Scott schreef:
Okay, I'm ashamed to admit that I don't even know what a bugzilla
is. I guess I always thought a bug was something that actually made
a program non-functional, rather than the things that make it only
function at a sub-par level, so I wouldn't have even thought to look
in a bug
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:14:24AM +0100, news.gmane.org wrote:
Gimp's bug tracker is Bugzilla and can be found at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=GIMP. Bugzilla is used in
many open source projects (and presumably many other projects as well)
and was first created for the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:48:47 +0100, Mukund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott
You can use bookmarks in the Open Image dialog to quickly flip to
directories. Not that this is exactly what you want, but it's more
convenient than having to browse to a particular directory from scratch.
Kind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several bugs are already open about how restrictive the so-called
filechooser interface is. Please dont hesistate to add your comments to
those bugs.
One should hesitate at least as long as reading all existing comments
takes, though.
HTH,
Michael
--
GIMP
Scott wrote:
/rant
Hm... don't you think that sticking to the current problem - crop tool -
would make this thread more useful than expanding it into a generic
rant once again?
HTH,
Michael
--
GIMP http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki http://wiki.gimp.org
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:07AM +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Scott wrote:
/rant
Hm... don't you think that sticking to the current problem - crop tool -
would make this thread more useful than expanding it into a generic
rant once again?
Well, I guess if the subject said Crop
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:01 -0700, Scott wrote:
I have yet to hear any feedback regarding my idea of allowing the
options for a tool like the current crop to be customised by the
user to make it do what s/he wants it to do as a normal case.
GIMP allows you to configure the default values
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:13:33AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:01 -0700, Scott wrote:
I have yet to hear any feedback regarding my idea of allowing the
options for a tool like the current crop to be customised by the
user to make it do what s/he wants it to
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:00:48PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 10/27/06, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
Your text gives an impression that the old crop tool is not
anymore there. Is that the case?
Yes, it is
The fact is that people have different ways of working and
therefore having
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:01:13 +0100, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, a tool which will remember what I want
it to do will be appreciated as a wise tool.
I'll second that, I find it very time consuming having to reassert my
jpeg/png options, compression ratio etc. every time I save an
On 10/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:01:13 +0100, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, a tool which will remember what I want
it to do will be appreciated as a wise tool.
I'll second that, I find it very time consuming having to reassert my
jpeg/png options,
Hi Scott
Scott wrote:
And directory paths. Probably a gtk issue, but why? A case in point is
the gtkam application, which has been updated to use the gtk
stuff. In the previous version, I would always save my digicam photos
to, eg, ~/photos/2006/10. And it would remember between instances, so
On 10/27/06, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
Your text gives an impression that the old crop tool is not
anymore there. Is that the case?
Yes, it is
The fact is that people have different ways of working and
therefore having two (or more) versions of the tools would be
perfectly ok.
Can you
From: Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The old crop tools was ok if you have a fixed target size.
The dialog always got in the way for the cases where you crop
the image to find the right aspect.
Your text gives an impression that the old crop tool is not
anymore there. Is that the case?
The
14 matches
Mail list logo
