Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidelines for dangerous USE flags

2017-08-22 Thread Sven Vermeulen
a way we could somehow ensure that a USE flag is never set globally, but only on a per-package basis? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-12 Thread Sven Eden
Am Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2017, 19:08:05 CET schrieb Walter Dnes: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:15:25PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote > > > On Jan 11 13:34:09, sven.e...@gmx.de wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2017, 13:36:15 CET schrieb Jan Stary: > > > > > You arguing that 40MB is nothing on modern s

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-11 Thread Sven Eden
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2017, 13:36:15 CET schrieb Jan Stary: > > You arguing that 40MB is nothing on modern systems (which, by the way is > > not exactly true, talking about embedded ones). > > Can you gove an example of an embedded system with manpages? My Raspberry Pi 3.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

2016-08-22 Thread Sven Vermeulen
m standard that says > how to do these things? Yes, wouldn't the Docker project be happy to take on a patch that uses gethostname() or so? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dev retirement - Farewell message

2016-05-03 Thread Sven Vermeulen
work in the previous documentation system – but in reality I am not a > developer at all. Nowadays, with the new wiki – which I can see grow > and improve day after day – it is no longer necessary for people like me > become a developer. > > At the beginning I could get a friendly

Re: [gentoo-dev] BOINC needs maintainer

2016-02-18 Thread Sven Eden
Am Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016, 09:37:28 CET schrieb David Seifert: > On Do, 2016-02-18 at 09:29 +0100, Sven Eden wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016, 15:20:56 CET schrieb Justin Lecher > > > > (jlec): > > > currently BOINC supposed to be maintained by

Re: [gentoo-dev] BOINC needs maintainer

2016-02-18 Thread Sven Eden
ay "seden" (via layman). Feel free to use it. Works fine, at least on my system. Cheers Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

2015-10-11 Thread Sven Vermeulen
n which a certain problem would already have been implemented. For instance, ebuilds with an optional python part using the python-r1 eclass. Do you think it is worthwhile to have a number of packages assigned as good examples? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

2015-08-09 Thread Sven Vermeulen
l we start depending on it (for instance, when we would automate stuff based on the content of the commit message). Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-06 Thread Sven Vermeulen
n the wiki as well which might best be aligned with whatever recommendation is used. See "Beautiful bug reports" [2] and "Bugzilla HOWTO" [3] as examples. [2] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Beautiful_bug_reports [3] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Bugzilla_HOWTO Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing 'selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-*)' from DEPEND

2014-11-01 Thread Sven Vermeulen
myself... > > You should have emphasized that the dependency will still be > in RDEPEND. As I said with QA hat on, such a change is fine since it > affects build-time dependencies only. People who installed the package > already are not affected. Thanks. I'll do the necessary updates tomorrow then (without revbump) and invalidate the bug reports I already made. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing 'selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-*)' from DEPEND

2014-11-01 Thread Sven Vermeulen
s is to remove the USE="selinux" specific dependency to a sec-policy/selinux-* package from the DEPEND variable. So something like: DEPEND=" foo - bar - selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-bez )" + bar" If I am allowed to do this change without revbumping, I can just stop making massive bug reports and do the change(s) myself... Someone? Pretty-please? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] Removing 'selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-*)' from DEPEND

2014-08-29 Thread Sven Vermeulen
themselves (for functional and other reasons) and the bugs (with tracker) allow developers to not forget this. Is this a good approach to take? Happy to hear your thoughts on this, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps

2014-07-22 Thread Sven Vermeulen
hould be focused on trying to think about how to >standardize a way for distinguish between revision bumps needing full >rebuild or only VDB updates :| As someone who regularly adds in dependencies without bumping (adding USE=selinux dependencies to the proper SELinux policy) because that would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multilib dependencies need to have >= on least version having EAPI=5 or multilib support

2014-06-19 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, developers and users. [...] > Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please do > not hesitate to ask. Hi Michał Thank you for your endless effort to get Gentoo to this stage (and further). Wkr,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-30 Thread Sven Vermeulen
;s still goes well. The last Dracut generated initramfs also failed on SELinux systems, but that isn't something that cannot be worked around... Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Namespace for users created for packages

2014-03-26 Thread Sven Vermeulen
; So the question is, what would you think about such a policy in Gentoo? I'm in favor. It shouldn't be used as *the* check to make sure that an account is a functional (non-interactive/daemon) account (for that there is also the user id range and so on) but for visibility it's definitely worth persuing. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] New package "eid-viewer", is app-misc ok?

