Hi!
It's known, that C coders usually uses #defines instead of values
directly for more portability and readability.
And of course the #defines should be on the right place.
So I post this patch (look in the attachment) to this ML hoping to get it
in, because I think this _one_ #define is at m
Hello,
I spent the last 3 days reading papers, websites and mailing lists about the
GGI-Project. There is still something confusing for me:
What is the difference between KGIcon and KGI, if there is one?
How fits GGI Console (J.McMullan's EvStack?) in the architecture?
I'm working at my these
> What is the difference between KGIcon and KGI, if there is one?
The KGI driver system itself is designed to be portable across platforms
(both hardware- and OS-wise). KGIcon is a wrapper around the KGI drivers
that will let them look like normal fbcon drivers for the Linux kernel
(hence the n
On 1999/Dec/15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Q: What videocards support -any- acceleration?
> > A: FBdev: Matrox
> > 3Dfx/Banshee; 3Dfx/3
> >(but it uses the tdfx driver for this and as the 3dfx and
> > tdfx switch the card into different modes they t
Andreas Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> KGI 0.0.9 - which is maintained by Steffen Seeger - is a massive intrusion
> into the Linux console subsystem which sets quite some things right and thus
> allows to use more features of modern graphics cards.
>
> It will need some updating of the drive
Andreas Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW: Heretic has a -mode parameter that should change resolution, however it
> doesn't seem to work right in my outdated copy.
Hmm, it should work, but it have some limitations - here's my Changelog
entry:
* Initial support for higher resolutions (autom
>Andreas Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW: Heretic has a -mode parameter that should change resolution,
>however it
> > doesn't seem to work right in my outdated copy.
>
>Hmm, it should work, but it have some limitations - here's my Changelog
>entry:
>* Initial support for higher resol
