On 17:54, Tue, Dec 16, 2014 thegeezer wrote:
On 15/12/14 20:39, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 15/12/2014 18:47, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this question is not related to a fully fledged,
>> big local area network with DMZs and such.
>>
>> Even the word "firewall" seems to be a little to
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, »Q« wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:43:21 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:32:08 +0100 Marc Stürmer wrote:
>> > Am 29.11.2014 um 11:11 schrieb Pandu Poluan:
>> >
>> > > What do you thi
On 18:00, Sun, Nov 30, 2014 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 30.11.2014 um 11:57 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> No, pv-grub is run inside the context of the host, using a kernel image
inside the VM.
... which is not in /boot as far as I see.
So if I want to add kernel-boot-time-options I have to instal
So, I just found out that some Debian Developers decided to fork Debian,
because they can no longer stand this abomination called 'systemd':
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20141127.212941.f55acc3a.en.html
What do you think, people? Shouldn't we offer them our eudev project to
assist?
Rgds
On Oct 28, 2014 12:38 AM, "Rich Freeman" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
> > Am 27.10.2014 um 16:36 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> >> and a boot
> >> partition as I don't think grub supports it - it could be a bit of a
> >> PITA for a single-drive system.
> >
>
On Oct 28, 2014 12:31 AM, "Rich Freeman" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> > ZoL (ZFS on Linux) nowadays is implemented using DKMS instead of FUSE,
thus
> > running in kernelspace, and (relatively) easier to put into an
i
On Oct 27, 2014 10:40 PM, "Rich Freeman" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Mick wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Rich, I have been reading your posts about btrfs with interest,
but
> > have not yet used it on my systems. Is btrfs agreeable with SSDs, or
should I
> > be using f2fs:
> >
>
> Btrfs
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Wasn't it supposed to hit portage a long time ago? Any news? There's zero
> information on the http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/qt site.
>
>
I see many blockers in the "[TRACKER] Qt5 in portage" bug [0].
I do believe the KDE proje
My company ended up with several 'ancient' HP ProLiant G4 servers.
We're thinking of setting up honeypots there.
Although I know Gentoo is perfectly capable of becoming a honeypot, we
currently prefer something... less involving in deployment :-D
Now, since this mailing list unarguably contains
On Mar 14, 2014 2:42 PM, "Edward M" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:26:27 +0700
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > Pointers are very welcome!
>
> May not apply now, but somebody was having kernel panics and
> network problems,etc last year.
>
>
http://f
Hello list!
I want to install Gentoo as headless firewalls on a pair of HP ProLiant
DL360 G5 servers we happen to have lying around.
Are there special issues I need to be aware of before embarking on this
endeavor?
Specifically, are there special steps to take w.r.t.:
* The RAID controller (AFAI
On Feb 18, 2014 1:13 PM, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
> On 18 February 2014 06:03:02 CET, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >Hello list!
> >
> >I'm planning to replace an Active Directory server currently
> >functioning
> >*only* as an LDAP server, with a
Hello list!
I'm planning to replace an Active Directory server currently functioning
*only* as an LDAP server, with a dedicated Linux-based LDAP server.
Now, the function of the LDAP server is at the moment:
* Provide the settings database for Axigen email server
* Provide group membership for Bl
On Feb 3, 2014 9:17 PM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2014 16:04, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2014 5:57 AM, "Neil Bothwick" > <mailto:n...@digimed.co.uk>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:54:28 +0100, ha
On Jan 28, 2014 5:57 AM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:54:28 +0100, hasufell wrote:
>
> > >> If it's about performance (in the sense of speed), then paludis
> > >> is worse, because dependency calculation is more complex/complete
> > >> there.
> > >
> > > That makes no sense at
On Dec 30, 2013 7:31 PM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
>
> Minor additions to what Pandu said...
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tanstaafl
wrote:
>
> > The numbers within [brackets] are statistics/cou
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
[-- LE SNIP --]
> Ok, well, maybe I should have posted my entire ruleset...
>
> I have this above where I define my chains:
>
> #
> *filter
> :INPUT DROP [0:0]
> :FORWARD DROP [0:0]
> :OUTPUT DROP [0:0]
> #
>
> Does it matter where this goes?
>
Hello list!