2014-03-08 Thread Sven Vermeulen
er doesn't seem to perform anything cryptographic-related. So - is app-misc ok? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to support C++11 in libraries?

2013-12-20 Thread Sven Eden
dd > a new virtual function to a base class in .) This is why C++11 > support is still labelled "experimental", because it would be worse to claim > it's stable and then have to break the ABI. So basically C++11 <-> C++03 is no problem at all (unless you *export* ce

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to support C++11 in libraries?

2013-12-19 Thread Sven Eden
=c++11" the default, and only override this for packages that do fishy stuff and break with it. But of course this must be tested thoroughly first. I have some extra time to spare in the first three weeks of january, and I've already planned to do an 'emerge -e @world

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-11 Thread Sven Vermeulen
on upstream was died while cronie forked it > fixing some bugs :/ > > What do you think? I'm ok with it. At least cronie's main website is quick to find, and I remember a bug I sent in to the cronie maintainers and got a fast reply, so positive experience as well. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-04 Thread Sven Eden
Am Montag, 4. November 2013, 12:55:45 schrieben Sie: > Dnia 2013-11-04, o godz. 10:01:18 > > Sven Eden napisał(a): > > PyQt4 and synaptiks were only the messengers, btw. > > dev-lang/python-exec-0. has the Targets pypy2_0 and python3_3 which > > dev- lang/python-ex

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-04 Thread Sven Eden
Am Montag, 4. November 2013, 10:01:18 schrieb Sven Eden: > Btw. Why does dev-python/python-exec:2 has a dependency on > dev-python/python- exec:0 ? Sorry, I meant: "Why does dev-python/python-exec:2 has a dependency on dev- lang/python- exec:0 ?" of course. signature.asc Descri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-04 Thread Sven Eden
th dev-python/python-exec-1.1 and dev-python/python-exec-1.2 want a dev-lang/python-exec:0 with the same target setting. Btw. Why does dev-python/python-exec:2 has a dependency on dev-python/python- exec:0 ? Cheers Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2013-10-13 Thread Sven Eden
t suffer in many places from the problems ustr solves. Cheers Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr

2013-09-25 Thread Sven Eden
Am Mittwoch, 25. September 2013, 11:39:20 schrieb Ian Stakenvicius: > On 25/09/13 11:27 AM, Sven Eden wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 25. September 2013, 11:05:24 schrieb Ian > > > > Stakenvicius: > >> On 25/09/13 10:51 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >>> On Wed,

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr

2013-09-25 Thread Sven Eden
id it. Result: No initrd and one partition less to take care of. I have never had any disadvantage by that merge over a year ago on all my machines. And then I took a closer look at all servers (debian, ranging from Sarge over Lenny to Squeeze) at my workplace, and none ever even had a separate /usr. Cheers Sven (*): Like /usr over NFS signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

2013-08-03 Thread Sven Vermeulen
r at minimum, I have a > very good idea where it is once I hit it, because I have a good idea what > changed and why. Care to elaborate a small bit on this? Is this a hook through bashrc that you use? I'm running a few - myself (not openrc though) and am interested in doing something similar... Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] [1/3] Automatic *XML->Wiki wiki.gentoo.org

2013-07-10 Thread Sven Vermeulen
e time of conversion the project sites themselves are still available to consult). I'll update the stylesheet with the suggested style improvements this evening. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [1/3] Automatic *XML->Wiki wiki.gentoo.org

2013-07-08 Thread Sven Vermeulen
can help ;) btw, the tool actually converts GuideXML, so I'll be updating it later on to support better moves of our documentation as well. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Hangouts

2013-06-24 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > I like the idea. It might help bring developers and users closer. Me too, if I can ever contribute to it, or help users with their Gentoo (Hardened/SELinux/IMA/EVM/...) through it, I'll be happy to work with it. Wkr

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org

2013-06-13 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Alex Legler wrote: > On 11.06.2013 13:05, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:20:20 Sven Vermeulen wrote: > >> "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > >>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Alex Legler wro

