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:27 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
here is the udev 181 unmasking news item.
If all goes well, this will be committed to the tree on 3/14 UTC.
I guess this might be OK for unstable, but before this goes stable
On 11.3.2012 17.33, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2012 04:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
The Display-If-Installed atom shows the news item to stable users once
it's committed. I am not sure at what point does Portage show it when
the atom is = so we might want to evaluate the options.
It's
On 11.3.2012 23.43, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:28:19PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 11.3.2012 17.33, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2012 04:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
The Display-If-Installed atom shows the news item to stable users once
it's committed. I am not sure at what
On 21.01.2012 20:08, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 01/21/2012 05:04 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 1/21/12 5:45 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (21 Jan 2012) # Package
renamed to
On 3.1.2012 19.51, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/hb-portage-advanced.xml
The discussion however is if it is okay to document these things there or
not. Some of the features are considered to be too fragile to be broadly
documented (at least in a
On 14.12.2011 13:06, Gaurav Saxena wrote:
Hello all,
I am interested in doing my final year computer scence project on
gentoo. I would be having a duration of six months to work on the
project. Could you please suggest me some good project ideas that would
be helpful to me as well as gentoo.
On 18.12.2011 19:13, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 12/18/11 6:02 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
There are parallel computing aspects in libbash for metadata generation,
data structures in AST building for bash and it's quite low level.
By the way, I've always wondered why libbash is separate from
On 04.12.2011 22:35, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Hi guys 'n gals
obligatory tl;dr:
Please check your package below this list and see if it (the package) has
a proper DEPEND and RDEPEND on the listed sec-policy/selinux-module
package(s)
The list would be easier to read if it was sorted.
On 03.11.2011 17:30, Mike Frysinger wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/eclass/user.eclass?r1=1.8r2=1.9
-mike
Less than a day is quite a short time for people to comment. Also it
would be better to include the diff in the original email.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 29.10.2011 12.39, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
If the upstream is dead I have no clear idea what to do, but maybe
infra could set-up something download.gentoo.org where we could keep
all the files with their sums and gpg sign from us gentoo devs to
ensure their validity.
The files should stay
On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell,
is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for
keeping these before i punt them ?
-mike
Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break
backwards
On 8.9.2011 16.16, Markos Chandras wrote:
(Consider my refusal to reply any more messages in this thread as
an polite attempt of avoiding escalation and flame.)
Consider my email as a friendly and polite request to please change
your ChangeLog behaviour from now on.
The changelog
On 1.9.2011 12.03, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
A quick idea. Right now eclasses sometimes do API changes and start
yelling at users merging ebuilds using outdates APIs. This often means
users start filling bugs about outdated ebuilds requiring maintainers
either to ignore that or start
On 1.9.2011 13.51, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:44:47 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1.9.2011 12.03, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
A quick idea. Right now eclasses sometimes do API changes and start
yelling at users merging ebuilds using outdates APIs
On 1.9.2011 14.31, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:02:11 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1.9.2011 13.51, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:44:47 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1.9.2011 12.03, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
A quick
On 1.9.2011 17.12, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 14:44 Thu 01 Sep , Petteri Räty wrote:
One thing to note is that we should get eqawarn into the next EAPI.
Why?
So that it wouldn't fall back on einfo where not available.
Regards,
Petteri
On 21.08.2011 15:27, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 07:29:45 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bas...@opensource.dyc.edu wrote:
OpenSuse has a nice solution. After an upgrade, it tells you that
there are some running binaries still linking against the old
libraries and asks you to run
On 27.07.2011 17:30, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
Eclasses still shouldn't break backwards compatibility — that hasn't
changed in the past 5 years, despite what a very small minority of
devs appears to think. This has been a huge PITA for python.eclass in
On 08.07.2011 01:21, Dane Smith wrote:
All,
In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are
Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be pertinent to
have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to 'use' and 'has'
respectively?
Sounds good. One thing we could
On 8.7.2011 11.55, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are
Deprecated. If this is the case, do we think it would be
pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to
'use' and 'has'
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm
On 06.07.2011 22:45, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:17:28PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
On 27.06.2011 15:28, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
So I know a bunch of people have already looked at it, and I'd like to
know: what do you find better about the Ruby approach compared to the
Python approach? Is it just the size of python.eclass, or are there a
number of other issues?
I like the
On 27.06.2011 19:00, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 17:53, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
I like the ruby approach for the reason that it doesn't require users to
run update scripts like python-updater.
