Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks:
$ equery d dev-ruby/*bundler*
* These packages depend on dev-ruby/bundler:
...
dev-ruby/*rdoc*-6.1.2 (test ? dev-ruby/bundler[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)])
(test ? dev-ruby/bundler[ruby_targets_ruby26(-)])
$ equery d dev
n952162 wrote:
> On 2/4/21 9:05 PM, Stefano Crocco wrote:
>> On giovedì 4 febbraio 2021 20:49:37 CET n952162 wrote:
>>> Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks:
>>>
>>> $ equery d dev-ruby/*bundler*
>>> * These packages depend on d
On 2/4/21 9:05 PM, Stefano Crocco wrote:
On giovedì 4 febbraio 2021 20:49:37 CET n952162 wrote:
Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks:
$ equery d dev-ruby/*bundler*
* These packages depend on dev-ruby/bundler:
...
dev-ruby/*rdoc*-6.1.2 (test ? dev-ruby/bu
On giovedì 4 febbraio 2021 20:49:37 CET n952162 wrote:
> Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks:
>
> $ equery d dev-ruby/*bundler*
> * These packages depend on dev-ruby/bundler:
> ...
> dev-ruby/*rdoc*-6.1.2 (test ? dev-ruby/bund
On 2/4/21 10:45 PM, Dale wrote:
n952162 wrote:
On 2/4/21 9:05 PM, Stefano Crocco wrote:
On giovedì 4 febbraio 2021 20:49:37 CET n952162 wrote:
Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks:
$ equery d dev-ruby/*bundler*
* These packages depend on dev-ruby/bundler:
...
dev-ruby/
On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:52:01 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Question: Is is true that the RUBY dependencies listed in the above
> paste link are entirely due to adding documentation support
> (specifically rdoc)? If so, can I tell portage to not install the rdoc
> stuff? I h
s to add a bunch of ruby_targets_ruby20 use flags in
/etc/portage/package.use
Thank you,
Chris
===
The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
(see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1[rdoc]
# required by
.0 globally instead.
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby20"
in make.conf.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Chris
>
> ===
>
> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
> (see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
> # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0
On 06/06/2014 09:48 AM, Stephen Reynolds wrote:
> rdoc -o doc -t 'JSON Implementation for Ruby' -m README.rdoc
> ext/json/ext/generator/generator.c sh: rdoc: command not found
You apparently have ruby19 and ruby20 installed, is this right?
Do you have a version of ruby eselected
On Sun, Aug 20 2017, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On 08/20/2017 08:19 AM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>> I am currently running ruby21 (ruby-2.1.9).
>> All such versions of ruby are masked so this is clearly a mistake
>> on my part. I was alerted to this error by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.2.
d, in order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> >
> >
> > [nomerge ] virtual/rubygems-6:ruby20 [1:ruby18, 4:ruby19]
> > RUBY_TARGETS="(ruby20)"
> > [nomerge ] dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8,
> >
dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8, 1.9.3_p484:1.9]
USE="berkdb doc gdbm ipv6 ncurses rdoc readline ssl -debug -examples -rubytests
-socks5 -tk (-xemacs)"
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE="doc {-test}"
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jrub
Is Ruby's rdoc documentation installed with the ruby ebuild? ri18 doesn't
seem to be able to find it.
David
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
gt; [nomerge ] virtual/rubygems-6:ruby20 [1:ruby18, 4:ruby19]
> RUBY_TARGETS="(ruby20)"
> [nomerge ] dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8,
> 1.9.3_p484:1.9] USE="berkdb doc gdbm ipv6 ncurses rdoc readline ssl -debug
> -examples -rubytests -socks5 -t
On Sunday 07 August 2005 02:11 pm, David Corbin wrote:
> Is Ruby's rdoc documentation installed with the ruby ebuild? ri18 doesn't
> seem to be able to find it.
