Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs:
app-dicts/stardict-freedict-eng-rus
app-doc/gimp-help
app-emulation/e-uae
app-emulation/uae
app-text/cuneiform (proxy maintained)
app-text/mathtex
app-text/yagf
dev-db/gigabase
dev-libs/guiloader-c++
dev-libs/guiloader
dev-libs/judy
As it's now empty
Thanks for joining, I am unsure about releasing its packages for up for
grabs and removing the herd if nobody joins :/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:08:06 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
dev-util/oprofile
Took this one, bumped the version and did some small fixes.
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
signature.asc
On Saturday 16 February 2013 14:08:06 Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs:
app-dicts/stardict-freedict-eng-rus
app-doc/gimp-help
app-emulation/e-uae
app-emulation/uae
app-text/cuneiform (proxy maintained)
app-text/mathtex
app-text/yagf
On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote:
sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode
sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode
Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or
not?
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description:
On 16/02/2013 07:08, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
What happens why a user runs --depclean and has a masked package
installed? Oh that's right, it uninstalls. My systems do that
automatically, but you are welcome to assume stupid user didn't read
messages if that is easier.
That's not right.
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode
I want this installed on my system.
sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode
But not this.
could we just remove them
Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution.
On the plus side it seems that these particular packages would
On 16/02/13 15:59, Peter Stuge wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode
I want this installed on my system.
sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode
But not this.
could we just remove them
Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution.
Having separate
On 16/02/2013 14:59, Peter Stuge wrote:
Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution.
Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your personal
lazyness.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
El mié, 06-02-2013 a las 18:17 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) escribió:
Hi ALL:
I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka)
dev-libs/libev
which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526
net-misc/ofono
need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.12)
El dom, 20-01-2013 a las 14:55 +, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 20 January 2013 09:10, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Only one package is inside it:
net-misc/capi4hylafax
It should probably be moved to kingtaco (if he is still interested...
are you?) or maintainer-needed until
El dom, 03-02-2013 a las 13:42 -0800, Tim Harder escribió:
On 2013-02-03 Sun 13:21, Cyprien Nicolas wrote:
Who is behind lisp overlay? Only you or more people that could also be
contacted to try to get them maintaining guile? Thanks for the info
We are 2 or 3 non-dev volonteers. pchrist is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/2013 08:44 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote:
sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode
sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode
Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or
not?
ozzie firmware #
On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do that
now.
Go for it.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution.
Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your
personal lazyness.
Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue.
Ulrich
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do
that now.
Go for it.
Please don't.
Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/2013 10:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten wrote:
Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution.
Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your
personal lazyness.
On 16/02/2013 16:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue.
Which Peter's remark is not about.
I do feel we need to fix the license issue, but I don't think this is
compounding anything to clear up the tree first.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Kernel sources providing /lib/firmware itself shouldn't be a problem
either, as that's just a dir, which many packages may own. The
individual firmware files would be a problem, but the USE=firmware
RDEPEND
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution.
Use savedconfig
linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there,
which was my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create
a savedconfig without installing the package.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \Zero Chaos\ Farina wrote:
Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue.
If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not
install those firmware packages.
Yes, but ACCEPT_LICENSE wouldn't work. It would still be necessary to
include all
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \Zero Chaos\ Farina wrote:
Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue.
If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not
install those firmware packages.
Yes, but
2013/2/16 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org:
As it's now empty
Thanks for joining, I am unsure about releasing its packages for up for
grabs and removing the herd if nobody joins :/
I did some work there wrt myspell dictionaries that are to be ported
to new official layout so if anyone wants to
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Mike Gilbert wrote:
I'm sure I'm not the only one who really doesn't care about having
ACCEPT_LICENSE work properly for a package full of binary blobs. It
seems like a rather insignificant reason to split the package up.
Nobody has suggested to split it up. But until
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Look into the WHENCE file and be horrified. Taking just the first ten
items (of a total 114):
Unknown license (3 times)
GPL, but without source (3 times)
All rights reserved
BSD, without source
Right for
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 16/02/2013 07:08, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
What happens why a user runs --depclean and has a masked package
installed? Oh that's right, it uninstalls. My systems do that
automatically, but you are
On 16/02/2013 20:18, Alec Warner wrote:
So because we did things badly in the past, that is an excuse to do
things badly in the future? :)
No. I still argue that this is NOT doing things badly.
Masking a package will NOT cause it to get unmerged by default.
The whole line of thought that Rick
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
So because we did things badly in the past, that is an excuse to
do things badly in the future? :)
No. I still argue that this is NOT doing things badly.
Masking a package will NOT cause it to get unmerged by default.
Hm, can you expand on by default ?
When will
On 16 February 2013 19:31, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
So because we did things badly in the past, that is an excuse to
do things badly in the future? :)
No. I still argue that this is NOT doing things badly.
Masking a package will NOT cause it to get
On 2013-02-16 Sat 05:08, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs:
net-libs/libmnl
Added to netmon herd.
Tim
pgpHn4U3M2RcW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/2013 10:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten wrote:
On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do
that now.
Go for it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/16/2013 10:29 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Kernel sources providing /lib/firmware itself shouldn't be a problem
either, as that's just a dir, which many
32 matches
Mail list logo
