Am 07.10.20 um 10:40 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 06.10.20 um 15:08 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
>> Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> I know the model: ICP5165BR
>>
>> https://ask.adaptec.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17414/~/support-for-sata-and-sas-disk-drives-with-a-siz
Am 06.10.20 um 15:08 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> I know the model: ICP5165BR
>
> https://ask.adaptec.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17414/~/support-for-sata-and-sas-disk-drives-with-a-size-of-2tb-or-greater
>
> says it is supported up to 8TB drives
Am 06.10.20 um 11:52 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> Some guesses:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/LinuxRaidForAdmins#aacraid
> says that it requires libstd++5
>
> arcconf might fork and exec, one could try with strace and try to
> see what happens
>
> one could, if the old suse dist. is
Am 06.10.20 um 11:52 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> Am 05.10.20 um 21:32 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> ...
>> What do you think, is 2 TB maybe too big for the controller?
>
>>>> 0a:0e.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID
>
> This d
Am 05.10.20 um 21:32 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> What if you put it on the 53c1030 card, can you do that, at least to
> verify the disk ?
I am 600kms away from that server and the people I could send to the
basement there aren't very competent in these things. I am afraid that
won't work out
Am 05.10.20 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> So my issue seems to be: non-working arcconf doesn't let me "enable"
> that one drive.
Some kind of progress.
Searched for more and older releases of arcconf, found Version 1.2 that
doesn't crash here.
This lets me view the p
Am 05.10.20 um 16:57 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> If you're doing software RAID or just individual disks, then you're
> probably going to go into the controller and basically configure that
> disk as standalone, or as a 1-disk "RAID". That will make it appear
> to the OS, and then you can do whatever
Am 05.10.20 um 16:38 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> And theese on the aac, since they have the same scsi host, and I guess
> that scsi ch.0 is for the configured drives and ch.1 for the raw drives:
>> [1:0:1:0]diskICP SAS2 V1.0 /dev/sda
>> [1:0:2:0]diskICP
On an older server the customer replaced a SAS drive.
I see it as /dev/sg11, but not yes as /dev/sdX, it is not visible in "lsblk"
Back then with an installed Suse Linux, I had some GUI tool to create a
VD on top of the physical drive and "enable" it ...
I am searching how to achieve that in
Reboot lead to some problems, now the flaky disk is removed.
Fixed some things in maintenance mode, did filesystem checks, now the
server boots OK and dbus also runs magically.
Am 24.09.20 um 11:01 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> I have a gentoo server with a failed /dev/sda. OS is on RAID1 with a
> working /dev/sdb below.
>
> I want to avoid rebooting because I mistrust the GRUB from a former SUSE
> installation (in parallel) right now.
>
&
I have a gentoo server with a failed /dev/sda. OS is on RAID1 with a
working /dev/sdb below.
I want to avoid rebooting because I mistrust the GRUB from a former SUSE
installation (in parallel) right now.
For some reason dbus isn't running.
I can't get a correct systemctl behavior right now.
Am 04.04.20 um 16:02 schrieb Ralph Seichter:
> * Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> Maybe I look into mongodb as well, for example I found this small
>> howto: https://www.fluentd.org/guides/recipes/maillog-mongodb
>
> That looks unnecessarily complicated to me. While you can of
Am 03.04.20 um 17:57 schrieb Ralph Seichter:
> * Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> My goal:
>>
>> collect logs of postfix, nginx into the docker-containers running ES,
>> Kibana .. and learn my way from there.
>
> If you are not dead-set on Elasticsearch et
I am trying my first steps to collect and aggregate logs into a
elasticsearch/kibana combo.
I have them in a docker-compose stack and want to collect nginx and
postfix logs for a start.
So far I am confused by stuff like filebeat, logstash, fluentd ... brrr
Could someone explain or even share
On 8/16/19 7:42 PM, Laurence Perkins wrote:
> Note that, in my experience at least, binary distros also tend to
> break hard if you leave them without updates for a year or more and
> then try to bring them current. And they're usually harder to fix
> when they do. So make sure that whatever you
Am 14.08.19 um 13:20 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> If there is no documentation, it is a mess by definition.
yes :-)
I see two devices sdc and sdd that should come from the SAN.
