On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:46:34PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:12 +1000, Roman Joost wrote:
I could and the patch provided by that bug adds a custom
'property-changed' signal. Sven and Mitch thought, if I inherit from
XMPModel, I wouldn't really need the
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 08/02/2009 01:50 PM, Roman Joost wrote:
does not change the fact that it would be nice to have a
'property-changed' signal as a convenience if you have the need to
listen property changes
So ... I'm just
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:12 +1000, Roman Joost wrote:
I could and the patch provided by that bug adds a custom
'property-changed' signal. Sven and Mitch thought, if I inherit from
XMPModel, I wouldn't really need the 'property-changed' signal, because
I'd be able to control the
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 09:32:36AM +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 07/31/2009 07:12 AM, Roman Joost wrote:
I could and the patch provided by that bug adds a custom
'property-changed' signal. Sven and Mitch thought, if I inherit from
XMPModel, I wouldn't really need the
On 08/02/2009 01:50 PM, Roman Joost wrote:
does not change the fact that it would be nice to have a
'property-changed' signal as a convenience if you have the need to
listen property changes
So ... I'm just wondering. If I like to use two signals for the
XMPModel, does it still make sense to
On 07/31/2009 07:12 AM, Roman Joost wrote:
I could and the patch provided by that bug adds a custom
'property-changed' signal. Sven and Mitch thought, if I inherit from
XMPModel, I wouldn't really need the 'property-changed' signal, because
I'd be able to control the 'property-changed' signal.
On 07/28/2009 12:40 PM, Roman Joost wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't sure if I should bring up this discussion on the mailing list
or better on the bug report
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589474).
I think it could be useful to subscribe to events emited by the XMPModel
(although other
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:42:55AM +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 07/28/2009 12:40 PM, Roman Joost wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't sure if I should bring up this discussion on the mailing list
or better on the bug report
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589474).
[...]
I'm working
Hi,
I wasn't sure if I should bring up this discussion on the mailing list
or better on the bug report
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=589474).
I think it could be useful to subscribe to events emited by the XMPModel
(although other people know something I don't know). The old
