Recently I found that new kernels were not booting for me, because they could
not assemble the LVM partition that I use for the root filesystem.
Booting back to my old kernel still worked.
I have tracked this back to the lvm2 version.
After booting with the old kernel, I ran lvm and tried the
Am 27.09.2013 12:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.09.2013 01:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
systemd-analyze blame to see what is taking so long.
systemd-delta to see what changes from upstream do you have.
Thanks ... I cleaned up some cruft already and will test some
boot-process
Am 25.09.2013 01:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
systemd-analyze blame to see what is taking so long.
systemd-delta to see what changes from upstream do you have.
Thanks ... I cleaned up some cruft already and will test some
boot-process soon. Still on the road ...
On 23/09/13 17:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd
like the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post.
Please disable
Am 23.09.2013 16:30, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
Did you read my next email? There is no need for the extra swap unit. I was
missing a couple of kernel options and to compile LVM2 and cryptsetup with
some USE flags. Everything works as expected; but you need to put the swap
in fstab.
got it
systemd-analyze blame to see what is taking so long.
systemd-delta to see what changes from upstream do you have.
Regards.
On Sep 24, 2013 4:47 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 23.09.2013 16:30, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
Did you read my next email? There is no need for
Am 21.09.2013 23:49, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
OK, so I conducted another experiment, to see if I was able to make
systemd *not* to work with an exotic combination of underlying
storage. I did the following:
- 4 drives, all of them in RAID5.
- The resulting /dev/md127 was put in a
Am 23.09.2013 09:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Yes, I reported this issue back then ... but I don't have the encrypted
swap in /etc/fstab.
I only have:
# cat /etc/crypttab
swap /dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M080G2GC_CVPO015404LR080JGN-part5
/dev/urandom
Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with
understanding that strange escaping etc ... :-(
I have now:
# cat /etc/systemd/system/dev-disk-by\\x2did-dm\\x2dname\\x2dswap.swap
[Unit]
#After=systemd-cryptsetup.service
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like
the plague/all the more...
On 2013-09-23 4:21 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with
Am 23.09.2013 13:00, schrieb Tanstaafl:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like
the plague/all the more...
I understand that, yes ... it is unnecessary complex from my point of
view as well.
Swap that is encrypted from scratch everytime you boot up isn't the
On Sep 23, 2013 3:22 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with
understanding that strange escaping etc ... :-(
I have now:
# cat
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like
the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post.
After I got LVM2, mdraid, and LUKS working with systemd, I just decided
that, for me, neither LVM2,
On 2013-09-23 10:37 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd
like the plague/all the more...
Please don't top
OK, so I conducted another experiment, to see if I was able to make
systemd *not* to work with an exotic combination of underlying
storage. I did the following:
- 4 drives, all of them in RAID5.
- The resulting /dev/md127 was put in a Physical Volume, that in a
Volume Group, and that split into 5
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:44:34 -0500, Dale wrote:
Other comments note that unsetting static allows it to build. Try
unsetting the static flag for lvm2 in package.use, i.e...
sys-fs/lvm2 -static
Does that build for you?
It might would but I can't recall WHY I set it to that. If I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:44:34 -0500, Dale wrote:
Other comments note that unsetting static allows it to build. Try
unsetting the static flag for lvm2 in package.use, i.e...
sys-fs/lvm2 -static
Does that build for you?
It might would but I can't recall WHY I set
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:44:34PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:39:39AM -0500, Dale wrote
Someone else ran into the same thing and it appears they use udev. So
switching wouldn't help anyway.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370217
Your
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:53:47AM -0500, Dale wrote:
Now that you mention it, it may have been when the separate /usr init
thingy was going on that I had to add it. That could be it. Well, if I
have to upgrade before they have a fix, I'll give it a shot and see what
happens. I suspect it
Bruce Hill wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:53:47AM -0500, Dale wrote:
Now that you mention it, it may have been when the separate /usr init
thingy was going on that I had to add it. That could be it. Well, if I
have to upgrade before they have a fix, I'll give it a shot and see what
Bruce Hill wrote:
You might want to run enalyze rebuild use to get an idea of what USE
flags you have which do not match the default settings. Over the
course of time the defaults change, and our need for certain options
change, so it's good to run this and check any USE flags for
situations
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:39:39AM -0500, Dale wrote
Someone else ran into the same thing and it appears they use udev. So
switching wouldn't help anyway.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370217
Your bug-report comment shows...
sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 USE=lvm1 readline static
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:39:39AM -0500, Dale wrote
Someone else ran into the same thing and it appears they use udev. So
switching wouldn't help anyway.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370217
Your bug-report comment shows...
sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 USE=lvm1
Samuli Suominen wrote:
sys-fs/udev-197, 200, 204. --- will install to / instead of /usr so it
will work with sep. /usr just like eudev does, or just like udev-171
used to
basically the only thing to look out for is the network interface
names, you can add extra entry to grub that boots with
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 26/06/13 07:58, Dale wrote:
I can't seem to get lvm2 to compile. I get this error:
FILE=`echo lvchange.d | sed 's/\\//\\//g;s/\\.d//g'`; \
DEPS=`echo ../make.tmpl ../VERSION ../Makefile
../include/.symlinks_created | sed -e 's/\\//\\//g'`; \
On 26/06/13 09:31, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 26/06/13 07:58, Dale wrote:
I can't seem to get lvm2 to compile. I get this error:
FILE=`echo lvchange.d | sed 's/\\//\\//g;s/\\.d//g'`; \
DEPS=`echo ../make.tmpl ../VERSION ../Makefile
../include/.symlinks_created | sed -e
I can't seem to get lvm2 to compile. I get this error:
FILE=`echo lvchange.d | sed 's/\\//\\//g;s/\\.d//g'`; \
DEPS=`echo ../make.tmpl ../VERSION ../Makefile
../include/.symlinks_created | sed -e 's/\\//\\//g'`; \
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -MM -I. -I../include
On 26/06/13 07:58, Dale wrote:
I can't seem to get lvm2 to compile. I get this error:
FILE=`echo lvchange.d | sed 's/\\//\\//g;s/\\.d//g'`; \
DEPS=`echo ../make.tmpl ../VERSION ../Makefile
../include/.symlinks_created | sed -e 's/\\//\\//g'`; \
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -MM -I.
090604 Maxim Wexler wrote:
why give the logical volumes any size at all ?
If they can be expanded at will,
why not just the let the files fill them up as much as they need ?
That's not how it works: you need to create the LVs with enough space
for your likely needs LVM then assigns them in
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:16:20 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
That's not how it works: you need to create the LVs with enough space
for your likely needs LVM then assigns them in its own way to the PVs;
later, if you made an LV too small, you can increase it
(you also have to extend the file system
Hi group,
Creating LVM partitions on SSD and SD card using systemrescuecd-1.2.0
while following doc, 'Gentoo LVM2 installation'. In the doc it says
to edit the 'filter =' statement in lvm.conf in order to scan the
correct devices. But just below it says to use #pvcreate with the
appropriate
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 13:01 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
Hi group,
Creating LVM partitions on SSD and SD card using systemrescuecd-1.2.0
while following doc, 'Gentoo LVM2 installation'. In the doc it says
to edit the 'filter =' statement in lvm.conf in order to scan the
correct devices. But
On 6/4/09, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote:
You'll know if LVM has detected your PVs by running pvdisplay.
Check! Thanks Albert
Another please, from the doc:
Note: As Terje Kvernes commented, it is easier to increase the size
of a partition then to shrink it. You might therefore
Hi all
I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml to create the LVM2 volume named vg
then create the logical volume /dev/vg/data. Everything went fine and I
can mount the volume /dev/vg/data to /mnt/data without any problem.
However, when I
On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:36:08 Hung Dang wrote:
Hi all
I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml to create the LVM2 volume named vg
then create the logical volume /dev/vg/data. Everything went fine and I
can mount the volume /dev/vg/data
Hi Alan,
Thanks a lot for a quick reply. It turn out that I need to activate LVM
at the boot time using rc-update.
