On Tuesday 20 February 2007 16:28, peter sikking wrote:
snip
>
> boy, am I glad we went out and did workplace observation as part
> of the project I am running. that means I can say with confidence
> that the brush is the way to go. actually healing is applied
> extremely local, with the tiniest br
Helmut wrote:
>> Painting with a brush is just a way to select an area. And a very
>> nice
>> and intuitive one also. The problem with the current
>> implementation is
>> however that it tries to heal while you are painting. This doesn't
>> quite
>> work. I think it would be better if, while
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 20:55 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> > I think it would be better if, while you are painting, the tool
> > would work like the clone tool. Then, when the mouse is released, the
> > healing algorithm should be applied on the area selected by the paint
> > stroke.
>
> hmmm
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 09:54, jEsuSdA wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm not a developer, but i suscribed to the devel list because i
> work everyday with gimp and i like to know how it grow day by day.
>
> First at all i would to congratulate us for you efforts.
> I love Gimp and i try to install it whe
jEsuSdA wrote:
> My question is why and when Gimp will include LAYER GROUPS or FOLDERS
> (more useful)?
>
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86337 for the current situation.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.
On 20 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> Finally I don't understand what the healing tool has to do
>> with a 'brush' (as it is currently implemented)
>
> Painting with a brush is just a way to select an area. And a very nice
> and intuitive one also. The problem with the current implementation is
> howe
I had our evaluation notes dug out to see what we have to say about
this.
>> I'd like to help to keep the healing tool alive.
>
> That would be very much appreciated since otherwise we would likely
> disable the heal tool for the 2.4 release.
yep, we can see it does not work right now.
>> Fina
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 18:02 +0900, Yoshinori Yamakawa wrote:
> I improved lcms display filter for the reference.
>
> More informations, examples, patch and Win32 binaries are available at:
> http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/cdisplay_lcms_trial.html
Let me add some comments to this. P
Hello!
I'm not a developer, but i suscribed to the devel list because i work
everyday with gimp and i like to know how it grow day by day.
First at all i would to congratulate us for you efforts.
I love Gimp and i try to install it wherever i can (friends, family,
office, ...) and i have made som
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:26:30 +0100, Hal V. Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 03:32, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:59 +0100
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> snip
>
>> Well, the actual story is that Gutenprint 5.0 includes its own Print
>
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 12:54 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I'd like to help to keep the healing tool alive.
That would be very much appreciated since otherwise we would likely
disable the heal tool for the 2.4 release.
> Finally I don't understand what the healing tool has to do
> with a '
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 03:32, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:59 +0100
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
snip
> Well, the actual story is that Gutenprint 5.0 includes its own Print
> plugin for the GIMP that replaces the one in GIMP 2.2. The best thing
> to do is to co
Hello,
While parsing authors.xml to add the "last-active" attribute and to update
the list with new contributors, I stumbled upon two incomplete names:
* GG
* Daniel Richard G
They are added as is for now, but if those people want to be properly
credited with their full name, they sould s
Hi
I'd like to help to keep the healing tool alive.
Unfortunately I don't know the internals of Gimp,
so I probably need (a lot of) help there.
I have had a looked at the paper by T. Georgiev as cited
in app/paint/gimpheal.c
If I were to implement it directly from that paper
I'd ask the user to
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:59 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There is also problems with the way changes broke the in
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There is also problems with the way changes broke the interface
>with gimp=print, amongst other things. Gimp 2.3 is still seriously
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
