On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 04:47:48AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
a) what does HCI mean? ;)
Someone already answered this. To see bad examples, either look at
http://www.iarchitect.com/mshame.htm or look in a good bookstore.
b) I always see programs do it the way gimp does it, so there must be
Nick Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[Reordering the Toolbox Menubar, because "Help" clobbers "Xtns" with
narrow Toolboxes]
What about renaming "Help" to "?" ? Maybe we can do this automagically
in narrow Toolboxes.
Is there a way to detect the clobbering?
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Nick Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 04:47:48AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
c) you gave _no_ reason why?
Ah, that wasn't clear from my diagrams? GTK+ draws space either side of
a menu item, so the Help menu can cover over Xtns, making it useless
Here is an interesting experiment for those who do not understand
what the problem is with the "Help" item in the toolbox:
- start Gimp
- resize the toolbox so that all tools are on a single column
(approx. 30 x 750 pixels)
- try to open a new image, or to do anything useful
The problem is
Here is an interesting experiment for those who do not understand
what the problem is with the "Help" item in the toolbox:
- start Gimp
- resize the toolbox so that all tools are on a single column
(approx. 30 x 750 pixels)
- try to open a new image, or to do anything useful
about
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, "Daniele Medri" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
about Toolbox resizeble.
Flexibility is ok.. but some time create problems.
Why don't set fixed sizes x*y to cover all the dimension of toolbar?
This could be usefull to have right dimension and good rappresentation.
I'll try your technique but shouldn't the toolbox be coded so that all
parts are visible all the time?
End users are going to be frightned if they resize the toolbox using the
corner of the window like they would with anything else and parts start
dissappearing.
To make matters worse, I messed
Hi,
Marc wrote:
So... I am not against this change, but I also see no reason to do it,
especially since that makes gimp different to other apps, and I think
there should be a very good reason for this.
Since all GNOME apps have the help menu rightmost but not seperated from
the other menus,
Austin Donnelly wrote:
[ snip lines which show that you definitely know much more about eps
than I do ;-) ]
So, where's a good place to put a couple of plugin-specific data
files, namely: eps-loader-prologue.ps and eps-loader-epilogue.ps ?
All other plugins with need auxilliary files
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Jon Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
^
You seem to have a problem with the date on your computer. :-)
I've had problems with the toolbox ever since it became re-sizable. I can
size it exactly the way I want it, three vertical rows of tools with
Hi,
One problem that people mention on comp.graphics.app.gimp quite
regularly is that gimp says "load failed" on some EPS files.
This happens when the EPS file doesn't have a "showpage" command on
the end of it.
Actually, EPS files probably shouldn't use an explicit showpage, since
they're
I've had problems with the toolbox ever since it became re-sizable. I can
size it exactly the way I want it, three vertical rows of tools with
colors, brushes, patterns, and gradients below but the brushes, patterns,
and gradients are always pushed outside the window, invisible and
On 10 Feb, Raphael Quinet wrote:
Flexibility is ok.. but some time create problems.
Why don't set fixed sizes x*y to cover all the dimension of toolbar?
This could be usefull to have right dimension and good
rappresentation.
Unfortunately, this is not so simple. Constraining the
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:59:43PM +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't beeen able to reproduce the problem, so I depend on more
You recent patch completely fixes the problem for me.
--
-==- |
==-- _
On 2/9/2000 16:47, Robert L Krawitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CMYK is a bit of an oddball subject. Partly this is because there are
so many variants (CMY, CMYK, CcMmYK, CcMmYy, CcMmYyK), and partly
because (to the best of my knowledge) this color space is really only
useful in the context
I wasn't sure if I was going to go to LinuxWorld in San Jose, but thought
I'd check if anyone else is submitting a paper for a talk or class there.
If so, I won't bother. If not, I can try to give another talk there.
Doesn't hurt to keep spreading the word, I guess. I'm only asking now
because
Hello all,
I just installed GIMP on my station, and I tried to make it save JPEGs
exactly as saved by IJG's software cjpeg. For that, I needed to strip the
comment field, because it was stored, even if it was the empty string. I
have fixed that problem with a small change.
I also tried to
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:29:56AM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 10:09:42AM -0600, Jon Winters wrote:
I've had problems with the toolbox ever since it became re-sizable. I can
size it exactly the way I want it, three vertical rows of tools with
colors,
18 matches
Mail list logo