And finally, I agree with Sven that I don't know why anyone would
want to have multipage PDF output for GIMP.
This is very simple : Illustrator CS4 has just implemented a real
multipage PDF support.
My opinion, if worth, is that gimp don't have to copy adobe software,
even if there are many
On Thursday, March 26, 2009, 21:20:53, Cédric Gémy wrote:
This is very simple : Illustrator CS4 has just implemented a real
multipage PDF support.
You mean something that CorelDraw had for years?
Then again, both CorelDraw and Illustrator are vector editing
programs, and having multiple
El Martes, 24 de Marzo de 2009 03:03:36 Guillermo Espertino escribió:
Does that indicate that separate+ is what needs to be enhanced, rather
than the core application?
This discussion was about a PDF export plugin at the beginning.
I was trying to make evident that a PDF export plugin is
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
I am by no means a photography professional and my point of view comes
mostly from what other people have said regarding CMYK support; I don't
have any direct sources to give.
Could you perhaps clarify/give references to your claim that high-end
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:51 -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
I do work in the printing industry, and I can tell you that
output is still CMYK, and will remain CMYK for at least the next
few years.
Output, yes, of course. But where in this process do you actually edit
an image in CMYK? I
CMYK exists because, though is possible theoretically, it isn't possible
to generate black from mixing CMY inks. As the C, M and Y inks aren't
perfect and have some contaminants, mixing them ends up in a dirty brown
instead of pure black.
That's why CMYK exists, and that's why it isn't so simple
From: Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:18:23 +0100
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:51 -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
I do work in the printing industry, and I can tell you that
output is still CMYK, and will remain CMYK for at least the next
few years.
On Monday 23 March 2009 04:56:23 pm Robert Krawitz wrote
snip
When people do send CMYK data to Gutenprint, the large majority of the
time it's either because they don't really understand what CMYK is
(it's very device and media specific) or because we have a problem
with the GCR parameters
From: Guillermo Espertino gespert...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:59:53 -0300
CMYK exists because, though is possible theoretically, it isn't possible
to generate black from mixing CMY inks. As the C, M and Y inks aren't
perfect and have some contaminants, mixing them ends
Hi Robert, thanks for your comments.
This really sounds like you're using black as a spot color rather than
going generic editing in CMYK space.
That was just an example. Another example could be just putting an image
in front of a gray gradient background.
In my experience, it's not that easy
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:51 -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
I do work in the printing industry, and I can tell you that
output is still CMYK, and will remain CMYK for at least the next
few years.
Output, yes, of course. But where in this process do you
11 matches
Mail list logo