>>>
>>> Interesting, are these supposed to be the same?
>>
>> No, I don't think so. But maybe you'r right. No sdd in
Am 14.08.19 um 08:36 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> Stefan,
>
>
> On maandag 29 juli 2019 21:28:50 CEST Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> At a customer I have to check through an older gentoo server.
>>
>> The former admin is not available anymore and among other things
Am 29.07.19 um 21:37 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> I remember a (test) kernel update where that lfpc-devices didn't come up
> well. Went back to old kernel then ...
reference ::
https://linux.gentoo.user.narkive.com/eIPbuEEK/gentoo-user-rebuilding-a-kernel-on-a-hardened-gentoo
I think I have to edit the subject:
seems that multipath-setup never worked ...
The goal is to get the fibrechannel stuff right:
# lspci | grep -i fibre
02:00.0 Fibre Channel: Emulex Corporation Saturn-X: LightPulse Fibre
Channel Host Adapter (rev 03)
02:00.1 Fibre Channel: Emulex Corporation
At a customer I have to check through an older gentoo server.
The former admin is not available anymore and among other things I have
to check how the SAN storage is attached.
As I have to plan a new installation with minimal downtime I'd like to
understand that multipath-stuff before any
Am 15.07.19 um 08:41 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> Does anyone have a binary package for app-backup/amanda-3.4.5 he could
> share?
>
> I have to (test the) downgrade because of issues with 3.5.1, and my
> binary package doesn't install anymore (perl now upgraded etc)
&
Does anyone have a binary package for app-backup/amanda-3.4.5 he could
share?
I have to (test the) downgrade because of issues with 3.5.1, and my
binary package doesn't install anymore (perl now upgraded etc)
and the latest amanda doesn't talk to a legacy client which I can't
upgrade at all
Am 16.05.19 um 14:09 schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
> On 5/16/19 6:44 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>> Will I be able to install such a "kept old" gentoo machine from scratch
>> or does some have a better idea?
>>
>
> Does it *need* SSHv1, or does t
At a customer we still have to keep up an ancient Suse 6.x VM, it has a
legacy and proprietary software in it which has to be kept alive.
No way to move that sw to another OS, don't ask ...
That VM only runs sshd v1 ... so far I kept my openssh package on the
host at 7.5 via masking ...
I now
Am 23.11.18 um 10:09 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> # qlist -ICv systemd sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-7
>>> sys-apps/systemd-236-r5
>>
>> Since no one else has come up with anything less kludgy, and I
>> assume you have already tried reins
Am 21.12.18 um 15:48 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> rebooted now with a new 4.14.83
>
> Still that amanda-error ... could be their bug as well.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/674864
Am 21.12.18 um 09:54 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> systemd fails at "waiting for LV xy" .. I have the former SUSE Linux
> booted up already and think of editing the gentoo fstab to skip the 3 LV
> mounts ... just to get it booted
>
> That could easily be the case.
Disabled the 3 lines
Am 21.12.18 um 08:53 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> We now have a non-booting gentoo (going into systemd emergency mode) ...
> something around LVM fails and so it stops booting.
Is it possible that related to the rebuilds related to the
profile-changes somehow LVM got "incompatible&
Am 19.12.18 um 23:11 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 19.12.18 um 19:25 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>
>> The 4.14.x range has a few dodgy ones causing issues along the way. The
>> ones currently marked stable allow me to do a full rebuild. Some of the
>> older ones in there c
Am 19.12.18 um 19:25 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> The 4.14.x range has a few dodgy ones causing issues along the way. The
> ones currently marked stable allow me to do a full rebuild. Some of the
> older ones in there caused all kinds of weird issues like segfaults
> during compile. Corrupt libraries.
Am 18.12.18 um 15:37 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
I had similar issues with multiple packages.
Solved by updating the kernel, are you using latest stable gentoo sources?
far from ...
