Raphael Quinet wrote:
>
> I see... But unfortunately it would be difficult to mail the top 10
> bugs to this list every month. The first problem is technical: I
> don't have the time to set up such a thing. The second problem is
> related to the information that would be sent: some bugs have a
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Dave Neary wrote:
>> By mailing the 10/15 most critical bugs on a monthly basis
>> to the list, I think people will be more likely to fix
>> them. I know that I was when Sven last posted his trawl
>> through outstanding bugs. It also has the benefit of
>> connecting
Hi all,
Apologies - I accidentally took this off-list for a couple
of mails. Returning to the list now.
Cheers,
Dave.
Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Raphael Quinet wrote:
> > Well, the easiest way to do that is to use one of the
> > existing queries for open bugs and click on the "Sev"
> > or "Pri"
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Personally it got me lookign at bugzilla (a habit that has since
> > lapsed), and looking at the thread it seemed to lead to the resolution
> > of a fair few bugs. Do people think that doing this on a regular
Hi,
Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Branko's talk of a bug week got me thinking recently, and I just noticed
> that one of the few mails which got left in my gimp-developer mailbox
> (usually RFCs & followups, but not in this case) was a mail that Sven
> sent to the list in June with a
Hi all.
Branko's talk of a bug week got me thinking recently, and I just noticed
that one of the few mails which got left in my gimp-developer mailbox
(usually RFCs & followups, but not in this case) was a mail that Sven
sent to the list in June with a list of active 1.2 bugs (the thread was
"1.
Hi all.
Branko's talk of a bug week got me thinking recently, and I just noticed
that one of the few mails which got left in my gimp-developer mailbox
(usually RFCs & followups, but not in this case) was a mail that Sven
sent to the list in June with a list of active 1.2 bugs (the thread was
"1.