>
I noticed that USE flags were "-doc". I assume correcting this will make
things better...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> Yes, this is true. We do this because normally ruby contains a copy of
> rdoc. We unbundle that and thus the external rdoc implementation is
> installed.
Hans,
Thank you, I understand.
Apparently I have to add some ruby_targe
files merge-sync news parallel-fetch
preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox sfperms splitdebug strict
unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv
usersandbox usersync"
>=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 ruby_targets_ruby20
# required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20]
#
Only with the doc use flag. Make sure you had that in there when you emerged ruby or re-emerge ruby with it.
-MikeOn 8/7/05, David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is Ruby's rdoc documentation installed with the ruby ebuild? ri18 doesn'tseem to be able to find it.David--gentoo
Indeed it should.On 8/7/05, David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 07 August 2005 02:11 pm, David Corbin wrote:> Is Ruby's rdoc documentation installed with the ruby ebuild? ri18 doesn't> seem to be able to find it.>I noticed that USE flags were "-doc&qu
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:49 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks:
>
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/bundler-2.1.4/temp/environment: line 663:
> rdoc: command not found
>
> Emerging rdoc fails because it tries to emerge bundler...
>
On 2/4/21 9:24 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:49 +0100, n952162 wrote:
Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks:
/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/bundler-2.1.4/temp/environment: line 663:
rdoc: command not found
Emerging rdoc fails because it tries to e
request caught my eye.
Question: Is is true that the RUBY dependencies listed in the above
paste link are entirely due to adding documentation support
(specifically rdoc)? If so, can I tell portage to not install the
rdoc stuff? I have USE=-doc already.
Thank you,
Chris
iutils-3.1.8 -zlib
dev-db/mysql -debug
#really not compatible!
dev-libs/klibc -custom-cflags
#stupid missfeature; buggy as fuck too.
media-video/mplayer -joystick
#BOINC compatibility.
net-misc/curl -gnutls
# requires dead libraries:
dev-libs/libusb -doc
media-libs/fontconfig -doc
media-sound
This is what I have.
stephen #grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby20"
stephen # ls -l /usr/bin/rdoc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jun 6 20:13 /usr/bin/rdoc -> rdoc20
stephen # eselect ruby list
Available Ruby profiles:
[1] ruby19 (with Rubygems)
[2] ruby20 (
the original 'package.use' file:
cat package.use
=dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite
>=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/rubyge
I am currently running ruby21 (ruby-2.1.9).
All such versions of ruby are masked so this is clearly a mistake
on my part. I was alerted to this error by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.2.0
failing to build on today's emerge --update @world
After I do
eselect ruby set ruby22
can I simply
emerge --u
). The original post in this thread provides a pastebin
> link to back up this claim.
Basically the newslot upgrade ruby 1.8.x -> 1.9.x.
For example, you can see that in
${PORTDIR}/dev-ruby/json/json-1.5.4-r1.ebuild there is the line
PDEPEND="
rdoc? ( >=dev-ruby/rdoc-3.9.4[r
t; run. If the output is acceptable, it should be piped through to the
> shell.
>
> Here is the contents of the original 'package.use' file:
>
> cat package.use
> =dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite
> >=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
> >=dev-ruby
:
>>
>> cat package.use
>> =dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite
>> >=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21
>>
in the next week or so.
Ok, I see.
The only ruby-related packages I have installed are ruby, rubygems, rake,
json, racc and rdoc, those are build-time-deps, so eselecting ruby21 will be
ok for me.
r
request:
- virtual/rubygems-7::gentoo (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- virtual/rubygems-5::gentoo (masked by: missing keyword)
(dependency required by "dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[-test]" [installed])
(dependency required by "dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353[rdoc]" [installed])
(dependency r
> On 20 Aug 2017, at 15:19, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
> I am currently running ruby21 (ruby-2.1.9).
> All such versions of ruby are masked so this is clearly a mistake
> on my part. I was alerted to this error by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.2.0
> failing to build on today's emerge -
Okay I am now using ruby19, This have solved my problem.