4.14.12-gentoo ... uptime 323 days
I will have to check that IRMC-like KVM-box with outdated Java before I
dare a
I see
[27905442.641298] amcheck-device[8581]: segfault at 8 ip
7f36788986e6 sp 7ffc67faf2f8 error 4 in
libc-2.27.so[7f36787fa000+1be000]
[27905718.857330] amcheck-device[8733]: segfault at 8 ip
7f143d7ae6e6 sp 7ffeb709f728 error 4 in
libc-2.27.so[7f143d71+1be000]
when I run
Am 23.11.18 um 09:36 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:33:03 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>>>>> What version does "qlist ICv systemd" show?
>>>>
>>>> No version, just a long list of files.
>>>
>
Am 20.11.18 um 11:19 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:49:27 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>>> What version does "qlist ICv systemd" show?
>>
>> No version, just a long list of files.
>
> That should have been "qlist -ICv syst
Am 20.11.18 um 10:19 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:14:01 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>>>> upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
>>>>
>>>> the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files
>>>&g
Am 19.11.18 um 09:41 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:14:38 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
>>
>> the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files ...
>> so it merges only parti
Am 19.11.18 um 08:19 schrieb YUE Daian:
> Have you tried to run `eix-update`?
For sure. Repeated right now, doesn't change the output of "eix -I"
upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files ... so it
merges only partially ...
after that I see:
# systemctl --version
systemd 239
(which is OK)
# eix -I systemd
[U] sys-apps/systemd
Available versions: 239-r2(0/2)
Am 07.11.18 um 10:45 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 07.11.18 um 10:42 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> Am 12.09.18 um 10:15 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> Am 12.09.18 um 10:09 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>>
>>>> seems I have been cautiou
Am 07.11.18 um 10:42 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 12.09.18 um 10:15 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> Am 12.09.18 um 10:09 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>>> seems I have been cautious so far to keep sys-fs/multipath-tools at
>>> version 0.5.0-r1 from 2016
Am 12.09.18 um 10:15 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 12.09.18 um 10:09 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> seems I have been cautious so far to keep sys-fs/multipath-tools at
>> version 0.5.0-r1 from 2016
>>
>> portage would update to stable 0.6.4-r1
&
Am 30.10.18 um 13:01 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Is that possible with gentoo already?
Simply adding "SSLProtocol TLSv1.3" to my vhost did not work out here,
pls point me to some info, thanks ;-)
Ah, I see, only with >=openssl-1.1.1, correct?
I will simply wait
Is that possible with gentoo already?
Simply adding "SSLProtocol TLSv1.3" to my vhost did not work out here,
pls point me to some info, thanks ;-)
Am 12.09.18 um 15:07 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
Bit sooner:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/
dm_multipath/mpio_overview
https://www.thegeekdiary.com/beginners-guide-to-device-mapper-dm-multipathing/
I use multipath from a SAS-controller to a
phew, that much feedback, thanks to all!
got to work through this and test things
Am 12.09.18 um 10:09 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
seems I have been cautious so far to keep sys-fs/multipath-tools at
version 0.5.0-r1 from 2016
portage would update to stable 0.6.4-r1
and maybe that would help creating /dev/sdX with a newer kernel as well
(instead of that flapping
Am 12.09.18 um 09:43 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I see a multipath.conf on the system, will try to understand that.
Another thing I just noticed:
seems I have been cautious so far to keep sys-fs/multipath-tools at
version 0.5.0-r1 from 2016
portage would update to stable 0.6.4-r1
Am 11.09.18 um 12:54 schrieb Mick:
Probably because you need a later version of gcc to compile the newer kernel
with.
I already installed gcc-6.4.0 and 7.3.0 some times ago. These should be
modern enough?
CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
in my kernel ;-)
Have you
Am 12.09.18 um 08:42 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:48:59 AM CEST Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
At first I emerged latest stable gentoo-sources, enabled these flags and
compiled ... but the lpfc module didn't detect the SAN devices
correctly, so I switched back to 4.1.15
At a customer we were asked to log/protocol all my administrative
activity for potential audits etc
My admin-work is basically 98% ssh and maybe some additional tasks done
via virt-manager (logging the work inside the VMs there is another topic
... I realize that right now).
Is there a
Am 11.09.18 um 11:48 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Right now I always get this when I run "make bzImage" (
# make bzImage
CHK include/config/kernel.release
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CC kernel/bound
I got the job to admin a gentoo server that was configured and setup by
a former admin.
