[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 13.1 / GeoServer 2.7.1 Release and Jira Migration

When going through the release process for GeoTools 13.1, I discovered that the jira_release.py scripts for GeoTools and GeoServer were still pointing to the old jira.codehaus.org URL. I have updated these to osgeo-org.atlassian.net, and verified that the updates work (by releasing GeoTools 13.1 /

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 13.1 Release Artifacts available for testing

The GeoTools 11.5 Release artifacts have been build and can be found at http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/13.1/ Feel free to download and verify these artifacts work with your configuration before I publish the release. Thanks, Torben --

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 13.1 Release Artifacts available for testing

, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > The GeoTools 11.5 Release artifacts have been build and can be found at > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/13.1/ > > Feel free to download and verify these artifacts work with your > configuration before

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 13.1 Released

The GeoTools community is happy to announce the latest GeoTools 13.1 download : - geotools-13.1-bin.zip

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 13.1 Release Artifacts available for testing

New release artifacts (including the previously missing mosaic harvesting fixes) are available at: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/13.1/ for testing. Torben On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > Everything looks to be

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 13.1 Release Artifacts available for testing

, May 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > New release artifacts (including the previously missing mosaic harvesting > fixes) are available at: > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/13.1/ for testing. > > Torben > > On T

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 13.1 Released

*Update*: There were some changes missing from the 13.1 release, so it has been updated. If you downloaded GeoTools 13.1 before 2015-05-20 22:30:00 UTC, please re-download it. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > The GeoTools com

[Geotools-devel] Mongo DB fix for indexed arrays + Test case fixes

). As part of this, I have also fixed a number of failing test cases. Tom/Stefano - I have heard you have some experience with the MongoDB plugin, might you be able to review my PR? Thanks, Torben Barsballe

Re: [Geotools-devel] Mongo DB fix for indexed arrays + Test case fixes

That is correct Jody. Specifically, it ignores arrays when generating a schema, and ensures only integer keys are used to access arrays (assuming a pre-existing/custom schema). Before, trying to import MongoDB data containing arrays into GeoServer would throw an exception on the import page (if th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Oracle Tests failing on Jenkins

Hi Ian I got in touch with our DBA at Boundless, and it looks like this is fixed now. However, the online database tests are still failing, but with a different error (In fact, it seems PostGIS, Oracle, and MySQL are all failing, take a look at the latest Jenkins build for more details). Sorry for

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 12.5 Release (Last 12.x release)

The GeoTools 12.5 is currently being built, and should be released later today. This will be the last release in the 12.x series. Torben -- Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metri

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 12.5 Release Artifacts

The GeoTools 12.5 Release Artifacts are available for testing at http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/12.5/ Please respond if you are able to test. Torben Barsballe -- Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 12.5 Release Artifacts

do you want unzip and > fix the links and bundle back up for SF? Or ignore as a minor detail ... > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 2 September 2015 at 14:57, Torben Barsballe < > tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > >> The GeoTools 12.5 Release Artifacts are availab

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 12.5 Release Artifacts

The artifacts at http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/12.5/ have been updated with this fix. I can confim the README.html links now point to the maintenance docs. I will proceed with publishing the release. Torben On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbar

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 12.5 Released

InputTransparentColor when dealing with Holes in mosaics - Other fixes: see the release notes <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10001&version=10800> for details Thanks to Torben Barsballe (Boundless) for this release. About GeoTools 12

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 12.5 Release Artifacts

build (with the README fix) used 98752ef68909ad8c482d9a24b24d7763176311c3 Torben On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > The artifacts at http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/12.5/ have > been updated with this fix. > I

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-14.x #8

http://repo.boundlessgeo.com/ is currently experiencing difficulties (resulting in this build failure), and should be restored shortly. Torben On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:30 AM, wrote: > See

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master #851

http://repo.boundlessgeo.com/ is currently experiencing difficulties (resulting in this build failure), and should be restored shortly. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:36 AM, wrote: > See > > Changes

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master #847

Hi Andrea http://repo.boundlessgeo.com/ is currently experiencing difficulties (resulting in these build failure). We are working on this issue and it should be restored shortly. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding a way to determine which files compose a certain store/reader