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org

2013-06-11 Thread Sven Vermeulen
"Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: >On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Alex Legler wrote: >> - Projects: Use a GuideXML-to-Wikisyntax conversion tool to create an >> initial wiki version of the document > > >What is the current status of such a tool? It is a script (xslt) that can be used with xsltpr

Re: [gentoo-dev] extending metadata.xml to support CPE information

2013-05-09 Thread Sven Vermeulen
mit that change for me ? :) > > just add "cpe" between "cpan-module" and "cran" in the remote-id field. Done Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] extending metadata.xml to support CPE information

2013-05-07 Thread Sven Vermeulen
#x27;m not proposing this be required or > anything (since not all packages will have one). I'm all for it. We can then easily map CVEs against packages, especially if the version structure we use in the ebuilds is the same one as used upstream (so the remainder of the CPE with version can be easily obtained). http://blog.siphos.be/2013/04/matching-packages-with-cves/ Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] alsaconf removal?

2013-04-11 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > alsaconf should die as it's useful only for ISA/PCMCIA and currently broken > > see, http://bugs.gentoo.org/456214 > > does anyone have problems with dropping alsaconf and patching the > gentoo's alsa-guide.xml to tell users to e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-18 Thread Sven Eden
egademo anyone? ;)) anyway. Cheers Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-08 Thread Sven Vermeulen
ned, > I'll summarize below. Feels like I'm on reddit now... Upvote for you for the explanation, and an upvote to Robin for implementing it for us! Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] tools-portage herd unmaintained packages

2012-12-25 Thread Sven Eden
maintain them. > > > > app-portage/ufed > > > > What did occur finally with them? Hi all, what has happened to app-portage/ufed? I could take care of it. I am no official dev, but maybe via a proxy maintainership? Would that be possible? SIncerly Sven -- http://pwxlib.so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-18 Thread Sven Eden
Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2012, 12:43:55 schrieb Marcin Mirosław: > W dniu 18.12.2012 12:13, Sven Eden pisze: (snip, because this has nothing to do with the previous discussion.) > >> On my 32-bit machines I have... > >> > >> FLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mfp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-18 Thread Sven Eden
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012, 11:48:12 schrieb Walter Dnes: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:37:27PM +0100, Sven Eden wrote > > > 1) --- kde-base/kate > > - > > > > Compiled with -ggdb in CFLAGS: > > # sum=0; for file in $(equery f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Sven Eden
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012, 11:47:24 schrieb Tomáš Chvátal: > 2012/12/17 Sven Eden : > > Hello Tomáš, > > > > on my system I have set up everything with splitdebug enabled. My CFLAGS > > use - march=native, -O2 and -ggdb. > > And this is the result: (Yes, I hav

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Sven Eden
l of 1,807 packages installed. I guess the regular user would end up somewhere between your 2G and my 22G. But I bet it will be slightly more likely my end, wouldn't it? Sincerly Sven -- http://pwxlib.sourceforge.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using emerge-webrsync to simplify the handbook

2012-12-09 Thread Sven Vermeulen
ve that down into the chroot section, and mkdir /usr/portage > if that is needed? Crap. Indeed, section moved towards the place where we optionally recommend "emerge --sync", and put in an mkdir /usr/portage. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using emerge-webrsync to simplify the handbook

2012-12-08 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:44:31AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > On 11/30/2012 06:46 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2012 10:24 AM, "Markos Chandras" wrote: > > > > We could slightly simplify the handbook installation procedure if we > > > > told

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using emerge-webrsync to simplify the handbook

2012-11-30 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Nov 29, 2012 10:24 AM, "Markos Chandras" wrote: > > We could slightly simplify the handbook installation procedure if we > > told people to use emerge-webrsync to fetch the initial snapshot. What > > do people think? > > > > Seems a good improvement to me. I'm ok with it as well. I'll draft up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)

2012-07-25 Thread Sven Vermeulen
need to know that a switch took place. > > 1) To a first approximation, nobody reads the documentation. There sure are a lot of nobody's then... Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] Re: news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)

2012-07-24 Thread Sven Vermeulen
ed to describe both of the locations for a while anyhow). Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a (temporary) proxy docdev for french documentation

