Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-13 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Just an idea without knowing all the details: Could - --emerge-info and --emerge-info-verbose options be added to paludis or - a converter script be written to convert paludis output to feel like emerge output to solves this issue? Would that technically be possible? Is paludis

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:21:37 +0200 Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote: Just an idea without knowing all the details: Could - --emerge-info and --emerge-info-verbose options be added to paludis or - a converter script be written to convert paludis output to feel like

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 09/04/2009 в 15:32 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: Please provide a list of packages that use custom configure scripts, that currently work with econf (including all the weird things it already passes), that would break with this change and whose ebuilds are using econf. I have yet to see

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing .la files...

2009-04-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
So we are now a year later, some people are getting excited at getting rid of .la files again but no decent solution has been presented yet that I am aware of. We've had two situations recently: * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264249 which got reverted *

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-13 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Taking any of it out would be removing things that are required to determine the cause of a bug. I doubt that's true in most cases: The information needed to finding the bug is a (possibly small) subset of the whole. I don't see how additionally providing a stripped

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:50:07 +0200 Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Taking any of it out would be removing things that are required to determine the cause of a bug. I doubt that's true in most cases: The information needed to finding the bug is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing .la files...

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 13 April 2009 17:17:36 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: So we are now a year later, some people are getting excited at getting rid of .la files again but no decent solution has been presented yet that I am aware of. We've had two situations recently: *

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-13 Thread Richard Freeman
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: This isn't a usability request. Making the use paludis --info cat/pkg text stand out more was a usability request, and I was happy to make that change. This is a few noxious trolls whining in an attempt to cause trouble. For those who have concerns with the paludis

[gentoo-dev] Re: `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-13 Thread Duncan
Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org posted 49e3d8dc.7090...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:29:16 -0400: It does seem a bit odd to ask somebody to imitate the emerge formatting of the output just to say that it matches. If somebody wants to create a script to do it they can