On 22/05/17 21:05, Matthias Maier wrote:
>> Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok,
>> we've clearly been working too hard this week, everyone stop, ITS PUB
>> O-CLOCK!"
> This is most definitely true for almost everything going on for the last
> days in Gentoo.
Just *da
> Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok,
> we've clearly been working too hard this week, everyone stop, ITS PUB
> O-CLOCK!"
This is most definitely true for almost everything going on for the last
days in Gentoo.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:24:24 +1000
Sam Jorna wrote:
> I suspect it's likely a misunderstanding - without notification, all
> anyone from Proxy Maint sees is proxy-maint being removed. An E-Mail
> to proxy-maint@g.o explaining that you've spoken to and are taking
> over proxying of the package wo
On Mon, 22 May 2017 06:10:11 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> ... Now that we know how it goes we can skip the rest and just glare
> at Michal for not being a reasonable person once more, and just
> continue doing useful stuff.
Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok,
we'v
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
> > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since
> > > they
> > > were unconditionally added to all packages
On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they
> > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer
> > in
> > metadata) they are the de facto
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:12:54AM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote:
> > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since
> >> they
> >> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-ge
On 22/05/17 05:12, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote:
>> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially
>>> since they
>>> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev
>>> maintainer in
>
On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote:
On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they
were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in
metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule e
On 05/20/2017 10:51 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job
as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do not have
to try to match him.
Was this comment really necessary
On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they
> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in
> metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else.
Just to clarify, the
>
> Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does...
Oh please cut it.
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 05/20/2017 11:06 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On sob, 2017-05-20 at 22:51 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job
>>> as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do
On sob, 2017-05-20 at 22:51 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job
> > as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do not have
> > to try to match him.
>
> Was this
On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job
> as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do not have
> to try to match him.
Was this comment really necessary?
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reach
On sob, 2017-05-20 at 21:57 +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> > I tried removing proxy-maint from metadata after multiple discussions
> > failed. Extra happiness towards monsieurp "but the GH PR is over 3 days
> > old, I have to commit" and gokt
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> I tried removing proxy-maint from metadata after multiple discussions
> failed. Extra happiness towards monsieurp "but the GH PR is over 3 days
> old, I have to commit" and gokturk "Yes I understand. I commit anyway"
>
> This has been an uph
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> I "was" package maintainer and relied on these versions.
>
> If I as maintainer have no control over such things, why am I maintainer,
> and why do I need an overlay?
>
>
> ... that sounds exquisitely confused, I have no idea why this disc
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one
> wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't. So now last person who
> touched it gets stuck with it.
>
For elasticsearch, you added yourself to the maintainers,
On 05/20/2017 12:43 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> ef2b2458815ba4e4694e0d5f3bbce239505ffbc8 - 2015-12-20
>
> Idella4's last commit on this package.
>
> 3d70356565d3213c370e1f64a85b55c3ded259f5 - 2016-01-06
>
> Patricks first direct commit to this package.
>
> <>
>
> e6175815b5792f09acd90627af5fe23f
On Fri, 19 May 2017 19:27:15 +0200
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> As far as I can see you were never the maintainer of at least
> app-misc/elasticsearch (I didn't check other possibly related
> packages), it was first proxied maintained through chainsaw, then
> later through proxy-maintainers her
On 05/19/2017 06:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> I have no idea how I could have fixed this without the QA+Comrel
> banhammer combo, which is a totally insane "fix" to a problem that
> shouldn't even exist. But I see no other options how to make people
> understand that "No means no".
>
> Is this
On 05/19/2017 03:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 18:38 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Bonus mention:
bbdc5412061adf598ed935697441a7d6b05f7614
app-admin/logstash-bin: drop old
Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko
That removed the versions I was using, so I better maintain th
On 05/18/2017 07:17 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Patrick Lauer mailto:patr...@gentoo.org>> wrote:
Ohey,
as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of
all elasticsearch-related packages.
For some strange reason I was listed there
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 18:38 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Bonus mention:
> bbdc5412061adf598ed935697441a7d6b05f7614
> app-admin/logstash-bin: drop old
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko
>
> That removed the versions I was using, so I better maintain the versions
> I use in an overlay
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Ohey,
>
> as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all
> elasticsearch-related packages.
> For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one
> wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't.
On Wed, 17 May 2017 18:38:28 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Ohey,
>
> as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all
> elasticsearch-related packages.
> For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no
> one wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 17.05.2017 kell 18:38, kirjutas Patrick Lauer:
> as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of
> all
> elasticsearch-related packages.
Reassignments should probably be coupled with bug reassignments as
well. You clearly need that, with having well over a
Ohey,
as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all
elasticsearch-related packages.
For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no
one wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't. So now last person
who touched it gets stuck with it.
Since pr
29 matches
Mail list logo