Re: active gradient suggestion

2000-02-20 Thread Tom Rathborne
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:19:11AM +0800, Ian McKellar wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:31:25PM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote: > > It's a little confusing to me sometimes to use the gradient tool, > > thinking the gradient at the bottom of the toolbar will be used, > > and finding out that it'

Re: active gradient suggestion

2000-02-20 Thread Ian McKellar
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:31:25PM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote: > It's a little confusing to me sometimes to use the gradient tool, thinking > the gradient at the bottom of the toolbar will be used, and finding out that > it's actually using the FG-BG colors (or vice versa). I do know how to >

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 22:36:11 + (GMT) From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Saturday, 19 Feb 2000, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > Pending a general way to scale images separately on X and Y axes, what > would be your (collective) suggestions about

Re: gimp_image_get_resolution/gimp_image_get_unit/release timetable

2000-02-20 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Saturday, 19 Feb 2000, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > Pending a general way to scale images separately on X and Y axes, what > would be your (collective) suggestions about how to handle an image > with different X and Y resolutions? This happens so rarely that I would (for the moment) ignore it.

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:04:42 -0500 From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't

Re: print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST) I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't

print plug-in problems

2000-02-20 Thread Michael J. Hammel
I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't try 1.1.16). Rob: if you need more info, let me know. -- Michael J. Hammel | The Graphics Mus

Re: active gradient suggestion

2000-02-20 Thread Zach Beane - MINT
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:04:05PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: [snip] > > Come on guys. This idea is not new and the only reason it's not yet > implemented is the feature freeze. Read the list we created last August > at the Chaos Communication Camp... Perhaps it's time to make the TODO file a

Re: active gradient suggestion

2000-02-20 Thread Sven Neumann
> > > Maybe best would be to have a magic entry in the gradient editor > > > "FG->BG" and "BG->FG" which would change accordingly, and remove the > > > selection from the gradient tool. Even better: have a reverse gradient toggle so that all gradients can be easily reversed... Before anyone sta

Re: active gradient suggestion

2000-02-20 Thread Jens Lautenbacher
Seth Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Maybe best would be to have a magic entry in the gradient editor > > "FG->BG" and "BG->FG" which would change accordingly, and remove the > > selection from the gradient tool. > > > > jtl > > Make that the gradient selector rather than the ed