lib version, so you've to
patch their Makefile and in the end, patch the ebuild anyways.
Hope these thoughts help,
Christian Parpart.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 07 June 2007 09:10:41 Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyways, thoughts?
> >
> > --Kumba
>
> +1
+1 here too
> possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
> confused with net-im/gossip )
gentoo-soap, lol!
signature.asc
Des
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 23:53:51 Markus Ullmann wrote:
> Some numbers to back Vlastimil up
>
> > Yep there's still development going on, devs commit ebuilds and stuff.
>
> http://cia.vc/stats/project/gentoo
>
> > Also, as said many times, number of devs participating in flamewars here
> > is
t still doesn't mean that *all* of us act like that.
regards,
Christian Parpart.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ebuilds, in fact, i'd be happy to
know there's yet another package that can be installed using gentoo's portage
on yet another architecture.
How do you feel with that idea?
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
odules) on your system(s) and please report any oddies you
experience.
Thanks in advance,
Christian Parpart.
[1] http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?apache-2.0.53
[2] http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?apache-1.3.33-r2
--
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
15:57:13 up 50 days,
eryone to configure their new apache files (httpd.conf for
commonapache/apache.conf) from scratch.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
--
the following rfc contains how to quote on lists like this:
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
17:57:59 up 18 days, 7:04, 0 users, load average:
existing svn repositories to be
merged into the gentoo svn repository, and we're offering
already existing sub-projects' CVS directories to be converted
on-demand. so, as soon as we're about to announce this service,
just drop us a note.
ka0ttic, you maybe overran me with your mail :-
Gentoo
> infrastructure. That's the purpose of this GLEP.
I see, there's a greater demand on this subject than I even thought
about. I even expected that you'll all kill me for the whols SVN
alternative thoughts I'm raising.
Christian Parpart.
--
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
19:45:33 up 18 days, 8:51, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.73, 0.60
pgpbblmElribB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 10 April 2005 7:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:44:19 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | So, sooner or shorter, we're announcing here some news on
> | this subject (oops, did I already by this?, so, I can say,
oved off of bkbits.net as soon as possible,
> and the gentoo server is
> not a current solution :(
could you be please more specific? I mean. why isn't it a current solution?
because SVN isn't right in place or because of the copyright problems still
around or ...?
thanks,
On Sunday 10 April 2005 8:34 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:27:03 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Both have pros and cons. Well, the ASF has everyting converted into a
> | single repository and they seem to be just lucky with it
On Sunday 10 April 2005 7:18 pm, Jason Wever wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 18:43:13 +0200
>
> Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course, we did not wanna push nearly-everyones little blindly
> > executed `emerge -uvD world` into hell. But everyone makes
;getting started" docs anylonger as a default webpage
and we did not agree to their current plain'n'ugly "It works!"
page. Once we've set up the server documentation e.g.
(that one on apache-svn repos that still exists) than yeah, lets
put it up. But for so long? no way. (excep
On Monday 11 April 2005 8:26 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:57:12 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | > SVN uses transactions and
> | > changesets. These make a heck of a lot more sense if they're done on
> | &g
On Monday 11 April 2005 10:42 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:23:29 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | On Monday 11 April 2005 8:26 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:57:12 +0200 Christian Parpart
with it. No one
said that cvs will go away. I'm tired of reading your 'svn is hard to merge
because it *is* hard to merge' posts :(
Sorry, but this is how it comes over.
Christian Parpart.
--
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
03:28:51 up 20 days, 16:35, 0 users, load average: 0.40, 0.27, 0.21
pgpaR4ulngk6Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 3:03 pm, Aaron Walker wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:33:46 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > | Finally, just don't use svn if you feel that uncomfortable with it. No
> >
at I don't have to live with the old shitty behavior
again.
Seriousely, why did we put all our power into those improvements when we're
now about to revert mostly everything?
