Hi,
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:33 -0600, Jason Simanek wrote:
> I understand that color management is complicated and probably not
> worth completely implementing until Gimp fully employs GEGL, but I
> think changing the menu so that
>
> File > Image > Mode > Assign Color Profile > sRGB
> ACTUALLY
On 03/04/2010 02:14 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> The point of the current behavior is that you need to make an assumption
> if no profile is attached to an image. Otherwise you could not even
> display this image. Without a color profile or an assumption about the
> meaning of the RGB values it's jus
So, I was thinking about an interesting matter: why the image viewer
softwares doesn´t have support to XCF? Some linux file managers, like
Thunar, have the thumbnails support.
So what if I want to develop, or help developing, an image viewer, can I
implement the XCF format? And if yes, where may I
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Eduardo Barijan wrote:
> So, I was thinking about an interesting matter: why the image viewer
> softwares doesn´t have support to XCF? Some linux file managers, like
> Thunar, have the thumbnails support.
> So what if I want to develop, or help developing, an image v
On 03/04/2010 02:13 PM, Jason Simanek wrote:
>
> On 03/04/2010 02:14 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> The point of the current behavior is that you need to make an assumption
>> if no profile is attached to an image. Otherwise you could not even
>> display this image. Without a color profile or an assump
Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
issue. The main question is one of licensing. I believe the license
allows us to distribute the profiles, but IANAL.
I'd appreciate if someone who eit
Omari Stephens wrote:
> Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
> to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
> issue. The main question is one of licensing. I believe the license
> allows us to distribute the profiles, but IANAL.
As I
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:49 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
> Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
> to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
> issue. The main question is one of licensing. I believe the license
> allows us to distri
On 03/03/10 11:19, Jason Simanek wrote:
> ...elision by patrick
> Gballard doesn't mention that Firefox, when its color management is
> enabled, actually does website color management correctly, since it
> applies color profiles to both images and HMTL/CSS-defined colors. But
> that really doesn't
Hi, I was advised to post these kind of ideas to developer mailing
lists, so here I am.
The link to the original post in bugzilla is below:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611765
What do you think of this?
Also sorry again Sven
___
Gim
Hi again, the original discussion is in the link below:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611758
I was advised to present this idea here, what do you think?
Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after
the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up
Once I was used to the behaviour I found it quite useful. If I need to
delete a number of consecutive layers, I select the top or bottom one
then use the down or up arrow to walk through the layers I want
deleted then click the delete button repeatedly.
However, even knowing it and leveraging it,
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 23:14 -0300, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote:
> Hi, I was advised to post these kind of ideas to developer mailing
> lists, so here I am.
>
> The link to the original post in bugzilla is below:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611765
>
> What do you think of th
I see your point...haven´t thought of it, thanks buddy. Now if someone
cames with the same idea I can answer accordingly
Em Qui, 2010-03-04 às 21:50 -0500, Liam R E Quin escreveu:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 23:14 -0300, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote:
> > Hi, I was advised to post these kind of ide
On 03/04/2010 05:58 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> On 03/03/10 11:19, Jason Simanek wrote:
>> That's not true in my experience. Yes, sRGB should be as good as NOT
>> having a profile since sRGB is the ASSUMED color space on most
>> computersy. But Gimp still adds a color profile to the image: an sRGB
On 03/04/2010 09:01 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:49 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
>> Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
>> to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
>> issue. The main question is one of licensing
16 matches
Mail list logo
