On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 05:09 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
The equal sign was a mistake. I've actually been meaning to poke you about
that. At the same time you should drop the --emptytree parsing and just
use --deep directly. With the circular deps in the tree now that gets much
better
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 05:39:01 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
However, paludis does have some missing features that may be critical for
your environment: binary packages (both building and using)
True. And it misses pkgmoves and slotmoves (profiles/updates/*).
and a revdep-rebuild
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 07:20:45 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 05:39:01 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
However, paludis does have some missing features that may be critical for
your environment:
a revdep-rebuild equivalent (although this can be hacked around)
With the
On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:09:10 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I found check_linkage.rb, but it's not installed (or linked) to any of the
standard $PATH directories. Instead, it's in a demo directory. Is it
fully functional?
Yes. You run it with ruby. It does still lack a couple of features
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 21:20:52 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:09:10 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I found check_linkage.rb, but it's not installed (or linked) to any of
the standard $PATH directories. Instead, it's in a demo directory. Is
it fully functional?
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 04:20 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses
with --package-names because of the lack of support for the
=category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still
supports.. :)
Hey, I'm
On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:37:52 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
If it's really useful, it should be chmod'd +x and installed or linked
into /usr/sbin. I can do that myself (in that case /usr/local/sbin), but
such wonderful utilities shouldn't be hidden. :)
I can't really disagree with that,
On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:57:53 Paul Varner wrote:
But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses
with --package-names because of the lack of support for the
=category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still
supports.. :)
Hey, I'm proud of
I haven't done an emerge on my server in quite a while, but now that
I've upgraded the CPU/RAM, I figure it's about time.
There are a few packages I'm a bit apprehensive about upgrading. exim
being one. I hate that MTA. It was a nightmare to setup and get working
properly, and now I don't want to
On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Daevid Vincent wrote:
I haven't done an emerge on my server in quite a while, but now that
I've upgraded the CPU/RAM, I figure it's about time.
There are a few packages I'm a bit apprehensive about upgrading.
exim being one. I hate that MTA. It was a nightmare to setup
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 10:32:23 Daevid Vincent wrote:
* mail-mta/exim
Latest version available: 4.67
Latest version installed: 4.54
Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest]
Homepage:http://www.exim.org/
So I have this in my package.mask:
=mail-mta/exim-4.55
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 06:51:12 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 10:32:23 Daevid Vincent wrote:
* mail-mta/exim
Latest version available: 4.67
Latest version installed: 4.54
Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest]
Homepage:
12 matches
Mail list logo
