Hi,
David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To me, it looks like until the release of the first 2.0 version of
> GTK+, it would be more logical to sync CVS gimp with CVS
> glib-atk-pango-gtk+. So, please apply.
it's a major burden for some of us with a slow internet connection, so
we will tr
Am Mon, 2001-10-08 um 22.47 schrieb 1002574041:
> I really think we should use XML for the tips but Marc is probably right
> that it only makes sense if we use it for other files too. If we decide
> to tackle some of our plug-in problems with XML, we will probably want a
> real XML parser. Tha
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:34:27PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have tried to keep the CVS version of GIMP compileable with the
> latest releases of GTK+ and friends as well as with the current state
> of these modules in CVS. The latest (small) changes in glib break
> source compat
Am Mon, 2001-10-08 um 17.46 schrieb 1002555985:
> Which GNOME components does GIMP use?
None, that's the point. :)
--
Servus,
Daniel
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-develo
Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 06:53:24PM +0200, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As Sven already mentioned, the solution would consist of adding a new
>
> I would also agree that the header idea is best, HOWEVER, Sven
> surprising
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 06:53:24PM +0200, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Sven already mentioned, the solution would consist of adding a new
I would also agree that the header idea is best, HOWEVER, Sven
surprisingly offered that it would be 10 minutes or so to use xml (he
seemed a
On Mon, 08 Oct 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Daniel could you please take the discussion about UTF-8 and editors
> somewhere else?! Then, if you want to propose something that is GIMP
> related, please take your time to write up an elaborate proposal and
> try to explain your ideas in a way that al
For what it's worth, here is my opinion on the Tip of the Day messages
and their translations. In summary: keep it simple! I know that
being the one who introduced these tips in the Gimp does not grant me
any special priviledges (especially since I am not translating them)
but it looks like the
Hi,
Daniel could you please take the discussion about UTF-8 and editors
somewhere else?! Then, if you want to propose something that is GIMP
related, please take your time to write up an elaborate proposal and
try to explain your ideas in a way that allows us to discuss them
in a constructive man
Heya prof,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-10-08 at 1526.45 +0200):
>
> Yes, and the point is? Evolution is using XML and xml-i18n-tools, but
> it has the slight "advantage" over GIMP that it's heavily relying on
> GNOME components for remote activation and components. Though I'm using
> it it's a huge
Am Mon, 2001-10-08 um 03.53 schrieb 1002506022:
> > gettext and po
> > files are a dead end for modular applications because they only behave
> > well for monolithic and small applications; both of which GIMP
> > definitely isn't and for sure even less will be in the future.
> Evolution certain
Am Mon, 2001-10-08 um 03.39 schrieb 1002505193:
> > You don't have to, that's the trick.
> Ok, I got the impression from your message that this was the case.
The trick about it is that there's nothing special, so you can use
any editor you like, like with ascii files just the XML represents
info
"pcg"@goof.com ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
> > My mailer doesn't (pine)
>
> pine doesn't even parse rfc822 addresses (like mine) - let's face it, pine
> is the worst mailer around with regards to features, standards compliance
> etc. Everybody is free to use it, but citing pine as an example o
Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> > Am Son, 2001-10-07 um 18.09 schrieb 1002470948:
> >
> > >
> > > Willkommen zu GIMP
>
> just a nitpick, that should have been "de-DE" etc.
I have never seen "de-DE" being used anywhere, not even in XML files. A
quick search in
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 08:56, Javier Hernandez wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a problem with a Epson FS200 Slide/negs Scanner.
>
> The problem is more obvious with negatives than with slides.
> The problem is that I always get one of the pixels in the negs more clearer
> than the rest of them (i.
15 matches
Mail list logo
