[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-trunk #731

2008-06-13 Thread jdeolive
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/731/changes - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforg

Re: [Geotools-devel] Kill or Kick or Keep

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : unsupported/jpox We can kill it unsupported/notifycollections (with apache license) Kill it. There is an other one that I found in my email archive, and I didn't went ahead with it yet: modules/unsupported/gml3. I attached to this email the comment from Justi

Re: [Geotools-devel] New transformation builder proposal

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Jan I didn't yet had the time to look to the transform builder. Actually I didn't had the time to look at Refraction's work from last year neither, so I'm really more than one year late on the referencing module :(. But if I'm understanding right, the new AdvancedAffineBuilder class is no

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] lists.refractions.net very slow

2008-06-13 Thread Jody Garnett
You are correct; it appears that we are suffering a "close wait" problem; some client is requesting files from us rapidly; thousands at a time; and not closing its HTTP connections properly. In each case the server is taking part the the HTTP hang-up protocol; the client asks us to CLOSE; we te

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
A provocative question deserves a provocative answer: I would ask them where the facility is, and move my residence at the exact antipodes hoping the radioactive fallout does not reach that far Cheers Andrea - Check out the n

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #730

2008-06-13 Thread jdeolive
See http://gridlock.openplans.org:8080/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/730/changes Changes: [desruisseaux] When given a flat array of tiles (all having the same subsampling), TreeTileManager now creates a default tree. This is an effort to avoid the "worst case" scenario, which appears to hurt Mosaic

[Geotools-devel] lists.refractions.net very slow

2008-06-13 Thread Arne Kepp
From here it looks like lists.refractions.net is very slow, like 1 minute before it comes around to serving the front page (Fedora Test Page). -Arne - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to bu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools needs YOU to finish the cleanup

2008-06-13 Thread Jody Garnett
I think we are all aware of how amazing Adrian has been during this time of need. I personally had a couple hard runs at this problem and can really respect the time and effort Adrian has invested in this work. One bit of advice I have for the frigging osgeo incubation process is that it is *no

[Geotools-devel] Kill or Kick or Keep

2008-06-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Comments inline, on the kill or keep issue. Two questions first: - Can we have a middle ground where we do not distribute the code? - Can we have a middle ground where modules like oracle datastore (that are in use) are included in the build; and leave everything else in unsupported out of the b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools needs YOU to finish the cleanup

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Thanks a lot Adrian for your hard work!! I would just like to let peoples know... Adrian has worked very long days (up to 3AM yesterday) lately for getting this copyright cleanup done. If he wasn't up for doing this task, I'm not sure that anyone else would have done it and maybe our OSGEO gra

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Jody Garnett
In terms of our graduation requirements; all we need to do is: - a note the weirdness; formally in our bug tracker - have links to these Jira tickets in our osgeo incubation review page Projects have graduated with known issues; the only requirement is that we know where the problems are. Having

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright Work

2008-06-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : >> I think if Martin has mvn site working we can probably kill the >> module matrix page; pom.xml being more likly to be kept up to date. > I agree. > > For now on Maven site generation, we are having issue with Clover > (Cédric posted an email

[Geotools-devel] Geotools needs YOU to finish the cleanup

2008-06-13 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, The headers are all changed except for: unsupported/community-schemas unsupported/jts-wrapper unsupported/ogc and whatever I have now missed. Justin, since you are generating the ogc classes on the fly, can't you put in the header? Either way, I'm leaving you to d

Re: [Geotools-devel] Another SUN class in our code

2008-06-13 Thread Graham Davis
Yah, we can make that change on Monday. I'll let you know when it's done. Thanks, Graham. Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks Adrian; yes I knew about this (and sent email that we would need > to rewrite this at the time :-D ). > I will ask gdavis to work on this today... > Jody > >> Hey Jody, >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Another SUN class in our code

2008-06-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Adrian; yes I knew about this (and sent email that we would need to rewrite this at the time :-D ). I will ask gdavis to work on this today... Jody > Hey Jody, > > On this one you are listed as the author. Can you please fix the > header/code of > modules/unsupported/process/src/main/java/o

[Geotools-devel] Another SUN class in our code

2008-06-13 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Jody, On this one you are listed as the author. Can you please fix the header/code of modules/unsupported/process/src/main/java/org/geotools/process/ProgressTask.java Thanks, --adrian - Check out the new SourceForge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] coverage module: ViewsManager and ViewType information requests.

