is reputed to be much faster in certain cases.
Hope that helps. I would be very interested in your findings.
Be well,
Dan Farrell
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:19:08 +0100
Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to harden the gentoo running on my little server, but I'm a
little worried about possible problems. Like, services not coming up
when rebooting after an emerge -e world. Do you see any possibility
for that?
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:04:28 -0800
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I should run my own portage server here for our 6 home
machines?
You could then sync once for the lot of them, rather than for each.
You might find that convenient, and the servers might appreciate it
too.
--
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:32:19 -0800 (PST)
maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi group,
Now emerge -uD world barfs at pam-0.99 and directs me
to
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/pam/upgrade-0.99.xml
Here, among other things, it says to edit certain
files, but it doesn't say which
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:49:48 +0100
Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Farrell writes:
Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to harden the gentoo running on my little server, but I'm a
little worried about possible problems. Like, services not coming
up when rebooting
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:44:59 +0100
Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks all for their respective input. From the information provided,
I've assembled a short Gentoo Wiki Tip [1].
Regards,
Liviu
[1] http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Reboot_to_Windows_(using_grub)
Thanks; I've been
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:27:24 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well thank you for that. I had planned on setting up port knocking
for ssh and cups but I guess I'm just as well off leaving them
listening on 22 and 631?
Fail2Ban, though a little intensive, seems to be a decent method for
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:42:05 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently printing a dynamic HTML web page via firefox, but I'm
trying to switch to a method that will allow me to print across the
internet in an automated fashion with lpr. I've tried printing a
static HTML file with lpr,
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 07:27:12 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well thank you for that. I had planned on setting up port
knocking for ssh and cups but I guess I'm just as well off
leaving them listening on 22 and 631?
Fail2Ban, though a little intensive, seems to be a decent
That's more or less what I'm trying to do. Is setting up a VPN
between my remote server and local network overkill? I think the only
thing I'd use it for is to hide the sending of these printouts.
I would speculate that a VPN for one service might be overkill, if that
service is easy to
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:06:47 -0800
kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant wrote:
I don't know about large setups, where it might be very possible
that port knocking becomes a major PITA as you say. But I have
setup and used port knocking for remote ssh access lots of time in
the past,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:03:16 -0500
Budd, Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People will appreciate it if you don't respond to unrelated posts.
Many mail browsers (my own included) organize by the in-reply-to header
(at least I think that's the one):
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and have probably
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:56:22 -0600
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and
Civilization III fails because some security module can't be found...
You might try a no-cd crack, if this is indeed caused by
copyprotection as I suspect. I think they're legal to use (if
you have a license for
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:58:32 +0100
Mateusz Mierzwinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have problem with postfix. I just want to send email to other mail
server from my new postfix/courier server.
Could you elaborate on your configuration? Are you...
- relaying mail to a specific
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:50:51 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:10:18 +0100, Stefán István wrote:
can I set up the network startup so that eth0 first tries to get
address from a dhcp server, and if it doesn't get
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:32:47 +0100
Mateusz Mierzwinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mateusz Mierzwinski pisze:
Ok, I don't know what's going on, but My laptop have issue - when I
press ALT/GR (Right ALT) it works like RETURN, executes
applications, sends messages by Kadu. What's wrong? I've
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:27:50 -0800
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd really like to share my ext3 file server with my Windows machines
without being forced to use windows file systems.
Thanks,
Mark
If you want to get files to windows hosts that aren't running
(dual-boot), you can do
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:25:25 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I would set up openvpn on my remote server and connect to it from:
here's a few ideas about the subject, some options to think about.
1. my local print server for printing
Look into routed vpn networks. If I were in your
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:34:07 +
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the point of the question was to avoid waiting for the GRUB
menu to appear.
I sometimes forget that some people actually use XP as an alternate OS
(for me it's just there in case I forget how bored with games I
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:04:27 +
Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the context of online banking, where Windows of some flavour is
the desktop OS, I see a substantial risk arising through spyware
and/or viruses. I suspect that a neat way to mitigate this would be
to run an OS from a CD
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:28:39 +0100
Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW,
I am more interested to get things working. Quality would be my
second priority.
