Hi all,
With the pull request to get wfs-ng passing tests on windows (thanks for
reviewing Jody) I have re-enabled it in the default unsupported build. If I
didn't catch all the issues and the various build servers continue to have
problems feel free to roll back the change.
-Justin
--
Justin D
Hi all,
I've just fixed a regression in the shapefile datastore module related
to reading non ASCII chars. I already fixed this bug one year ago,
and added unit tests for that. Unfortunately someone disabled the
ShapefileDataStoreTest (that is, the most important test in the
shapefile suite) and we
Ciao Mediii,
on Monday we discussed how to proceed on the 19108 implementation and
the agreement we found was as follows:
1> you (or someone over there :-) ) committing the version of the code
2> us reviewing and commenting the code you have committed
3> deciding how to proceed (joda vs non-joda a
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> I have nothing against merging this tools in gt2 of course.
>> Yet, I was thinking that it may have more potential in a standalone
>> project that would be reused by everybody playing with JAI.
>> Take it and the old TCTool and we may end u
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> I have nothing against merging this tools in gt2 of course.
> Yet, I was thinking that it may have more potential in a standalone
> project that would be reused by everybody playing with JAI.
> Take it and the old TCTool and we may end up having enough to
> make up a jai-too
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>>> However your screenshot looks great, and your application may very
>>> well provides
>>> additional informations that OperationTreeBrowser do not - I see from the
>>> screenshot that you draw the tile bounds for example.
>> Yeah, along wit
Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> However your screenshot looks great, and your application may very
>> well provides
>> additional informations that OperationTreeBrowser do not - I see from the
>> screenshot that you draw the tile bounds for example.
>
> Yeah, along with rendering hints and the like.
Yes
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Hello Andrea
>
> Nice screenshot!!! But... a similar tools already existed in GeoTools SVN
> since
> 2003 (after all, I was involved with JAI in GeoTools before any other GeoTools
> contributor...)
Doh, I did not know. Oh well, it has been a learning experience
Hello Andrea
Nice screenshot!!! But... a similar tools already existed in GeoTools SVN since
2003 (after all, I was involved with JAI in GeoTools before any other GeoTools
contributor...)
http://javadoc.geotools.fr/snapshot/org/geotools/gui/swing/image/OperationTreeBrowser.html
However your scre
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea - that is fun :-)
>
> I have a similar pile of useful code here from udig on a different topic
> (hacking away at features).
Ah, nice to hear that. Is it available?
> Can we talk about making the
> "module/extentions/tools" project in todays GeoTools meeti
Hi Andrea - that is fun :-)
I have a similar pile of useful code here from udig on a different topic
(hacking away at features). Can we talk about making the
"module/extentions/tools" project in todays GeoTools meeting? It could
even be "unsupported/tools" if you want.
Jody
aaime wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
these days I've been trying to re-learn a bit about JAI, RenderedImages and
the like.
While doing so I've developed a little tool that displays the full rendering
chain of a
RenderedImage (and in particular, of RenderedOps). Here are some screenshots
of the tool
in action against an image mosa
Hi Gilles, Hi Romain,
thanks for your answer. I am not sure, or if i´ve not made my problem clear
enough (case (2) in the first mail) or i didn´t understand your mail
correctly. Would do you mean with "component"?
I´m sending an illustration in annex. The problem is that the Difference of
A and
Hi,
see answers below:
A1 and A2 have the same behaviour from A.
B1 and B2 have the same behaviour from B. In this case, perhaps B1 and B2
can not be seen than GM_Primitives. In this case, it would become Complex?
Ok, now i got your 5 component idea.
With definition A is CompositeSurface (
Dear Sanjay,
In this case, it is difficult to understand the object (GM_Object of Iso)
use for the result of Boolean operations. In a Java hierarchical meaning, we
can agree this use, but the two cases you have discussed are problematic.
In geometric modelling, we treat the second case by: the
Hi Jody,>> Futhermore, we want our implementation to address the problem of
>> limited memory, e.g. we want to offer an interface for later>> possibility of storing some geometry data in order to relieve the>> limited memory capabilities (for example a Factory which returns
>> Lists os some GM_xxx
Hi Jody,
> This part sounds a bit strange to me, I imagine you have some
> feedback from Martin?
