Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-22 Thread Sven Neumann
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:13 -0400, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote: Quoting Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@mpc.com.br: Oliver - this rant has no reason to be. Sorry for that. I disagree. Oliver has politely raised an issue to be discussed and presents some valid points.

[Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread oliver
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: [...] The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some can-opener library will likely require a dedicated developer in the team. Which the team doesn't seem to have right now, being heavily shorthanded

Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:38 AM, oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: [...] The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some can-opener library will likely require a dedicated developer in the team. Which

Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread oliver
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:25:12AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:38 AM, oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: [...] The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some can-opener

Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread Jon Nordby
On 20 September 2010 15:10, oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote: Is this is not addressed, then it makes no sense to mourn about shorthanded and outnumbered developers. You're more than welcome to address the issue. -- Regards Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com

Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/20/10, oliver wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: [...] The way things are going native RAW support in GIMP using GEGL + some can-opener library will likely require a dedicated developer in the team. Which the team doesn't seem to have right now,

Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread Øyvind Kolås
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:10 PM, oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote: Oliver - this rant has no reason to be.  Sorry for that. It makes no sense to start working in a project the size of GIMP without having to learn the code already in there first. [...] I didn't say people should not look

Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread oliver
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:31:07PM +0100, Øyvind Kolås wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:10 PM, oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote: Oliver - this rant has no reason to be.  Sorry for that. It makes no sense to start working in a project the size of GIMP without having to learn the code

Re: [Gimp-developer] shorthanded and outnumbered (Re: Native RAW support)

2010-09-20 Thread saulgoode
Quoting Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@mpc.com.br: Oliver - this rant has no reason to be. Sorry for that. I disagree. Oliver has politely raised an issue to be discussed and presents some valid points. GIMP is nearly a million lines of code -- well over a million if you take into account