Hi All,
Until recently ( a couple of stable versions ago) I used to have
ooo-kde in my USE flags, which emerged OOo with the nicer (me thinks)
Ximian style icons.
Well, ooo-kde is now deprecated. I removed it and ever since OOo is
launched with the uglier menu icons. That's despite me having
Hello,
OpenOffice has worked wonderfully for me for some time now, until just
yesterday.
I do not use openoffice regularly so I not sure which update caused the problem.
On both these versions: 2.0.1-r1 and 2.0.2-r2
I get the same problem:
ooffice2 lauches the apps just fine. When I go to
On Thursday 27 April 2006 18:11, James wrote:
Hello,
OpenOffice has worked wonderfully for me for some time now, until just
yesterday. I do not use openoffice regularly so I not sure which update
caused the problem.
On both these versions: 2.0.1-r1 and 2.0.2-r2
I get the same problem:
Hi,
I've just recompiled my system using gcc-4.1 and of course
openoffice does not work, the compilation fails while the binary one
segfaults.
I searched the archives but found no clue.
Anyone else experienced the same issues ?
Thanks,
Catalin
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just recompiled my system using gcc-4.1 and of course
openoffice does not work, the compilation fails while the binary one
segfaults.
I searched the archives but found no clue.
Anyone else experienced the same issues ?
When glibc 2.4 was
Hi all
I got OpenOffice2 installed last week. I use Evolution as my default
mail frontend.
Openoffice has now display settings for a (nearly) blind person. The
icons in the taskbar aren't big. They are huge.
I'd like to change some font settings in Evolution too.
If I remember right this is
Franta schreef:
Hi all
snip
Openoffice has now display settings for a (nearly) blind person. The
icons in the taskbar aren't big. They are huge.
I'd like to change some font settings in Evolution too.
. Can anyone tell me which part of Gnome to install to be able to
change the display
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 00:17 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
Franta schreef:
Hi all
snip
Openoffice has now display settings for a (nearly) blind person. The
icons in the taskbar aren't big. They are huge.
I'd like to change some font settings in Evolution too.
. Can anyone tell me
I just upgraded to OpenOffice 2.0.1 but it seems to me that certain
fonts that came with OpenOffice will not print on the printer, they are
being substituted to something else. Example Becker font will not
print.
Is there a work around?
--
#Joseph
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Have anybody tried to compile openoffice 2.0 with --disable-cups ?
I think Openoffice is detecting cups printer (local printers)
automatically but it is not showing all the entries I have setup in
Kprinter.
With printer auto-detect I can not add any other printer via spadmin, so
I was wondering
WORD OF WARNING. I HAVE NEVER DONE THIS!
I think it is in make.conf. Looks something like this:
# PORTAGE_TMPDIR is the location portage will use for compilations and
# temporary storage of data. This can get VERY large depending upon
# the application being installed.
On 12/3/05, Jeff Cranmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it was fully compiled, but I didn't check back before I closed
the compile window (my bad). There are only 3.5GB free on my \var
directory, so it's possible.
Don't feel bad. I think in some cases the build and installation
looks
On 12/3/05, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget to remove the # though. May want to change it back
afterwords too.
You can change it temporarily in the environment:
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=/mnt/data emerge openoffice
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi All,
The new update came out (app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.9.19) and it
complained that first I must unmerge the now deprecated
app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.3.9-r1. Then I should use
app-office/openoffice instead. So, I did as I was told but it seems that
the vanilla opeoffice wants to
On Friday 02 December 2005 21:10, Mick wrote:
Hi All,
The new update came out (app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.9.19) and it
complained that first I must unmerge the now deprecated
app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.3.9-r1. Then I should use
app-office/openoffice instead. So, I did as I was told
Charly ghislain wrote:
[massive amounts of OP snipage]
try USE=-eds
ever hear of trimming?
Here are some helpful links:
http://www.emailreplies.com/
http://kimihia.org.nz/articles/email/
http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
[ebuild N] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.2.3 -debug -doc -ipv6
-kerberos -ldap -mozilla -nntp +ssl 13,821 kB
[ebuild N] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 +curl +eds -gnome -gtk -java
+kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 210,553 kB
==
USE=aac avi
Yoandy Rodriguez wrote:
[ebuild N] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.2.3 -debug -doc -ipv6
-kerberos -ldap -mozilla -nntp +ssl 13,821 kB
[ebuild N] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 +curl +eds -gnome -gtk -java
+kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +xml2 +zlib 210,553 kB
I've just upgraded to the latest version of openoffice
It seems to be broken.