Yes everyday :-)
> It would make more sense to store a Go-1 "Graphic" where you are
> saving out some Geometry+Style
> information...
That's exactly what we intended to do. In our side we need 3D
Here is some quick feedback:
> So, my questions are :
> - what's the way to integrate this work on the Geotools project ?
>
We have recently tried to lighten up the geotools process, so you guys
can have an unsupported plug-in shortly after you make a wiki page
describing the work you wa
Hi Adrian,
I *just* updated the file as I got this, improvements are:
- resource allocation (gasp this is where I got in trouble last year),
tried to record where people had expressed interested (hopefully they
can get time)
- outline of two options for the PMC to take charge of the release
pro
Guillaume,
Any open source software is available for potential integration, and
therefore good for us. I am forwarding your email to the geotools
developer list so that other interested parties can contact you directly or
via the mailing list.
I had to lookup the abstract for ISO 8211, as it see
In a question about open source licenses, I got the following response
back from our Open Source Program Director:
The Apache license is much more business-friendly than
the LGPL, especially when considering usage in IBM products.
While we have folks who contribute to a number of Linux related pr
Hi
I feel that we really need to move forward with Simone's short term
plan so that he can get the GC branch merged onto trunk. I am ok
with doing what he suggests for a short term solution and migrating
towards the suggested medium range plans. I will happily do the work
to the shapefi
Hey, if anyone's hacking on this code, could you put in a bit of a
better error report?
Now that many people are using postgres 8, when they forget their
primary key they get a message about oid's not found. Perhaps have that
error report say 'no oid's found - if you are using postgres 8 or l
Hi Michael,
I was preparing for a demo so it is possible that the classes are
redundant and I didn't have time to correctly investigate the issue.
I'm looking into it now and this is my current understanding, anyone
can correct me I'm still learning postgis.
OIDFidMapper and PostGISAutoI
I would take a look here
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/The+axis+order+issue?focusedCommentId=53165#comment-53165
in case you haven't yet.
Simone.
On 5/29/06, Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
I would imagine that this will be a topic of discussion at tonights
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
That would be good for me as long as I do not get the "modified axis"
metadata but the EPSG plain name. Since the registration has a system
wide effect it should not clash with anything else.
This part is already done and commited on trunk since revision 19642:
ht
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
Could someone please summarize so that poor souls like myself can follow
at tonights meeting.
A wiki page was started there: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/The+axis+order+issue (may
need to be completed...)
Martin
-
Hi folks,
I would imagine that this will be a topic of discussion at tonights IRC
meeting. I know Martin came up with someone but there seems to be more
to this issue.
Could someone please summarize so that poor souls like myself can follow
at tonights meeting.
Thanks.
-Justin
Simone Gia
That would be good for me as long as I do not get the "modified axis"
metadata but the EPSG plain name. Since the registration has a system
wide effect it should not clash with anything else.
I hope I made my point clearly.
Simone.
On 5/29/06, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sim
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
I would like to expose some thougths about the proposed solution.
[...snip...]
OrderedAxisAuthorityFactory is not going to be removed. Even with the Hint proposal, it still the
class performing the work under the hood, so this class is there to stay. The
OrderedA
Ciao Martin, ciao a tutti,
I would like to expose some thougths about the proposed solution.
I read and understood all objections and concerns stated by different
people in these set of emails. My objection is (do not yell at me
please...) that we are not solving the problem or at least not the
p
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Jody Garnett a écrit :
If I could also add support for the silly URI the OGC has defined
that would be swell, we will start running into them over the next
while -
I added a JIRA task. Could you check if the example given in this task
are the one you are looking f
Recovered and online again.
On 28-May-06, at 9:36 AM, Richard Gould wrote:
Geotools SVN appears to be down. I am unable to preform svn update
or svn checkout. It is timing out.