2012-07-12 Thread Sven Vermeulen
hus an /ad interim/ proxy docdev to help us to merge the > patches for the documentation. > Meanwhile, I could follow the procedure to become a docdev. Hi Xavier, You might want to take this to the gentoo-doc mailinglist. That being said, I don't mind proxying commits for you guys. I&#

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: some sec-policy/selinux-* packages

2012-05-13 Thread Sven Vermeulen
pd selinux-tftpd selinux-ucspi-tcp selinux-courier-imap selinux-gnupg selinux-haveged selinux-openldap Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] Cleanup of @link attribute in guides

2012-04-05 Thread Sven Vermeulen
from the DTD so that new commits won't bring it in again. Yours faithfully, your local doc monkey Sven Vermeulen PS Sending to gentoo-dev because it also includes changes on the xml/htdocs/proj/* documents.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Happy 10th birthday (in advance)

2012-03-31 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:56:22AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Do you really want to be advertising an awful hack that doesn't really > work, is conceptually unsound and that breaks all kinds of things in > subtle ways? Isn't that something all major distributions do? ;-) Sven

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-03-31 Thread Sven Vermeulen
ment) for alternative / better partitioning layouts, and when that has stabilized then we can talk about Handbook integration, not? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-03-27 Thread Sven Vermeulen
rchitecture. After a while, people start asking more information for "just the necessary bits", making the guides longer and longer, after which they'll eventually need to be made multi-page. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-03-27 Thread Sven Vermeulen
rg/doc/en/handbook/draft/complete/handbook.xml) but I've since moved away from that. Perhaps I should work again on it... Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-03-27 Thread Sven Vermeulen
to take into consideration what is needed (must) for a Gentoo installation, what is seriously recommended (should), what is nice to have (could), etc. And for me, having a separate /usr/portage is a nice-to-have imo. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty

2012-03-22 Thread Sven Vermeulen
helping out here, I use nginx, privoxy, squid and apache on a daily basis (albeit not to their full potential). Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-12 Thread Sven Vermeulen
9 > Also, the handbook still endorses having a separate partition for /usr and > includes it in the example setup. This should be changed now, not when > stabilization time comes. It's an example, and we still endorse it. Only will we now tell users to use an initramfs with it. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

2012-01-23 Thread Sven Vermeulen
ures (like additional grSecurity restrictions or even SELinux) that makes Gentoo Hardened systems less vulnerable to this specific vulnerability. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-05 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:08:44PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Or will /etc move to /usr too? > > > > No, /etc isn't going anywhere. > > Are you sure? I heard a rumour that systemd will soon require you to > put /etc inside your initrd (since / can't be mounted without it). > Obviously, y

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-03 Thread Sven Vermeulen
king the next few days. Once (or when) it does, I'll submit the necessary patches to wherever is necessary. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Documentating advanced portage feaetures in Gentoo Handbook

2012-01-03 Thread Sven Vermeulen
The first part is about getting a base system. The rest of the handbook is to describe the Gentoo-specific administrative stuff. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] Documentating advanced portage feaetures in Gentoo Handbook

2012-01-03 Thread Sven Vermeulen
have it documented anyhow, and I already notice that many of the features are already used in #gentoo or gentoo-user@g.o. But there's still a difference between "not documenting" and putting it in the Gentoo Handbook. Thoughts? Suggestions? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-02 Thread Sven Vermeulen
the concepts underlying, etc. > > Short version: use dracut. And how does dracut know which files it needs to mount my /usr? Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-01 Thread Sven Vermeulen
ne, but also why it is necessary, how to manage initramfs'es, the concepts underlying, etc. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency

2011-12-05 Thread Sven Vermeulen
olve it. > As said by other devs here, I also think it'd be more effective if you > just do the change yourself. USE="selinux" doesn't affect anything else > so it's safe. Ok, no problem. I'll check on IRC regardless, if not just to give a "heads up" on changes. Also, my apologies for not sorting the list. Careful readers will notice it is sorted, but by the package name, not category :/ Thanks you all for the feedback! Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE="selinux" dependency

2011-12-04 Thread Sven Vermeulen
fficient due to binary package support requirements. Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought about first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of work done. I also wouldn't mind creating bugreports for each of them, but that would still be be