Sure, but if that means the developers now have to bump every
On 19.06.2011 11:06, Hans de Graaff wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 14:14 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 18.06.2011 09:16, Hans de Graaff wrote:
RDEPEND=dev-ruby/rcsparse =dev-ruby/rbtree-0.3.0-r2 dev-vcs/git
The ruby-ng eclasses frob RDEPEND, so you should always add to it, e.g.
RDEPEND
On 18.06.2011 09:16, Hans de Graaff wrote:
RDEPEND=dev-ruby/rcsparse =dev-ruby/rbtree-0.3.0-r2 dev-vcs/git
The ruby-ng eclasses frob RDEPEND, so you should always add to it, e.g.
RDEPEND=${RDEPEND} dev-vcs/git
This stacking is automatically handled by the package manager.
Regards,
On 17.06.2011 20:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, June 17, 2011 12:25:21 Torsten Veller wrote:
* justin j...@gentoo.org:
Now using the new pkg_pretend for EAPI=4
While T is defined in all phases, PMS also says that pkg_pretend must
not write to the filesystem.
Is it allowed to write to
On 10.06.2011 14:44, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 06/09/2011 03:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
do we need some kind of policy around membership on special
project teams. QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might
be another.
in my eyes we do. too much power to be unregulated.
On 10.06.2011 18:33, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
* Samuli, extremist right wing parties are gaining power in your
country, I think this is a way better reason to rebel than a stupid file.
True Finns are not right wing. The foreign media seems to always get it
wrong. They
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110510-summary.txt
Please note that you must now update ChangeLog with each commit. For
more information please see the meeting log and the preceding mailing
list thread:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110510.txt
On 05/15/2011 09:24 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
--
If you are cross-compiling to a 32-bit architecture such as ARM, or if
you are using a 32-bit architecture and have sys-devel/crossdev installed,
please be warned that - unless you follow the advice below - your system
may
On 05/12/2011 04:55 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
Yeah I know I'm replying to my own message, but I also have another idea
about this. Another option would be that for the next release we just
stop parsing and use config_* but without trying to do any conversions.
The disadvantage of this would
On 04/30/2011 07:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and old is
not useful information to them
So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if
others would stop it as well
Individual developers (especially QA
On 04/30/2011 10:22 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
I'd suggest having repoman force a changelog entry on ebuild removal.
Opened yesterday:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365361
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/30/2011 11:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
It no where in the link you provided mentions ChangeLog is required for
removals. Removing an unused ebuild is not the same as making changes to
an ebuild.
We have no policy for logging removals. And that's like it should be.
It doesn't
On 04/30/2011 11:35 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Petteri Räty wrote:
Individual developers (especially QA project members) should not be
ignoring policies when they feel like it.
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html
While I'm all
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html
There doesn't seem to be a common opinion on what the policy for
ChangeLog entries is. See:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f829da2375f1ceab766a800913cc4998.xml
I propose a simple new text: Every commit should
On 03/24/2011 11:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
Manifest's anymore ? generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is
ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have
done this already.
Also submitting the quizzes
On 03/10/2011 12:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date. it
talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymore.
basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the
Council. so rather
On 03/06/2011 02:22 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
Hey guys,
in bugzilla-4.x they did change the Status Workflow[1].
snip
This will convert the status of all bugs using the following
system:
REOPENED will become CONFIRMED (and the REOPENED status will be
removed)
We would be loosing
On 02/26/2011 07:08 PM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2011/2/21 Uditha Galgamuwa nandun8...@gmail.com:
Hi dev,
I am Uditha Galgamuwa from university of moratuwa,Sri Lanka.I am
interested in the project idea Rewrite java-config in C++ or python which
was in last year Gsoc.As I saw this
On 02/15/2011 05:15 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Hi,
since Betelgeuse didn't actually commit the news item in November,
here's my try. Slightly reworded the text, comments welcome. Otherwise I
plan to commit this on Friday.
Thanks for picking this up again.
Petteri
signature.asc
On 02/07/2011 03:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
+1 with exception that those using USE=sound for libcanberra should be
split into it's own USE flag called USE=libcanberra
and USE=sound should be kept for the generic ones
libcanberra describes the means and not the results so we should
On 02/07/2011 08:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/07/2011 07:55 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 02/07/2011 03:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
+1 with exception that those using USE=sound for libcanberra should be
split into it's own USE flag called USE=libcanberra
and USE=sound should be kept
On 02/02/2011 11:42 PM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
For the record, Kacper told me today that every developer is allowed to touch
ppc/ppc64 profiles. Archies that don't want others to touch their profiles
should mention it in the devmanual. I was not aware of that, I thought that
!arch
On 01/31/2011 07:04 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
2. I don't think it makes sense for QA to discipline developers
permanently in these cases. They should suspend access pending Devrel
resolution of the issue. Devrel should of course strongly consider
the input of QA.