When I start openoffice writer, I get the error
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Richard Fish wrote:
If you are compiling from source, you will need _at least_ 4G of free
space for PORTAGE_TMPDIR at the start of the merge.
-Richard
He is not kidding either. My /var is on my / partition and that puppy
got big while compiling OOo. It's back to normal now though. It
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 18:48 -0500, Yoandy Rodriguez wrote:
[ebuild N] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.2.3 -debug -doc -ipv6
-kerberos -ldap -mozilla -nntp +ssl 13,821 kB
[ebuild N] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 +curl +eds -gnome -gtk -java
+kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +xml2
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:37:34 -0700, Joseph wrote:
Does anybody have a clue what is going on and how to make changes via
spadmin.
Are you running spadmin as root?
--
Neil Bothwick
668 - The neighbour of the beast.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 08:46 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:37:34 -0700, Joseph wrote:
Does anybody have a clue what is going on and how to make changes via
spadmin.
Are you running spadmin as root?
Yes, I did.
--
#Joseph
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my
system.
Uwe
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more
stable on my system.
Uwe
I always compile mine to. It is downloading it now. Why is it only
32MBs this time? It was over 200MBs last time.
Dale
:-)
--
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.
--
The first file is only 32MB. There are more to come. :)
Uwe
Dale wrote:
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more
stable on my system.
Uwe
I always compile mine to. It is downloading it now. Why is it only
32MBs this time? It was over 200MBs
I'll agree here: I sometimes download a new binary to test before seeing
if I really want it - then compile it. Compiled is usually subjectively
faster, and definitely more stable.
Besides, as someone else put it, its more fun ...
BillK
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
I
Uh Oh. Here goes my dial-up. I only get 26K here. Last time it took
three nights to get it all, about 24 hours total.
I may go visit my friend that has DSL. LOL
Dale
:-)
Uwe Klosa wrote:
The first file is only 32MB. There are more to come. :)
Uwe
Dale wrote:
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I
On 2005-11-30 08:12:34 +0100 (Wed, Nov), Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
It's likely to take somewhere around
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 03:00 am, a tiny voice compelled Uwe Klosa to
write:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on
my system.
I've installed OO both ways in the past and stability hasn't been an issue.
The only thing I noticed is that the compiled
Ernie Schroder wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 03:00 am, a tiny voice compelled Uwe Klosa to
write:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on
my system.
I've installed OO both ways in the past and stability hasn't been an issue.
The only thing I
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my
system.
Uwe
[snip]
I've compile OO 2.0 without any errors.
But when I just open and save a spreadsheet OO 2.0 crashed on me with
[signal.11].
Not a good
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:30:24 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote:
I've installed OO both ways in the past and stability hasn't been an
issue. The only thing I noticed is that the compiled version opens
faster than the binary version. As I remember, the difference was
roughly 7 seconds. It seems like
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 09:18 am, a tiny voice compelled Neil Bothwick
to write:
Except that you don't sit and watch it compile (unless you are
exceptionally sad
You mean you don't have to keep watch over long compiles? I guess I have no
life.
Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ernie Schroder wrote:
time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running. I can never remember
to do those long builds while I sleep so I end up, in this case, and for
Well, I wrote a latemerge script that sets up an at cron job :P - So, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
Well, I wrote a latemerge script that sets up an at cron job :P - So, I
emerge it in the
moment but starts at night.
sed -e 's/cron//'
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar
Consultor en Seguridad
Ernie Schroder wrote:
I've recently done 11 months worth of updates on this box and have about 40
hours of build time on it in the last 10 days. I want to use it, not watch
more text fly by on the console.
Try compiling it at a lower priority.
I just put this in my /etc/make.conf file:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the source code version.
Uwe
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:01 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue with
the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the source code version.
Uwe
What do you mean import your settings from an older OO
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:01 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the source code version.
Uwe
What do you mean import your settings
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:35:48 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote:
Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours that it takes to build OO is
not down time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running.
