From: Alchemie foto\\grafiche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3
May
be is missed, also the possibility to select transparent area as
was a color,meaning using the magic wand or the color selector
tool..
But since there is alpha to selection(=select transparency) that
is no too missed... well IS missed
On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Chris Moller wrote:
Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
So there is obstacle, indeed. And till now I have no idea how to solve
this.
Might be a bit of a wild branch on this topic, but I'm wondering if all
the effects described here could be implemented as a
On Thursday 25 September 2008, Chris Moller wrote:
Yeah, I expect it's the same function, but adding a transparent layer,
painting it, switching to subtract mode, and merging down, is more
cumbersome than just painting in subtract mode would be.
The documentation site only refers to those
Excuse the double post in the first the subject went somehow lost and the rest
reformatted in a weird way with question marks filling blank spaces
--
May be that this long discussion suffers a lack of
Hi,
sorry, but your mail is still so badly formatted that I simply refuse to
even attempt to read it. Could you please stick to the rules of the
mailing-list and send text-only mails instead of this HTML crap with
tables? Thank you very much.
Sven
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
sorry, but your mail is still so badly formatted that I simply refuse to
even attempt to read it. Could you please stick to the rules of the
mailing-list and send text-only mails instead of this HTML crap with
tables? Thank you very much.
Please don't think I'm
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:59:55 -0700
Patrick Horgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please don't think I'm advocating for HTML mail for the list I'm not,
just had a brain fart. Does anyone else find it ironic that a mailing
list having to do with high quality graphics is text only? grin;
Hello,
From: bgw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does draw with transparency differ from using eraser tool
with x% opacity?
Pencil and eraser are counterparts of course, but I wished for
transparent color, not just transparent pencil (yes, it exists, and
it is eraser).
From: Chris Moller [EMAIL
Hi Maciej,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Maciej Pilichowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
From: bgw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How does draw with transparency differ from using eraser tool
with x% opacity?
Pencil and eraser are counterparts of course, but I wished for
transparent color, not
Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
So there is obstacle, indeed. And till now I have no idea how to solve
this.
Might be a bit of a wild branch on this topic, but I'm wondering if all
the effects described here could be implemented as a /subtractive/ process.
I haven't looked at gimp's
Hello,
I was asked to bring this issue to the ML instead of discussing it
on bugzilla so here we go.
Original post:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553003
Please, provide transparent color or in other words -- treat
transparency _also_ as a color.
I know GIMP has alpha channel
Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
It would be useful (and _intuitive_) to have
black color, white color, ... and transparent "color", so user could
pick up color dialog, choose transparent and paint/draw with
transparency.
That would be cool!
Patrick
Maciej Pilichowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Please, provide transparent color or in other words -- treat
transparency _also_ as a color.
I don't think that this is a sensible approach in general.
We currently use alpha to do proper antialiasing, compositing existing
photos on top of each
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
Hello,
I know GIMP has alpha channel and it provides transparency. However it
is artificial for me that you have colors and then you have distinct
entity -- transparency. It would be useful (and _intuitive_) to have
Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
Hello,
I was asked to bring this issue to the ML instead of discussing it
on bugzilla so here we go.
Original post:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553003
Please, provide transparent color or in other words -- treat
transparency _also_ as a
Hello,
From: Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We currently use alpha to do proper antialiasing, compositing
existing photos on top of each other and in all of these cases a
coupled alphacolor (= color + alpha value) would be cumbersome
and unhelpful.
Why unhelpful? Note, that you are already
Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
Hello,
I was asked to bring this issue to the ML instead of discussing it
on bugzilla so here we go.
Original post:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553003
Please, provide transparent color or in other words -- treat
transparency _also_ as a
Maciej Pilichowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But even taking him into account the current model
has served us well for the last years and there has been very few
discussion about this specific problem, if it cropped up it was in
the context of indexed
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:19:09PM +0200, Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
From: David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the real world I live in, I have yet to see a transparent
pencil.
Wish granted -- simply use your finger (I assume you thought of glass
painting because it is only good metaphor
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, bgw wrote:
How does draw with transparency differ from using eraser tool with x%
opacity?
You could change the color information at the same places (and less
importantly in a single step) you change the alpha information. At least
that's how I understand it.
Simon Budig wrote:
Also I think that most of the tasks you mention in other mails - like
cleaning up edges - can nicely be done with the current gimp,
provided that you don't need 100% exact control over the alpha values
We do have an old feature request which does deal with different ways of
21 matches
Mail list logo
