On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (12 Mar 2012)
> # Severely broken wrt bugs #179178, #331181, #334835, #350059,
> # #372839, #380155, #380627, #381055, #383515, #383553, #384687,
> # and #403399. Search bugzilla with keyword lilypond. Nothing
> # left i
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:08:27PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:04:31 -0700
>> Greg KH wrote:
>> > Not always, no, it isn't obvious that something didn't start up
>> > correctly, or that it didn't fully load properly.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 10:11 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
>> What's wrong with:
>> * having an "early mounts" list file
>> * having an "early modules" list file
>> * init system in early boot (e.g., OpenRC in init.sh) loading "early
>> modules" and m
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> So, anyone been thinking about this? I have, and it's not pretty.
>
> Should I worry about this and how it affects Gentoo, or not worry about
> Gentoo right now and just focus on the other issues?
>
> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company'
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
> wrote:
>> On 01/08/2012 23:42, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> Honestly, if some asian person has whatever charset that I often find in
>>> spam messages, but is not UTF-8, are you then going to t
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:38:48 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> I certainly don't feel safe anymore running non-upstream code in
>> production boxes.
>
> You don't run it unless you explicitly tick on that you want
> experimental functionality
d as all the other optional
> languages and disabled by default, but I'd like to know if there are other
> opinions.
>
If you do disable fortran by default, please make a news item, if you
don't mind. I know this will effect some percentage of our scientific
user base (including my
pp, even differing versions of
the same webapp. If it's not doing that, its a bug in webapp-config.
I'm adding blueness@g.o to CC since he is working on this package some.
Thanks,
Matt
Matthew Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.
GPG: 111B C438 35FA EDB5 B5D3 736F 45EE 5DC0 0878 9D46
sues exist that make
libressl unsafe for anything other than play time.
Thanks,
Matthew Summers
Gentoo Foundation Inc.
GPG: 111B C438 35FA EDB5 B5D3 736F 45EE 5DC0 0878 9D46
Greetings Gentoo Devs,
I'm writing to let everyone know about a Gentoo Birds of a Feather at
PyCon 2008 in Chicago.
We have room Love Int'l A scheduled for Saturday, March 15, from 6PM to
(PM (or later).
Please post to this forum if you have a moment, and you are planning on
attending PyCon.
http
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 10:29 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > On 11/10/2010 02:42 PM, Peter Volkov wrote:
> >> В Втр, 09/11/2010 в 18:20 -0500, Anthony G. Basile пишет:
> >>> Title: Restructuring of Hardened profiles
> >> [...]
> >>> Display-If-Profil
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Matthew Summers
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/2010 10:29 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> > On 11/10/2010 02:42 PM, Peter Volkov wrote:
>> >> В Втр, 09/11/2010 в 18:20 -0500, Anth
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> to better communicate USE_PYTHON we could use:
>
> - a portage news entry
>
> - notifications from within ebuilds
>
> - a users guide counterpart of
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/Python/developersguide.xml
>
> - mentio
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Natanael Olaiz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to make a live-ebuild for a private subversion repository.
> I see in the developers manual [1] that CVS have the vars ECVS_USER and
> ECVS_PASS, but cannot found equivalent ones for SVN [2].
>
> Anyone knows what would b
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 09:05 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
> > Now, as to whether to include the value ESVN_PASSWORD in the ebuild, I
> would
> > not do that. Personally, I would setup svn+ssh and use an ssh key to
> access
> &g
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> Why not specify all the CAMERAS you know about as being on by default in
> the profile? Users who care enough can override this with an explicit
> subset.
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh
This is how ALSA_CARDS and LCD_DEVICES are handled now. Its l
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Hans de Graaff wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 17:20 +, Corentin Chary wrote:
>>
>>> misc:
>>> - automatic bug report
>>> - automatic email report for maintainer/herds
>>
>> I'm not sure if this makes se
Hi,
I have a few suggestions regarding this major change to Gentoo systems.
1. We should determine and then announce the precise date (appears to
be in May) and time that baselayout-2 will be stabilized via:
1.1 A front page News item on www.g.o (PR team assemble!),
1.2 The main MLs (gentoo-a
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 04 Mai 2011, 00:18:08 schrieb Alec Warner:
>> ask on the gentoo-scm list?
>>
>> -A
>
> I'd say this is of enough general interest, and the relevant people are for
> sure also subscribed here...
>
> -A
>
> --
> Andreas K. Huet
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 05/05/2011 03:44 PM, Marijn wrote:
>> I confess I know next to nothing about Blender, but what exactly makes
>> it so hard to port the logo to a recent version?
>
> My experience modelling in Blender is zero, so it's hard to tell to
>
Ladies and Gentlemen,
After consultation and discussion at length with several developers, I
am writing to announce the impending revival of the tool known as
app-admin/webapp-config effective immediately. If any fellow
developers or motivated users from our superb community wish to join
in this e
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Questions:
>
> - What does reviving mean in detail?
> A re-write? A somewhat compatible re-write?
I am not necessarily interested in a complete re-write unless its
really warranted due to support for new features. First things firs
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:01 AM, justin wrote:
> On 22/06/11 09:55, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:15:35 +0200
>> justin wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/06/11 16:18, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, justin wrote:
> HI,
>
> with the addition of the fortran-2
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>> * Robin H. Johnson schrieb am 05.08.11 um 02:46 Uhr:
>> [...]
>>> That leaves the only reasonable solution as #2. In terms of minimal
>>> impact, I propose that we offer users with a s
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 19:45, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm forking from a thread on gentoo-project:
>>
>> On 17:26 Wed 17 Aug 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Personally, I want to shrink portage. There is no way for 250 listed
>>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:33:14PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > > I'm going to be doing a minor bit of Bugzilla maintenance later
> > > tonight that will need 10-15 minutes of downtime.
> ...
> > > I'm planning on starting around 2011
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:20 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 10/14/11 12:39 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:29:19PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:16 PM, "Pawe?? Hajdan, Jr."
>>> wrote:
OK, so what are the _blocking_ reasons for no EAPI 4 su
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> this seems like a bit of a tempest in a teapot
It cracks me up, this colloquialism.
Please don't change this back.
In theory, this should make Portage slightly more efficient since it
won't be performing the simultaneous operation of spewi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le dimanche 19 février 2012 à 12:06 +0100, Justin a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> any objections against following patch for subversion.eclass?
>> Fixes bug 401737. Basically respects ESVN_{USER,PASSWORD} during
>> reemerge of a package.
>>
>>
29 matches
Mail list logo