This all looks reasonable. I also think I prefer a single main file with a list of supporting files, it makes it easier to figure out exactly which supporting files are associated with each main file. To handle the latter, I'm almost wanting a getDataFiles(File mainFiles), > getSupportFiles(File

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools Test dependencies

Does anyone know if we deployed test dependencies (ie test jars) to the reposity before the (current/ongoing) migration, or did they always need to be built locally? Thanks, Torben -- _

Re: [Geotools-devel] maven repo update

Stable and maintenance updated and builds successfully. Deploy on ares is also working now by the looks of things. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Updated master and testing now, Torben will report back on updating stable > and maintenance. > > (So glad to get this finished

Re: [Geotools-devel] MVN repo.boundlessgeo having problems?

I have updated the geotools poms to point to artifactory. Waiting on the ares builds to verify the fix. Torben On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Morning Alessio (and all). > > Got an update for everyone ... all last week we normal, under 50k requests > a day with one spike

Re: [Geotools-devel] MVN repo.boundlessgeo having problems?

GeoTools ares build finished. The artifactory repo is working, but we are getting build failures in 13.x and 14.x. Looks like a test failure in Render for 13.x and a Documentation build failure in 14.x. Torben On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.

[Geotools-devel] Online Tests quietly failing (again)

So, it looks like the online oracle tests are not being run, due to an oracle error on set up ("ORA-28001: the password has expired"). I am working with the dbadmin to get oracle working again (hopefully in a way that won't expire). What concerns me is that this did not cause the test to fail, jus

Re: [Geotools-devel] cobertura MIA

The "-o" flag is run offline - so if you haven't run it before you wouldn't have the artifacts yet. Perhaps the developers guide needs to be fixed? I can run that command fine without the "-o" Torben On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > It did not show up just now when teachin

Re: [Geotools-devel] Boundless YSLD to GeoTools?

Hello Justin Yes, Boundless is still interested in having YSLD move from geoserver-exts to GeoTools. As a GeoTools/GeoServer dev, I also want to bring up one other minor note - A few months back, I added some support to GeoServer for generating styles in any format (including YSLD). This functio

Re: [Geotools-devel] beta2 planning

Mark - I have reviewed and merged those two PR's. Torben On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Mark Prins wrote: > On 12-04-16 08:45, Jody Garnett wrote: > > I am looking to make a beta2 release this week, I notice Ben and Maciej > > working away on a pull request. > > > > Are there any other pull r

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

My thoughts on the @author tag: I feel like the git commit log gives a clearer and more usefull picture of this sort of information - You can see the initial author, as well as the author of any major changes, and can usually get a good idea of who is currently doing the most work in that area of t

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools-15-RC1 / GeoServer 2.9-RC1 Release

GeoTools 15-RC1 / GeoServer 2.9-RC1 will be released Monday, May 2. This will become the new stable release in place of GeoTools 14.x / GeoServer 2.8.x, which will move to maintenance status. GeoTools 13.x / GeoServer 2.7.x will move to unsupported status, and will no longer be included in ares bu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-15.x #1

Does anyone have a clue about this failure? The branch should be effectively identical to master right now, yet master passes. The error is a Java Heap Space error, thrown by 'Extensions to EPSG authority factory' during the deploy target. Torben On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:18 PM, wrote: > See

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 15.x build failure: Heap Space

The new geotools-15.x builds have been failing with a Java Heap space error. It is thrown during the deploy phase (exactly where varies, I have seen it thrown by the 'Extensions to EPSG authority factory' and by the 'PostGIS DataStore'). Does anyone have a clue about this failure? The branch should

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 15.x build failure: Heap Space

I have upped the heap to 2G for both the build and deploy steps, and that seems to have fixed the issue for now. I am still curious as to why this was happening in the fist place, and why it is not affecting master. Torben On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Torben Barsballe < tbar

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jenkins geotools-release-jira still broken

