Hi Rob; last time your message got sucked by mail rules off to the
geoserver folder where I never acted on it :-)
This time I was waiting for you; Ben should have svn access now for
geotools.
Jody
> hi all,
>
> I'd like to nominate Ben Caradoc-Davies for commit rights for both
> GeoTools and Geo
hi all,
I'd like to nominate Ben Caradoc-Davies for commit rights for both
GeoTools and Geoserver.
Ben is working with me, and will be a full time developer working with
the international GeoSciences community to make sure the tools are
useful.
We'll be working on a set of currently unsupported
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/236/changes
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/d
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/235/changes
--
[...truncated 5469 lines...]
[INFO]
[INFO] Building MySQL DataStore Implementation
[INFO]task-se
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/234/changes
Changes:
[desruisseaux] First working version of MosaicImageWriter and TileBuilder. More
work will be needed in order to improve performance.
--
[...truncated 5482 lines...]
[INF
We are now down to 2 and a half versions in flight; great work :-)
Jody
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/0
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Looks like we have a few corrections from the user list:
>>> - iso geometry implementation available as a supported module
>>>
>> Looks like this was dropped; sad about that as we were paid to put it
>> in. What happened?
> I did not touch anythi
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> - I know you tried to sort out the "unsupported" directory; thanks for
> at least looking at that
Just as a reminder, this is something that I (maybe only partially - depends on
the goal) tried to solve as part of the "gt2 prefix removal" branch, but never
got the time to
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Looks like we have a few corrections from the user list:
>> - iso geometry implementation available as a supported module
>>
> Looks like this was dropped; sad about that as we were paid to put it
> in. What happened?
I did not touch anything. But the diagnosis is pr
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/233/changes
Changes:
[jdeolive] added flag to fail on validation error
[johann.sorel] update demo
[johann.sorel] separating widgettools and processtools.
[johann.sorel] separating widgettools and processtools.
--
Looks like we have a few corrections from the user list:
> - iso geometry implementation available as a supported module
>
Looks like this was dropped; sad about that as we were paid to put it
in. What happened?
It also looks like Ryan Moquin has tried upgrading from 2.4.RC0 and can
no longer
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> I'm sceptical about this. Look at the 2.4.x release history: we
>> have had no release since August 2007, yet there has been more than
>> one reason to make more RCs. It's just that no one can spare
>> the full day needed for a 2.4.x release (that's
Andrea Aime wrote:
> I'm sceptical about this. Look at the 2.4.x release history: we
> have had no release since August 2007, yet there has been more than
> one reason to make more RCs. It's just that no one can spare
> the full day needed for a 2.4.x release (that's what it took
> me despite makin
Hi,
the cite guys just hit me with a wcs request that contains
quite a bit of xml errors:
http://www.opengis.net/wcs/1.1.1";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:ctl="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl";
xmlns:ows="http
Or'ed spatial filters are being and'ed instead
--
Key: GEOT-1705
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1705
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data arcsde
Affects Versi
> Sigh, for the n-th time. I did generate the javadocs with jdk5.
Oups! Sorry, I didn't realized that. Yes given your report, removing the profile
was probably the best action to do.
Martin
-
This SF.net email is spo
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> The same should apply to every class in the whole GeoTools API. This
> information
> has not been added because of a weid idea of mine - users really asked for
> that
> on the mailing list. They want to know in which JAR is a class. This
> information
> will not
The requirement for Java 5 in JavaDoc generation was because I wrote two taglets
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/gt/build/maven/javadoc/src/main/java/org/geotools/maven/taglet/
and unfortunatly the taglet API was not stabilized before Java 5, so those
taglets will not work when generating
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Hey Andrea,
>
> Like so many things in Geotools, Martin is probably the only person who
> fully understands the reason for this maven block and who can tell us
> where to check in the javadocs to see if there are broken links or
> missing pieces when the javadocs are bu
Hey Andrea,
Like so many things in Geotools, Martin is probably the only person who
fully understands the reason for this maven block and who can tell us
where to check in the javadocs to see if there are broken links or
missing pieces when the javadocs are built with 1.4. And Martin is so
busy th
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Hi,
> the troubles with the javadoc generation (see users mailing list)
> were related to a profile we have in the main pom:
>
>
>java5
>
> 1.5
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
