2010-03-22 22:12:54 Jacob Godserv napisał(a):
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
item saying that python-3 will soon
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
that users
Duncan wrote:
...
++ - I can only add the saying With freedom comes great responsibility..
Maybe the python herd could maintain a little status page which covers
informations like:
- Estimated python 3 compatibility in respect to the packages in the
main tree.
- Recommendations if installing
On 03/20/2010 02:56 AM, Jean-Marc Hengen wrote:
Duncan wrote:
...
++ - I can only add the saying With freedom comes great responsibility..
Maybe the python herd could maintain a little status page which covers
informations like:
- Estimated python 3 compatibility in respect to the
2010-03-20 13:51:37 Peter Hjalmarsson napisał(a):
I have a question related to this:
If I have package X which supports python2 and python 3, and I install
it without python3 installed it will only install python2-files
(i.e. /usr/lib/python2.x/*), right?
What happens if I later install
2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a
link to documentation with
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500
Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100
Ben de Grootyng...@gentoo.org wrote:
