Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I've got portage's dev-perl/XML-Parser-2.36, but nevertheless several
> packages have started to fail during emerge for lack of Perl's
> XML::Parser.
> Even the simple script fails to run under perl:
>> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
>>
>> use XML::Parser;
>>
>> print "yes\n";
>
> Do
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:57:48 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Dealing with unexpected side
> effects of syncing in-use files could be a lot more problematic.
perhaps a digest of some kind? md5 the files, write up a little script
to keep the rest of the nodes synced up?
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST)
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files
> /etc/conf.d/hostname
> /etc/conf.d/net
>
> I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating
> GenToo upto several times a week)
> and 'rsync' the other ones.
I've got portage's dev-perl/XML-Parser-2.36, but nevertheless several
packages have started to fail during emerge for lack of Perl's
XML::Parser.
Even the simple script fails to run under perl:
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
>
> use XML::Parser;
>
> print "yes\n";
Do I have to get it from CPAN?
Consider li
>>> Anyway, the point of all this is to prevent an HD failure from
>>> stopping the system. An SSD is much safer, right?
>>
>> SSDs are still relatively new technology, so predicting failure rates is
>> less reliable. What's wrong with using RAID-1? It's proven technology and
>> totally resistant
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Mike Mazur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:23, Dale wrote:
> > Mike Mazur wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:44, Fernando Antunes
> wrote:
> >>> I don't use xorg.conf in my notebook Lenovo T61, Intel 965GSM , xorg
> and
> >>> xfce ~x86, gentoo 2.
I read on this list that the kernel needs *some* swap, even just a
tiny amount, to function properly. Is that true? If so, do you think
it would be OK to put this tiny amount of swap on a cheap SSD?
>>>
>>> I have no swap and things work just fine. (8 gigs of RAM)
>>>
>>> Obviously
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:23, Dale wrote:
> Mike Mazur wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:44, Fernando Antunes wrote:
>>> I don't use xorg.conf in my notebook Lenovo T61, Intel 965GSM , xorg and
>>> xfce ~x86, gentoo 2.6.30 with KMS, anymore.
>>> Both kernel and X switch to 1280x800 reso
On 07/30/2009 06:12 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Friday 31 July 2009 00:05:16 Harry Putnam wrote:
>>> Somebody know how I to so send mail with IP and Date/time when same
>>> user login on shell ( remote or local ) ?
>>>
>>> I work with another admin's and I never told me when they access a
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:46:17 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> No, on the 'master' machine I have in /etc/make.conf
> FEATURES="buildpkg -stricter"
>
> and on the clones I use '-k'.
>
> But still, portage checks dependencies on the clone.
> And, if it sees a problem (like those when upgradi
On 31 Jul, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:59:02 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> I've done so in the past but I've made bad experience.
>> Unfortunately portage isn't so clever, yet.
>
> portage is a lot cleverer than it used to be, especially with regard to
> blocks.
Yes
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:59:02 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I've done so in the past but I've made bad experience.
> Unfortunately portage isn't so clever, yet.
portage is a lot cleverer than it used to be, especially with regard to
blocks.
> Many times (on the 'clones', as well) I had t
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files
> /etc/conf.d/hostname
> /etc/conf.d/net
>
> I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating
> GenToo upto several times a week)
> and 'rsync' the other ones.
>
> Now,
On 31 Jul, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:07:14 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files
>> /etc/conf.d/hostname
>> /etc/conf.d/net
>>
>> I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating
>> GenToo upto several times a wee
Hi,
I have 4 identical machines, they only differ in the 2 files
/etc/conf.d/hostname
/etc/conf.d/net
I'd like to maintain only one of them (updating
GenToo upto several times a week)
and 'rsync' the other ones.
Now, rsync'ing a life root filesystem is risky.
I don't see any problems for the FS
15 matches
Mail list logo
