On 25/08/2017 09:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:12:52 PM CEST Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 24/08/2017 22:20, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote:
>> J. Roeleveld
On Friday, 25 August 2017 08:21:53 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:12:52 PM CEST Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > [3] In this case, I'd be willing to
> > s/pain/enormous amounts of pain, on shaming youtube video/g
>
> Don't forget to share the link to that video...
>
> --
> Joo
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:12:52 PM CEST Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/08/2017 22:20, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote:
> >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>> On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 G
wabe wrote:
> wabe wrote:
>
>> Dale wrote:
>>
>>> OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are
>>> using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to
>>> something stupid like Seamonkey/thunderbird just did.
>>>
>>> To put it simply, I'm considering switc
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 6:41:58 PM CEST Dale wrote:
>
>> root@fireball / # du -shc
>> /home/dale/.mozilla/seamonkey/q6o6ulhz.default/Mail/
>> 3.9G/home/dale/.mozilla/seamonkey/q6o6ulhz.default/Mail/
>> 3.9Gtotal
>> root@fireball / #
> Mine is at about 40G
That's
On 24/08/2017 22:20, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> Thunderbird.
>>
>> I have no
wabe wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
> > OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are
> > using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to
> > something stupid like Seamonkey/thunderbird just did.
> >
> > To put it simply, I'm considering switching away from
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote:
> > >> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > >>> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > Thunderbird.
> >
> > I hav
Dale wrote:
> OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are
> using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to
> something stupid like Seamonkey/thunderbird just did.
>
> To put it simply, I'm considering switching away from Seamonkey here
> and just ma
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote:
> >> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> Thunderbird.
>
> I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 6:41:58 PM CEST Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> >> Thunderbird.
> >>
> >> I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in
> >> dovecot imap folders and every client out there can rea
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote:
>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
>>> wrote:
Thunderbird.
I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in
dovecot imap folders and every client out there can
On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thunderbird.
>>>
>>> I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in
>>> dovecot imap folders and every client out there can read them. MUA
>>> incompa
On 24/08/2017 19:54, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 16:59:21 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On 24 August 2017 16:50:32 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
>
>>> OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are
>>> using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to
>
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 16:59:21 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 24 August 2017 16:50:32 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
> >OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are
> >using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to
> >something stupid like Seamonkey/thunde
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>>
>> Thunderbird.
>>
>> I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in
>> dovecot imap folders and every client out there can read them. MUA
>> incompatibilities just do not happen to me anymore
On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
>On 24/08/2017 16:50, Dale wrote:
>> Mick wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>>
I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't
>set some
idiotic font or background colou
On 24 August 2017 16:50:32 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
>Mick wrote:
>> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>>> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't
>set some
>>> idiotic font or background colours)
>> I don't mind messages which contain both fo
On 24/08/2017 16:50, Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
>> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>>> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set some
>>> idiotic font or background colours)
>> I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the
On Thursday 24 August 2017 09:50:32 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set
> >> some idiotic font or background colours)
> >
> > I don't mind messages which contain both
Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set some
>> idiotic font or background colours)
> I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the mail client
> render the content accord
On Tuesday 22 August 2017 19:37:10 Mick wrote:
> PS. I think Peter may be around the corner any minute now, to correct my
> English too! Ha, ha, ha!
Funny you should say that :)
I've been offline for a few days and I'm only just catching up.
I don't often waste everybody's time trying to ach
On 24 August 2017 10:55:52 GMT+02:00, Mick wrote:
>On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't
>set some
>> idiotic font or background colours)
>
>I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the
On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set some
> idiotic font or background colours)
I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the mail client
render the content according to the preferenc
On 23 August 2017 22:10:10 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
>On 23/08/2017 21:26, Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote:
You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative
>problem, except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgra
On 23/08/2017 21:26, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
>>> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
>>> multipart/alternative went through.
>>
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
>> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem,
>> except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc)
>> where multipart/alternative went through.
>>> I woul
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
>> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
>> multipart/alternative went through.
>>
>> I would never design an email clien
On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
> multipart/alternative went through.
>
> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alterna
On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote:
>Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem,
>except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc)
>where multipart/alternative went through.
>>
>> I would never design an email cli
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except
> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
> multipart/alternative went through.
>
> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by
> default, an
On 22/08/2017 17:41, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
>>> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
>>> says it is. Can someone tell me for
You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except one
message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where
multipart/alternative went through.
I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by default,
and might design an email client to
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 16:41:54 BST Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I have this
> You have not defined what "this" is. The word "this" is being used here as a
> determinant (I think), but it is not preceded by a sen
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 16:41:54 BST Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote:
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> I have this
You have not defined what "this" is. The word "this" is being used here as a
determinant (I think), but it is not preceded by a sentence defining it
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
>> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
>> says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is
>> sending
Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
> says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is
> sending as it should? Text only I hope.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
> says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is
> sending as it should? Text only I
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
> says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is
> sending as it should? Text only I
I only see content-type text/plain.
So it seems to be working from my POV.
Todd
On 8/22/2017 9:01 AM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
says it is. Can someone te
Howdy,
I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone
replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings
says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is
sending as it should? Text only I hope.
Thanks.
Dale
:-) :-)
41 matches
Mail list logo