My company's considering of purchasing a couple of Fusion-IO [1]
devices, especially the ioDrive Octal model [2]. However, before we
actually commit to purchasing it, I'd like to gather some info first.
Have any of you had any experience with a Fusion-IO product? Not
necessarily the s
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Fri, October 18, 2013 05:33, Dale wrote:
>> Bruce Hill wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:40:52PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Well, this is interesting. I swapped out the mobo. First, it has the
UEFI BIOS thing. That was interesting
On Oct 14, 2013 6:04 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-13 5:49 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Talk about putting some stuff on tmpfs. O_O I have always wanted to
>> copy the tree to tmpfs and run "time emerge -uvaDN world". Just to see
>> how fast it will go. lol
>
>
> I remember once I worked for
On Oct 15, 2013 10:51 AM, "Dale" wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I ordered the new mobo as much as I needed to wait. The mobo is the
> same brand but a different chipset and a couple other things are
> different. I have already built a kernel for those changes. I plan to
> put everything on the old mobo
On Oct 13, 2013 5:09 PM, "Martin Vaeth"
wrote:
>
> >> 5. You can't script iptables-restore!
> >
> > Well, actually you can script iptables-restore.
>
> For those who are interested:
> net-firewall/firewall-mv from the mv overlay
> (available over layman) now provides a separate
> firewall-scripted
On Oct 13, 2013 9:15 PM, "Michael Orlitzky" wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2013 06:08 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> >>> 5. You can't script iptables-restore!
> >>
> >> Well, actually you can script iptables-restore.
> >
> > For those who are interested:
> > net-firewall/firewall-mv from the mv overlay
> > (avail
On Oct 3, 2013 9:26 PM, "William Hubbs" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:52:36AM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:44:35AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:04:24AM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
> > > > Just stumbled across some very interesting sof
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 18/09/2013 16:09, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> On 18/09/2013 16:05, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 14:52:30 Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
>>>
In my opinion, reiser is a bit outdated ...
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the significance
On Sep 30, 2013 9:31 AM, "Daniel Campbell" wrote:
>
--- le snip ---
> If the proposed solution is all binaries and libraries in the same
> root/prefix directory, then why call it /usr?
My question exactly.
Why install to /usr at all, leaving /bin and /sbin a practically empty
directory contain
On Sep 21, 2013 7:54 PM, "thegeezer" wrote:
>
> On 09/17/2013 08:20 AM, Grant wrote:
> > I'm convinced I need 3-disk RAID1 so I can lose 2 drives and keep
> > running. I'd also like to stripe for performance, resulting in
> > RAID10. It sounds like most hardware controllers do not support
> > 6-
Hello list!
Does anyone know the meaning of the 'number between brackets' in the
"power management" line of /proc/cpuinfo?
For instance (I snipped the "flags" line to not clutter the email:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 21
model : 2
model name
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Grant wrote:
You should definitely determine the right value for ashift on pool
creation
(it controls the alignment on the medium). It's an option that you afaik
can only set
on filesystem creation and therefore needs a restart from scratch
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-09-19 3:44 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
>> You should definitely determine the right value for ashift on pool
>> creation
>> (it controls the alignment on the medium). It's an option that you afaik
>> can only set
>> on filesystem creation
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:49:40PM -0700, Grant wrote:
>> > I think many folks are interested in upgrading to EXT4 with RAID from
>> > an ordinary JBOD workstation(server); or better yet to ZFS on RAID. I wish
>> > one of the bright
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Dale wrote:
> Grant wrote:
Interesting news related to ZFS:
http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
>>> I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
>>> future? May even be their intention?
>> I think the CDDL license is what's keepi
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Grant wrote:
>> I think many folks are interested in upgrading to EXT4 with RAID from
>> an ordinary JBOD workstation(server); or better yet to ZFS on RAID. I wish
>> one of the brighter minds amongst us would put out a skeleton
>> (wiki) information page as such
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Grant wrote:
> I'm convinced I need 3-disk RAID1 so I can lose 2 drives and keep
> running. I'd also like to stripe for performance, resulting in
> RAID10. It sounds like most hardware controllers do not support
> 6-disk RAID10 so ZFS looks very interesting.
>
>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Grant wrote:
>>> Is the Gentoo Software RAID + LVM guide the best place for RAID
>>> install info if I'm not using LVM and I'll have a hardware RAID
>>> controller?