As I said before, I did not have any problem (unfortunately, I cannot
access the hardware now and check the bandwidth
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:46:48 -0600
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 04:35:35 Daniel Barkalow wrote:
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
It did? Where did it leave for?
That reminds me of the pages in the IBM service
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:10:56 -0600
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian Philipp wrote:
SNIP
Malware for Linux? What about those macro viruses for Open Office?
Every cross platform software such as Mozilla derivatives, java
based stuff like Azureus and so on is a possible target.
But
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 07:16:44 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My server's current IMAP setup is only used with squirrelmail so it
doesn't have to communicate over the internet. I'm trying to ditch
squirrelmail for claws-mail
good choice.
and I'm having a little trouble making the
my guess is that courier hasn't been told where to look for the mails.
If you can see them from squirrelmail but not imap, that's probably the
problem.
furthermore you can diagnose connection problems seperately from
missing mail problems. ( claws-mail has a convenient log feature for
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:47:48 -0700
Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I need to re-compile phpmyadmin with vhost? and setup phpmyadmin
as virtualdomain?
I recommend that you do, to avoid htdocs 'bloat'.
however that's unlikely to solve your problem. It sounds like,
perhaps, apache is
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:29:15 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the OT, but unable to raise anyone at comcast right now.
Really? I didn't think that was possible... although sometimes it's
good to call twice, get another opinion.
I think I recall having read somewhere that one can do
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:53:31 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my guess is that courier hasn't been told where to look for the
mails. If you can see them from squirrelmail but not imap, that's
probably the problem.
But squirrelmail doesn't work if I stop imapd, so imapd must know
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:55:49 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 10 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the authentication is configured at the PC/client end rather than
the modem, then you are probably not using the correct encapsulation
for the cable network and, or have
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:45:14 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still can't send mail though, with or without authentication. I get
this when port scanning with nmap:
25/tcp filtered smtp
Does that mean my host is blocking the smtp port?
It's possible. Or, perhaps you're behind a
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:02:01 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still can't send mail though, with or without authentication.
I get this when port scanning with nmap:
25/tcp filtered smtp
Does that mean my host is blocking the smtp port?
It's possible. Or, perhaps
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:00:49 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can print from your laptop to your printer at home while
overseas, for example.
Sounds very convenient ; )
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:28:16 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I happen to be in a situation where I have both a DSL and CABLE
connection to internet up for the time being... (Until the DSL
contract month runs out).
It affords a nifty opportunity to do some experiments. Of course I
tested
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:14:59 -0500
Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been waiting and waiting and waiting forever for DSL to come to
my neighborhood just so that I can switch to a decent provider and rid
myself of this nonsense.
Don't assume DSL will be better. They often block ports
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:52:14 -0600
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also had to change the IP address on the router to a fixed address
to get it to work right. I think I had it set to 192.168.100.2.
After that, we had very little trouble with the connection. The
modem itself was
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:23:23 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cringe at the idea of having to use a VPN for imap, however.
Why? Would you say the same of using it for SMTP?
I read email rather compulsively I guess, and would hate to be bothered
with VPNs, then use an encrypted mail
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:55:29 +0100
Arnau Bria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
has someone changed the hard disk of that laptop? (or one from its
family?)
Any advice? May I buy a generic one?
TIA,
judging by
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:42:44 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about having ssh, imap, smtp, cups, and possibly a non-standard
https port all hidden within a VPN? Should that be considered a
benefit of running a VPN?
One other thought about ssh+vpn, if you have VPN
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:23:15 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wanted to try to gauge if there was much of a noticeable
difference with the two IP connections. And it would be handy to
just step through the links changine the GW intermittently
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:19:48 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if you just want to encrypt some clear-text protocol that
doesn't have an encrypted equivalent, a vpn is still overkill.
