Thank you for your advice. I will choose to use the way you recommended
Best wishes!
Tiandy
Ian Turton 于2023年5月22日 周一下午11:48写道：
> As Mark suggested please try to use `gt-geojson-core` as we are trying to
> deprecate the `gt-geojson` module which relies on an older and unsupported
> dependen
As Mark suggested please try to use `gt-geojson-core` as we are trying to
deprecate the `gt-geojson` module which relies on an older and unsupported
dependency.
Ian
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 16:22, pengfei tian wrote:
> Hi,
> I found GeoJSONUtil.parse(featureCollectionHandler,
> featureCollect
You are free to try and propose a pull request.
Alternatively you could look into the geojson-core module and
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/48547967e75f2ef841751c3950b01e88cd5683e7/modules/unsupported/geojson-core/src/main/java/org/geotools/data/geojson/GeoJSONReader.java#L300
Op ma 22
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> there are dingo jokes?
Dingoes (like Pingos) are inherently funny :-)
Ian
--
Ian Turton
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for you
there are dingo jokes?
On 18/03/2010, at 1:36 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> At this point I could reach into my stock of old, very poor taste
> dingo jokes but I'll refrain...
>
> On 18 March 2010 13:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies
> wrote:
>> We can provide dingoes if required.
>>
--
At this point I could reach into my stock of old, very poor taste
dingo jokes but I'll refrain...
On 18 March 2010 13:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> We can provide dingoes if required.
>
--
Download Intel® Parallel Stud
We can provide dingoes if required.
On 17/03/10 18:22, Michael Bedward wrote:
> We have wolves ?
>
> On 17 March 2010 18:55, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Thanks Andrea that would be kinder then throwing Jim / John to the wolves.
>> Jody
>>
>
>
Ah - this explains the low growling and gnashing of teeth that I can
hear in the background sometimes when there's been one too many dumb
questions on the user list.
On 17 March 2010 21:23, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Michael Bedward ha scritto:
>>
>> We have wolves ?
>
> Oddly enough for Jody's answer,
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> We have wolves ?
Oddly enough for Jody's answer, I use the represent myself as one:
http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/aaime
But I guess Jody was referring to committing changes without
the safety net of a review.
Cheers
Andrea
> On 17 March 2010 18:55, Jody Garnett wro
We have wolves ?
On 17 March 2010 18:55, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Thanks Andrea that would be kinder then throwing Jim / John to the wolves.
> Jody
>
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for you
>> The wps module is only manned by Graham right now (who we have not
>> heard from in over a year). As such we may be able to mark it as up
>> for grabs if you or John would like to look after it?
>
> I'm going to work some on GeoServer WPS in the following months
> so I'd like to review the patch
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Jim:
>
> We need to jump through a couple of hoops here; some evidence you have
> read the developers guide; sign a code contribution agreement etc.
>
> The developers guide has the details here:
> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/2+Committers
>
> You can get
Hi Jim:
We need to jump through a couple of hoops here; some evidence you have
read the developers guide; sign a code contribution agreement etc.
The developers guide has the details here:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/2+Committers
You can get back to the email list when you have an os
We have answered this question several times; I think we are somehow
having difficulty communicating.
Literally all we want you to do Felip is have the gt2-epsg-hsql.jar and
a hsql jdbc driver on your classpath (the jar will do the rest; it will
unpack the database into a temporary directory and
Hi Felipe,
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 03:02:31 am felipe gutierrez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do I need a database EPSG to create a program only to open an image of a
> directory on my pc and Show in a JFrame?
short answer is yes. You can barely do anything geospatial without a
referencing system. The EPSG
Hello Felipe Gutierrez,
This kind of question belongs on the user list so I am including that in
the CC list and future discussion should be there.
First, we can't possibly help you with so little information; with what
you have given us we can only guess at what is going on.
Second, you need t
It seems that you do not have JAI properly installed.
Ciao,
Simone.
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:02 PM, felipe gutierrez <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Someone knows how I solve the following problem at NetBeans ?
> If someone wants the source code I post it here .
> thanks
>
> Exception in
I just had a talk with a scientist co-worker in my laboratory (this laboratory
is fully dedicaced to remote sensing), and he suggested that while binding the
"sampleToGeophysics" transform to SampleDimension seems raisonable, the
"sampleToGeophysics" name may be part of the problem. For some sci
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the
>> merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another
>> thread on what the best coverage model is?
>
> Andrea, have you seen the proposal? the Raster symboli
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
> > Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the
> > merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another
> > thread on what the best coverage model is?
>
> Andr
I agree,
so should we vote? Should me and Alessio proceed without a formal vote?
I will send a last separate email for the old thread,
Simone.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> > Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> >> As you mi
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the
> merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another
> thread on what the best coverage model is?
Andrea, have you seen the proposal? the Raster symbolizer is not just a raster
symbolizer prop
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
>> As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non
>> geophysics duality from the coverage themselves so that we stop
>> running into the duality images vs models this is trying to push some
>> time in that direction
I'm repeating my self, but I want to stretch very loudly the following:
--
The "sample to geophysics" transform defines the
conversion from pixel units to geophysics units.
---
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non
> geophysics duality from the coverage themselves so that we stop
> running into the duality images vs models this is trying to push some
> time in that direction.
Giving more though to that since th
Thanks for taking some time to review martin...
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Please take a look and review at
> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Raster+Symbolizer+support
>
> I had a quick look to the
Thanks for taking some time to review martin...
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Please take a look and review at
> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Raster+Symbolizer+support
>
> I had a quick look to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Please take a look and review at
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Raster+Symbolizer+support
I had a quick look to the interfaces at:
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/branches/2.4.x_rs/modules/library/render/src/main/java/org/geotools/renderer/coverage/cate
Its all a mystery to me. Can we get a confirmation about this?
Jesse
Le 21-Feb-08 à 12:29 PM, Gabriel Roldán a écrit :
> May be a dumb question, but I wonder if a proposal were needed at
> all?
> Developers guide says proposals are for API changes [1].
> The proposal[2] says it adds API: "Th
May be a dumb question, but I wonder if a proposal were needed at all?
Developers guide says proposals are for API changes [1].
The proposal[2] says it adds API: "The structure of the proposed API allows a
developer to chain nodes as desired."
and no API change is needed: "It is worth to point ou
I've been looking at this proposal and am pretty excited.
I'd like to do a shout out to all the Geotoolers that can vote to take
a look at this. I'm waiting on the proposal to do some funded work.
Thanks,
Jesse
Le 20-Feb-08 à 7:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> the GeoTools R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Okay, its there now. I had awful problem moving the changes from 2.2.x
to trunk.
Thanks, it seems to compile file now.
I noticed the addition of the following dependency:
import EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
Is it appropriate if I had the fo
Hi Paolo,
P.Rizzi Ag.Mobilità Ambiente wrote:
I read the IRC of yesterday and I'd like to add a few opinion about
containers and factories.
They are, obviously, plain IMHOs.
Bye
Paolo Rizzi
1) Constructors should _only_ take immutable parameters. That is values that
cannot change
after the obj
33 matches
Mail list logo