Thanks
stephen # eselect ruby list
Available Ruby profiles:
[1] ruby19 (with Rubygems) *
[2] ruby20 (with Rubygems)
stephen # ls -l /usr/bin/rdoclrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jun 8 11:45
/usr/bin/rdoc ->
rdoc19
stephen # grep R
27;t support running with ruby19 only. It might work, we
just don't support it. :-)
> f) [your idea here]
f) It should just have worked.
I tried to be conservative and not add ruby19 in RUBY_TARGETS right away,
but as you have noticed this causes problems for rdoc and friends. I
RGET. It's not immediately clear which package that is from
the output, but I suspect dev-ruby/rubygems? Re-emerging the packages
still installed for ruby18 should fix this.
I rebuiltd rubygems and the virtual but still no go.
Then I rebuilt rdoc (which pulled in a bunch of other stuff) but no
ortage(5) man page for more details) # required by
dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0-r1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby24] # required by
dev-ruby/rdoc-6.1.1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby26] # required by
dev-lang/ruby-2.5.3::gentoo[rdoc] # required by
dev-vcs/subversion-1.11.1::gentoo[ruby] # required by
app-portage/layma
sk changes are necessary to proceed: (see "package.unmask" in the
portage(5) man page for more details) # required by
dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0-r1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby24] # required by
dev-ruby/rdoc-6.1.1::gentoo[ruby_targets_ruby26] # required by
dev-lang/ruby-2.5.3::gentoo[rdoc] # requi
cons-2.3.0-user.pdf
scrollkeeper-omf.dtd
seamonkey-2.26.1-en-GB.xpi
rdoc-4.0.1.gem
readline62-004
rfc2307bis.schema-20140524
nmap-logo-64.png
gobject-introspection-1.40.0.tar.xz._checksum_failure_.146ofr
I guess I need "enlightenment" ?
Also, in the past I have manually aged/pruned or size/
ARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Ragel State Machine Compiler version 6.7 May 2011
Copyright (c) 2001-2009 by Adrian Thurston
Ragel State Machine Compiler version 6.7 May 2011
Copyright (c) 2001-2009 by Adrian Thurston
Writing version information for 1.8.0
rdoc -o doc -t 'JSON Implemen
On 08/20/2017 08:19 AM, allan gottlieb wrote:
I am currently running ruby21 (ruby-2.1.9).
All such versions of ruby are masked so this is clearly a mistake
on my part. I was alerted to this error by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.2.0
failing to build on today's emerge --update @world
After I do
es
x27;all_ruby_compile'
environment, line 618: Called all_ruby_compile
environment, line 727: Called all_fakegem_compile
environment, line 688: Called die
The specific snippet of code:
rdoc ${RUBY_FAKEGEM_DOC_SOURCES} || die "failed to (re)build
documentation"
verdan32.exe webdin32.exe )
>
> and many others (here's a sample from /usr/portage/distfiles):
>
> scons-2.3.0-user.html
> scons-2.3.0-user.pdf
> scrollkeeper-omf.dtd
> seamonkey-2.26.1-en-GB.xpi
> rdoc-4.0.1.gem
> readline62-004
> rfc2307bis.schema-20140524
>
sts on installing other versions of
ruby, rdoc, rubygems, and you already know the others.
AFAICT, the other versions of ruby are dragged in by old ruby packages
that were installed before I started using "RUBY_TARGETS" (because I
didn't yet know about RUBY_TARGETS),
I discovered
but why three different versions of
> Ruby all of a sudden?
I found the same a few days ago, but didn't have the energy to sort out the
mess. Just now I ran:
$ sudo emerge -c dev-lang/ruby:1.8 dev-lang/ruby:1.9 dev-lang/ruby:2.0 json
racc rake rdoc rubygems thin-provisioning-tools =virtua
led for the moment due to weird dependency issues with some
> packages. This will get rectified when we add ruby20 to the default
> RUBY_TARGETS.