That should be
On 01/29/2011 12:42 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Finally, if Devrel, QA, and the Council have already talked this out
and agree that QA is in the best place to police technical commit
issues, then pipe this email to /dev/null...
The diff proposed in this thread has not yet been talked about
On 01/07/2011 11:15 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
Sorry guys,
after thinking about it I definitely chose the wrong lists. Won't happen
again...
Also I wonder why the moderators thought this was appropriate for
-dev-announce?
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 01/03/2011 04:40 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Quoting PMS, Chapter 8:
All ebuild-defined variables discussed in this chapter must be defined
independently of any system, profile or tree dependent data, and must
not vary depending upon the ebuild phase.
On 01/02/2011 05:19 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
One way we could drop EAPI 0 would be if we do a major review of tree
and repo formats to improve upgrade paths, which would however likely
require breaking backwards compatibility at such point.
I believe such a change would only
On 01/02/2011 11:04 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
Whatever you folks eventually settle on, please send patches and
suggestions to the GDP for our upgrade guide. I'd prefer that users
have a possible upgrade path from *any* profile/version of Gentoo up
through the present. If you decide not to
On 12/31/2010 12:29 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 12/30/2010 07:37 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
As the text was just approved it will take a while before Package
Managers release new versions that declare support for EAPI 4. As such,
the new EAPI 4 can't yet be used in the main tree. You
On 12/31/2010 01:02 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hi,
after approval of EAPI 4, there are now 5 different EAPIs available,
and it's hard to remember what features are offered by which EAPI.
So maybe it's about time that we deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1 for new
ebuilds. As a first step, a warning
As the text was just approved it will take a while before Package
Managers release new versions that declare support for EAPI 4. As such,
the new EAPI 4 can't yet be used in the main tree. You will be notified
as soon as you can start reaping the benefits.
On behalf of the Gentoo Council,
Petteri Räty
On 12/24/2010 11:19 AM, Justin (jlec) Lecher wrote:
On 24/12/10 02:18, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
What do you mean about python.eclass?
python.eclass doesn't define python_src_unpack().
No it doesn't, but calling the default() function in a phase will make
the default phase
On 12/17/2010 08:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Old-style virtuals are extremely messy and introduce an awful lot of
complexity. They were supposed to be on the way out several years ago,
with GLEP 37, but that seems to have stalled.
Is there anything in particular holding back replacing most
On 12/13/2010 11:00 PM, Roy Bamford wrote:
Markos,
Interesting - How can you address future strategy and plans without
addressing Gentoos meta structure too. It could not be a purely
technical talk ... but thats what interests me.
There's no restriction for the talks to be technical
I tried getting input for talks from gentoo-user but so far there have
been no responses. Currently there aren't that many talks proposed for
the distribution miniconf so it should be easy to get purely Gentoo
related topics in. So what kind of Gentoo related talks would you like
to see and
On 2.12.2010 3.03, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure if you know but we're currently experiencing a spur of build
failures related to eautoreconf (in particular, eaclocal) and
libtool-2.4 The new libtool release only works with automake 1.9 and
later. [1]
Maybe we should start
On 2.12.2010 15.38, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno gio, 02/12/2010 alle 10.19 +0200, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
Maybe we should start with !automake-1.9 for libtool =2.4 ebuilds?
This would force action but people could still keep installing stuff
needing older automake version by masking
On 2.12.2010 17.31, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno gio, 02/12/2010 alle 17.24 +0200, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
Ok thanks for clarifying the last point. Doesn't this go against your
original wish to mask it though?
If you read my first mail, I said I want them masked, and not removed
On 11/28/2010 11:56 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
It seems like the problem here is that we don't have separate profiles
for stable and unstable keywords. The obvious solution would be to have
separate profiles, mask the flags in the stable profiles, and unmask the
flags in
Any improvements to the text are welcome.
Regards,
Petteri
Title: Pending Removal of Java support in ia64
Author: Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org
Author: IA64 Arch Team i...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2010-11-14
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Keyword: ia64
On 11/10/2010 07:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for
On 11/10/2010 02:42 PM, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Втр, 09/11/2010 в 18:20 -0500, Anthony G. Basile пишет:
Title: Restructuring of Hardened profiles
[...]