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hi Daniele There is no documentation at this stage. There is the steps assuming that your image have only one band. If you have more bands, just repeat the steps for each of them. * Create a Category using the constructor expecting the following informations: - Minimum packed value - Max

[Geotools-devel] coverage module: ViewsManager and ViewType information requests.

2008-06-13 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Martin, Actually, I'm working with some HDF files containing packed data related to some geophysic quantities (as an instance, SST), together with attributes scale/offset to transform packed -> geophysic. Simone suggested me to take a look at the classes in coverage module: ViewsManager/Viewtype

[Geotools-devel] Dates for files in unsup/h2

2008-06-13 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey Justin, most of the files in unsupported/h2 are dated 2002-2006 but the svn module only starts in september 2007. Are the dates right? thanks, --adrian - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best pla

Re: [Geotools-devel] New expression visitor, check and commit

2008-06-13 Thread johann sorel
Andrea Aime a écrit : > johann sorel ha scritto: >> Hello, >> >> Here is a new Expression visitor that returns a collection of the >> required attributes of this expression. >> I would like someone to check it and someone working on the main >> module to commit it. >> (or at least tell me that I

Re: [Geotools-devel] New expression visitor, check and commit

2008-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
johann sorel ha scritto: > Hello, > > Here is a new Expression visitor that returns a collection of the > required attributes of this expression. > I would like someone to check it and someone working on the main module > to commit it. > (or at least tell me that I can commit it in package : >

[Geotools-devel] GeoAPI 2.1.1 released

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
This is an update from GeoAPI 2.1 branch (*not* the trunk, which is GeoAPI 2.2-SNAPSHOT). The only difference compared to GeoAPI 2.1.0 is that the following package has been removed: * org.opengis.coverage.grid.quadrilateral This package was experimental and not intented to be released. It cont

[Geotools-devel] New expression visitor, check and commit

2008-06-13 Thread johann sorel
Hello, Here is a new Expression visitor that returns a collection of the required attributes of this expression. I would like someone to check it and someone working on the main module to commit it. (or at least tell me that I can commit it in package : org.geotools.filter.visitor) regards --

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ok Adrian, thanks for the advice. I guess the best thing for the moment is to just remove the code in order to understand how to treat it after the osgeo graduation. Ciao, Simone. On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:53 +0200, Simo

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Adrian Custer
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:53 +0200, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Adrian, > please read below... > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 20:54 +0200, Adrian Custer wrote: > >> Okay Simone, > >> > >> I will be nothing but dry with

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Adrian, please read below... On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 20:54 +0200, Adrian Custer wrote: >> Okay Simone, >> >> I will be nothing but dry with you. >> >> >> A class on which you are listed as the single author cannot be l

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Adrian Custer
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 20:54 +0200, Adrian Custer wrote: > Okay Simone, > > I will be nothing but dry with you. > > > A class on which you are listed as the single author cannot be legally > included in our LGPL project. i.e. There exists in the coverage module a class on which you are liste

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Simone Giannecchini
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 01:46 +0200, Simone Giannecchini wrote: >> Ciao Adrian, >> please read below.. >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Okay Simone, >> > >> > I will be not

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Adrian Custer
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 01:46 +0200, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Adrian, > please read below.. > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay Simone, > > > > I will be nothing but dry with you. > > > > > > A class on which you are listed as the single au

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright Work

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : > I think if Martin has mvn site working we can probably kill the module > matrix page; pom.xml being more likly to be kept up to date. I agree. For now on Maven site generation, we are having issue with Clover (Cédric posted an email about that two days ago). Is the Clo

Re: [Geotools-devel] What if nuclear facility designers want to use geotools?

2008-06-13 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Hello Simone Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > Just to be sure we are talking about the same > thing, you were referring to the Palette stuff inside the coverage > module right? Yes. We are talking about the CustomPaletteBuilder class with Sun Copyright header. The class javadoc contains only one

Re: [Geotools-devel] points are BIG

2008-06-13 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Running udig trunk today; looks like I am getting some exceptions on > Expression.NIL; the resulting visual display results in massive point > symbolizers :-) I will grab a stack trace tomorrow and see what I can see... Jody, this may be related to my changes to SLDSty