Re: [gentoo-dev] supporting /usr on separate partition

2011-10-17 Thread Sven Vermeulen
t need to reappear again ;-) If you think it is still unclear or needs improvements left or right, don't hesitate to mail me or, even better, file a bugreport (I act better on bug reports than on e-mails). Oh, and I use a separate /usr with no initramfs (yet), with software raid and lvm2. /me quickly hides Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation

2011-10-08 Thread Sven Vermeulen
of the FUD once and for all ;-) Wkr, Sven Vermeulen [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/gcc-upgrading.xml

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sec-policy/selinux-mta (SELinux profiles)

2011-10-07 Thread Sven Vermeulen
Hi all, For those using one of the SELinux profiles, sec-policy/selinux-mta will be masked/removed as its policy is already part of selinux-base-policy (and as such gives conflicts, cfr bug #384851). Other people won't notice this as the package is already masked by default. Wkr,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?

2011-08-16 Thread Sven Vermeulen
ed recently (last few days) so they should be okay now. However, some good reviews never hurt. If you do still find issues, don't hesitate to create a bugreport for it. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux

2011-08-05 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:42:29PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:06:48PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > That said, I'm a bit hesitant to describing that we "recommend" it > > regardless of the situation. What is wrong with describing when?

Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux

2011-08-05 Thread Sven Vermeulen
in other locations, like /usr and /var. How does the tool that creates an initramfs know which files to copy from /usr and /var anyhow? Also, how well does this play with all our profiles (so not only the popular architectures)? What about SELinux and/or grSecurity's RBAC model? Are these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?

2011-08-04 Thread Sven Vermeulen
tramfs and work from there? I personally have /usr on a separate partition too (using LVM) without an initramfs or initrd. Works just fine. And I'd like to keep it that way, since it is simple and very manageable. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-06-02 Thread Sven
nly hours, Ruby devs would rather use the RubyGems manager than waiting for the ebuild to appear. -sven

[gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-14 Thread Sven
ful reply.) Cheers, -sven

[gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-13 Thread Sven
d acceptable to expand Portage by the possibility to declare a file shared between slots and only delete it once the last slot is uninstalled? Thanks for some feedback on this! -sven

[gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-12 Thread Sven Schwyn
package and gems would enable (symlink to wrapper) themselves at postinst. I'm an eselect n00b but this all sound like something an eselect module could do. The wrappers can't be boiled down to one unified wrapper. Cheers, -sven

[gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-11 Thread Sven Schwyn
nal package managers to the main package manager through some interface (a bit like pkgkit)? What about eix support? I wouldn't be happy about such a solution. This "assimilation" sounds like trouble and the current co-existence works quite well in most cases. -sven

[gentoo-dev] Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-11 Thread Sven Schwyn
sions, you get a shitload of ebuilds to host and sync. RubyGems does a very good job dealing with versions and dependencies, so it's IMHO a good idea not to delegate this to Portage unless absolutely necessary. We better find a way for Portage and RubyGems to work hand in hand. What do you think? -sven

Re: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation

2008-08-21 Thread Sven Vermeulen
d upon the Software. The rest of the paragraph is about obtaining (or trying to obtain) its source code or application behavior, i.e. learn the program, not modify it. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-03 Thread Sven Köhler
gin 2.4.3 which has fixed the ICQ login issue. You saw the bump-request coming, didn't you? 2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early version bump requests? - Oh please don't discourage bump-requests, even if they are 0-day. I like them because I CC to t

Re: EAPI definition Was: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-27 Thread Sven Vermeulen
g features from the package manager." Most of the time, the user is happy with the answer ;-) Wkr, Sven Vermeulen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Good-bye

2007-11-25 Thread Sven Vermeulen
getic new developers ;-) Anyway, have fun and we'll sure see you around! Wkr, Sven Vermeulen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [portage] "download as"-feature

2007-10-20 Thread Sven Köhler
>> In an ebuild, i'd like to specify an "download as"-filename. That means, >> out there, there is a file called "http://host/myprogram-1.2.3/patch01"; >> which i'd like to download as "myprogram-1.2.3-patch01". > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177863 > > We're planning to support that

