On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:44:57 -0700
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/04/12 11:45, William Hubbs wrote:
There are binaries in /{bin,sbin} which link against libraries in
/usr/lib for example.
We could try to have an exact list and figure out exactly what is it
and how impacting
On 28/04/12 23:44, Michał Górny wrote:
I have already opened bugs for many of them. But the list will increase
in time, and we'll either move a lot of libraries to /lib* or decide to
go the other way.
repeat after me EARLY BOOT, as in initramfs. In initramfs you don't have
/usr with everything
On 04/29/2012 12:04 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 28/04/12 23:44, Michał Górny wrote:
I have already opened bugs for many of them. But the list will increase
in time, and we'll either move a lot of libraries to /lib* or decide to
go the other way.
repeat after me EARLY BOOT, as in initramfs.
On 29/04/12 15:40, Zac Medico wrote:
Maybe it's reasonable for the initramfs to utilize a config file from
/etc of the future root filesystem, but having in depend on files from
the future /usr seems like a strange idea. Wouldn't it make more sense
to bundle all dependencies into the
On 10/04/12 11:45, William Hubbs wrote:
Also, I am going to reiterate what Greg said. This is not an issue with
udev, but with the entire linux ecosystem.
As in bluez using dbus and some mount helpers requiring libraries in /usr.
There are binaries in /{bin,sbin} which link against libraries
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
| 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes)
|
|See [4]: Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported
|configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and
|alternatives should be investigated. If it isn't, a lot of
|
On 04/22/2012 05:28 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
| 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes)
|
|See [4]: Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported
|configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and
|alternatives should be
On 04/22/2012 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On 04/22/2012 05:28 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
| 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes)
|
|See [4]: Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported
|configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:45:04 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:04:22PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
New udev and separate /usr partition
Decide on
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:04:22PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
New udev and separate /usr partition
Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported configuration.
If it is, newer udev can
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
New udev and separate /usr partition
Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported configuration.
If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and alternatives should be
investigated. If
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Greg KH gre...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
The council has voted in favour of a separate /usr being supported
(5 yes, 1 no vote).
What?
Perhaps the council should be the ones to clarify, but I think the
12 matches
Mail list logo
