On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:20:48 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The problem is that custom tables seems very confusing -- it sounds
like the user's going to be asked to input something she knows nothing
about. One could argue that Use existing image
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:36:05 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:10:30 -0400, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would Use existing image quality settings be a better name for this?
I considered naming this option Use original quality settings, but
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:25:54 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2w=?= Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:36:05 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:10:30 -0400, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would Use existing image
Quoting Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The problem is that custom tables seems very confusing -- it sounds
like the user's going to be asked to input something she knows nothing
about. One could argue that Use existing image quality settings
means the same thing as Use quality settings
Hi Raphael,
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:44 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Since Friday, I added a new option to the JPEG save dialog: Use
custom quality settings. If some quantization tables were attached
to the image when it was loaded, then this option allows you to use
them instead of the
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:22:58 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:44 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Since Friday, I added a new option to the JPEG save dialog: Use
custom quality settings. If some quantization tables were attached
to the image when it was
Why don't add such a wonderful floating tip with a short description of
the switch and not to revoke the possibility from a user?
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
I think that this option is still useful. Maybe not for disabling it
when it is enabled, but for enabling it when it is not enabled
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:16:15 +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why don't add such a wonderful floating tip with a short description of
the switch and not to revoke the possibility from a user?
This is already done. There is a tooltip associated with that option
and it
Raphaël, I would object to removal of DCT method settings switch. Make a
simple but clear test case - open any file from RAW and save it with
100% quality, 1x1,1x1,1x1 subsampling and integer vs float DCT method.
Then open two resulted files as 2 layers, subtract, flatten and look at
the
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:08:27 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2w=?= Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:22:58 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:44 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Since Friday, I added a new option to the JPEG save
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 11:25 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
[...]
- the smoothing option because this can also be performed by the usual
blur filters.
Actually no, I don't think it can :-)
The smoothing seems to reduce jpeg artifacts quite noticeably; it
appears as if it's done after
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:36 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
[...]
Considering
that the quantization tables attached to an image would not always
be the original ones, I decided to write custom instead of
original for the label of that option. It is not perfect, but I
have not been able to
12 matches
Mail list logo
