[Gimp-developer] The Frosty Logo Script and the Sparkle Plug-in are Back in Action

2005-01-08 Thread Shlomi Fish
This bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132145 Was present in the Bugzilla for a long time now. It was reported because the Frosty Logo script did not render correctly. Kevin Cozens discovered it was due to the Sparkle Plug-in. Eventually, I decided to resolve it. I did that by

[Gimp-developer] Renaming the Xtns menu

2005-01-08 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
Hi everyone! Due to a suggestion on the portuguese-br translation I had set up, I renamed, in GIMP 2.2 already, the Xtns menu option to Extras. Extras is written and means the same in PT and EN, just as Xtns was being used as abreviation of extenses. I am writting this because I liked the

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-08 Thread Akkana Peck
Sven Neumann writes: Assuming your camera adds EXIF info, are you seriously telling me that you do not run 'exiftran -a -i' on each and every image you ever shoot and instead use GIMP to rotate them? Add another voice to all the others saying No, I leave my originals untouched, and only edit

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]It's a bummer that it's not something like UTF-8 (and quite odd, ]if the spec came from Japan), but editing ASCII is still useful ]for quite a large number of people. ] ]What do modern cameras sold in Japan save in the EXIF fields? Japan has a romanized alphabet that's corresponds to their

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-08 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:24:49 -0800 From: Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sven Neumann writes: Assuming your camera adds EXIF info, are you seriously telling me that you do not run 'exiftran -a -i' on each and every image you ever shoot and instead use GIMP to rotate them?

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's a bummer that it's not something like UTF-8 (and quite odd, if the spec came from Japan), but editing ASCII is still useful for quite a large number of people. It would require unreasonable effort to create an entry that restricts editing to

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-08 Thread Hal V. Engel
On Saturday 08 January 2005 13:40, Robert L Krawitz wrote: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:24:49 -0800 From: Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sven Neumann writes: Assuming your camera adds EXIF info, are you seriously telling me that you do not run 'exiftran -a -i' on each and every

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-08 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:09:29 -0800 You can add me to the list. I also leave my originals alone. As you=20 say this is just good photographic practice. I have negatives that=20 are almost 70 years old that are in nearly new condition that I