For that you use ssh tunneling (which is essentially the same
thing as an encrypted
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:57:07 -0500
John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I have just gotten a computer with a Super Micro c2sbe
Motherboard. Now I also bought a dual port PCI Express ethernet
card. Now the normal kernel driver in my 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 does not
recognize the ethernet port
I haven't been able to build sane-backends.
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libsane-sane-epson2.la', needed by
`all'. Stop.
any thoughts?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:34:16 -0600
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been able to build sane-backends.
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libsane-sane-epson2.la', needed
by `all'. Stop.
any thoughts?
Well, removing all settings for SANE_BACKENDS in my make.conf seems
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:34:16 -0600
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been able to build sane-backends.
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libsane-sane-epson2.la', needed
by `all'. Stop.
any thoughts?
Curses! My scanner won't scan a thing. Has anyone else been able
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:21:00 -0800
Michael Higgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, OT post here, but:
I (the office, actually) have this lousy ISP that sells mailboxes
limited to 50MB. Whatever, I can't change that just now.
I have need to keep all mail in one place... for safekeeping,
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:57:08 +0300
Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ehci module is loaded, all MB USB ports are USB 2 ports, printer is
USB 2 (Full Speed) printer.
Where to dig in? Which additional information must I supply?
Andrew
just a guess, but do you have your kernel set
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:16:36 -0800
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Chris Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
Can anyone tell me what packages you know of that will break your
system if you
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:04:31 -0500
Ritesh Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:23 PM, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Doesn't Ghost work with Ext3? What can I do to
recover my system without
reinstalling from scratch?
I've had success with #dd
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:21:48 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Samstag, 1. März 2008, b.n. wrote:
maxim wexler ha scritto:
This is such an obvious fraud it makes me wonder at
his 100% positive
.
Anyhow, my advice to you is to do what many, including myself do - save
yourself the headache of running ~amd64, and only use package.keywords
to unmask packages as necessary.
Good luck, and may you withhold judgment of me as I have of you,
Dan Farrell
--
gentoo-user
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:56:20 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's one other way that I just remembered (for future reference).
You don't *have* to use a linux machine as a gateway if you have a
decent managed switch - set it to route all traffic on all ports out
through the
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:02:40 +0100
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Essentially, the
antiailiasing seems to alter the consistency of fonts in an
irregular manner causing them to blur (differently) across the
screen, as if the monitor resolution is out of sync.
hmm, that
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 18:10:58 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please find xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log attached. I am using the xorg
radeon driver. The font size is just right, would not like to
increase it.
A few thoughts based on your xorg.conf.
1) you set
HorizSync 64 #31 - 80
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:11:20 -0500 (EST)
Jason Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many interfaces but they are all frontends to iptables.
Personally I just did a lot of reading and built my firewall from
scratch.
that's the spirit ; )
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:16:09 -0400
Mark Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you thinking his ISP is doing port-based connection filtering?
What kind of connection filtering allows a connection to go through for
5 seconds, then resets it?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
to the idea of granting us permission to use the
site engine?
Thank you for your time,
Dan Farrell
[2]
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-673136.html
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:04:22 -0600
Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is suposed to be here soon, I guess anyway.
Dale
you've been saying that for so long now.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:55 -0400
Mike Edenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comcast?
I was on comcast for a long time (2.5 yrs) and never had a problem like
this. They might have blocked port 25 and squelched my bittorrenting
at times, but never anything like this. Of course, ymmv.
--
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:51:42 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2008, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:55 -0400
Mike Edenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comcast?
