On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:50 PM, RS wrote:
> My initial reaction was that it was too early to worry about this. When we
> had problems with Segment not found errors in HLS, that was at a holiday
> time and many programmes were corrected within a week of broadcast.
>
Hi CJB,
> is the overly-LOUD dramatic music. This is so loud that the narrator
> cannot be heard
The production companies paid by the BBC put `plinkity-plink' music over
all the speech audio, not just narration, and not just to add drama. It
seems to be for no good reason; similar to a
On 08/04/18 17:22, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
Interestingly enough there's a posting today on the support forum which
wonders whether hlshd is being phased out as the "BBC isn't making
programs available in hlshd (720p 25fps), only dvfhd and hvfhd (720p
50fps) for HD. The list includes:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:39 PM, CJB wrote:
> Not sure about loudness of narrators, what I find extremely irritating
> - to the point of switching to another channel - is the overly-LOUD
> dramatic music. This is so loud that the narrator cannot be heard, and
> I then have
In article <7495777d-626b-394b-be2d-5f2ca5f14...@tqvideo.co.uk>, Tony
Quinn wrote:
> Read this, and see what I mean
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/25/the_future_of_moving_images_the_eyes_have_it/
Thanks for the reference.
FWIW I've started downloading a series
Not sure about loudness of narrators, what I find extremely irritating
- to the point of switching to another channel - is the overly-LOUD
dramatic music. This is so loud that the narrator cannot be heard, and
I then have to switch to using subtitles. And even Attenborough's
narration is not
Hi Tony,
> Read this, and see what I mean
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/25/the_future_of_moving_images_the_eyes_have_it/
Thanks, interesting, though I didn't grasp it all on first reading.
Don't suppose you know of a good article explaining why the narrator in
BBC programmes is
Sorry, should've been the PCC (Press Complaints Commission)!
On 10/04/2018 00:15, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
In fact, they're probably even less reliable than the Daily Fail - at
least the latter are occasionally brought to book by the IPCC, whereas
blugger-land (deliberate mistype) has no
Please see below ...
On 09/04/2018 21:13, Tony Quinn wrote:
On 09/04/2018 20:37, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
>
> I will, but 'The Register' has sometimes proved to be a very
unreliable source of scientific information, so I wouldn't expect it
necessarily to be a good source of technical
I have read it, and it does discuss the issue I raised. 50p is not necessarily
50p when your display has finish motion interpolating it (or not as the case
may be). Just because people don't come away from an article agreeing with you
completely does not mean they did not read and understand
On 09/04/2018 21:37, Owen Smith wrote:
Before you get all fussy about 50i, 50p or 25p you need to look at what your display is doing to
that. Most people are viewing on LCDs these days, and these have a "sample and hold"
nature of their own and run at a particular frame rate. So you may find
Before you get all fussy about 50i, 50p or 25p you need to look at what your
display is doing to that. Most people are viewing on LCDs these days, and these
have a "sample and hold" nature of their own and run at a particular frame
rate. So you may find everything is being re-sampled to 30p or
On 09/04/2018 20:37, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
>
> I will, but 'The Register' has sometimes proved to be a very
unreliable source of scientific information, so I wouldn't expect it
necessarily to be a good source of technical information either.
>
What that actually means is that if it
Please see below ...
On 09/04/2018 19:22, Tony Quinn wrote:
Not "MIGHT be so" . ***IS*** so - having spent 35 years as an
engineer in broadcast TV (some of it at the BBC) , I've heard too many
bloody amateurs dismiss the physics/maths with phrases like "might be
so, but..."
On 09/04/2018 19:00, Steve Dodd wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:34 PM, MacFH - C E Macfarlane
wrote:
Yes, I can see that that might be so, but I don't think it alters the thrust
of my argument, does it? Wouldn't 1080p25 still be better to watch than
720p50?
On 09/04/2018 18:34, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Please see below ...
On 09/04/2018 16:54, Tony Quinn wrote:
On 09/04/2018 16:23, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Can't see the logic, if there is any?! Surely, for the same disk
space and bandwidth, the customer viewer would get a better
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:34 PM, MacFH - C E Macfarlane
wrote:
> Yes, I can see that that might be so, but I don't think it alters the thrust
> of my argument, does it? Wouldn't 1080p25 still be better to watch than
> 720p50?
Brains are weird things, could easily
Please see below ...
On 09/04/2018 16:54, Tony Quinn wrote:
On 09/04/2018 16:23, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Can't see the logic, if there is any?! Surely, for the same disk
space and bandwidth, the customer viewer would get a better download
from 1440 25fps rather than 720 50fps?