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
--
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
09:29:00 up 27 days,
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 2:14 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Christian Parpart wrote:
> > And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to support
> > this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed apache
> > httpd 2.1 into the
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 10:59 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:36, Christian Parpart wrote:
> > And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to
> > support this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushing p.mask'ed
g google, I found lots of commercial software of this
subject and just a few few (serious) open sourced ones.
So, finally, in what category could those packages be placed in?
Thanks in advance,
Christian Parpart.
--
23:17:49 up 119 days, 12:25, 0 users, load average: 4.17, 2.57, 3.12
pgpY
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 23:58, Christian Parpart wrote:
> dev-libs/libyacsutil
> - the support library (client/server)
> community-libs/libyacs
> - the YaCS core framework library (server)
> community-server/yacsd
> - the UNIX daemon process finally serving the com
I understand.
So, as Oliview proposed the same like you, I gonna stick with this then.
Thanks all,
Christian Parpart.
--
00:23:29 up 119 days, 13:31, 0 users, load average: 1.47, 1.90, 2.09
pgpKmYGgJBy43.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ially where we recognized, that debian even did some more effords on
this partiular package.
don't flame me now, but I forgot what package exactly it has been, however,
the wact still remains.
finally, genlop still has a user base (including me). So I wouldn't dare in
dropping it.
Rega
be the same package; though slotted, and with differend homepage
URL.
But anyway, I feel that these cases in realworld are really very rare (except
the the license-change thingy)
just my thoughts,
Christian Parpart.
--
05:28:28 up 140 days, 18:36, 0 users, load average: 0.14, 0.18, 0
lots of more packages, but mysql is one
use case where I myself ran into;
Do we have a general accepted gentoo policy for this?
And... any thoughts on this subject?
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88490
--
15:56:43 up 148 days, 5:04, 2 users, load
On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:01, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 18/08/2005-16:28:40(+0200): Christian Parpart types
>
> > Using the "minimal" useflag for this - IMHO - is a misuse of the idea of
> > "minimal" semantically - as I do understand minimal in a
have to add it to his
emerge args as well. I see no problems there - instead: it would be a great
enheancement. (IMO)
> All in all, I think it isn't worth even attempting at this time.
read above. do you still think so? If so, why?
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.o
return 0;
}
Of course, you might think WTF do some guy need this, but hey, programmers are
really creative, and use what the compiler accepts - I myself ran into this
while porting my apps/libs to amd64. And think of it, not everybody has the
money to grab one.
Congrats,
Christian Parpart.
pgpKwfrGKm0Ue.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 02 September 2005 06:28, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > Christian Parpart wrote: [Thu Sep 01 2005, 05:45:43PM CDT]
> >
> >>This just leads me to assume you're not really a coder (wrt native
> >>programming languages like C/C++),
(no-herd, vapier)
> > dev-db/stldb4
>
> generally i dont need help with these as the upstream author is a pretty
> cool guy and gets back to me :)
> -mike
but having some backup is always the safer way, in case some of us is AFK for
some unobvious reasons and a security patc
t; category:
>
> Is this bit really necessary?
indeed, it at least helps curious c++ devs to browse through some yet unknown
c++ libs and he maybe finds something useful.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
pgpzHaXkO28CW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 17 September 2005 14:01, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On 17/9/2005 13:33:30, Christian Parpart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 September 2005 11:36, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > > On 17/9/2005 0:20:57, Mark Loeser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
&g
understand you correctly, I'd even not use dev-cpp as category,
instead something that contains the word `platform` or `framework` in it, as
STLport/boost/STL(libstdc++-v3,...) and others are exactly of that kind.
However, we've some more no-herd'ed packages to put into this new potential
c++ herd - but these are two different discussions/threads IMHO.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
pgpmomqy0QfGN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 19 September 2005 15:22, warnera6 wrote:
> Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> >> I think that dev-util is a very specific category containing
> >> development utilities of some sort. There might be some
> >> misclassifications in them, but from a user perspective I don't reall
36 matches
Mail list logo