Richard
---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Wi
Jody Garnett a écrit :
If I could also add support for the silly URI the OGC has defined that
would be swell, we will start running into them over the next while -
I added a JIRA task. Could you check if the example given in this task are the one you are looking
for please (I found those exam
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Added a Wiki page about the axis order issue. I wrote it mostly from
the material found in various emails from Paul, Jody, Bryce and others.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/The+axis+order+issue
Note: the FORCE_LONGITUDE_FIRST_AXIS_ORDER hint is not yet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/25/2006 02:05:48 AM:
> Added a Wiki page about the axis order issue. I wrote it mostly from
> the material found in various
> emails from Paul, Jody, Bryce and others.
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/The+axis+order+issue
>
> Note: the FORCE_LONGIT
David Blasby wrote:
I've been thinking about IP issues the last few days, and did a very
quick
review of parts of geoserver. I found a few issues - I'm sure there are
others.
Thanks for taking these issues seriously Dave, looking at what you have
found
so far leaves me a be daunted on the geot
Added a Wiki page about the axis order issue. I wrote it mostly from the material found in various
emails from Paul, Jody, Bryce and others.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/The+axis+order+issue
Note: the FORCE_LONGITUDE_FIRST_AXIS_ORDER hint is not yet implemented. This is a propo
Adrian Custer a écrit :
FORCE_LONGITUDE_FIRST_AXIS_ORDER is long but descriptive.
I'm fine with that name. Lets use it (if peoples agree with the Hint approach).
Also, in the interests of completeness for some day where someone wants
to do the opposite, do we provide the opposite hint *LATLON
Hey all,
I'm *totally* not competent to judge the proposal so this is not about
content but about presentation.
FORCE_ORDERED_AXIS seems like a *terrible* name. (1) We are having this
discussion because there is no inherent ORDER. (2) The issue is the
order of 2 axes not a single axis. Would it
Thanks Jody, Bryce, Paul and everyone for your input.
So the best compromise I can imagine right now is:
* CRS created from EPSG codes will still as specified in the EPSG database
(i.e. latitude,longitude axis order) by default. The EPSG factories stay
basically unchanged - no hack.
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
Note: we also add a page for that on www.geotools.org, but Codehaust
seem to be down right now.
Found the page:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+add+a+3rd+party+jar
or http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+cut+a+release if the JAR to upload are
Part of the problem is I think we havent been uploading the jar
properly. From what I understand the procedure is:
1. upload new jar
2. uplodate maven-metadata-local.xml
3. regenerate md5sum
Don't do that by hand on a Maven 2 repository! Please follow the instruction in the following page
ins
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Part of the problem is I think we havent been uploading the jar
properly. From what I understand the procedure is:
1. upload new jar
2. uplodate maven-metadata-local.xml
3. regenerate md5sum
I've never heard of or seen maven-metadata-local.xml before...
My understan
Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/24/2006 05:46:32 AM:
OGC is sick of the problem, it is a political problem with no good
solution - as such I do not expect a formal decision from them.
(It is not helpful for a standards body when the real world does not
wa
I would like to point out that Spring licence is Apache too ... maybe
it's not important but I'm asking myself if can be a problem for the
future GeoServer versions.On 5/24/06, Jody Garnett <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Adler wrote:> Please note that I am not speaking in any official capacity o
Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/24/2006 05:46:32 AM:
> OGC is sick of the problem, it is a political problem with no good
> solution - as such I do not expect a formal decision from them.
> (It is not helpful for a standards body when the real world does not
> want to agree).
This
Please note that I am not speaking in any official capacity on behalf of IBM.
IBM, and I expect most commercial software providers, is very concerned
about putting its IP portfolio at risk which is a possibility when
externally-developed software is mingled with internally-developed
software.
David Adler wrote:
Please note that I am not speaking in any official capacity on behalf
of IBM.
No fear David we understand. Indeed we are more interested in making you
happy, you contribute to our project and if this matters to you it
matters to us.
IBM, and I expect most commercial software
Hey all,
1) Any chance for an eventual writeup?
Can you all write up whatever solution you agree on, when you
reach a consensus. I presume nothing will change for 2.2 since
it's trying to find its keys to get out the door. If you have a
plan for 2.3 and beyond (3.0
David Adler wrote:
I would like to consider GeoTools and GeoServer for some IBM offerings
but it is very difficult to get approval for anything other than the
Apache license.