Hung
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:36:08 Hung Dang wrote:
Hi all
I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
At start-up shut-down, lines appear on screen :
/var/log/lvm2.log : fopen failed : No such file or directory
When I check for the file I get :
root:537 log pwd
/var/log
root:538 log ls -l lvm2.log
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 116194 2007-11-02 04:49 lvm2.log
root:539 log file
On Saturday 06 December 2008 23:40:15 Philip Webb wrote:
At start-up shut-down, lines appear on screen :
/var/log/lvm2.log : fopen failed : No such file or directory
When I check for the file I get :
root:537 log pwd
/var/log
root:538 log ls -l lvm2.log
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root
Hi
when i reboot the gentoo box all the lvm settings are gone, I have
followed the below steps
http://pastebin.com/d52c219ba
Please let me know if I am missing something
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
What I'd check:
Make sure dm-mod is either part of the kernel or, if it's a module, make
sure it's loaded during start-up.
Make sure lvm init script is executed on start-up.
Take a look at: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml
HTH,
Abraham
when i reboot the gentoo box all the lvm settings are
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 00:22, David Grant wrote:
I have an lvm2 questions. I have 4 partitions in a pv, according to
pvdisplay, sda6, sda7, sda8, and sda9. According to fdisk, only sda6,
sda7, and sda8 are of partition type Linux LVM (0x8e) but sda9 is of
type Linux (0x83). Does this
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:29:26PM -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/17/06, Leopold Gouverneur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ebuild N] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.05 USE=nolvm1 nolvmstatic nosnapshots
readline -clvm -cman -gulm -nomirrors
Anyway i think that without a previous declaration of dm_pool
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:29:26PM -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/17/06, Leopold Gouverneur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ebuild N] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.05 USE=nolvm1 nolvmstatic nosnapshots
readline -clvm -cman -gulm -nomirrors
Anyway i think that without a previous declaration of dm_pool
emerge lvm2 abort during compilation with this message:
...
../include/lvm-string.h:40: attention : 'struct dm_pool' declared inside
parameter list
...
wordir/.../lvm-string.h i see:
...
struct pool;
char *build_dm_name(struct dm_pool *mem,
^^^
On 5/17/06, Leopold Gouverneur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
emerge lvm2 abort during compilation with this message:
...
../include/lvm-string.h:40: attention : 'struct dm_pool' declared inside
parameter list
...
wordir/.../lvm-string.h i see:
...
struct pool;
char
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:23:00AM -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/17/06, Leopold Gouverneur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
emerge lvm2 abort during compilation with this message:
...
../include/lvm-string.h:40: attention : 'struct dm_pool' declared inside
parameter list
...
On 5/17/06, Leopold Gouverneur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ebuild N] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.05 USE=nolvm1 nolvmstatic nosnapshots
readline -clvm -cman -gulm -nomirrors
Anyway i think that without a previous declaration of dm_pool the
compilation should abort.But since i seem to be the only one
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Then why do we see zoom here?
Sorry zoom is actually cont. For some reasons I good the word zoom
in here :-(
Also, be /very/ careful with upgrading LVM / device-mapper.
Sure ;-)
Back to my last question. Any thoughts how to get this fixed without
remote hand
On Thursday 11 May 2006 06:06, Barny M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] LVM2 Problems':
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Then why do we see zoom here?
Sorry zoom is actually cont. For some reasons I good the word zoom
in here :-(
Ah, well if all the messages say cont it's
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vgchange -a y
device-mapper: deps ioctl failed: Invalid argument
_deps: task run failed for (254:0)
Failed to add device (254:0) to dtree
My guess is a conflict between the device-mapper version and your
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 10:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about '[gentoo-user]
LVM2 Problems':
I recently synced my Gentoo (2.6.7-gentoo-r13) and after emerging
updated ebuilds, sure lvm2 was one of them and a reboot I lost my
mounted fs.
/dev/cont/swap noneswap
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 12:40, Barny M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] LVM2 problems':
Any further suggestions how to troubleshoot or fix the issue ?
See my answer to your previous post. Also, gmail doesn't show you your own
messages.