Did anything ever happen with this? From what I can tell it is still broken (and has been for the last year?). Torben On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks Ben, I have rewriting that to use REST API on "the list", perhaps > we should make a bug report for build issues wi

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 15-RC1 artifacts ready for testing

The 15-RC1 artifacts are available for testing at: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/15-RC1/ I am currently running a clean local build of these artifacts. If someone else wants to test them as well, that would be appreciated. Torben ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jenkins geotools-release-jira still broken

oing to see anything > happen to start with, people doing releases are normally > already logged into Jira, doing the release there is > like a few clicks more than doing it on hudson, plus being able > to compute the next release number? > > Cheer > Andrea > > On Mon, Ma

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 15-RC1 Released

tps://sourceforge.net/projects/geotools/files/GeoTools%2015%20Releases/15-RC1/geotools-15-RC1-project.zip/download> This release is also available from our Maven repository <http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools/>. This release is made by Torben Barsballe (Boundless) in conjunction with Geo

[Geotools-devel] Release guide improvements

When doing the GeoTools 15-RC1 / GeoServer 2.9-RC1 release, I ran ito a bunch of places in the release guide that were incomplete or out of date. I have attempted to fix these with the following PRs: - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1182 (GeoTools) - https://github.com/geoserver/g

Re: [Geotools-devel] Copyright header policy

Copyright header with file creation date sounds like a good idea, although a would assume we would still want aspects of option B here - specifically, if there is ever a copyright transfer event, all the headers would need updating. I assume we would do something similar to the following: /* (c) 2

[Geotools-devel] OGR Failure with Java 8

Cross-posting to GeoServer devel and GeoTools devel as it kind of spans both projects (although is probably mostly a GeoTools issue) https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7578 I was testing the OGR bindings (with OpenFIleGDB) on GeoServer 2.9.0, and ran into a failure when rendering. Re-te

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16 Milestone release

I am releasing a GeoTools 16-M0 Milestone release this week. I know there are a few people who want to use this release in there talks at FOSS4G Bonn in a couple weeks, so if there is simething you want included in the relase, please ensure it is committed to master by the end of Thursday. Thanks

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing

The GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing from: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16-M0/ Torben -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an in

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing

i, Aug 12, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Torben Barsballe < > tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > >> The GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing from: >> http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16-M0/ >> >> Torben >> >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing

Looks like my failed test refers to the JAI version, and is thus system-specific. Given that it works on other systems, I am not especially concerned about this failure (although I evedently need to the JAI version on my system) Torben On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbar

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing

or switch to > 1.9.2-noclassprop to protect GeoTools users? > > (2) gt-complex-16-M0-tests.jar is present. This is the only *-tests.jar > included in the bin-zip. I wonder why? > > All the other contents look sane to me. > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > > On 13/08/16 11:50

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing

be deferred for future work. Including tests jars causes no harm. > commons-beanutils is only a vulnerability in specific types of > applications. There is also a hardcoded commons-beanutils 1.7.0 in > gt-app-schema. > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > > On 13/08/16 12:33, Torben

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-M0 release artifacts available for testing

ncy with incorrect scope, not > transitive. > > We sent our emails at the same moment. :-) > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > > On 13/08/16 12:54, Torben Barsballe wrote: > >> Doing a mvn:dependency:tree, I found this: >> >> [INFO] >> ---

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-M0 Milestone Release

GeoTools is pleased to announce the GeoTools 16-M0 milestone release: - geotools-16-M0-bin.zip

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release managers for GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer September release trains

Hi Andrea Devon and I can take the beta. We will likely perform the release on the 16th, so as not to run the risk of colliding with any potential late-running ares jobs from your release on Monday. Torben On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi folks, > me and Alessandro are

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Release managers for GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer September release trains

; request might be ready today, but if not, then Thursday or Friday, which is > the 16th. Low risk as it is a straight port from PROJ.4 and will not harm > anyone not using it. > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > > On 13/09/16 04:31, Torben Barsballe wrote: > >> Hi Andrea

