On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:07:40 +0200, Raphaël Quinet raphael at gimp.org
wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:57:44 +0200, gg at catking.net wrote:
Gimp should not decide what is better because it cannot know what is
required so cannot make that choice.
This sort of surprise behaviour is
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:56:16 -0600, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:56:33AM +0200, Jakub Friedl wrote:
I think that use image file quality unless defaults are 'better' is not
thee problem. Problem is inheriting image quality between different images
in one GIMP
Rather strange conclusion from my POV - if something very convenient
cannot be provided for each and every case, it shouldn't be provided at
all.
I can prove my opinion with a case with healing brush. It saves me a lot
of time and efforts during photo retouching despite the fact it doesn't
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:39:45 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2w=?= Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want to save several images with the same settings, you can
use the buttons Save defaults and Load defaults. We also have
an enhancement request (bug #120829) about providing
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:24:47 -0400, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like what's happening is something like this:
1) Current JPEG quality setting is 85
2) User selects Use quality settings from original image if
original image is better
3) Original
Hi,
i'm not a developer but i'm using gimp since ten years (nearly the early
days). It is true that there are now many applications. Just think of :
- those photo organizer such as F-Spot or digikam+ShowFoto, which are
made for we, good fathers
- more cool apps (you mention panos like Hugin),
Nope Radar,
Gimp is under important internally changes - most of the actual limits
are not from developers minds but from actual toolkit limitations.
They work hard to introduce for next GIMP versions a new engine which
will make possible a lot of new posibilities. This mean they have to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok not many photo retouching program, but krita is here. An also, i've
to apologize, i'm beginning myself using ... Blender... even for
photo-retouching and compositing, even if it is not its main purpose
I don't know why you would have thought of even trying to use
