On Wednesday 08 December 2004 04:17, Austin Donnelly wrote:
I think I was probably the last person to do any major work on the
scissors tool, and that was in 1999 to port it to the (then new)
tile-based world.
The code when I took it on was a software Vietnam; a complete
mess. I had to
Dear all,
Sorry for previous mail. In my hurry I pressed the wrong button in my mail
app.
Greetz,
Henry
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joao, I think you completely misunderstood the question.
I am sorry. Obviously it was me who completely misunderstood the
question. I shouldn't read mail before having at least one large cup
of coffee...
Sven
Austin Donnelly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[scissors tool]
I think I was probably the last person to do any major work on the scissors
tool, and that was in 1999 to port it to the (then new) tile-based world.
The code when I took it on was a software Vietnam; a complete mess. I had
to read
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:31:10 +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Austin Donnelly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[scissors tool]
- the point editing interface sucks; I merely made the existing one work
but it might be interesting to see if it could use the same code from the
Path tool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-12-08 at 1714.59 +0100):
That'd indeed rock. Intelligend Scissors could just be a path tool that
has a very crude way to calculate the segment between two control
points. The API might already support this (you can have custom stroke
types) but details would be
GSR - FR wrote:
Of course, in past years the algoritms have evolved, see for example
the concept of freehand sketch selection:
http://vision.ai.uiuc.edu/~tankh/Selection/selection.html
This is the second time I have seen something which really only exist as
a research paper but would be really
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in the past it
took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining this? Is there a way to get
the histogram for just the selection?
-Joseph
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL
William Skaggs wrote:
Joseph Heled wrote:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in the past it
took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining this? Is there a way to get
the histogram for just the selection?
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72959
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:59:39AM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote:
In 2.2, the histogram always takes the full image. I thought that in the
past it took the selection if there was one. Am I imagining this? Is there
a way to get the histogram for just the selection?
it is easy enough to make a
Is there a way to get some statistics on a selection? Say for each RGB channel
Average, min max, STD, median? (I want this in some interactive way. i.e. to see
the results while I play with the image/layers)
And if not, how would one implement this? A plugin need to be re-activated every
time
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 05:58:51PM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote:
(And Carol, there is no need to point out it can be done by going over the
pixels one by one and a hand calculator )
i offer you a two step solution and you get worried that i will suggest
a thousands of steps solution?
what
Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 05:58:51PM +1300, Joseph Heled wrote:
(And Carol, there is no need to point out it can be done by going over the
pixels one by one and a hand calculator )
i offer you a two step solution and you get worried that i will suggest
a thousands of steps
13 matches
Mail list logo