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Release managers for GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer September release trains

ime zone difference from Italy > should reduce build server contention with 2.9.2. > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > > On 13/09/16 07:36, Torben Barsballe wrote: > >> Hi Ben, >> >> Good Point. Given that the feature freeze date has already been agreed >> up

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Release managers for GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer September release trains

ding digits in band names are > replaced with underscores ("_"). > > - WMS GetFeatureInfo on coverages now supports continuous map wrapping for > latitude/longitude projections, and coverages with native > latitude/longitude coordinates and longitudes>180 can be queried with >

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16-beta

I notice that commons-beanutils-1.7.0.jar is present. This JAR was removed from GeoServer and replaced with the customised commons-beanutils-1.9.2-noclassprop.jar because it enabled a remote code execution vulnerability. Also, gt-complex-16-beta-tests.jar is still present. Both these issues were

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] GeoTools 16-beta

Ben Caradoc-Davies >> wrote: >> >> Fixed on master and 15.x: >>> >>> Restrict gt-app-schema dependency on gt-complex tests to test scope >>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commit/ad608007d69bb342 >>> 8898ad41db8a37eff0d47545 >>>

Re: [Geotools-devel] starting the 16-RC1 release train

I notice that commons-beanutils-1.7.0.jar is present. This JAR was removed from GeoServer and replaced with the customised commons-beanutils-1.9.2-noclassprop.jar because it enabled a remote code execution vulnerability. This issue was noticed during the 16-M0 and 16-beta releases and has not been

Re: [Geotools-devel] starting the 16-RC1 release train

Pull request for the commons-beanutils jar fix here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1346 Torben On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > I notice that commons-beanutils-1.7.0.jar is present. This JAR was removed > from G

Re: [Geotools-devel] is boundless artifactory down?

Hi Ian Boundless artifactory appears to be online, and I can see some 17-SNAPSHOT artifacts on it (e.g. gt-api ). What sort of issue are you getting? Torben On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Ian Turton wrote: > or is it just t

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-10-04

GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-10-18 === Attending - Torben Barsballe Andrea Aime Kevin Smith Ian Turton Agenda -- 2.10.0 Release - New release date, release volunteers 2.10.0 Release - Bug fixing GSIP-138 - Promote Vector Tiles to

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-10-04

Correction - Title should be GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-10-18 On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-10-18 > === > > Attending > -----

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-11-01

Attending Torben Barsballe Jody Garnett Kevin Smith Actions -- - IanT: email release anouncements to deve/users/discuss/etc... it is a major release Actions from last meeting: -- - 2.10.0 Release: Bug fixing (done) - 2.10.0 Release: Ian

[Geotools-devel] geoserver-master failures

Hi All, It looks like some of the recent EPSG lookup changes in geotools are causing test failure(s) in geoserver: Failed tests: testReprojectLayerGroup(org.geoserver.catalog.CatalogIntegrationTest): expected null, but was:<4326> testSRSConverter(org.geoserver.config.util.XStreamPersisterTest)

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] geoserver-master failures

d will go back to normal, if not consider reverting. > > Cheers > Andrea > > Il 21 Nov 2016 20:13, "Ben Caradoc-Davies" ha scritto: > > I think Andrea just merged a fix on GeoServer master. > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > On 22/11/16 08:06, Torben Barsbal

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16.1 release on Dec. 19th

The GeoTools 16.1 release is scheduled for Sunday, December 18. I plan to be actually doing the release on the 19th, so please ensure any changes are in before than. If you have a bugfix on master that should be included in 16.1, please backport it to the 16.x branch before the 19th. Thanks, Torb

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16.1 release on Dec. 19th

-5603] Intermittent build failure with UnfinishedStubbingException >> in JDBCTransactionStateTest >> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5603 >> >> Kind regards, >> Ben. >> >> >> On 16/12/16 06:08, Torben Barsballe wrote: >> >>&g

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16.1 artifacts ready for testing

The 16.1 artifacts are available for testing at: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16.1 I am currently running a clean local build of these artifacts. If someone else wants to test them as well, that would be appreciated. Torben

[Geotools-devel] Unusual (local) build times

I am getting some unusually long build times for certain modules: imagemosaic datasource module -> 18:50 min NetCDF gridcoverage module -> 59:12 min WFS client module (NG) -> 01:22 h Most other other modules build in less than a minute. Total build time is 3:05 h Anyone else seeing this? (I

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16.1 artifacts ready for testing

on: "4.8.0-2-amd64", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > > On 20/12/16 08:37, Torben Barsballe wrote: > >> The 16.1 artifacts are available for testing at: >> http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16.1

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 2.10.1 Released!