I was on comcast for a long time (2.5 yrs) and never had a problem
like
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jamie Dobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been away from Gentoo for the last year or so and using Ubuntu
but find that I want to return to Gentoo simply because of the
level of
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:27:22 + (UTC)
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a firewall that is built pretty minimally on a P3 and
and old 4 gig ide disk:
/dev/hda3 2068348 1668104400244 81% /
/dev/hda1 100728 40452 60276 41% /boot
I
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:06:07 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:00:41 -0700
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Jamie Dobbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:45:21 +
Filipe Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few numbers from genlop -t
Thanks much! This was interesting for me to read. I am surprised by
how much faster 64bit system was for compiling these things.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:10:54 -0500
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got a new USB trackball today. When I plug it into the computer,
this shows up in dmesg:
input: Logitech USB Trackball as /class/input/input6
input: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [Logitech USB Trackball] on
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:46:49 + (UTC)
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pongracz Istvan pongracz.istvan at gmail.com writes:
I've got several boxen that need to be installed so I was hoping
to test drive 2008.0
AFAIK the releng team are working on the next release (2008.0) but
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:18:33 +0100
Neil Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Farrell wrote:
Install from 2007.0 with interet:
- most recent stage3
- most recent portage
therefore most recent system
Install from 2008.0-beta with internet:
- same stage3
- same
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:18:05 -0600
darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth the Dan Farrell:
net benefit of 2008.0: none.
The benefit is that the beta gets tested, and we all move that much
closer to a stable 2008.0 release.
True, I suppose. I tend to be a little draconian with my
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:06:04 -0400
Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Main thing
that speeds up the AMD box is using 320MB scsi's
for near-term storage. They are hugely faster than
[S]ATA or IDE used on most equipment these days.
what R/W speeds can you expect?
--
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:19:11 -0230
Roger Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to configure the firewall on a client to allow that client
to mount an nfs directory. The client runs a netfilter firewall, the
server uses tcpwrapper.
rpcinfo -p on the server shows:
beryl
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:59:46 -0300
Norberto Bensa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ubuntu patch indeed. For those interested:
...
Thanks for the source overview
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
insistent about documenting.
Needless to say I'd like to solve the problem the right way. However,
the init scripts are a complex bunch for me and I'm not sure how to go
about fixing this.
I was hoping one of you might be able to guide me. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Dan Farrell
--
gentoo
On Wed, 28 May 2008 03:51:01 -0500
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
friends,
has anybody else come across the problem updating their initscripts
and breaking network booting in the last few months?
Evidently not.
Well, it looks like the new baselayout2 also has problems with net
Have you used ~/.xsession ?
That's what I do for a 'custom' session. Search for xsession in the X
manpage for more information on this.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:56:13 +0200
Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What interfaces was the win2003 server using previously for bridging
and connecting to the Internet?
I'm not entirely sure windows 'bridging' is equivalent to linux Ethernet
bridging. Specifically, wouldn't linux
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:48:55 +0200
Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:18:16 -0700
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I get Treason uncloaked! in dmesg when running
bittorrent. The solution here:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:54:23 +0200
Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:03:55 +0200 b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What concerns me is that alsamixer nevers shows a volume control on
Master anymore, and amixer says:
Simple mixer control 'Master',0
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:41:39 +0200
brullo nulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, Intel onboard videocards were well
supported open source...
They do a really nice job on 2D in my experience.
But if you are accelerating 3d opengl in hardware, like glxgears for
example, expect artifacts to the
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:23:23 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:05:24 +0200, b.n. wrote:
The onboard Intels were a good lifesaver. I'm considering an Intel
Core Duo... what's wrong with them that AMD does right? :)
Nothing AFAICT. I have a Core2Duo
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:36:38 +0200
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say if you stick with AMD, try the boxed cooler and test it.
Since it's not a dedicated silent system, it might be good enough. If
you switch to Intel, buy a good cooler from the beginning.
Furthermore, be sure
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:17:17 +0200
Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:55:06 -0500
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It usually means that the other side of the TCP
connection reduced the window to zero size, thus leading stupid
TCP stacks
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:53:28 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
journaling is just a waste of space
and time.
not to mention breaking compatibility with older bootloaders. not that
it's likely to matter, but yet another con.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
BRM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have to check into iproute2. Seems interesting...won't be able to
try until tonight (after I get home), but will certainly share the
results.