[gentoo-dev] [portage] "download as"-feature

2007-10-18 Thread Sven Köhler
want to discuss, before i make an RFE in BugZilla) Greetings, Sven signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] jmbsvicetto is now Sparc AT Subproject Lead

2007-10-18 Thread Sven Vermeulen
subproject from its beginning, and he was willing to > become its lead when I begged him to do so. Please give him the usual > Gentoo words of encouragement for which we are so well known. My condolences to Jorge... Or isn't that the encouragement you were looking for? *g* Hit the bug(

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Staff Developer: Maarten Bressers (mbres)

2007-08-28 Thread Sven Vermeulen
stinguish between K and C). Wkr, Sven Vermeulen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Sven Köhler
> There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a compressed > pci.ids file. And many of them are non-obvious. It took me more than > I little bit of effort after the zlib USE flag was first added to the > pciutils ebuild to figure out why so many packages where failing... Oh! Really

Re: [gentoo-dev] New (old) Developer: Dimitry Brad (diox)

2007-07-29 Thread Sven Vermeulen
But for the rest: always welcome Dimitry ! ;-) Wkr, Sven Vermeulen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Sven Köhler
>>> Why did you provocate this breakage? >> Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here. > > That is with USE=hal. Crap... Oh! So USE="hal" forces pciutils not to use zlib? And so the check, which the hal ebuild performs, should be modified to check for USE="hal" rather than for USE

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Sven Köhler
>> Why did you provocate this breakage? >> This is not a good idea, IMHO. > > No. And many gave up getting this sensible again. > As is, the default USE flags for a desktop profile lead to a compilation > failure when unattended due to this, which is very very bad. I'm not even complaining about

[gentoo-dev] why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Sven Köhler
Hi, so today, pciutils-2.2.4-r3 went stable on x86. It's a known issue, that pciutils compiled with zlib use-flag turned on (which is default) doesn't work with the version of hal, which is currently stable on x86. So at the moment, hal-0.5.9-r1 is stable on x86. It went stable weeks or even mont

[gentoo-dev] Re: USB disks - idea/question

2006-12-22 Thread Sven Köhler
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck schrieb: > On Saturday, 23 December 2006 2:40, Sven Köhler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> so as you plugin a USB-disk, the kernel will recognize it, and it will >> be called sda, sdb, sdc or whatever ... >> >> I don't like that - why doesn

[gentoo-dev] USB disks - idea/question

2006-12-22 Thread Sven Köhler
er distribution doing it like that. So what do you think? - is it possible? - is it a good idea? - is it such a good idea, so that gentoo becomes the first distribution doing it? - is it a bad idea to differ from all the other distros out there? Thanks, Sven signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: udev coldplugging and /etc/init.d/modules

2006-12-01 Thread Sven Köhler
> As others have said, look at using udev to name your network devices in > a persistant manner, it's the best solution. Yes, i agree. But i have thought about it, and i wonder, if it's going to work if: 1. udev loads the modules which results in a "natural order": saying eth0 and eth1 are used.

[gentoo-dev] Re: udev coldplugging and /etc/init.d/modules

2006-12-01 Thread Sven Köhler
>> Unfortunatly, the order of loading of modules defines the ordner of >> the network-interfaces (if you different types of network cards). > > This is what udev's interface renaming capability is for. Define names > for your interfaces according to their MAC address, for example, and > all is goo

[gentoo-dev] udev coldplugging and /etc/init.d/modules

2006-12-01 Thread Sven Köhler
. Unfortunatly, the order of loading of modules defines the ordner of the network-interfaces (if you different types of network cards). So can you imagine, loading the modules before udev's coldplug happens? Greetings, Sven signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare - orphaned files in /etc

2006-11-25 Thread Sven Köhler
Hi, i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules and 60-fuse.rules. The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't they? So that is _very_, _very_ unpractical, because the older your gentoo gets, the more of such orphaned files you get. Have you ever th

[gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.13 going into ~ARCH soon

2006-11-06 Thread Sven Köhler
>> In 1.13, we've removed the variable from /etc/conf.d/rc and it's now forced >> to /lib/rcscripts/init.d which is safe as /lib is always on the same >> partition as /. > > From a filesystem usage point of view though, storing actively changing > state data on /lib is ugly. The tmpfs /lib/rcs

  1   2   3   >