The GeoTools team is pleased to announce the release of GeoTools 16.1 : - geotools-16.1-bin.zip

Re: [Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting at 16:30 UTC on Tuesday

Hi Ian, yes it is. Starting shortly On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Ian Turton wrote: > is this still on Skype? > > Ian > > On 9 January 2017 at 17:26, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > >> GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on Skype at 16:30 UTC on Tuesday: >> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldcl

[Geotools-devel] Updates to the Dev Guide procedures

Hello All, I am working towards moving gt-ysld towards being a supported module, and ran into a bunch of minor outdated procedures in the dev guide. Pull request with fixes here , feedback welcome. Torben ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] Updates to the Dev Guide procedures

der this a 15.4 blocker... but without -Dall > it would not build. > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Torben Barsballe < > tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I am working towards moving gt-ysld towards bein

[Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

Hello All, I am hoping to promote gt-ysld to a supported module. There are still a number of things that need to be done before this module is ready to be promoted; I will be tackling these over the next few weeks, with the aim of having gt-ysld be a supported module for GeoTools 16.2 next month.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

meone else is keen > to maintain I will gladly step aside. > > -Justin > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:12 PM Torben Barsballe < > tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I am hoping to promote gt-ysld to a supported module. >> >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] 15.4 release artifacts available for test

Thanks Andrea, I have merged that fix and backported to 16.x and 15.x. Torben On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Builds locally, thanks Ian. > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 20 January 2017 at 09:07, Ian Turton wrote: > >> Please download from http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geot

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > I've added some documentation to the user manual (mostly pulled from the > YSLD README.md). YSLD Documentation PR here: https://github.com/ > geotools/geotools/pull/1437 > > Justin - thanks for the response. > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

I agree that strictly not returning null ever is overkill. Given that, we should probably update the dev guide: http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/conventions/code/null.html Torben On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Matt Kruszewski < >

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2017-01-24

tching to a different coverage tool. Torben On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > *GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2017-01-24* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

Based on Matt's analysis, we have put together a pull request fixing up the outstanding issues in gt-ysld bringing it up to compliance with the developers guide: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1440 Null returns are documented, and are used sparingly. Torben On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:5

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

ted. > > General feedback is we could take one run at class javadocs (usual > Class/Responsibility/Collaboration info) and we should be good. > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 25 January 2017 at 09:26, Torben Barsballe > wrote: > >> Based on Matt's analysis, we have

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

serguide/uns upported/ysld.html If the GeoTools PMC is happy with the module, I will put together a PR moving it from unsupported to plugin. Thanks, Torben On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Class jav

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

ot know if we have rules. Is there a difference, or >> is this just an historical oddity? >> >> Kind regards, >> Ben. >> >> On 27/01/17 07:41, Torben Barsballe wrote: >> > The gt-ysld module is now ready to be considered for a supported module. >> >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

" and >> realised that I do not know if we have rules. Is there a difference, or is >> this just an historical oddity? >> >> Kind regards, >> Ben. >> >> On 27/01/17 07:41, Torben Barsballe wrote: >> >>> The gt-ysld module is now ready to

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting gt-ysld to a supported module

Pull request here: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1448 Torben On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > somewhere - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/welcome/ > architecture.html > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 26 January 2017 at 17:18, Torb

Re: [Geotools-devel] web, css, x11, html color names support

Hello, To my knowledge, SLD does not have named colors. All SLD color values do use a "" tag. It would be nice if this supported the standard CSS names colors in addition to the currently supported hex colors. SLD also supports SVG snippets. SVG uses CSS2 color syntax, including names. The YSLD c

Re: [Geotools-devel] web, css, x11, html color names support

example. Jody might know more. Torben On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Torben Barsballe < > tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > >> SLD also supports SVG snippets. >> > > Torben, > can you clarify this sta

Re: [Geotools-devel] Formatting formatting... getting tired of all complaints

I agree pull requests should not contain unrelated formatting changes, but I don't see too much of an issue if the changes are a) all in the same area as the functional changes and b) in a separate commit from the functional changes. I think a bulk reformat + automatic format checking is probably

[Geotools-devel] Releases and Code Freeze at the end of this week.

