Lie Ryan wrote:
On 09/19/10 19:04, Dale wrote:
Yep. I use Seamonkey which is browser and email all in one. It doesn't
use much when I first start it up. The amount it accumulates as time
goes on depends on the websites I go to. If I go to sites that have a
lot of flash, pictures and
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, me poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
Chrome's set of extensions is growing rather large, and at least
contains most of what anyone would need, a bit short of 'want', but
covers needs fairly well. If you don't like chrome's interface I'll
not argue, but if the
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons
(xmarks,
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan
did opine thusly:
On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan
did opine thusly:
On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried Chrome
once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up on it
because I was not sure if the browser was calling home with my browsing
On 09/19/10 19:26, András Csányi wrote:
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried
Chrome
once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up
on it
because I was not sure if the
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:56:36 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:26:56 András Csányi wrote:
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried
Chrome once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I
gave up on it because I
12 matches
Mail list logo