Thanks,
Ben.
Ben,
iproute2 is the latest and greatest (and
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:18:47 +0200 (CEST)
Cipher van Byte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't good idea to mount nfs over openvpn. Both are highly
unstable.
Openvpn is highly unstable? really? mine's been up for days.
NFS is highly unstable? Hardly. Perhaps you mean that it's unstable
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:54:27 +0200 (CEST)
Cipher van Byte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I'm concerned the structure of directories and links (hard
or symbolic) were invented to eliminate the _need_ of having such
searching engines.
Using those search engines is like reinventing the
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:05:47 -0300
Norberto Bensa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know - but I know that genkernel's config sucks.
Why?
I can make menuconfig and then:
sudo genkernel --oldconfig --no-clean all
Well, I make it a point to not use genkernel, but do you think
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:44:34 -0400
Ryan Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Ok, I've decided I'm doing more damage than good here. Arnau, if you
want to take this off list away from the static (much of it generated
by me, apologies), please feel free to email me, I'll help as far as I
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:08:27 +1000
Alan E. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been unable to boot into my gentoo system due to a Machine
Check Exception. This is an AMD 64 system. MCE for AMD is enabled
in the kernel (2.6.21 gentoo-sources).
I am unable to boot in to turn off MCE
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 17:19:15 -0400
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well... since the demise of openMosix... What similar cluster
software are gentoo users using? Anyone?
I recommend submitting this question (or rather, reading responses to
others' similar questions) on the
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 01:10:30 -0700
Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, a vanilla Gentoo installation could be
considered a bare Stage 3, which has so little software installed
it has to be the most secure.
Also worth pointing out is since such a
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:51:38 +1000
Alan E. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your solution is the better one, though.
I did follow the instructions of the boot messages and installed an
mce log translation utility, but I didn't make sense of what to do
with it.
The thing is, you are
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:01:08 -0400
sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was only trying out Amarok.
What did you think? I thought it was super cool, except it's resource
utilization is so high i don't run it anymore if I can avoid.
audacious seems almost completely better to me
I suspect they
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:50:25 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
this is not outlook express, it's kmail.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:55:44 -0700
Kevin O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
treat ~ # cd /etc/init.d
treat init.d # ./apache2 stop
* Stopping apache2 ...
No /usr/sbin/apache2 found running; none
killed.
[ !! ]
treat init.d # ./apache2 start
* WARNING: apache2 has already been started.
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:51:53 -0400
sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sean wrote:
I installed Audacious again and it works with error, I will just
stick with that. I was only trying out Amarok.
That should have been without error.
--
as fun as errors are, I think we all went ahead and
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:27:32 -0700
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the same problem yesterday, but rebooting the machine fixed it.
As for the KEEPENV, I was puzzled by that too but I didn't add
anything to env_whitelist and I left KEEPENV commented. Everything
seems to be fine.
Possibly
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:27:32 -0700
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today apache2 wants to upgrade to 2.2.4-r12. I've got cold feet.
Anyone tried this yet?
I just started it out, to see what happens.
I turned off the AC today, my feet aren't very cold ; )
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:02:16 -0500
Marzan, Richard non Unisys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goodluck friend
Thanks, I needed it. I finally found a nice list of the information I
need here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/upgrading.html
there's a message en route that covers all the majority
I have discovered a really fun error message:
zeus dan # /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
* Starting apache2 ...
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
0.0.0.0:80 no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open
logs
I have tracked down what appears to be the source of the difficulty
with restarting apache 2.2 after an upgrade.
to recap, here's the error:
zeus ~ # /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
* Starting apache2 ...
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
0.0.0.0:80 no listening
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:00:12 -0400
Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm kinda desperate
at this point as I'm about to go on a very long tour through Europe
and I won't have time to troubleshoot this sorta thing then.
well then I think there may be hope for you, for this isn't likely to
provide
1 - 100 of 510 matches
Mail list logo