Hello All, The GeoTools 17-beta / GeoServer 2.11-beta and GeoTools 16.2 / GeoServer 2.10.2 releases are scheduled for February 18, so please get any fixes you want included in these releases merged and backported to the appropriate branch by the end of the week. We are planning on doing the relea

Re: [Geotools-devel] Bug stop Feb the 24th?

24th sounds good to me. Torben On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > too bad... > > this bug stop thing got me excited! > > +1 anyway... > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16.2 artifacts available for testing

The GeoTools 16.2 release artifacts are available for testing at http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16.2/ I will be testing the artifacts on OS X. Any additional testing is appreciated. Thanks, Torben -- Chec

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16.2 artifacts available for testing

"project" artifacts build on my machine, userguide looks good. Torben On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > The GeoTools 16.2 release artifacts are available for testing at > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/relea

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 16.2 Released!

The GeoTools team is pleased to announce the release of GeoTools 16.2 : - geotools-16.2-bin.zip

Re: [Geotools-devel] Bug stop Feb the 24th?

ers > would). > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 25 February 2017 at 04:58, Andrea Aime > wrote: > >> Hum... >> is it just me, or everybody forgot about it? Shall we reschedule for next >> week? >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >> On Fri, Feb 17

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Branching off, creating the new stable series

GeoServer 2.11.x and GeoTools 17.x have now been branched. If someone with commit access to GeoWebCache wants to branch that project, it would be appreciated. Torben On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > now that RC1 is out can we branch off geoserver 2.11 and the > sibli

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-16.x #1

Looks like we are having a similar problem with 17.x. Perhaps there is something special about 1st-time builds that consumes more memory than usual? Torben On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Success! Build #3 passed without any extra JVM args. Was the extra > memory re

[Geotools-devel] GeoPackage Raster Mosaic tile order

I've discovered some interesting behaviour in the GeoPackage Raster Mosaic implementation over the last few days. I tried viewing a GeoPackage generated from the GeoServer GeoPackage WMS output format in QGIS, and observed that tile order is reversed along the y-axis. QGIS used GDAL for parsing G

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoPackage Raster Mosaic tile order

Types(org.geoserver.geopkg.GeoPackageGetFeatureOutputFormatTest): Error occurred creating table If anyone wants to test master locally, and see if those tests run for them or are failing, that would be appreciated. Torben On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > I've discover

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] GeoPackage Raster Mosaic tile order

Hi Ben, Thanks for tracking down all of this! I've updated my PR accordingly, and tests now pass locally. Swapped SEVEN and FIFTEEN for LAKES and STREAMS to get the GeoPackage feature tests working. Torben On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Ben

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoPackage Raster Mosaic tile order

6 April 2017 at 13:17, Torben Barsballe > wrote: > >> I've discovered some interesting behaviour in the GeoPackage Raster >> Mosaic implementation over the last few days. >> >> I tried viewing a GeoPackage generated from the GeoServer GeoPackage WMS >> o

[Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools 17.1 / GeoServer 2.11.1 release on May 18

Hello Everyone: Just a reminder that the GeoTools 17.1 / GeoServer 2.11.1 release is scheduled for Thursday, May 18 (next week). Please be sure to backport any commits you would like to have included in that release before then (Preferably at least a day in advance, so the nightly builds and cite

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 17.1 artifacts available for testing

The GeoTools 17.1 artifacts are available for testing from http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/17.1/ Any help testing would be appreciated. Additionally, if anyone wants to review the 17.1 blog post, the draft is available here

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >