Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-03-01 Thread Ed W
Hmm, all interesting stuff You mention in the notes also that openrc has some kind of keepalive function which can restart crashing services. Can point me towards how that works (assuming it needs some kind of config?) I haven't had any time yet to try this on a test machine, but interested

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-03-01 Thread Roy Marples
On Saturday 01 March 2008 22:26:24 Ed W wrote: Hmm, all interesting stuff You mention in the notes also that openrc has some kind of keepalive function which can restart crashing services. Can point me towards how that works (assuming it needs some kind of config?) No such function :) We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-03-01 Thread Bernd Steinhauser
Roy Marples schrieb: On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote: On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and starting to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Ed W
Hi baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an official dev. Answering my own question (for the record). I found some explanation here: http://lycos.dropcode.net/gregarius/author.php?author=Roy_Marples__uberlord_ Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Doug Klima
Ed W wrote: Hi baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an official dev. Answering my own question (for the record). I found some explanation here: http://lycos.dropcode.net/gregarius/author.php?author=Roy_Marples__uberlord_ Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Doug Klima
Ed W wrote: Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great! Funnily enough I came across this earlier today for different reasons. However, I hadn't realised that it was a full baselayout competitor? baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Ed W
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great! Funnily enough I came across this earlier today for different reasons. However, I hadn't realised that it was a full baselayout competitor? Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a baselayout

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Roy Marples
On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote: On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and starting to push it out to users?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Roy Marples
On Friday 29 February 2008 15:56:44 Ed W wrote: Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great! Funnily enough I came across this earlier today for different reasons. However, I hadn't realised that it was a full baselayout competitor? Does Roy hang out

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Benedikt Bšoehm
Roy Marples schrieb: [2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant). I don't and probably never will support vserver personally, but will work with Gentoo developers ensuring that at least one version works.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Stefan Hellermann
I just tried openrc and I really like it! All the things changed from baselayout-2.0.0-rc6 are really good ideas! good work! Thanks! But bugs are still being found and fixed - although at a slow rate :) Two small things happened here: After Login I the shell looks like: -bash-3.2# when I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Roy Marples
On Friday 29 February 2008 18:32:44 Stefan Hellermann wrote: I just tried openrc and I really like it! All the things changed from baselayout-2.0.0-rc6 are really good ideas! good work! Thanks! :) Two small things happened here: After Login I the shell looks like: -bash-3.2# when I start

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Doug Klima
Stefan Hellermann wrote: Roy Marples schrieb: Two small things happened here: After Login I the shell looks like: -bash-3.2# when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment is not setup correctly the first time. Doesn't sound like an OpenRC issue as such as bash

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Stefan Hellermann
Roy Marples schrieb: Two small things happened here: After Login I the shell looks like: -bash-3.2# when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment is not setup correctly the first time. Doesn't sound like an OpenRC issue as such as bash sets up it's own prompt.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Stefan Hellermann
Doug Klima schrieb: Stefan Hellermann wrote: Roy Marples schrieb: Two small things happened here: After Login I the shell looks like: -bash-3.2# when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment is not setup correctly the first time. Doesn't sound like an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Ed Wildgoose
btw: All my problem are gone ... somehow I managed to not install baselayout from Roys overlay, I only installed openrc. Thanks Roy for your help! So just to be clear, you need to install both openrc AND baselayout from the layman profile? Sounds sensible enough Cheers Ed W --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Ed Wildgoose
Benedikt Bšoehm wrote: Roy Marples schrieb: [2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant). I don't and probably never will support vserver personally, but will work with Gentoo developers ensuring that at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Ed Wildgoose
[2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant). I guess I could just check it out instead of asking but What's missing from the busybox s-s-daemon? I am using the busybox version 95% successfully

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?

2008-02-29 Thread Roy Marples
On Friday 29 February 2008 23:23:34 Ed Wildgoose wrote: [2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant). I guess I could just check it out instead of asking but What's missing from the busybox