--
If there's one thing we've established
Hi,
I recently synced my Gentoo (2.6.7-gentoo-r13) and after emerging
updated ebuilds, sure lvm2 was one of them and a reboot I lost my
mounted fs.
Fortunately I do not have / (root) under LVM however all efforts so far
haven't brought my fs back:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
Hi,
I recently synced my Gentoo (2.6.7-gentoo-r13) and after emerging
updated ebuilds, sure lvm2 was one of them and a reboot I lost my
mounted fs.
Fortunately I do not have / (root) under LVM however all efforts so far
haven't brought my fs back:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
I've never seen this issue, so I may not be the right person to give advice
here. But at a glance, it looks like lvm and device-mapper are incompatible
or something similar. If I were in your place I would try differrent versions
of lvm2, device-mapper and/or kernel.
FYI, my configuration
On 5/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vgchange -a y
device-mapper: deps ioctl failed: Invalid argument
_deps: task run failed for (254:0)
Failed to add device (254:0) to dtree
My guess is a conflict between the device-mapper version and your
kernel. 2.6.7 is quite
A. Khattri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im talking about software RAID specifically. I would assume running
lvm2 (a software process) over software RAID would have more overhead
than just software RAID alone.
I'd say you do not need to worry about it (if you have at least 500MHz
cpu). SW-raid 0/1
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:44:04 -0400 (EDT), A. Khattri wrote:
Im talking about software RAID specifically. I would assume running lvm2
(a software process) over software RAID would have more overhead than
just software RAID alone.
Your CPU and memory are so much faster than your hard drive that
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:25:14 -0700, Carl Flippin wrote:
The trick to getting it all to work together is doing the raid setup
first and then using the /dev/md* devices for the LVM2 setup.
I did something similar here. By creating the RAID first,
On Sep 20, 2005, at 4:38 PM, A. Khattri wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:25:14 -0700, Carl Flippin wrote:
The trick to getting it all to work together is doing the raid setup
first and then using the /dev/md* devices for the LVM2 setup.
I did
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, John Jolet wrote:
you'd have to define just plain raid. There is a performance
penalty for software raid over hardware raid, but I've not been able
to see any performance penalty for lvm over plain filesystem. Note
that my testing has been on light-to-moderately loaded
Anybody using lvm2 and RAID together on the same partitions?
Can anyone detail how to create such a setup?
--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] lvm2 and RAID
Anybody using lvm2 and RAID together on the same partitions?
Can anyone detail how to create such a setup?
--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I have such a setup. It was fairly easy to do.
For the LVM2 part, just follow this howto:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml
For the raid part, the documentation you need is here:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86-tipsntricks.xml#software-raid
The trick to getting it all to work
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:25:14 -0700, Carl Flippin wrote:
The trick to getting it all to work together is doing the raid setup
first and then using the /dev/md* devices for the LVM2 setup.
I did something similar here. By creating the RAID first, you only need
to RAID one large partition.
--
Comments inline:
moriah ~ # df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda5 3.8G 2.2G 1.6G 59% /
udev 252M 2.6M 249M 2% /dev
cachedir 3.8G 2.2G 1.6G 59% /lib/splash/cache
/dev/vg1/usr 32G 5.9G 27G 19% /usr
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2005 08:49 schrieb ext W.Kenworthy:
Comments inline:
moriah ~ # df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev 252M 2.6M 249M 2% /dev
Hmm, mine takes 116k, how comes your /dev uses 2.6M?
cachedir 3.8G 2.2G 1.6G
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:50:15 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm looking at LVN2 for this install. The main drive is 250GB. I'm
wondering a couple of things:
I've ben using LVM2 on my AMD64 box since I built it.
1) Should use all of the drive, other than the boot and swap
partitions, for the
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2005 10:25 schrieb ext W.Kenworthy:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:38 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2005 08:49 schrieb ext W.Kenworthy:
Comments inline:
moriah ~ # df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev
You can use it all or into chunks of 20GB each as the how-to suggests;
I agree. I think the biggest reason to use the whole drive as one
logical partition would be if you had dual SATA and you were striping.