David this is good information to know, I got a proposal for you. I am
trying to complete a geotools IP check (anyone c
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Bryce L Nordgren a écrit :
If we agree than starting from now, "EPSG:whatever" should be
understood as being always
(longitude,latitude) axis order (as OGC decided recently in my
understanding of a recent
Jody's mail), then it is a new authority factory derived from t
Part of the problem is I think we havent been uploading the jar
properly. From what I understand the procedure is:
1. upload new jar
2. uplodate maven-metadata-local.xml
3. regenerate md5sum
if wrong please inform.
-Justin
Cory Horner wrote:
Jody Garnett wrote:
Well things are moving a bit
Here is the information from the "horses mouth" (Carl Reed) as dug
out of my mailbox from just under a year ago:
Prior to the June meetings, there was considerable email dialogue
regarding axis order and coordinate reference systems. During the
closing TC Plenary, we continued the dialogue.
Bryce L Nordgren a écrit :
If we agree than starting from now, "EPSG:whatever" should be understood as
being always
(longitude,latitude) axis order (as OGC decided recently in my understanding of
a recent
Jody's mail), then it is a new authority factory derived from the previous one
I wouldn'
Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/23/2006
04:24:55 PM:
> If we agree than starting from now, "EPSG:whatever" should be
> understood as being always
> (longitude,latitude) axis order (as OGC decided recently in my
> understanding of a recent Jody's
> mail), then it is a new auth
Jody Garnett wrote:
Well things are moving a bit faster now that I have Justin right here
to bother.
Cory I saw where you were stuck writing a feature collection test and
we have responded by:
- removing the power set of builders (FeatureBuilder,
FeatureCollectionBuilder, SmalFishBuilder, et
Bryce L Nordgren a écrit :
1] Addressing an encoding issue with an authority factory is now, and
forever will be, a hack. Many hacks, actually. Everywhere in the code.
I agree and hope to avoid such hack. The first step I'm considering is to make Geotools referencing
code a little bit more "
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/22/2006 05:18:00 PM:
> Openned a JIRA task
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-854
>
>
> Comments welcome (especially any implication that may come to your mind).
>
>Martin.
Done.
Key points:
1] Addressing an encoding issue with an authority factory
On 5/20/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesse Eichar wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> I'm in agreement that this issue needs to be resolved. The problem is
> that I'm not 100% sure how to solve the problem. Do you have a
> suggestion? I apologize if you have put you suggestion in this email
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Jody Garnett a écrit :
We have a SoC application set up to do a 3D renderer based off of the
uDig rendering model. So perhaps we can combine forces or have your
students take over the work?
Our planed 3D renderer will not begin this summer. If it get realized,
it w
Rob Atkinson a écrit :
IMHO, I think we should carry two (or more) peices of metadata instead
of just the CRS definition:
1) projectionDefinitionSource="EPSG:4326" // source of projection definition
(independent of serialisation formatting)
2) axisFormat=X,Y
3) numberFormat=DD // DMS is usu
Jody Garnett a écrit :
We have a SoC application set up to do a 3D renderer based off of the
uDig rendering model. So perhaps we can combine forces or have your
students take over the work?
Our planed 3D renderer will not begin this summer. If it get realized, it will be a more long-term
proj
Openned a JIRA task
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-854
Comments welcome (especially any implication that may come to your mind).
Martin.
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stu
+1 on being pragmatic and explicit!
IMHO, I think we should carry two (or more) peices of metadata instead
of just the CRS definition:
1) projectionDefinitionSource="EPSG:4326" // source of projection
definition (independent of serialisation formatting)
2) axisFormat=X,Y
3) numberFormat=DD
On 5/22/06, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 14:58 +0200, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> Very often people ship data saying this is EPSG:4326, meaning lon,lat
> and not lat,lon.
>
> I would suggest the following two steps solution which should make
> everyone happy (or
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 14:58 +0200, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> Very often people ship data saying this is EPSG:4326, meaning lon,lat
> and not lat,lon.
>
> I would suggest the following two steps solution which should make
> everyone happy (or unhappy which would basically be the same :-) ).
>
>
On 5/22/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> I would suggest the following two steps solution which should make
> everyone happy (or unhappy which would basically be the same :-) ).