No thanks, I'm broke enough as it is :(
I can
never remember to do those long builds while I
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:48 +0100, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:01 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue
with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the
I just tired to add to OpenOffice 2.0 kprinter but I can not do it.
The usual procedure was:
go to spadmin
Generic printer - properties and enter command kprinter --stdin
But whenever I make any changes, they are not saved. Every time I
restart spadmin I see only one choice Generic Printer. If
Ernie Schroder wrote:
Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours that it takes to build OO is not down
time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running. I can never remember
to do those long builds while I sleep so I end up, in this case, and for
firefox, going for the immediate
Use rsync. I am not sure how much gain there is to be had but try using
an older version as the seed file - should save at least a little.
Creative use of head/tail with seed files and already downloaded
portions can save a lot if the link drops out halfway.
Make sure you use the -P option (read
On Thursday 01 December 2005 03:17, W.Kenworthy wrote:
Use rsync. I am not sure how much gain there is to be had but try using
an older version as the seed file - should save at least a little.
Creative use of head/tail with seed files and already downloaded
portions can save a lot if the
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
--
#Joseph
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
It's likely to take somewhere around 8-11 hours on such a machine. It
took somewhere around 10 hours for me on a
Make sure all nfs services are running on client and server.
OR
you have iptables running and you are blocking random nfs service ports.
Check both client and server.
run rpcinfo -p on each machine to see what ports need to be open. It might
be better to just allow anything to go between
Solved the problem.
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
# file locking now enabled by default
#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
as simple as it gets.
yours,
kos
--
On 10/27/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solved the problem.Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out thefollowing lines:# file locking now enabled by default#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
I
tried it,
but it did not solve the issue on my box.
I guess, i'll stick to the commenting out the file_locking
yours,
kos
--
Respectfully,
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko
Arhont Ltd - Information Security
web:http://www.arhont.com
http://www.wi-foo.com
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko wrote:
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
either that or run lockd...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bruno Lustosa wrote:
It seems rpc.statd isn't running, because status monitor doesn't show on
the list.
ah.. that's right. lockd needs statd. silly nfs.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
As discussed in this thread
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
QTE
++
1 On certain Linux machines, file locking is known to fail due to the
NFS lock demon not running.
2 On certain other Linux machines, it appears that file locking fails
due to some other, not yet
Hi list,
I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,
that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2
hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine with nfs, and such
problem never happened with OpenOffice 1.x
The problem happens on two gentoo
On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine with nfs, and suchproblem never happened with
On Oct 26, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Bruno Lustosa wrote:On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine
On 10/26/05, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in
my experience samba works better for that sort of thing anyway.
If a server serving an nfs share goes down, all the computers with that
share mounted will go nuts, spending 100% cpu trying to get the share
back. Samba seems to fail more
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:24:07 -0600
Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta era. For a while,
I've had issues with the responsiveness when I click a menu or use the
scroll bar with my mouse. Clicking a menu or scrolling with the mouse
causes
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta era. For a while,
I've had issues with the responsiveness when I click a menu or use the
scroll bar with my mouse. Clicking a menu or scrolling with the mouse
causes the program to pause for a few seconds before something happens.
I don't
yes,i am wait a long time too
i have another problem too
when i double click one file,openoffice can't open it ,gave me some error message look like can't find file ***.xls
but the ***.xls was exist
thx2005/10/22, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:37:45AM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 05:58 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
051016 John J. Foster wrote:
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
which wants to re-install the
051016 John J. Foster wrote:
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
which wants to re-install the OOo I just installed.
I haven't done this with OO, but my experience is
that Revdep-rebuild always wants to remerge what I
John J. Foster schreef:
Good evening,
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild, which wants to
re-install the OOo I just installed. I remember having trouble with
various binary packages before, including OOo, which I
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 05:58 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
051016 John J. Foster wrote:
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
which wants to re-install the OOo I just installed.
I haven't done this with OO, but my
Good evening,
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now. Everything
is fine until running revdep-rebuild, which wants to re-install the OOo
I just installed. I remember having trouble with various binary packages
before, including OOo, which I always solved, or hid, by NOT
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip long-windedness and get to the point]Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's, rc2 and rc3?Yes,
I too have the same problems, mostly it would seem, with some embedded
python interpreter. I ignore it and things
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's,
rc2 and rc3?