If anything needs ruby, you get whatever version of ruby it wants (say,
1.9). But then the next time you emerge -puDN world, you pull in
dev-lang/ru
s
[ebuild R]dev-ruby/test-unit-3.1.9 RUBY_TARGETS="(-ruby21%*)"
[ebuild R]dev-ruby/rdoc-4.2.0 RUBY_TARGETS="(-ruby21%*)"
[ebuild R]dev-ruby/minitest-5.8.4 RUBY_TARGETS="(-ruby21%*)"
RUBY_TARGETS is set in the profiles
; *.exe (like verdan32.exe webdin32.exe )
>
> and many others (here's a sample from /usr/portage/distfiles):
>
> scons-2.3.0-user.html
> scons-2.3.0-user.pdf
> scrollkeeper-omf.dtd
> seamonkey-2.26.1-en-GB.xpi
> rdoc-4.0.1.gem
> readline62-004
> rfc2307bis.schema-
e 1782: Called _ruby_invoke_environment 'all'
'all_ruby_compile'
environment, line 618: Called all_ruby_compile
environment, line 727: Called all_fakegem_compile
environment, line 688: Called die
The specific snippet of code:
rdoc ${RUBY_FAKEGEM_D
0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
>dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 re
ets, I get this:
[ebuild N ] dev-ruby/thor-1.2.1:1::gentoo USE="-doc -test"
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby27 (-ruby30) (-ruby31)" 95 KiB
and, dev-lang/ruby-2.7.6:2.7 is drawn in as a build dependency:
[ebuild N ] dev-lang/ruby-2.7.6:2.7::gentoo USE="gdbm ipv6 rdoc ssl -
berkdb -debug -doc -examples -jemalloc -jit -rubytests -socks5 -static-libs -
systemtap -tk -xemacs" 11,802 KiB
NOTE: ruby 3.0 and 3.1 are marked as testing.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
p this claim.
It is implicit. dev-lang/ruby:1.9 requires a new enough version of rdoc
with this particular USE flag enabled.
> 2. If the answer to (1) is "the gentoo system itself", then why doesn't
> "the gentoo system itself" update the USE_EXPAND by adding a ref
Sunday 07 August 2005 02:11 pm, David Corbin wrote:
>
>
>>Is Ruby's rdoc documentation installed with the ruby ebuild? ri18 doesn't
>>seem to be able to find it.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I noticed that USE flags were "-doc". I assume correcting this will make
>things better...
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
ssert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> > dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> > dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> > dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> > dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires
> > dev-lang/r
dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> > dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> >dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev-
> > lang/ruby:2.1
> > dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires
> > dev-lang
e
ruby19 has the best overall coverage for packages. Once ruby20 has caught
up I think we'll move to a default of RUBY_TARGETS="ruby20"
> In spite of that, portage often insists on installing other versions of
> ruby, rdoc, rubygems, and you already know the others.