I am already - you are understanding the issues. Last time I had this
conversat
Simone Giannecchini wrote:
I would suggest the following two steps solution which should make
everyone happy (or unhappy which would basically be the same :-) ).
I am already - you are understanding the issues. Last time I had this
conversation
I had to sit through 100 emails to make it this fa
On 5/22/06, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adrian Custer a écrit :
> Any chance you could write up a paragraph explaining what's going on
> with axis order? I'm assembling notes for an eventual writeup of the
> geotools CRS and this seems like an important corner case. The EPSG
>
Using non EPSG CRS is neater, but at odds with practice and leaves an
authority hole...
IMHO the only hope of reconciling these things is to state that the OGC
recognises EPSG as the authority for the geometry definition, not the
representation (serialisation) rules, and that should be reinfor
Adrian Custer a écrit :
Any chance you could write up a paragraph explaining what's going on
with axis order? I'm assembling notes for an eventual writeup of the
geotools CRS and this seems like an important corner case. The EPSG
CRS's are all in the lat, long order except for 4326 which is long,
Hey Martin,
Any chance you could write up a paragraph explaining what's going on
with axis order? I'm assembling notes for an eventual writeup of the
geotools CRS and this seems like an important corner case. The EPSG
CRS's are all in the lat, long order except for 4326 which is long, lat?
are the
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
I am pretty sure that in gdal (which
uses Proj) EPSG:4326 is lon,lat as expected, moreover Jody told me
that OGC, after a long debat, now states that EPSG:4326 is lon,lat and
not lat,lon as EPSG db (please Jody help me here).
If this is an
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
Good news is, I might have found a guy to do his master thesis on
advanced geospatial rendering. I would like to reuse your experience,
the GO1 code, the old J2DRenderer code and a bit of my experience. He
should start in september, let's
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
I am pretty sure that in gdal (which
uses Proj) EPSG:4326 is lon,lat as expected, moreover Jody told me
that OGC, after a long debat, now states that EPSG:4326 is lon,lat and
not lat,lon as EPSG db (please Jody help me here).
If this is an OGC decision, then the EP
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
Good news is, I might have found a guy to do his master thesis on
advanced geospatial rendering. I would like to reuse your experience,
the GO1 code, the old J2DRenderer code and a bit of my experience. He
should start in september, let's hope tht we get this thing
Rob Atkinson a écrit :
CRS:84 I think has been defined by the OGC - maybe we lobby for an
effort to move all existing WMS services to supporting it.
As a side note, "CRS:27", "CRS:83" and "CRS:84" are supported straight into module/referencing since
Geotools 2.2. They are equivalent to "NAD27
Ciao Jody,
let me summarize as you did:
1>I absolutely agree. As Martin pointed out we should NEVER make any
assumptions on the axes order but lawys inspect it int the data we are
managing and behave coherently.
Having different CRS definitions in different authorities is of course
a big problems
Ahh yes - dont we always get into trouble when we get poor separation of
concerns!
The problem is that axis order is a representation issue, and the rest
of the CRS is a definition of the geometry.
The use of the EPSG code as (an) authority to carry the definition for
OGC protocol usage was
Simone Giannecchini wrote:
Well, I looked up the code of that class and I noticed that you strip
some info and change some other when reordering the axis. This actions
are understandable but I am more concerned with what common practice
and OGC says about this thing. I am pretty sure that in gdal
Ciao Martin, thanks for the reply,
On 5/20/06, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> Martin already implemented the OrderedAxisAuthorityFactory which
> should take care of this. I used it and I have to say that it works
> fine except that if I ask for an
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
Martin already implemented the OrderedAxisAuthorityFactory which
should take care of this. I used it and I have to say that it works
fine except that if I ask for an EPSG:4326 crs it gives, correctly, a
lon,lat WGS84 but with no identifiers related to EPSG, so basica
Just for fun, here's the record for 63266405:
coord_ref_sys_code | 63266405
coord_ref_sys_name | WGS 84 (deg)
area_of_use_code | 1262
coord_ref_sys_kind | geographic 2D
coord_sys_code | 6405
datum_code |
source_geogcrs_code | 4326
projection_conv_code | 101
cmpd_horizcr
Simone,
On May 19, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
Ciao Jesse,
before talking about a solution, I would first like to have some
answers from the module mantainers of the features plugins to thee two
questions:
1>Can I assume that features in EPSG:4326 are always Lon,Lat even if
t
Ciao Jesse,
before talking about a solution, I would first like to have some
answers from the module mantainers of the features plugins to thee two
questions:
1>Can I assume that features in EPSG:4326 are always Lon,Lat even if
the CRS claims to be Lat,Lon as it happens with EPSG-HSQL authority?