No surprise that it is outdated ...
It runs with profile "hardened/linux/amd64" and kernel 4.1.15-gentoo-r1
That kernel does not have the necessary flags enabled to support EXT4
ACLs ...
At first I
Am 09.08.18 um 18:52 schrieb Wols Lists:
> May I suggest using btrfs for your backup drive?
I like btrbk:
https://github.com/digint/btrbk
I run btrfs as main filesystem on 3 systems (2 laptops, 1 main desktop)
and so far I am not looking back.
-> btrbk snapshots to local subvolumes ("time
While I am at my upgrade, I also see that a PAM library is missing now:
PAM unable to dlopen(/lib64/security/pam_smbpass.so):
/lib64/security/pam_smbpass.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
net-fs/samba has been compiled with USE="pam", does someone know where
to get
glibc-2.26 tells me to edit my nsswitch.conf:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Glibc_2.26_porting_notes/nsswitch.conf_in_glibc-2.26
"add files entry"
-
unfortunately this overlaps with an upgrade of a samba-domain-member
server, I got the job to upgrade it from 3.6.25 to a 4.5.x
Now I am unsure
Am 2018-06-07 um 09:33 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 2018-05-30 um 17:06 schrieb Marko Weber:
>> hello,
>>
>> Am 2018-05-30 12:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> Am 2018-05-30 um 10:46 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
>>>> error messages? - I get th
Am 2018-05-30 um 17:06 schrieb Marko Weber:
> hello,
>
> Am 2018-05-30 12:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> Am 2018-05-30 um 10:46 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
>>> error messages? - I get this happening sometimes from the oom killer
>>> when the server runs out
Am 2018-05-30 um 10:46 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> error messages? - I get this happening sometimes from the oom killer
> when the server runs out of memory - semi-random (usually but not
> always the same vm)
And the VM itself idles at 1,8 GB RAM used right now.
Am 2018-05-30 um 10:46 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> On 30/05/18 15:52, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> maybe someone has hit that as well:
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/656886
>>
>> bug report at redhat is from yesterday (!)
>>
>> -
>>
>>
maybe someone has hit that as well:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/656886
bug report at redhat is from yesterday (!)
-
That windows guest is shutting down and/or crashing now and then.
Same QEMU/libvirt combo at another site runs >20 VMs without problems.
I'd be happy to find some workaround or fix
I am running a gentoo server with net-fs/samba-4.6.12 as domain member
server in an Active Directory domain with 2 Debian 9.3 servers running
samba-4.6.12 as well.
We see issues like all the smbd-sessions stopping to work and I am
trying to find the reason.
What USE-flags do you gentoo-users
Am 2017-12-04 um 21:21 schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
> Once the profile is deprecated (not yet), you've got six months.
>
> Keep in mind that a profile isn't actually all that complicated. It
> consists mainly of a few small text files, and can likely be copied
> locally just like you would with an
On 12/03/2017 03:30 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> However, you can delay switching to the new profile for a while.
For how long?
eselect news item tells me:
"Please migrate away from the 13.0 profiles within the six weeks after
GCC 6.4.0 has been stabilized on your architecture. The 13.0
aside from that you might want to specify a different IO scheduler for
the SSD, I do that via udev rules like:
# 60-sched.rules
# set deadline scheduler for non-rotating disks
ACTION=="add|change", KERNEL=="sd[a-z]", ATTR{queue/rotational}=="0",
ATTR{queue/scheduler}="deadline"
# set cfq
Am 2017-07-11 um 13:37 schrieb Rasmus Thomsen:
> Hello,
>
> I use GNOME with Wayland for some time and I actually didn't notice that
> I switched until I tried to get synergy working ( mouse sharing
> software, which only works on X ), seems like GDM automatically chose
> Wayland since some
Am 2017-05-29 um 22:36 schrieb Mart Raudsepp:
> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 29.05.2017 kell 22:12, kirjutas Stefan G.
> Weichinger:
>> how do we gentoo-users handle CVE-2017-7494 ?
>
> You upgrade to the version including the fix. 4.5.10, that is.
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug
how do we gentoo-users handle CVE-2017-7494 ?
