WISH YOU ALL A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:42:40PM +0530, Chetan Dhavse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subroutine gimp_text_get_extents_fontname redefined at
/opt/other/src/perl-5.6.0/lib/site_perl/5.6.0/i686-linux/Gimp.pm line 539.
this is very strange but is most probably a
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Great timing, Marco. Yesterday and today I have been working on the .spec
file for GIMP 1.2.0. I have a working one now.
Ohhh, good news! (My poor and overheated K6-233 takes a breath) ;))
I'm just reviewing it as I am not sure that the libgimp .html
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Please check the patch and _please_ merge those changes in order to build
again easily and RPMmed GIMP. ;)
Instead of requiring special rpm support for each and every package, why
not just fix the package manager? ;-
Eh, eh, I know this old story, not
Does GIMP 1.2.0 have layer blending or is this feature in development or
just not at all? The control I'm referring to is the one found in
Photoshop's Layer Options dialog box. It looks really useful - like able to
blend a plane or something into clouds without having to muck around with
layers
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 08:59:51AM +0100, Marco Lamberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not just fix the package manager? ;-
Eh, eh, I know this old story, not everybody loves RPM but, on my own, I think
it's extremely useful (if you write a decent specfile) not only for novice
It is (and rpm per
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 05:31:24PM -0500, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
should be. I am also trying to decide where scm2scm and scm2perl belong.
Should they be in gimp and gimp-perl respectively, or gimp-devel for both?
scm2scm should go into gimp-devel, as it only requires perl, not
Marco Lamberto wrote:
Please check the patch and _please_ merge those changes in order to build again
easily and RPMmed GIMP. ;)
I've taken a look at the patch, Marco. For some reason all your patches
were rejected when I tried to apply them so I recreated the patches.
However, I am only using
Marc Lehmann wrote:
scm2scm should go into gimp-devel, as it only requires perl, not
gimp-perl, scm2perl should go into gimp-perl-devel, so you can choose on
your own (I recommend gimp-perl).
Thank, Marc. I was thinking that was probably how it would wind up. I'll
move scm2perl in to
Marco Lamberto wrote:
Good, I've attached a revised patch of mine vs the gimp.spec.in that should fix
some stuff. It was contributed by my friend Giandomenico Di Tullio.
I hope this will help you. ;)
Thanks, Marco. That patch shows most of the changes I have already made
myself. There are a
Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly, the 0.54
version (yes, kids. It did exist and it ruled.) had antialiased Threshold
tool.
Hmm - i just compiled gimp 0.54 and did not manage to find *any* threshold
function. Can
I have ported a part of my iscissors patch from 1.1.25 to gimp 1.2.
All this patch does is add a livewire boundary to the iscissors tool,
and an option in the tool options to turn it on and off.
While working on iscissors, I noticed that there was an error in converting
the
iscissors selection
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 08:43:37PM -, Laramie Leavitt wrote:
While working on iscissors, I noticed that there was an error in converting
the
iscissors selection to an actual selection. Has this bug been fixed or
should I track it down?
Not directly related, this one, but I think the
Marco Lamberto wrote:
This time I've fixed the main problem related to the "prefix" var used for
installation, now changed into "DESTDIR", and I've attached a patch vs 1.2.0.
I've added the DESTDIR support in the subdirs that still hold the old
installation prefix.
I tried building an RPM
OOPS!!!
I forgot to change the perl script name in the shell script (both at the
bottom of my last mail) from "rot to "tests".
well doesn't make much of a difference
Thankyou
Gimper
Chetan
14 matches
Mail list logo