>>
>> Not ready to take the ZFS plunge? That would greatly reduce the complexity
>> of RAID+LVM, sin
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Grant wrote:
>>> Is the Gentoo Software RAID + LVM guide the best place for RAID
>>> install info if I'm not using LVM and I'll have a hardware RAID
>>> controller?
>>
>> Not ready to take the ZFS plunge? That would greatly reduce the complexity
>> of RAID+LVM, sin
On Sep 3, 2013 10:51 AM, "William Kenworthy" wrote:
>
> On 03/09/13 11:26, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > William Kenworthy [13-09-03 05:08]:
--snip--
> >> Have you run out of inodes? - ext 4 has had very mixed success for me
on
> >> solid state. Running out of inodes is a real problem for gen
On Sep 2, 2013 11:16 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I need some urgent help...
>
>
>
> The rootfs and $HOME of my embedded system is stored
> on a 16GB SD-card (about 5GB used, rest free). The FS
> is ext4.
>
> Since the system hangs for unknown reasons several times I
> removed the sdcard, put it in
On Aug 31, 2013 8:47 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> Whenever I hibernate or do a wake-up from hibernation, I always get
> messages about a crond time disparity detected. It's usually 580 or 602
> minutes. But the clock appears to be correct within a few seconds after
> wake-up. I'm in Eastern t
On Sep 1, 2013 7:51 AM, "Mark David Dumlao" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:19:56PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote
> >
> >> So there seems to be no real need to create a static linux kernel
> >> with ZFS inside.
> >
> > See
http://www.gen
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Mick wrote:
>> On Friday 30 Aug 2013 15:44:35 Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> On 2013-08-30 10:34 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> > On 30/08/2013 16:29, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> >> Why would there be a problem if someone
On Aug 29, 2013 7:13 PM, "Randy Barlow" wrote:
>
> Honestly, I think the best solution is to switch the company to using
domain names to access these resources. This makes it much easier to
silently introduce things like load balancers later on if you ever need to
scale. It's also much easier to c
On Aug 29, 2013 7:46 PM, "thegeezer" wrote:
>
> On 08/29/2013 01:12 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > Honestly, I think the best solution is to switch the company to using
domain names to access these resources. This makes it much easier to
silently introduce things like load balancers later on if you e
Hello list!
Here's my scenario:
Currently there is a server performing 2 functions; one runs on, let's
say, port 2000, and another one runs on port 3000.
Due to some necessary changes, especially the need to (1) provide more
resource for a function, and (2) delegate management of the functions
t
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On 27/08/2013 14:05, Tanstaafl wrote:
[-- snippy --]
> > Thanks Alan, starting to get excited about playing with ZFS.
> >
> > How would you rate their docs and support community (for the free version)?
>
> Support is top-notch, on par wit
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:34:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> Where is the best docs for understanding and working with ZFS?
>
> There are plenty of links on the zfsforlinux site.
>
"on" Linux, not "for" Linux ... http://zfsonlinux.org/
:-)
Th
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On 27/08/2013 04:06, »Q« wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:02:32 +0200
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> >> On 26/08/2013 03:52, »Q« wrote:
> I doubt your wiki page idea will work, it will be just accurate
> enough
> > to look
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 26.08.2013 18:14, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
>
> > Well... with a ZFS-backed storage, when you want to create a new VM, all
> > you have to do is `zfs clone` ;-)
>
> Yes, I see those possibilities ;-)
>
&g
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 26.08.2013 17:51, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
>
> > 2 smallest disks in RAID1 configuration for booting.
> >
> > Then the 6 disks as JBOD and use it within a RAIDZ2 array.
> >
> > Or, 6 disks in
On Aug 26, 2013 9:02 PM, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
>
>
> We now get into choosing hardware for that shiny new gentoo-server ...
>
> as mentioned this will be a KVM-host and we look at a HP Proliant DL385p
> ... 2 AMD Opteron 6344 ... 32 GB RAM, 8 disks (the customer has some
> bigger contract
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:45:15 +0100, Mick wrote:
>
> > > emerge zfs works too :)
> > >
> > > I really like the way ZFS just lets you get on with things.