Display-If-Profile: hardened/linux
Is it possible to restrict this news item to be shown on affected
profiles only?
Yeah it shouldn't
On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri Räty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to
where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
${WORKDIR}/${module}
(where module usually is the last component of source URI) to
On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use flags from default
IUSE
-apache2
-ldap
A minimal server installation does requires neither apache2 nor ldap
Although one can install a server without apache or ldap, I'd say
On 10/25/2010 02:54 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever)
wrote:
arfrever10/10/25 11:54:19
Modified: python.eclass
Log:
Set IUSE in EAPI =4.
Rename _parse_PYTHON_DEPEND() to _python_parse_PYTHON_DEPEND() and unset it
after its using.
Ban NEED_PYTHON
On 10/25/2010 04:24 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
I would like to request that 2 additional features are added to EAPI=4.
These features will be needed for further development of python.eclass.
1. Support for . characters in names of USE flags
Ideally we should have
On 10/23/2010 11:54 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Subpatch #11 adds temporary support for EAPI=0 in
python_get_implementational_package() to work
around a part of bug #340395.
This subpatch is very small, so I'm planning to commit it with the rest of
subpatches.
Please
On 10/24/2010 09:49 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-10-18 17:26:13 Petteri Räty napisał(a):
On 10/18/2010 04:33 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Subpatch #10 fixes exporting of python_pkg_setup() in EAPI =4.
There will be other changes in API
On 10/23/2010 08:51 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 08:39:22PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 10/23/2010 04:16 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (23 Oct 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Does not work with recent versions of ffmpeg.
# Does
On 10/23/2010 08:59 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno sab, 23/10/2010 alle 20.58 +0300, Petteri Räty ha scritto:
My point was to have something along the lines of Removal in 15 days
because of the above.
It would just be a formula to use, and a silly one. _Obviously_ the
removal
On 10/16/2010 05:26 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
Hi folks,
a couple of weeks ago I was told that the PUEL license we have in our license
pool is outdated. We currently have version 6 from July 28, 2008 but latest
virtualbox releases come with version 8 from April 19, 2010.
A quick glance at
On 09/30/2010 06:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/30/2010 12:41 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack
on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to
suggest, to have two portages installed?
You can run portage
On 09/28/2010 12:43 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
So if you want to have your say, gentoo-qa is there for that.
You should not cross post like this. Following the recent discussion the
only list allowing cross posting is gentoo-dev-announce.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description:
On 08/31/2010 11:03 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
How about this as an idea:
1. Include a parsaable return date I suggest (Returning:/MM/DD,
Returning:Unknown)
2. Automated emails when:
2.1. It's after the return date (weekly).
2.2. You start committing again.
Sounds good:
On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400
Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail client. Then you
On 08/16/2010 08:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le lundi 16 août 2010 à 16:07 +0400, Peter Volkov a écrit :
This was discussed many times here and since every time we had same
consensus the policy is in place. It's just not written
I assume many of us have wrapper scripts to automatically generate
matching ChangeLog and CVS commit messages. When we eventually move to
git the plan is for the ChangeLog to be automatically generated from
git. To unify developer practices and to ease the transition to git it
has been proposed to
On 09/14/2010 05:50 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-09-13 00:53:19 Mark Loeser napisał(a):
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever) arfre...@gentoo.org said:
arfrever10/09/12 20:43:13
Removed: pygtkhelpers-0.4.1.ebuild
Log:
Delete older
On 09/11/2010 09:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:26:17 +0200
Francesco R viv...@gmail.com wrote:
echo $(use_case useA,echoA useB,echoB ,echoC)
I would personally rather use:
echo $(use_case useA,echoA useB,echoB echoC)
but AFAICS your implementation should support
On 09/11/2010 09:51 PM, justin wrote:
Hi all,
is the following comment an adequate way to close bugs with
RESOLVED/INVALID? If so, I will change the way I handle bugs and use it too.
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.35 (sys-kernel/linux-headers)
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
you mix stable unstable
On 09/11/2010 01:39 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever)
wrote:
arfrever10/09/10 22:39:27
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild
Log:
Version bump.
(Portage version: 2.2_rc79_p5/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Revision
On 09/11/2010 01:02 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever)
wrote:
arfrever10/09/10 22:02:28
Modified: PyQt4-4.7.6.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Update EAPI. Fix dependencies.
This message does not tell why the EPREFIX stuff was removed.
(Portage version:
1 - 100 of 893 matches
Mail list logo