Hi Simone,
I'm in agreement that this issue needs to be resolved. The problem
is that I'm not 100% sure how to solve the problem. Do you have a
suggestion? I apologize if you have put you suggestion in this
email, I must have missed it.
Jesse
On 19-May-06, at 8:51 AM, Simone Giannecchi
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
So what I am getting is that the data is the authority, where as the
type is more like a recipe. And we respect aggregation in that
something that is contained by another and defines a CRS overrides the
containers CRS.
Sounds like you got it, note that the for a "valid"
So what I am getting is that the data is the authority, where as the
type is more like a recipe. And we respect aggregation in that something
that is contained by another and defines a CRS overrides the containers CRS.
-Justin
Jody Garnett wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
Looking at
Hi Sommer,
GeoServer falls back on support in the underlying GeoTools library for
all reprojection. The file you are looking for is inside the
gt2-epsg-wkt.jar located in the WEB-INF/lib directory of the server. Its
called epsg.properties. Its basically a mapping from EPSG code to the
WKT des
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi guys,
data is back into the mix on fm (AbstractDataStore and the like). Not
passing tests yet though.
Cory, is there any chance of getting the Function tests going again on
main (UniqueInterval,EqualInterval,Quantile). For now they have been
taken out of the bui
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
If I instantiate the transform between first one and second one and
then I concatenate it with its inverse I do not get the indentity. If
it is the expected behaviour then, houston I hve a problem (in the
grid coverage renderer at least) otherwise I hope we can fix t
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
Looking at new feature model I must admit I am confused as to where I
should get CRS info from since there are multiple choices. Given a
feature I can look up a CRS with:
Missed one (and adjusted your names to reflect class):
0. Geometry.getCRS() - this is opt
Here you go Martin,
try {
// sourceCRS = CRS
// .parseWKT("PROJCS[\"unnamed\",GEOGCS[\"NAD27\",DATUM[\"North
// American Datum 1927\","
// + "SPHEROID[\"Clarke 1866\", 6378206.4, 294.9786982138982,"
// + "AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"7008\"]],"
// + "TOWGS84[-4.2, 135.4, 181.9, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0],"
/
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Test for FM are back in the game.
Cory, I think the interval function stuff is still not right due to
the changes regarding Feature no longer having a "parent"
FeatureCollection. I found one of the tests "fixed" and applied the
fix to the other. The tests now pass bu
Vitali Diatchkov wrote:
Hello!
I am thinking about various object models, libraries, frameworks,
application implementations related to GIS domain.
You did miss one - and an important one at that. GeoAPI is a project
that is only about defining interfaces allowing the various toolkits and
Gertjan van Oosten wrote:
Hi Chris,
As quoted from Chris Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Any chance I could convince you to put this patch in the geoserver task
tracker? http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS I'm happy to submit it
myself, but if you do it then you'll be automatically notified
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
- The GO-1 module has basic classes for a new renderer with more
rigourous axis support.
Martin,
I've heard about the GO-1 renderer, but I dont know anything about it.
Could you give a few sentances on what it is?
dave
---
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
Hacking on fm and came across an issue I wanted to start some
discussion about.
In the new feature model, a *type* has the notion of a *binding*. The
binding being an associated java class. For example the simple type:
new AttributeType(
"http://www.w3.or
Jody Garnett a écrit :
I've heard about the GO-1 renderer, but I dont know anything about it.
Could you give a few sentances on what it is?
It is a formal OGC specification you can download that defines the
various aspects of a rendering system. It has concepts such as a
"Graphic" and a syst
1 - 100 of 466 matches
Mail list logo