It's nice to have that extra space available as non-LVM2 just in case
you need it.
Thanks Neil
On 8/30/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:50:15 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm looking at LVN2 for this install. The main drive is 250GB. I'm
wondering a couple of things:
I've ben using LVM2 on my AMD64 box since I built it.
1) Should
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:03:49 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I have /boot, swap and / on normal partitions, everything else on
LVM. / is only 300MB, as /usr is on an LVM2 partition, /var and /opt
are bound to directories in /usr. I kow I could put / on LVM, but
that requires an initrd, which
On 8/30/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:03:49 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I have /boot, swap and / on normal partitions, everything else on
LVM. / is only 300MB, as /usr is on an LVM2 partition, /var and /opt
are bound to directories in /usr. I kow I
Hi,
My new A8N-E/AMD64 hardware came up the first time. SATA/DVD/CDRW
all seen. LiveCD boots fine. memtest86 has been running for the last
hour and looks good so far. All looks good so I'll start a Gentoo
install pretty soon.
I'm looking at LVN2 for this install. The main drive is 250GB.
My scheme is:
100 M /boot on ext3 (I was going to store some other info there, but
its mostly space att)
2G swap
4G reiserfs with a complete, basic gentoo rescue install - if all goes
pear shaped, I have a backup including a functioning /boot on this
partition. Particularly useful with
On 8/29/05, W.Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My scheme is:
100 M /boot on ext3 (I was going to store some other info there, but
its mostly space att)
2G swap
4G reiserfs with a complete, basic gentoo rescue install - if all goes
pear shaped, I have a backup including a functioning
/dev/hda3 is the backup/rescue. What I did last time I built a system,
is used this to build a working system. Put it into service,
adjust/configure until I am happy. Create the LVM in prep for the main
install. Copy the rescue system to the LVM and setup grub. reboot into
the main and go
On Monday 29 August 2005 07:50 pm, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
My new A8N-E/AMD64 hardware came up the first time. SATA/DVD/CDRW
all seen. LiveCD boots fine. memtest86 has been running for the last
hour and looks good so far. All looks good so I'll start a Gentoo
install pretty soon.
I'm
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2005 06:28 schrieb ext Mark Knecht:
That's very helpful. To test my understanding
/dev/hda1 - boot - 100M
Way too much.
/dev/hda2 - swap - 2G
Can be on a logical volume, too.
/dev/hda3 - NOT CLEAR - the backup/rescue install?
Why? Use the LiveCD.
/dev/hda4 -
Hi again,
Sorry to top-post, but since 1) it's been a bit (RL and minor PC crises,
sorry) and 2) I fixed it, I hope everyone will forgive me for putting
the relevant information first.
Anyway, in the course of trying to clean up the 3900 unread list
messages since I started my reinstall of
Hey ho, all--
This is not a major problem (I have LVM2 partitions, but EVMS compiled
fine, so I can manage them), but I don't like it, as it seems weird for
the main tool for the fs not to compile. Nothing related seems to be on
B.G.O (which is also weird), so I'm wondering if anyone might know
This is not a major problem (I have LVM2 partitions, but EVMS compiled
fine, so I can manage them), but I don't like it, as it seems weird for
the main tool for the fs not to compile. Nothing related seems to be on
B.G.O (which is also weird), so I'm wondering if anyone might know what
I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
snip[sig:]
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 9: Political science
Wrong!! :: Political Science is the study of how/why things happens *in* politics...
You know, like studying how an AIDS virus works?
**Very** evil grin!!
I *LIKE* you rolling-sig -- are these from
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:01:02 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
*LIKE* you rolling-sig -- are these from 'noseguy,' by any chance?
Where-the-futz do you get all these anyway?
No one source. I have collected them over the last twelve years. Some are
very out of date now, I
On 4/14/05, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using lvm2 2.0.33-r1, dynamically linked, but all of the dependent
libraries are installed in /lib, not /usr/lib.
carcharias linux # ldd /sbin/lvm
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libdevmapper.so.1.00 =
85 matches
Mail list logo
