Hi Andrea; this thread has been on my rainy day list for a while. I have
added, but not committed, two utility methods:
- Types.assertNameAssignable (ensures that the name/value relationship
holds to the point that you can assign data over)
- Types.assertOrderAssignable (ensures that the order/v
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Looked into PostgisDataStore as well, no length information there
>> either. And I cannot find anything in 2.2.x either:
>> http://gtsvn.refractions.net/branches/2.2.x/module/main/src/org/geotools/data/jdbc/JDBC1DataStore.java
>>
>>
>>
>> So...
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Looked into PostgisDataStore as well, no length information there
> either. And I cannot find anything in 2.2.x either:
> http://gtsvn.refractions.net/branches/2.2.x/module/main/src/org/geotools/data/jdbc/JDBC1DataStore.java
>
>
>
> So... how is this a functionality restore?
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I feel a bit like the shot messenger; the change to the new feature
> model resulted in the change to the equals contract. During that change
> we lost the length information that I depended on for exporting
> shapefiles from a PostGIS table FeatureType. Restoring that
I feel a bit like the shot messenger; the change to the new feature
model resulted in the change to the equals contract. During that change
we lost the length information that I depended on for exporting
shapefiles from a PostGIS table FeatureType. Restoring that has shown
that the FeatureType
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
>> This is a dammed if you do dammed if you don't - the length information
>> is needed if we are going to export from PostGIS into a shapefile
>> correctly.
>
> Well, broken build is in my book more damned, it prevents any
> other work in the module. It's the first sing
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> In what way does this break the equality tests? Is data being truncated?
>> Now, I'm wondering two things:
>> - why is the build box not running the postgis tests?
>>We must re-enable this, the normal dev build does not run them
>>
> That is also my question.
Ok,
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
...
> Apparently not.
>> Fixing this requires a softer equality, one that does not care about
>> the restrictions, and that
>> needs to be propagated in quite a bit of places...
>>
> It sounds like you are asking for a comparison of FeatureType her
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I was looking into a postgis issue and found
> that many tests on trunk were broken.
> Investigating I tracked down the issue at a commit Jody
> made one month and a half ago, that enables the length
> restriction parsing on attributes:
> r31660, October 14 2008,
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Hi,
> today I was looking into a postgis issue and found
> that many tests on trunk were broken.
> Investigating I tracked down the issue at a commit Jody
> made one month and a half ago, that enables the length
> restriction parsing on attributes:
> r31660, October 14 200
Hi,
today I was looking into a postgis issue and found
that many tests on trunk were broken.
Investigating I tracked down the issue at a commit Jody
made one month and a half ago, that enables the length
restriction parsing on attributes:
r31660, October 14 2008, "Make use of length if available"
11 matches
Mail list logo