Yes, I too have the same problems, mostly it would seem, with some
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [1]Gentoo-[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's,
rc2 and rc3?Yes, I too have the same problems,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:35:55PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
Well the only thing I can think is emerge -C openoffice-bin. But that has
other side-effects that you may like even less than a non-clean run of
revdep-rebuild :-)
Yeah - I guess that would teach that stinking
Hi folks,
I've got a couple of questions regarding localisation.
1. OO and English
If I set OO to either British or South African English the spellchecker still
accepts American spelling which is wrong in Namibia. Anybody in the know how
to make it stick to British spelling?
2. OO and
Hi,
With the latest bin version I can't open of save documents that are on a
nfs volume, has anyone else the same problem?
TIA
Patrick
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 09:43 am, Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
Hi,
With the latest bin version I can't open of save documents that are on a
nfs volume, has anyone else the same problem?
No problem here with nfs mounts, but I cannot open some documents that were
saved as .odt files using
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 09:53 am, James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
There is an
James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
I never got it to compile, but I have been using
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 10:44 am, Richard Fish wrote:
James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it
On Wed, 11 May 2005 13:53:16 + (UTC), James wrote:
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
There's already an ebuild for 1.9.95, a beta of 2.0, in portage, but it
is masked. If you want to try it,
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 13:53 +, James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
As someone
By the way, I merged openoffice-bin 1.9.93 . I don't see the beta
versions in the standard (non-bin) ebuild.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 12 May 2005 03:42:01 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
There is an ebuild for the beta somewhere, I'll look for it if you are
interested.
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people are mentally ill.
pgpoFG3pJs8u3.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 16:45 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2005 03:42:01 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
There is an ebuild for the beta somewhere, I'll look for it if you are
interested.
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
--
On Wed, May 11, 2005 8:53 pm, Nick Rout said:
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
Who wants to spend 12 hours building beta software that will probably have
been updated before the merge has finished?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 04:04 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 8:53 pm, Nick Rout said:
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
Who wants to spend 12 hours building beta software that will probably have
been updated before the merge has
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
And I built OpenOffice once, it ended up running slower than OpenOffice-bin...
How come?
I have noticed the same effect with Mozilla-software. At least I get the
feeling that the binaries are a little faster -- I can't really say for
sure.
Sigi
--
S. Schwartz wrote:
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
And I built OpenOffice once, it ended up running slower than
OpenOffice-bin...
How come?
I have noticed the same effect with Mozilla-software. At least I get
the feeling that the binaries are a little faster -- I can't really
say for sure.
Hi,
I'm still trying to figure out why my install doesn't execute for normal
users. So OO only works for root. Upon the ooffice command a normal
user gets a message regarding setup or something like that, then it
aborts.
I believe its not supposed to be started as ooffice, but as one of
In OOo you do what the call a net install first which installs everything.
The each user runs another setup (in the OOo programs directory) which
then sets the user up - you do this for each user. The OOo install guide
has all this in it for various operating systems in more detail.
On Wed,
Many thanks for the help with OpenOffice. I now have it working. Its a
great program. Wow, MS Word files and .pdf. I haven't even scratched
the surface of it all yet. The OpenOffice people have sure done a great
job.
The Genoo mailing lists are great. They are on par with the FreeBSD and
Hi there!
After emerging openoffice-1.1.4-r1, I can't open any .sxw, sxc, etc file.
Immediately, a window pops up saying An unrecoverable error has
occured
With the old version 1.1.4, it works fine, even on the same files that
cause 1.1.4-r1 to crash (so bad files can be excluded)
The
Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2005 21:25 schrieb Alexander Kern:
On Wednesday, 4. Mai 2005 20:30 Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
After emerging openoffice-1.1.4-r1, I can't open any .sxw, sxc, etc
file. Immediately, a window pops up saying An unrecoverable error
has occured
Do you mean that its
Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:01:38AM -0400, Kurt Guenther wrote:
Just checking if I'm missing something. I resumed a merge that ran
over night and it appears to start from the beginning again. As this
merge won't complete in the 10 hrs I give it, is there some
On 4/19/05, Mrugesh Karnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I don't remember who it was, but just last week, someone mentioned
using the feature keeptmp (the name could be wrong. I don't remember
properly and strangly I've somehow not archived the mail :S ) in
make.conf. That makes portage keep
201 - 294 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
