Re: [Geotools-devel] broken links on docs page

2011-04-10 Thread Michael Bedward
Thanks Justin, I've just made those changes. Also now have the zip files being moved to xxx.old.zip after unpacking. Fingers crossed that it all still works :) Michael On 11 April 2011 05:49, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Yeah the changes are pretty straight forward. Essentially instead of > uplod

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 8-SNAPSHOT available on trunk

2011-04-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay I have completed the rest of the paper work: Blog post: - http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2011/04/geotools-8.html Jira: - https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT Wiki pages: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/8.x - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/8+Downloads I also updat

Re: [Geotools-devel] xml docs updated; and stalling out on binding examples

2011-04-10 Thread Jody Garnett
I updated it; it works now. Do we have an example with EMF? -- Jody Garnett On Monday, 11 April 2011 at 5:19 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Yeah I am wondering if this documentation is even worth keeping... that > tutorial is quite out of date now and it's not like it is a common task. And >

Re: [Geotools-devel] broken links on docs page

2011-04-10 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Yeah the changes are pretty straight forward. Essentially instead of uplodaing the .zip files into the home directory on the web server, put them in a directory called "latest" or "stable". And adjust the update script accordingly. This would prevent any conflicts with simultaneous uploads which I

Re: [Geotools-devel] xml docs updated; and stalling out on binding examples

2011-04-10 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Yeah I am wondering if this documentation is even worth keeping... that tutorial is quite out of date now and it's not like it is a common task. And when people do generate bindings it seems that going with emf is the norm. On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Justin: > > Th

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-cql docs

2011-04-10 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Saturday 09 April 2011 01:49:40 am Jody Garnett wrote: > I think I misspoke: > > Is there a file for the BNF in source code that we could just "include" in > this page? I don't like retyping the BNF in; and it would always be out of > date. > > Better to "include" the origional. It is crystal cl

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 8-SNAPSHOT available on trunk

2011-04-10 Thread Jody Garnett
More importantly hudson is building it correctly and the snapshot is available: http://repo.opengeo.org/org/geotools/gt-api/8-SNAPSHOT/ -- Jody Garnett On Monday, 11 April 2011 at 12:01 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Okay that went smoothly; thanks to everyone who review the doc changes. > > I sen

Re: [Geotools-devel] xml docs updated; and stalling out on binding examples

2011-04-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay Justin docs for gt-xml are done; complete with all your pictures (thanks for attaching svg files to the wiki pages; it was so nice not to redraw stuff). - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/guide/library/xml/internal/overview.html The tutorial was truly epic. - http://docs.geotools.

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 8-SNAPSHOT available on trunk

2011-04-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Okay that went smoothly; thanks to everyone who review the doc changes. I sent an email to geoserver-devel and udig-devel to provide advanced notice; hopefully things will be smooth on that end. Does Geomajas have a build tracking geotools trunk? (and if not why not :-D ). -- Jody Garnett ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Skip GeoTools 3

2011-04-10 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Hi Jody, Andrea, > > If I read you posts correctly there will hardly ever be a release > under the new numbering scheme with a non-zero suffix. Next release is > 8.0.0, then we make the usual additions extensions etc and go to > 8.1.0... >

[Geotools-devel] xml docs updated; and stalling out on binding examples

2011-04-10 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Justin: The xml docs are up on the website now; I have going through your binding tutorial and having a hard time updating it to use any version of jaxb to generate beans. In my research I also note that they link to http://java.net/projects/ogc/ as a worst case scenario; I was not aware som

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Skip GeoTools 3

2011-04-10 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Jody, Andrea, If I read you posts correctly there will hardly ever be a release under the new numbering scheme with a non-zero suffix. Next release is 8.0.0, then we make the usual additions extensions etc and go to 8.1.0... In that case why bother having three parts to the version string at a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Skip GeoTools 3

2011-04-10 Thread Jody Garnett
We are in complete agreement; indeed I only expected Justin to tag and deploy to maven. And yes I took your last email as a +1; and pushed the change out already. -- Jody Garnett On Sunday, 10 April 2011 at 5:54 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Skip GeoTools 3

2011-04-10 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Generally speaking it works for me, the only thing raising eyebrowses > is that it's going to add a concept (patch releases) that we never had > for years and years. > > Agreed we have only had them on occasion (occasions like last week). Las