P
dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires
dev-lang/ruby:2.1
dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
e system with default ruby targets, I get this:
[ebuild N ] dev-ruby/thor-1.2.1:1::gentoo USE="-doc -test"
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby27 (-ruby30) (-ruby31)" 95 KiB
and, dev-lang/ruby-2.7.6:2.7 is drawn in as a build dependency:
[ebuild N ] dev-lang/ruby-2.7.6:2.7::gentoo U
ires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires
> dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
>
dev-lang/ruby:3.0)
dev-ruby/rake-13.0.6-r2 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0)
dev-ruby/rdoc-6.5.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0)
dev-ruby/rexml-3.2.6 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0)
dev-ruby/rss-0.3.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0)
dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.15 (ru
quires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires
> dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
> dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
>
portage message about it:
The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
(see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
# required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p484[tk]
# required by dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6[ruby_targets_ruby19]
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353
ing digest for
'/var/cache/portage/tree/media-libs/libass/libass-0.11.2.ebuild'
| * Missing digest for
'/var/cache/portage/tree/kde-apps/pairs/pairs-4.14.3.ebuild'
* Missing digest for
'/var/cache/portage/tree/x11-misc/obconf-qt/obconf-qt-0.1.0.ebuild'
/ * Missing dig
json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
>> dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
>> dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
>> dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1
>> dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires
&g
l/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)] pulled in by:
* (dev-ruby/did_you_mean-1.2.1:2.5/2.5::gentoo, installed)
*
* virtual/ruby-ssl[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)] pulled in by:
* (dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2:0/0::gentoo, installed)
*
* virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)] pulled in by:
* (
following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
(see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
# required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p484[tk]
# required by dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6[ruby_targets_ruby19]
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353
# required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targe
00.2
dev-python/setuptools-0.8-r1
dev-ruby/json-1.8.0
dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9
dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6
dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1
dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3
dev-util/boost-build-1.52.0-r1
dev-util/dialog-1.2.20130928
dev-util/gperf-3.0.4
dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.19
dev-util/intltool-0.50.2-r1
dev-util/ragel-6.7-r1
med
Sorry...a typo...
It has to be 463 packages NOT 4563 packages...
Cheers
Meino
On 02/27 04:08, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 02/26 11:55, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Monday, 26 February 2018 18:42:33 GMT tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Peter,
> > >
> > > luky you...I got 462 packages to
e_DE/Adobe Reader/8.0/images
/opt/Adobe/Help/en_US/Adobe Reader
/opt/Adobe/Help/en_US/Adobe Reader/8.0
/opt/Adobe/Help/en_US/Adobe Reader/8.0/images
/sbin/fix_libtool_files.sh
/usr/bin/addr2line
/usr/bin/ar
/usr/bin/as
/usr/bin/c++
/usr/bin/c++filt
/usr/bin/c89
/usr/bin/c99
/usr/bin/cc
/usr/bin/cpp
[ebuild R] dev-util/cppcheck-1.75::gentoo USE="pcre qt4
-htmlreport" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5
(-python3_3%)" 0 KiB
[ebuild U ] media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.6.6:0/6.9.6.6::gentoo
[6.9.5.10:0/6.9.5.10::gentoo] USE="X bzip2 cxx fftw fontconfig
erl/Unicode-EastAsianWidth-1.330.0-r1
dev-perl/XML-Parser-2.440.0
dev-python/absl-py-0.7.1
dev-python/astor-0.8.1
dev-python/bleach-3.1.4-r1
dev-python/blinker-1.4-r1
dev-python/bz2file-0.98
dev-python/cachetools-3.1.1
dev-python/certifi-2019.11.28
dev-python/cffi-1.14.0
dev-python/chardet-3.0.4
dev-pyt
ev-ruby/net-telnet:1 dev-ruby/power_assert:0 dev-ruby/racc:0
dev-ruby/rake:0 dev-ruby/rdoc:0 dev-ruby/rubygems:0 dev-ruby/test-unit:2
dev-util/automoc:0 dev-util/boost-build:0 dev-util/cmake:0
dev-util/cppunit:0 dev-util/ctags:0 dev-util/desktop-file-utils:0
dev-util/gdbus-codegen:0 dev-util/google-pe
Setup:
gentoo 32bit vbox guest on win 10 64bit host
Installed xorg-server, lxde Meta pkgs and deps
(along with many other pkgs ... to many to list
here but included at the end)
uname -a:
Linux g0 4.8.8-gentoo #2 Fri Nov 18 20:16:14 EST 2016 i686 Intel(R)
Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GH
On 07/12/2016 17:34, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup:
>
>gentoo 32bit vbox guest on win 10 64bit host
>Installed xorg-server, lxde Meta pkgs and deps
>(along with many other pkgs ... to many to list
>here but included at the end)
>
> uname -a:
> Linux g0 4.8.8-gentoo #2 Fri Nov 18 2
73 matches
Mail list logo