Am 2017-03-02 um 13:41 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> try lshw to get that info:
we had that already in the other leg of the thread
doesn't work for me:
# lshw -c disk
*-disk:0
description: SCSI Disk
physical id: 0.0.0
bus info: scsi@1:0.0.0
logical name: /dev/sda
Am 2017-03-01 um 22:42 schrieb Daniel Frey:
> I'm not sure how the sg? -> sd? mapping is supposed to work. I find it
> odd that there seems to be two nodes reported for each sd? entry.
> However, this could be the way the controller driver reports it to the
> kernel...
>
>> 07:01.0 SCSI storage
Am 2017-03-01 um 23:21 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> Is there actually a disk on that interface? - I have a system where one
> sdx allocated to an unused sata port with nothing attached - it returns
> similar information to yours above - check the other entries.
I checked them, sure.
to me it seems
Am 2017-03-01 um 16:49 schrieb Daniel Frey:
>> Have you tried `lsblk -O`?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
> Well, I forgot how much info that barfs out.
>
> Try `lsblk -o name,model,serial` instead.
nice one, thanks.
But the shown serials don't match the serials on the disk(s) :-(
I also tried "-O" and
Am 2017-03-01 um 15:42 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> Never hurts to try the low hanging fruit first :)
>
> Have you tried lshw?
did so right now:
*-disk:2
description: SCSI Disk
physical id: 0.2.0
bus info: scsi@1:0.2.0
Am 2017-03-01 um 14:39 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:04:45 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> and I would like to know which hard disk (vendor, serial) each
>> /dev/sdX is.
>
> hdparm -i /dev/sdX
# hdparm -i /dev/sdi
/dev/sdi:
SG_IO: bad/missing
could someone help me out?
I have this software-raid:
md3 : active raid6 sdi1[8] sdh1[6] sdg1[4] sdf1[5] sde1[3] sdd1[2] sdc1[0]
4391334912 blocks level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/6] [U_U_]
[>] recovery = 22.8% (167386900/731889152)
finish=196.6min
Am 2017-02-10 um 00:32 schrieb Dale:
> That wouldn't handle the number of open tabs I have here. Not even
> close. There are times where I have close to and even exceeding 200
> tabs open. I use the group add-on to sort them into groups. Depending
> on what I'm into at the time, or looking
Am 2017-01-14 um 20:00 schrieb Alarig Le Lay:
[stefangweichinger-gentoo]
location = /usr/local/portage
masters = gentoo
sync-type = git
sync-uri = https://github.com/stefangweichinger/gentoo.git
auto-sync = no
I think you have a publickey specified for your repo to push on it. A
simple
I recently suggested ebuilds on bugs.gentoo.org and was advised to
generate a PR (=pull request) against the gentoo portage repo on github:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo
ok, I forked that repo, did my changes within a local copy (clone) of my
repo .. etc etc
So far I understand things,
Am 2017-01-05 um 07:42 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
>> I am still using using samba3 for my NAS.
>> Samba4 has been planned for a while, but with it wanting it's own LDAP and
>> tree layout, I have a few more things to organise.
>>
>> Other projects keep getting a higher priority.
>
> Scratch that.
> I
Do people here run samba-4.x AD DCs on gentoo?
If yes, pls let me know of any traps or so.
Yes, I read the wiki ;-)
I currently prepare the migration of an old NT4-based domain (on a
samba-PDC, gentoo) to AD (other physical box, gentoo as well).
Did something similar last week (but with debian
Am 2016-11-14 um 15:31 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
Hi,
I have two external USB3 hard disk enclosures. They have the same
vendor, model and the same serial number (unfortunately).
Vendor, model and serial occur in the usb-subsystem only.
Since the hard drives within theses enclosures have
Am 2016-07-17 um 16:02 schrieb Mick:
If I continue to run (router) commands on the terminal, while the debugging is
running, the SSH time out is postponed.
What do you suggest I try on an SSH terminal from my PC to keep running
recurring commands after I have connected to the router? I will
Am 2016-06-22 um 20:42 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
Stefan, could you please show us the contents of
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf? In the early stages of
systemd's integration in Gentoo, it was necessary to disable some
plugins that tried to set /etc/conf.d/network as configuration
Am 2016-06-22 um 06:50 schrieb J. García:
Apparently they are stored in the gnome-keyring if you set up the
conection to
'Store the password for this user' when using nm-applet, but stored in
/etc/NewtorkManager/system-connections/ as plain text when you select
'all
users may connect to this
Am 2016-06-21 um 23:03 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Go to the network settings, and set the wireless connection as "shared
> with other users". Then it will appear in
> /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections.
>
> If you don't want to share the connection with other users, do something like
>
Am 2016-06-21 um 12:05 schrieb Tom H:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <li...@xunil.at> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have a pointer to where Gnome 3 (3.20 in my case) stores my
>> wifi credentials?
>>
>> I would love to sync that over to
Does anyone have a pointer to where Gnome 3 (3.20 in my case) stores my
wifi credentials?
I would love to sync that over to my new laptop without re-entering PSKs
at customers.
Am 2016-05-10 um 14:30 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> did someone else hit this:
>
> https://github.com/owncloud/core/pull/23480
>
> https://github.com/owncloud/core/issues/22988
>
> I am fiddling with 9.0.1 now to fix the calendars without downgrade :-(
>
>
did someone else hit this:
https://github.com/owncloud/core/pull/23480
https://github.com/owncloud/core/issues/22988
I am fiddling with 9.0.1 now to fix the calendars without downgrade :-(
anyone fixed this for gentoo already??
Yesterday I hit samba bug id 11538 at a customer.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11538
We still run stable samba-3.6.25 on gentoo there, with a basic NT4-style
domain. Simple use case, just users/passwords, no logon scripts, no
server based profiles ...
Now I consider upgrading to
On 12/30/2015 11:16 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> right now gcc rebuilds itself, some more packages to re-emerge, load at
> around 7.5, system usable, audio stream without a hickup.
# genlop -t thunderbird
* mail-client/thunderbird
Mon Jan 4 22:55:49 2016 >>> mail-cli
On 12/26/2015 06:44 AM, Paul Colquhoun wrote:
> Yes, using gcc-5.3.0 to recompile 5.3.0 with +jit worked.
Doing the same right now.
Does JIT make any difference yet when I recompile something with a
JIT-enabled gcc? Does any code in current gentoo actually use that already?
On 12/15/2015 03:02 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2015-12-13 um 13:05 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> Am 2015-12-13 um 12:50 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> If I pull the mouse down to the bottom of the screen the desktop snaps
>>> into correct place.
For
On 12/30/2015 08:00 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Would using gcc-5.x make a noticeable difference?
Well, while you all are preparing to reply ...
;-)
... I simply went for it.
unmasked gcc-5.3.0, compiled it, and then recompiled @system and the
kernel ("make localmodconfig"
On 12/30/2015 10:14 PM, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> soon I'll be replacing the system disks and will copy over the existing
> system to the new disks. I'm wondering how much merit there would be in
> being able to make snapshots to be able to revert back to a previous
> state when updating software or
Am 20.12.2015 um 08:40 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> These new filesystems should really be handed control of the entire disk as
> they already include LVM-like functionality.
> You can create subvolumes and limit those to different sizes if you so desire.
>
> When using an additional layer between
Am 2015-12-13 um 13:05 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 2015-12-13 um 12:50 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
If I pull the mouse down to the bottom of the screen the desktop snaps
into correct place.
found this:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7800470.html
the module option is now
Am 2015-12-11 um 10:33 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 10.12.2015 um 19:52 schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
>
>>> Do I have to set that variable then (in make.conf?) ?
>>
>> Yes, you should. While you're at it, you can remove the corresponding
>> flags from
Am 2015-12-13 um 12:50 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> If I pull the mouse down to the bottom of the screen the desktop snaps
> into correct place.
found this:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7800470.html
the module option is now "enable_ips=0" ... but this doesn't work for me
so far.
Am 2015-12-13 um 11:39 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Right now I am fiddling with getting Gnome installed and running.
I have X starting now. gdm as well, but with problems:
the mouse somehow pulls a "curtain" up and down ... so the display is
not correct. The lower part is one
1 - 100 of 1486 matches
Mail list logo