It
On 09/04/2018 16:23, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Please see below ...
On 08/04/2018 17:22, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
Interestingly enough there's a posting today on the support forum
which wonders whether hlshd is being phased out as the "BBC isn't
making programs available in hlshd (720p
Please see below ...
On 08/04/2018 17:22, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
Interestingly enough there's a posting today on the support forum
which wonders whether hlshd is being phased out as the "BBC isn't
making programs available in hlshd (720p 25fps), only dvfhd and hvfhd
(720p 50fps) for HD. The
On 08/04/2018 10:36, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Please see below ...
On 06/04/2018 16:21, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
On 06/04/2018 13:37, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
Notwithstanding this, Charles was making the point that, from time to
Please see below ...
On 06/04/2018 16:21, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
On 06/04/2018 13:37, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
Notwithstanding this, Charles was making the point that, from time to
time, in a series we might have some programmes at
On 06/04/2018 16:07, David Cantrell wrote:
Broadcast rights and online rights are not the same thing.
Absolutely. I suspect this is the reason why so much material on Channel
4's excellent "All4.com" under the "Walter Presents" tag is only
available online, rather than being broadcast on
On 06/04/2018 13:37, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
Notwithstanding this, Charles was making the point that, from time to
time, in a series we might have some programmes at one mode and others
at another mode. Some consistency across a
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:01:11PM +0100, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
> For many things, that would be true, but for the sort of big Hollywood
> films that I mentioned, I doubt if there can be any doubt who the
> current rights holders are. Apart from anything else, the original
> rights
Some good points, please see below ...
On 06/04/2018 13:27, David Cantrell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:58:44PM +0100, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
And that's not to mention the absurdity of not being allowed to download
a 40-50 year old B version of 'Pride & Prejudice', or the 50 year
On 06/04/18 13:27, David Cantrell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:58:44PM +0100, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
And that's not to mention the absurdity of not being allowed to download
a 40-50 year old B version of 'Pride & Prejudice', or the 50 year old
'Funny Girl' & 43 year old 'Funny
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:45:50PM +0100, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
> Notwithstanding this, Charles was making the point that, from time to
> time, in a series we might have some programmes at one mode and others
> at another mode. Some consistency across a series should not be too much
> to ask
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:58:44PM +0100, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
> And that's not to mention the absurdity of not being allowed to download
> a 40-50 year old B version of 'Pride & Prejudice', or the 50 year old
> 'Funny Girl' & 43 year old 'Funny Lady', because of rights issues -
>
On 05/04/2018 10:41, RS wrote:
On 04/04/18 23:58, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
I do wish the BBC would get their act together, this is by no means
the first time that this sort of thing has happened - others include:
> ...
The BBC's policy is set out in
On 05/04/2018 10:41, RS wrote:
The BBC's policy is set out in
http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2015-07-the-development-of-new-video-factory-profiles-for-bbc-iplayer
(an article I have linked to before).
I'd forgotten about this document! Thanks for reminding us.
HLShd does not appear in the
On 04/04/18 23:58, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Please see below ...
On 04/04/2018 22:16, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
On 04/04/2018 22:03, I wrote:
It looks as though the best 25fps resolution you can get is hvfxsd,
960x540. It is quite common for older programmes only to be
available in HVF
Please see below ...
On 04/04/2018 22:16, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
On 04/04/2018 22:03, RS wrote:
On 04/04/18 19:27, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
On 04/04/2018 16:12, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Hi,
Was able to download the previous day's Episode 1 as hafhd, but
seemingly can only download Episode
On 04/04/2018 22:03, RS wrote:
On 04/04/18 19:27, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
On 04/04/2018 16:12, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Hi,
Was able to download the previous day's Episode 1 as hafhd, but
seemingly can only download Episode 2 as hvfhd at twice the disk
space. Has anyone else been able
On 04/04/18 19:27, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
On 04/04/2018 16:12, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Hi,
Was able to download the previous day's Episode 1 as hafhd, but
seemingly can only download Episode 2 as hvfhd at twice the disk
space. Has anyone else been able to download Ep 2 as hafhd or
On 04/04/2018 16:12, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
Hi,
Was able to download the previous day's Episode 1 as hafhd, but
seemingly can only download Episode 2 as hvfhd at twice the disk
space. Has anyone else been able to download Ep 2 as hafhd or hlshd?
Afraid not. I tried to download
36 matches
Mail list logo