> >
> > Does anyone run it on a desktop/laptop as their day to day fs?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Any
On Aug 26, 2013 5:06 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>
> On 18/08/2013 21:38, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > On 2013-08-18 5:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> While we're on the topic, what's the obsession with having different
> >> bits of the file hierarchy as different*mount points*? That harks back
> >> to t
On Aug 26, 2013 8:41 AM, "Mark David Dumlao" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:54 PM, wrote:
> > Hi Mark, hi William,
> >
> > the script ds3231 in /etc/init.d is -- according to rc-update --
> > set as folows:
> >
> >ds3231 | boot
>
> Long and short of it, here's the boot ord
On Aug 25, 2013 11:38 PM, "Grant" wrote:
>
> >> >> >> I set up squid on a remote system so I can browse the internet
from
> >> >> >> that IP address. It works but it stalls frequently. I had
similar
> >> >> >> results with ziproxy. I went over this with the squid list but
we
> >> >> >> got nowh
On Aug 16, 2013 12:26 AM, "Kerin Millar" wrote:
>
> On 14/08/2013 13:15, Bruce Hill wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:18:41PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello list!
>>>
>>> My company has 2 HP DL585 G5 servers and 5
Thanks, Wang Xuerui and Bruce!
That's exactly helpful.
I'm going to do some testing Real Soon.
Rgds,
--
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Wang Xuerui wrote:
> 2013/8/14 Helmut Jarausch :
> > Why not compute it yourself?
> >
> > Do cat /proc/cpuinfo on all machines and compute the intersect
Hello list!
My company has 2 HP DL585 G5 servers and 5 Dell R... something servers. All
using AMD processors. They currently are acting as XenServer hosts.
How do I determine the 'least common denominator' for Gentoo VMs (running
as XenServer guests), especially for gcc flags?
I know that the (t
Hello guys,
I'm a bit ashamed to ask this question, as it belies how long I haven't
actually installed a 'lightweight' Gentoo system...
But I digress. On to my question:
Anyone knows an exhaustive list of USE flags?
And a related subquestion:
Is the USE flags list at znurt.org up-to-date?
The
On Aug 4, 2013 5:48 PM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2013 23:08, Kerin Millar wrote:
> > Regarding VirtualBox, it does support a virtio-net type ethernet adapter
> > so you would certainly benefit from enabling CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET in a
guest.
> >
> > I'm not entirely certain as to where Virtu
On Jul 22, 2013 6:34 PM, "Samuli Suominen" wrote:
>
> On 22/07/13 10:03, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How did you resolve this conflict?
>>
>> Many thanks for a hint,
>> Helmut
>
>
> As a maintainer of sys-auth/consolekit, and xfce-base/xfce4-meta I can
assure you sys-auth/consolekit is
On Jul 20, 2013 9:27 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-07-19 3:02 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> I think you are. Unless you are moving massive terabytes of data
>> across your drive on a constant basis I would not worry about regular
>> everyday write activity being a problem.
>
>
> I have a que
On Jul 8, 2013 1:05 AM, "Bruce Hill"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > On 2013-07-06 8:12 AM, Bruce Hill
wrote:
> > > NB: I only sell the best A/V software on the market, which hasn't
> > > missed a virus in the wild since it's inception.
> >
> > Not to st
On May 20, 2013 12:04 PM, "staticsafe" wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:31:31AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking for a simple HTTP+FTP proxy that supports upstream
> > authentication.
> >
> > The reason is t
Hello,
I'm looking for a simple HTTP+FTP proxy that supports upstream
authentication.
The reason is that we (that is, my employer) have a server that requires
Internet access for its setup, but for some reason* my employer does not
want to give the contractors a login for the corporate proxy.
I'
On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
>
> Ouch! minpoll and maxpoll should be specified as the log2 of the actual
> value, i.e. 6 and 10. Those are the defaults anyway.
>
> > disable auth
> > broadcastclient
> > se
On May 6, 2013 4:57 AM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-05-05 5:25 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 5 May 2013 16:06:45 -0400, Todd Goodman wrote:
>>
>>> mkdir -p $BACKUP_DIR/$PGyy/$PGmm/$PGdd
>>> /usr/bin/pg_dumpall -U $PGUSER -o | \
>>> gzip >$BACKUP_DIR/$PGyy/$PGmm/$PGdd/pg_all-$
On Apr 27, 2013 4:02 PM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:05:06 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>
> > > I think the problem there is a Chromebook needs to be online in order
> > > to do much of anything, and the connection needs to be fast in order
> > > to make them very functio
On Apr 26, 2013 3:09 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > EXT3-fs (sda5): error: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional
> features (240)
>
> > /dev/sda5 / ext4noatime,discard 0 1
>
> When first mounting the root filesystem the kernel has no access to
> /etc/fs
On Apr 26, 2013 10:31 AM, "Pandu Poluan" wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2013 9:46 AM, "Mark David Dumlao" wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Pandu Poluan
wrote:
> > > Can't get to see dmesg, the system locked up tight.
> >
On Apr 26, 2013 9:46 AM, "Mark David Dumlao" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > Can't get to see dmesg, the system locked up tight.
> >
> > I can create an ext4 fs on a different partition, and since the 'disk'
is
On Apr 25, 2013 10:37 PM, "Michael Hampicke" wrote:
>
> Am 25.04.2013 17:25, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
>
>> Just wondering if any of you guys experienced this lately:
>>
>> System hangs when creating a brand-new ReiserFS on a new partition.
>>
>> I&#x
Just wondering if any of you guys experienced this lately:
System hangs when creating a brand-new ReiserFS on a new partition.
I've tried using the latest gentoo minimal CD, or the latest
SystemRescueCD, both exhibited the same.
I'm on an HP DL585 G7 box, by the way, so it's using an AMD CPU.
I
On Apr 25, 2013 5:54 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-04-24 10:23 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>> My Gentoo VMs in the cloud (using VMware's vCloud) uses PV-SCSI. It's
>> stable... but kind of sensitive: Everytime the cloud provider do
>> som
On Apr 24, 2013 2:29 AM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-04-22 8:56 AM, Andre Lucas Falco wrote:
>>
>> 2013/4/21 Tanstaafl wrote:
>>>
>>> Windows VMs see get an 'LSI Logic SAS', and my gentoo VM gets an
>>> 'LSI Logic Parallel' controller.
>
>
>> Did you tested using pvscsi? It's improve performa
On Apr 22, 2013 2:05 AM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-04-21 12:38 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
>>
>> I should mention one specific advantage to using LVM over file-based
>> images: I believe you will find that LVM performs better. This is due to
>> avoiding the duplicated filesystem overhead that wo
On Apr 21, 2013 4:51 PM, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
> On Sat, April 20, 2013 18:22, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Apr 20, 2013 10:01 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the responses so far...
> >>
> >> Another question
On Apr 20, 2013 10:01 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> Thanks for the responses so far...
>
> Another question - are there any caveats as to which filesystem to use
for a mail server, for virtualized systems? Ir do the same issues/questions
apply (ie, does the fact that it is virtualized not change anyt
On Apr 20, 2013 9:31 PM, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
> On Fri, April 19, 2013 18:42, Jarry wrote:
> > On 19-Apr-13 17:52, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> >> Well, for me, XenServer-based virtualization is very very simple. And
if
> >> I compile the kernel wit
On Apr 19, 2013 11:14 PM, "J. Roeleveld" wrote:i
>
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2013 10:24 PM, "Jarry" wrote:
>> >
>> > On 19-Apr-13 16:21, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> >
>> >> Previously I had asked for
On Apr 19, 2013 10:24 PM, "Jarry" wrote:
>
> On 19-Apr-13 16:21, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> Previously I had asked for some help with a preconfigured image, but
>> decided against that, and have been playing and reading.
>>
>> I'm ready to get down to brass tacks with the ultimate goal of getting a
>>
On Apr 14, 2013 1:27 PM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
>
> On 04/14/2013 01:55 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 14, 2013 1:42 AM, "Michael Mol" > <mailto:mike...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > What
On Apr 14, 2013 1:42 AM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
>
> On 04/13/2013 01:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> > Three, AMD has no concept of Hyperthreading.
>
> Correct.
>
> > Just match -j to the number of cores your CPU provides, and that'
On Apr 13, 2013 11:57 PM, "Tamer Higazi" wrote:
>
> Am 13.04.2013 18:24, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
> >
> > On Apr 13, 2013 8:29 PM, "Tamer Higazi" > <mailto:th9...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dale!
> &g
On Apr 13, 2013 8:29 PM, "Tamer Higazi" wrote:
>
> Hi Dale!
>
>
> Am 13.04.2013 13:54, schrieb Dale:
> > Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I myself prefer AMD CPUs to Intel ones.
> >>
> >> Intel has this habit of
On Apr 13, 2013 12:18 PM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" wrote:
>
> On Saturday 13 April 2013 10:39:08 AM IST, Kvothe Tech wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Tamer Higazi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi people!
>>> My old core2duo machine says slowly goodbye and I am at this lever
>>> a
On Apr 9, 2013 11:18 PM, "Marc Joliet" wrote:
>
> Update:
>
> I opened a bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465288. There is a
> reference to the Awesome upstream bug which resulted in the change to the
> desktop file, along with a link to a LightDM upstream bug that sounds
like what
> w
On Apr 9, 2013 1:16 PM, "Michael Hampicke" wrote:
>
> Am 09.04.2013 05:50, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
> > I have two Gentoo VMs at Hetzner and the CPU supports 64 bit (grep lm
> > /proc/cpuinfo = true).
> >
> > But something funny, gcc -march=native -mtune=native -v -E - 2>&1
> > >
> > Using bui
On Apr 8, 2013 11:17 PM, "Bruce Hill"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> >
> > Mike is right, if it's not a dep of another ebuild, you don't need
> > wpa_supplicant. I just upgraded udev to 200 on the last remote box
> > (which is always a bit of a thril
On Apr 9, 2013 12:32 AM, "Jarry" wrote:
>
> On 08-Apr-13 19:19, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> On 04/08/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Hill wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:58:38PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400
Nick Khamis wrote:
>
> As for /sbin/ip.
On Apr 7, 2013 8:13 AM, "William Kenworthy" wrote:
>
> On 07/04/13 01:10, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > 'Evening, Alan.
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 06:36:07PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On 06/04/2013 17:57, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Please excuse me, I am running back and forth from the s
On Apr 7, 2013 3:56 PM, "Stroller" wrote:
>
>
> On 7 April 2013, at 07:00, Joseph wrote:
> > ...
> > Are these new udev rules going across all Linux distros or this is
something specific to Gentoo?
>
> I would assume across all distros.
>
> Gentoo generally makes a policy of just packaging whateve
On Apr 7, 2013 5:59 PM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 00:34:03 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > > Now I only had to figure out how to rename eth[0-9]+ to the custom
> > > naming scheme when using mdev.
> >
> > ***UDEV*** has broken using "eth[0-9]". mdev works just fine, thank
>
On Apr 6, 2013 7:32 PM, wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:11:46 +0700
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > On Apr 6, 2013 3:44 PM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 21:14:39 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > >
> > > &
On Apr 6, 2013 3:44 PM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 21:14:39 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > * on a machine with multiple network cards *ALL USING DIFFERENT DRIVERS*
> > * drivers are built as modules, not built-in into the kernel
> > * is it possible to set things up so that the
On Apr 1, 2013 1:54 PM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:34:51 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> > > What about USB network adaptors? A user may not even realise they
> > > plugged it into a different USB slot from last time, yet the device
> > > name changes.
> >
> > Fair point bu
On Apr 1, 2013 2:10 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2013 20:26, Dale wrote:
> > Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> >> On 2013-03-31, Dale wrote:
> >>> Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Since
On Mar 31, 2013 7:13 PM, "Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)"
wrote:
>
> On 2013-03-31, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> > On 2013-03-31, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> On 30/03/13 17:15, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >>> Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page
> >>
> >> You should probab
On Mar 30, 2013 9:48 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> I should have added that this is for a server (not hardened), so I don't
care about hot plug this or that, I just care about stability and
reliability with respect to updates not breaking booting capability...
>
>
> On 2013-03-30 10:39 AM, Tanstaafl
On Mar 30, 2013 2:54 AM, "Mick" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> A few months ago I got some errors about the match option in some iptables
> rules that I was running at the time. I modified these to remove match
and
> add conntrack and all went well.
>
>
> Now I am trying to run this:
>
> /sbin/iptables -
On Mar 29, 2013 8:49 PM, "Florian Philipp" wrote:
>
> Hi list!
>
> I noticed that beginning with kernel 3.8, ext4 can store small files
> entirely inside the inode. But I couldn't find much additional
information:
>
> - Is the improvement automatically enabled?
>
> - Is the change backwards compat
1 - 100 of 949 matches
Mail list logo
