A very informative comparison, thanks.
The two main issues with bright water are the strong localized impacts on
marine micro environment / food chain and also the simple problem that it
may just not work!
Assessing the former cannot be properly achieved until the latter is
established, as the
Albert:
1. Thanks for this information on Bayer. Googling I found a bit more at
http://www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/bayer-co2-plastics/
which hints that the catalyst somehow involves zinc.
2. As described, I would put this in the carbon neutral, not CDR category. Of
course if the
Hi Ron,
I want to pick up on the importance of China - but first an apology for
not replying to your message sooner.
I tend to alternate, week by week, between focussing on the principal
types of geoengineering: SRM and CDR (solar radiation management and
carbon dioxide removal) to rescue
The methane time bomb should be quantifiable as follows:
When there were large scale destabilisation of depressurised and then sunlight
and heat-exposed sea beds most of the 22,000 methane clathrate craters were
formed onto the Russian coastal seas as methane ice took the impact from sun
and
overview page
http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications/global-status-beccs-projects-2010
full report
http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/GCCSI_Biorecro_Global_Status_of_BECCS_110302_report.pdf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
From Green Futures magazine, this week, by Alan Knight, who is the director
of the Earth Challenge
http://www.forumforthefuture.org/greenfutures/articles/Virgin_25million_fix
With 2,600 submissions, why is no one top dog?
*
Question: how can $25 million be too much money and also not enough at
Oliver and list
This below sounds to me like a meeting to further investigate topics like
permaculture and composting. These are carbon negative, but measured in
decades, not centuries and millennia. There is little impact on energy supply
and not likely to involve REDD+.
Nevertheless,
One of the potential dissertation topics suggested to me in late 1965 or
early 1966 by Dr. Edward Teller, who had been a leader in forming the
Department of Applied Science of the University of California Davis where I
was a graduate student, was to explore the potential for dispersing Los
Angeles
List (and Andrew and other ccs)
In response to Andrew's comment (repeated in full below), Russell this AM sent
me the following (in full) with (my presumption) an intent to forward to the
list .
The ' optical density' to which Andrew Locksley's response refers, ( the term
is scarcely
Fascinating, Mike.
Do you recall whether the advocates for these approaches in the late 50s
rationalized them as needed because of a view that society would never pursue
serious mitigation?
David
From: Mike MacCracken [mailto:mmacc...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 01:00 PM
To:
Thanks, Oliver. Very disappointing. Of course there are no commercially viable
ways to consume 1GT of air CO2/yr, but let's at least find out what
technologies come closest, give them some award for their efforts, and spur the
RD community to evaluate and innovate further. If the goal is to
Thanks Ken
The tart conclusion is amusing:
Conclusion
Unfortunately, most proponents of
schemes to abate the smog by meteorological
modification consider that they
have done their share in coming forward
with the general ideas, and that it becomes
the duty of the county Air Pollution
Oliver -
Again - thanks for an interesting and helpful lead on Forum for the Future. I
hope you will keep supplying such l.eads.
1. What you have given below gets more interesting for CDR fans when you read
the appreciably longer story at the address you have given below:
[
13 matches
Mail list logo
